1
|
Kim S, Ahn K, Kim J. Practical issues of oral immunotherapy for egg or milk allergy. Clin Exp Pediatr 2024; 67:140-148. [PMID: 37350169 PMCID: PMC10915454 DOI: 10.3345/cep.2023.00234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been recommended to reduce parental burden related to strict allergen avoidance and induce desensitization and immune tolerance for patients with long-lasting allergies to hen's eggs (HE) or cow's milk (CM). OIT should be monitored by pediatric allergists specializing in OIT and oral food challenge tests to manage allergic reactions. Although a previous history of anaphylaxis or multiple food allergies is not a contraindication to OIT, it is contraindicated if the patient has uncontrolled asthma, a malignancy, active systemic autoimmune disorders, or diseases requiring treatment with beta-blockers. A variety of OIT protocols have been de veloped to ensure better outcomes and safe up-dosing, including adjunctive therapies with biologics. This review provides insight into the practical issues of various immunotherapy options for children with HE or CM allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukyung Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Kangmo Ahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihyun Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang L, Dalziel K, Lloyd M, Loke P, Lozinsky AC, Tang M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) versus placebo in Australian children with peanut allergy alongside a randomised trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075521. [PMID: 38072489 PMCID: PMC10729191 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compared the cost-effectiveness of coadministration of a probiotic adjuvant with peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) with placebo (no treatment) in children with peanut allergy. DESIGN Prospectively planned cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised control trial. SETTING The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS 56 children with peanut allergy aged 1-10 years at recruitment. INTERVENTION A daily dose of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 (NCC4007) and peanut oral immunotherapy administered for 1.5 years. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Costs were considered from a healthcare system perspective and included costs of treatment delivery and adverse events. Effectiveness outcomes included rate of sustained unresponsiveness (SU) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The cost-effectiveness of PPOIT versus placebo was analysed using patient-level data. Time horizon was 10 years from commencement of PPOIT treatment, comprising 1.5 years of treatment (actual data), 4 years of post-treatment follow-up (actual data), and 4.5 years of extrapolation thereafter (modelling). RESULTS Healthcare cost per patient over 10 years was higher for PPOIT compared with placebo ($A9355 vs $A1031, p<0.001). Over half of the per patient healthcare cost (53%) in the PPOIT group was attributable to treatment delivery, while the remaining cost was attributable to adverse events. Both measures of effectiveness were superior in the PPOIT group: the average SU rate over 10 years was 54% for PPOIT versus 6% for placebo (p<0.001); QALYs over 10 years were 9.05 for PPOIT versus 8.63 for placebo (p<0.001). Overall, cost per year of SU achieved was $A1694 (range $A1678, $A1709) for PPOIT compared with placebo, and cost per additional QALY gained was $A19 386 (range $A19 024, $A19 774). CONCLUSIONS Cost per QALY gained using PPOIT compared with no treatment is approximately $A20 000 (£10 000) and is well below the conventional value judgement threshold of $A50 000 (£25 000) per QALY gained, thus deemed good value for money ($A1= £0.5 approximately). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12608000594325; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Huang
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Lloyd
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paxton Loke
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adriana C Lozinsky
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mimi Tang
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akhavan Rezayat A, Soleimanian A, Kamandi N, Aslzare M, Shaikh Zada MM. Semen's parameters after varicocelectomy surgery with mast cell stabilizers treatment in infertile varicocele patients: Randomized clinical trial study. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1431. [PMID: 37455707 PMCID: PMC10349387 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Varicocele is one of the most common causes of male infertility in which testicular function is progressively damaged. This study aims to investigate the effect of varicocelectomy and mast cell stabilizers on reducing sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile patients with varicocele. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, after obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, infertile patients with varicocele were randomly assigned to three groups: varicocelectomy, 1 mg ketotifen, and varicocelectomy plus with 1 mg ketotifen for 3-month follow-up. Semen analysis and estimation of DNA fragmentation index (DFI) were obtained from all people in the studied time periods. Results In this study, 420 infertile patients with varicocele were included with an average age of 31.6 years. The results showed that sperm morphology, sperm motility, sperm count, and sperm DFI had significant differences after the intervention (p < 0.05). Also, the results of semen analysis for each group showed that there was a significant improvement in sperm morphology, motility, count, and DFI index of infertile people with varicocele after the intervention (p < 0.05). But the difference was statistically higher in the varicocelectomy plus with 1 mg ketotifen group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion The evidence and results of this study showed that the use of varicocelectomy plus ketotifen in infertile people with varicocele was more effective in improving Semen parameters than the use of mast cell stabilizers or varicocelectomy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neda Kamandi
