Acute Massive Pulmonary Thromboembolism Due to Acute Intoxication by Duloxetine: A Case Report

Duloxetine overdose causes sympathomimetic and serotonin toxicity without major complications

OBJECTIVE

Duloxetine is a commonly used antidepressant that is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. We aimed to investigate the frequency and severity of clinical effects following duloxetine overdose.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of duloxetine overdoses (>120 mg) admitted to two tertiary toxicology units between March 2007 and May 2021. Demographic information, details of ingestion (dose, co-ingestants), clinical effects, investigations (ECG parameters including QT interval), complications (coma [GCS < 9], serotonin toxicity, seizures and cardiovascular effects), length of stay [LOS] and intensive care unit [ICU] admission were extracted from a clinical database.

RESULTS

There were 241 duloxetine overdoses (>120 mg), median age 37 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 25-48 years) and there were 156 females (65%). The median dose was 735 mg (IQR: 405-1200 mg). In 177 patients, other medications were co-ingested, most commonly alcohol, paracetamol, quetiapine, diazepam, ibuprofen, pregabalin and oxycodone. These patients were more likely to be admitted to ICU (12 [7%] vs. none; p = 0.040), develop coma (16 [9%] vs. none; p = 0.008) and hypotension [systolic BP < 90 mmHg] (15 [8%] vs. one; p = 0.076). Sixty four patients ingested duloxetine alone with a median dose of 840 mg (180-4200 mg). The median LOS, in the duloxetine only group, was 13 h (IQR:8.3-18 h), which was significantly shorter than those taking coingestants, 19 h (IQR:12-31 h; p = 0.004). None of these patients were intubated. Six patients developed moderate serotonin toxicity, without complications and one had a single seizure. Tachycardia occurred in 31 patients (48%) and mild hypertension (systolic BP > 140 mmHg) in 29 (45%). One patient had persistent sympathomimetic toxicity, and one had hypotension after droperidol. Two patients of 63 with an ECG recorded had an abnormal QT: one QT 500 ms, HR 46 bpm, which resolved over 3.5 h and a second with tachycardia (QT 360 ms, HR 119 bpm). None of the 64 patients had an arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine overdose most commonly caused sympathomimetic effects and serotonin toxicity, consistent with its pharmacology, and did not result in coma, arrhythmias or intensive care admission, when taken alone in overdose.

Differential effects of psychoactive substances on human wildtype and polymorphic T356M dopamine transporters (DAT)

Many psychoactive substances affect the human dopamine (DA) reuptake transporter (hDAT). Polymorphisms in the encoding gene could affect the functionality of the transporter and consequently alter effects of psychotropic and recreational drugs. Recently, a T356 M single nucleotide polymorphism in the human SLC6A3 gene was described, which resulted in functional impairments of DA uptake. Therefore, we investigated the effects of 10 psychoactive substances (0.01-1000 μM)) on DA uptake in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells transiently overexpressing wildtype (WT) or T356 M hDAT. Our data shows that T356 M hDAT has a 3 times lower V_max and a 3 times higher K_m compared to WT hDAT. Additionally, all psychoactive substances inhibited DA uptake by T356 M and WT hDAT. The DA reuptake inhibitors (methylphenidate, cocaine, and bupropion) inhibited DA uptake by WT hDAT most potently, followed by amphetamine-type stimulants [4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA), amphetamine and MDMA], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI; fluoxetine and citalopram) and arylcyclohexylamines [methoxetamine (MXE) and ketamine]. Compared to DA uptake by WT hDAT, bupropion, methylphenidate, cocaine, and MXE less potently inhibited DA uptake by T356 M hDAT, while citalopram more potently inhibited uptake. The differences in IC₅₀ values between T356 M and WT hDAT were considerable (3-45 fold). As such, the presence of this polymorphism could affect treatment efficiency with these substances as well as susceptibly for toxicity and addiction for individuals carrying this polymorphism.

Reference Brain/Blood Concentrations of Citalopram, Duloxetine, Mirtazapine and Sertraline

Postmortem blood samples may not accurately reflect antemortem drug concentrations, as the levels of some drugs increase due to postmortem redistribution (PMR). The brain has been suggested as an alternative sampling site. The anatomically secluded site of the brain limits redistribution and prolongs the detection window, thereby enabling sampling from deceased individuals where blood is no longer suitable for analysis. We report concentrations in brain tissue and blood from 91 cases for the four antidepressants citalopram, duloxetine, mirtazapine and sertraline. The cases were classified according to their role in the cause of death, as follows: (A) concentrations where the drug was the sole cause of fatal intoxication; (B) concentrations where the drug contributed to a fatal outcome; and (C) concentrations where the drug was not related to the cause of death. The analytical method was successfully validated in brain tissue in terms of linearity, process efficiency, precision and accuracy. Quantification of analytes was performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Correlations between blood and brain concentrations were achieved with R2-values between 0.67 and 0.91. The following median brain-blood ratios were obtained: 3.71 for citalopram (range: 1.4-5.9), 11.0 for duloxetine (range: 5.0-21.6), 1.53 for mirtazapine (range: 1.02-4.71) and 7.38 for sertraline (range: 3.2-14.2). The S/R ratio of racemic citalopram was the same in brain (0.80) and blood (0.85), whereas the median citalopram/N-desmethylcitalopram ratio was higher in brain (9.1) than blood (4.1). The results of this study may serve as reference concentrations in brain for forensic cases.

Evaluating the Phase II drugs currently under investigation for diabetic neuropathy

Introduction: The worldwide number of patients suffering from diabetes mellitus (DM) is projected to approach 552 million by the year 2030. As diabetic neuropathy (DN) is present in 8% of new diabetic patients at the time of diagnosis and occurs in ∼ 50% of all patients with established DM, the number of patients who will develop painful DN will also increase. The suboptimal efficacies of currently approved drugs have prompted investigators to develop new therapeutic agents for the management of painful DN. Areas covered: In this review, the authors present and elucidate the current status of drugs under investigation for the treatment of painful DN. A short synopsis of currently approved drugs is also given. Literature information and data analysis were retrieved from PubMed, the American Diabetes and Neurological Associations Websites and ClinicalTrials.gov. The keywords used in the search included: DM, DN, painful diabetic neuropathy. Expert opinion: In addition to treating the pain associated with DN, the actual causes of the disease should also be targeted for improved management. It is hoped that drugs which improve vascular blood flow, induce neural regeneration, reduce hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and inflammation can be more effective for the overall treatment of painful DN.