- Department of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Mohammad Aslzare
- Department of UrologyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
ITO : pourquoi une biothérapie ? REVUE FRANÇAISE D'ALLERGOLOGIE 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reval.2023.103345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
|
5
|
Nuñez-Borque E, Fernandez-Bravo S, Yuste-Montalvo A, Esteban V. Pathophysiological, Cellular, and Molecular Events of the Vascular System in Anaphylaxis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:836222. [PMID: 35371072 PMCID: PMC8965328 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.836222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a systemic hypersensitivity reaction that can be life threatening. Mechanistically, it results from the immune activation and release of a variety of mediators that give rise to the signs and symptoms of this pathological event. For years, most of the research in anaphylaxis has focused on the contribution of the immune component. However, approaches that shed light on the participation of other cellular and molecular agents are necessary. Among them, the vascular niche receives the various signals (e.g., histamine) that elicit the range of anaphylactic events. Cardiovascular manifestations such as increased vascular permeability, vasodilation, hypotension, vasoconstriction, and cardiac alterations are crucial in the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis and are highly involved to the development of the most severe cases. Specifically, the endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells, and their molecular signaling outcomes play an essential role downstream of the immune reaction. Therefore, in this review, we synthesized the vascular changes observed during anaphylaxis as well as its cellular and molecular components. As the risk of anaphylaxis exists both in clinical procedures and in routine life, increasing our knowledge of the vascular physiology and their molecular mechanism will enable us to improve the clinical management and how to treat or prevent anaphylaxis. Key Message Anaphylaxis, the most severe allergic reaction, involves a variety of immune and non-immune molecular signals that give rise to its pathophysiological manifestations. Importantly, the vascular system is engaged in processes relevant to anaphylactic events such as increased vascular permeability, vasodilation, hypotension, vasoconstriction, and decreased cardiac output. The novelty of this review focuses on the fact that new studies will greatly improve the understanding of anaphylaxis when viewed from a vascular molecular angle and specifically from the endothelium. This knowledge will improve therapeutic options to treat or prevent anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Nuñez-Borque
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Instituto en Investigación Sanitaria - Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Fernandez-Bravo
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Instituto en Investigación Sanitaria - Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alma Yuste-Montalvo
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Instituto en Investigación Sanitaria - Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanesa Esteban
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Instituto en Investigación Sanitaria - Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine and Biomedicine, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loke P, Orsini F, Lozinsky AC, Gold M, O'Sullivan MD, Quinn P, Lloyd M, Ashley SE, Pitkin S, Axelrad C, Metcalfe JR, Su EL, Tey D, Robinson MN, Allen KJ, Prescott SL, Galvin AD, Tang MLK. Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2022; 6:171-184. [PMID: 35123664 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00006-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy is effective at inducing desensitisation to allergens and induces sustained unresponsiveness (ie, clinical remission) in a subset of patients, but causes frequent reactions. We aimed to investigate whether addition of a probiotic adjuvant improved the efficacy or safety of peanut oral immunotherapy. METHODS PPOIT-003, a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial, was conducted in three tertiary hospitals in Australia (Adelaide [SA], Melbourne [VIC], and Perth [WA]) in children aged 1-10 years, weighing more than 7 kg, with peanut allergy confirmed by a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (cumulative 4950 mg dose of peanut protein) and positive peanut skin prick test (≥3 mm) or peanut-specific IgE (≥0·35 kU/L). Children were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT), placebo probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT), or placebo probiotic and placebo OIT (placebo) for 18 months, and were followed up until 12 months after completion of treatment. Oral immunotherapy consisted of increasing doses of peanut protein (commercially available food-grade 12% defatted peanut flour [50% peanut protein]) until a 2000 mg daily maintenance dose was reached. The probiotic adjuvant was a daily dose of 2 × 1010 colony-forming units of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103. Placebo immunotherapy comprised maltodextrin, brown food colouring, and peanut essence, and placebo probiotic was maltodextrin. Dual primary outcomes were 8-week sustained unresponsiveness, defined as no reaction to a cumulative dose of 4950 mg peanut protein at treatment completion and 8 weeks after treatment completion, in the PPOIT versus placebo groups and the PPOIT versus OIT groups, analysed by intention to treat. Safety endpoints were adverse events during the treatment phase, and peanut ingestion and reactions in the 12-month post-treatment period. This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, 12616000322437. FINDINGS Between July 4, 2016, and Sept 21, 2020, 201 participants were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 36 (46%) of 79 children in the PPOIT group and 42 (51%) of 83 children in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness compared with two (5%) of 39 children in the placebo group (risk difference 40·44% [95% CI 27·46 to 53·42] for PPOIT vs placebo, p<0·0001), with no difference between PPOIT and OIT (-5·03% [-20·40 to 10·34], p=0·52). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 72 (91%) of 79 children in the PPOIT group, 73 (88%) of 83 children in the OIT group, and 28 (72%) of 39 children in the placebo group. Exposure-adjusted incidence of adverse events was 10·58 in the PPOIT group, 11·36 in the OIT, and 2·09 in the placebo group (ratio 0·92 [95% CI 0·85 to 0·99] for PPOIT vs OIT, p=0·042; 4·98 [4·11-6·03] for PPOIT vs placebo, p<0·0001; 5·42 [4·48-6·56] for OIT vs placebo, p<0·0001), with differences seen primarily in gastrointestinal symptoms and in children aged 1-5 years. During the 12-month post-treatment period, 60 (85%) of 71 participants in the PPOIT group, 60 (86%) of 70 participants in the OIT group, and six (18%) of 34 participants in the placebo group were eating peanut; rescue epinephrine use was infrequent (two [3%] of 71 in the PPOIT group, four [6%] of 70 in the OIT group, and none in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION Both PPOIT and OIT were effective at inducing sustained unresponsiveness. Addition of a probiotic did not improve efficacy of OIT, but might offer a safety benefit compared with OIT alone, particularly in preschool children. FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council Australia and Prota Therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paxton Loke
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Francesca Orsini
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Adriana C Lozinsky
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Gold
- Department of Paediatrics, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michael D O'Sullivan
- Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Nedlands, WA, Australia; Discipline of Paediatrics, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Patrick Quinn
- Department of Paediatrics, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Melanie Lloyd
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah E Ashley
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sigrid Pitkin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Jessica R Metcalfe
- Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Nedlands, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Ee Lyn Su
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean Tey
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Marnie N Robinson
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Katrina J Allen
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan L Prescott
- Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Nedlands, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia; NOVA Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Audrey Dunn Galvin
- School of Applied Psychology, Cork University Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez del Río P, Alvarez‐Perea A, Blumchen K, Caimmi D, Caubet JC, Konstantinopoulos AP, Riggioni C, Fassio F, Karakoc‐Aydiner E, Le TM, Patel N, Savolainen J, Vazquez‐Ortiz M, Alvaro Lozano M. Food immunotherapy practice: Nation differences across Europe, the FIND project. Allergy 2022; 77:920-932. [PMID: 34289131 DOI: 10.1111/all.15016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergen immunotherapy (FA-AIT) practice is known to vary globally. This project aims to identify and characterize European centres performing FA-AIT. METHODS An EAACI task force conducted an online survey to gather relevant information regarding FA-AIT practice and setting-specific resources after reviewing the published literature and congress abstracts throughout Europe. RESULTS We identified 102 FA-AIT centres in 18 countries; only Spain (n = 39) and France (n = 16) had ≥10 such centres. Overall, most facilities were hospital-based (77.5%), publicly funded (80.4%) and delivered FA-AIT as routine clinical care (80.4%). On average, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses. Surveyed centres had provided FA-AIT for a median of 9 years [1-24] to a median of 105 [5-2415] patients. The estimated total number of treated patients was 24875, of whom 41.3% received AIT for milk, 34.2% egg, 12.8% peanut and 11.7% other foods. Anaphylaxis to AIT doses requiring over 4-6 h of observation was reported by 70.6% of centres, ICU admissions by 10.8% and eosinophilic esophagitis by 45.1%. Quality of life and sustained unresponsiveness were evaluated in 20.6% and 54.9% of centres, respectively. The main contraindications for food AIT were severe asthma (57%-63%), eosinophilic esophagitis (56%-48%) and age below 5 years (47%-41%). CONCLUSIONS In Europe, FA-AIT is provided mostly in clinical practice. Significant variation is seen in the number of centres per country, facility characteristics and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and in certain aspects of protocols. Potential inequality in access to AIT has been identified as well as the need for education and guidance for treatment standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Rodríguez del Río
- Allergy Department Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesus Madrid Spain
- Health Research Institute Princesa Madrid Spain
- ARADyALRD16/0006/0026 Madrid Spain
| | - Alberto Alvarez‐Perea
- Allergy Service Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute Madrid Spain
| | - Katharina Blumchen
- Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine Division of Allergology, Pneumology and Cystic Fibrosis University Hospital Frankfurt Goethe University Frankfurt Germany
| | - Davide Caimmi
- Department of Pulmonology Division of Allergy Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital University Hospital of Montpellier Univ Montpellier Montpellier France
- UMR‐S 1136 INSERM‐Sorbonne Université Equipe EPAR ‐ IPLESP Paris France
| | | | | | - Carmen Riggioni
- Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Division Department of Paediatrics Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
| | - Filippo Fassio
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio Azienda USL Toscana Centro Florence Italy
| | | | - Thuy May Le
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology University Medical Centre Utrecht, University Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Nandinee Patel
- Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - Johannes Savolainen
- Department of Pulmonary Disease and Clinical Allergology University of Turku and Turku University Hospital Turku Finland
| | - Marta Vazquez‐Ortiz
- Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - Montserrat Alvaro Lozano
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shamji MH, Valenta R, Jardetzky T, Verhasselt V, Durham SR, Würtzen PA, van Neerven RJ. The role of allergen-specific IgE, IgG and IgA in allergic disease. Allergy 2021; 76:3627-3641. [PMID: 33999439 PMCID: PMC8601105 DOI: 10.1111/all.14908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated allergy is the most common hypersensitivity disease affecting more than 30% of the population. Exposure to even minute quantities of allergens can lead to the production of IgE antibodies in atopic individuals. This is termed allergic sensitization, which occurs mainly in early childhood. Allergen‐specific IgE then binds to the high (FcεRI) and low‐affinity receptors (FcεRII, also called CD23) for IgE on effector cells and antigen‐presenting cells. Subsequent and repeated allergen exposure increases allergen‐specific IgE levels and, by receptor cross‐linking, triggers immediate release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells and basophils whereas IgE‐facilitated allergen presentation perpetuates T cell–mediated allergic inflammation. Due to engagement of receptors which are highly selective for IgE, even tiny amounts of allergens can induce massive inflammation. Naturally occurring allergen‐specific IgG and IgA antibodies usually recognize different epitopes on allergens compared with IgE and do not efficiently interfere with allergen‐induced inflammation. However, IgG and IgA antibodies to these important IgE epitopes can be induced by allergen‐specific immunotherapy or by passive immunization. These will lead to competition with IgE for binding with the allergen and prevent allergic responses. Similarly, anti‐IgE treatment does the same by preventing IgE from binding to its receptor on mast cells and basophils. Here, we review the complex interplay of allergen‐specific IgE, IgG and IgA and the corresponding cell receptors in allergic diseases and its relevance for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Laboratory of Immunopathology Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia
- NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia Moscow Russia
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences Krems Austria
| | | | - Valerie Verhasselt
- School of Molecular Sciences University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia
| | | | | | - R.J. Joost van Neerven
- Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands
- FrieslandCampina Amersfoort The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mori F, Giovannini M, Barni S, Jiménez-Saiz R, Munblit D, Biagioni B, Liccioli G, Sarti L, Liotti L, Ricci S, Novembre E, Sahiner U, Baldo E, Caimmi D. Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate. Front Immunol 2021; 12:636612. [PMID: 34650547 PMCID: PMC8507468 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy has increased in recent years, especially in children. Allergen avoidance, and drugs in case of an allergic reaction, remains the standard of care in food allergy. Nevertheless, increasing attention has been given to the possibility to treat food allergy, through immunotherapy, particularly oral immunotherapy (OIT). Several OIT protocols and clinical trials have been published. Most of them focus on children allergic to milk, egg, or peanut, although recent studies developed protocols for other foods, such as wheat and different nuts. OIT efficacy in randomized controlled trials is usually evaluated as the possibility for patients to achieve desensitization through the consumption of an increasing amount of a food allergen, while the issue of a possible long-term sustained unresponsiveness has not been completely addressed. Here, we evaluated current pediatric OIT knowledge, focusing on the results of clinical trials and current guidelines. Specifically, we wanted to highlight what is known in terms of OIT efficacy and effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life. For each aspect, we reported the pros and the cons, inferable from published literature. In conclusion, even though many protocols, reviews and meta-analysis have been published on this topic, pediatric OIT remains a controversial therapy and no definitive generalized conclusion may be drawn so far. It should be an option provided by specialized teams, when both patients and their families are prone to adhere to the proposed protocol. Efficacy, long-term effectiveness, possible role of adjuvant therapies, risk of severe reactions including anaphylaxis or eosinophilic esophagitis, and impact on the quality of life of both children and caregivers are all aspects that should be discussed before starting OIT. Future studies are needed to provide firm clinical and scientific evidence, which should also consider patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rodrigo Jiménez-Saiz
- Department of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Immunology & Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Inflammation, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benedetta Biagioni
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Liccioli
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Sarti
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Liotti
- Department of Pediatrics, Salesi Children's Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Ricci
- Division of Immunology, Section of Pediatrics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence and Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elio Novembre
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Umit Sahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ermanno Baldo
- "Giovan Battista Mattei" Research Institute, Stenico, Italy
| | - Davide Caimmi
- Allergy Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,IDESP, UA11, INSERM-Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Food allergy is an immune-mediated disease and must be differentiated from other adverse effects related to food that are non-immune mediated. Symptoms of immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated allergy can range from mild to severe, and life-threatening anaphylaxis may occur. Current recommended strategies for diagnosis include the use of skin prick tests, allergen-specific serum IgE, and/or oral food challenges. Management entails allergen avoidance and appropriate treatment of allergic reactions should accidental ingestions occur. Treatment approaches under investigation include immunotherapy as well as biologics and novel vaccines. Attention has also recently focused on implementing strategies for prevention of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Carbonell Oriel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy & Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy & Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 62:180-199. [PMID: 34519995 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies (FAs) are an emerging health care issue, and a "second wave of the allergy epidemic" was named. There are extensive data that documented the prevalence rate as high as approximately 10%. FAs are immunological adverse reactions, including IgE-mediated mechanisms, cell-mediated mechanisms, or mixed IgE- and cell-mediated mechanisms. A diagnosis of FA is made by specific symptoms encounter with food, detailed past history, sensitization tests, and oral food challenges (OFCs) if necessary. The component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) test can distinguish true or cross-reaction. "Minimal elimination" from the results of CRD and OFC could avoid unnecessary food restriction. Strict food limitation is harsh and stressful on patients and their families. Children with FAs experience a higher rate of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and bullying than others. In the last 20 years, oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) are treatment strategies. OIT and EPIT are the most two encouraging treatments for FA. This review aims to introduce FAs in diverse clinical disorders, new perspectives, and their practical implications in diagnosing and treating FA.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao X, Thijssen S, Chen H, Garssen J, Knippels LMJ, Hogenkamp A. Selenium Modulates the Allergic Response to Whey Protein in a Mouse Model for Cow's Milk Allergy. Nutrients 2021; 13:2479. [PMID: 34444651 PMCID: PMC8400770 DOI: 10.3390/nu13082479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cow's milk allergy is a common food allergy in infants, and is associated with an increased risk of developing other allergic diseases. Dietary selenium (Se), one of the essential micronutrients for humans and animals, is an important bioelement which can influence both innate and adaptive immune responses. However, the effects of Se on food allergy are still largely unknown. In the current study it was investigated whether dietary Se supplementation can inhibit whey-induced food allergy in an animal research model. Three-week-old female C3H/HeOuJ mice were intragastrically sensitized with whey protein and cholera toxin and randomly assigned to receive a control, low, medium or high Se diet. Acute allergic symptoms, allergen specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels and mast cell degranulation were determined upon whey challenge. Body temperature was significantly higher in mice that received the medium Se diet 60 min after the oral challenge with whey compared to the positive control group, which is indicative of impaired anaphylaxis. This was accompanied by reductions in antigen-specific immunoglobulins and reduced levels of mouse mast cell protease-1 (mMCP-1). This study demonstrates that oral Se supplementation may modulate allergic responses to whey by decreasing specific antibody responses and mMCP-1 release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China; (X.Z.); (H.C.)
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.T.); (J.G.); (L.M.J.K.)
- School of Food Science Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
- Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Suzan Thijssen
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.T.); (J.G.); (L.M.J.K.)
| | - Hongbing Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China; (X.Z.); (H.C.)
- Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
| | - Johan Garssen
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.T.); (J.G.); (L.M.J.K.)
- Danone/Nutricia Research, Global Centre of Excellence Immunology, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M. J. Knippels
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.T.); (J.G.); (L.M.J.K.)
- Danone/Nutricia Research, Global Centre of Excellence Immunology, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Hogenkamp
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.T.); (J.G.); (L.M.J.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barros SÉDL, Rocha CDS, de Moura MSB, Barcelos MP, da Silva CHTDP, Hage-Melim LIDS. Potential beneficial effects of kefir and its postbiotic, kefiran, on child food allergy. Food Funct 2021; 12:3770-3786. [PMID: 33977950 DOI: 10.1039/d0fo03182h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies are known as the public health problem, affecting people of all age groups, but more commonly in babies and children, with consequences for nutritional status and quality of life. The increase in the consumption of healthy foods has consequently led to an increased demand for functional foods with specific health benefits. Thus, the pharmaceutical industry's interest in natural products has grown every time and is therefore considered as an alternative to synthetic drugs. Kefir has been outstanding for several years as promising in the manufacture of various pharmaceutical products, due to its nutritional and therapeutic properties for the treatment of many diseases. Currently, a wide variety of new functional foods are appearing on the market, representing an important segment. Postbiotics, for example, has stood out for being a product with action similar to probiotics, without offering side effects. The kefiran is the postbiotic from kefir that promotes potential beneficial effects on food allergy from the intestinal microbiome to the immune system. In this context, it is necessary to know the main promoting component of this functional effect. This review compiles the benefits that kefir, and especially its postbiotic, kefiran, can bring to food allergy. In addition, it serve as a subsidy for studies on the development of innovative nutraceutical products, including the use of kefiran as an alternative therapy in food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susy Érika de Lima Barros
- Laboratory of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry (PharMedChem), Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.
| | - Caique Dos Santos Rocha
- Laboratory of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry (PharMedChem), Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.
| | | | - Mariana Pegrucci Barcelos
- Computational Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Science of Riberão Preto, Univerisity of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sicherer SH, Warren CM, Dant C, Gupta RS, Nadeau KC. Food Allergy from Infancy Through Adulthood. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 8:1854-1864. [PMID: 32499034 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies are the result of immune responses that cause adverse reactions to foods. Immune responses to foods may produce a spectrum of symptoms and disorders, including acute allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis, food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, and oral allergy syndrome (pollen-food allergy syndrome). Food-allergic responses also contribute to chronic inflammatory disorders such as eosinophilic esophagitis and atopic dermatitis. Although food allergy affects people from infancy through adulthood, there are allergic features that differ according to age (ie, presentation, triggers, and natural course) and have important implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and management. New food allergies can develop at any age, and we propose similarities in the etiology of de novo food allergy whether in infancy or adulthood. The approach to managing food allergy changes dramatically over the life course, and physicians and patients must respond accordingly to optimize care. Food allergy therapies are emerging, and the efficacy and safety of these interventions could differ by age group of those treated. In this review, we highlight interesting observations on the etiology and characteristics of food allergy presenting at different ages and discuss clinical management as it relates to life stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott H Sicherer
- Department of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Christopher M Warren
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research, Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Christopher Dant
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Ruchi S Gupta
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research, Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mayorga C, Palomares F, Cañas JA, Pérez-Sánchez N, Núñez R, Torres MJ, Gómez F. New Insights in Therapy for Food Allergy. Foods 2021; 10:foods10051037. [PMID: 34068667 PMCID: PMC8151532 DOI: 10.3390/foods10051037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Food allergy is an increasing problem worldwide, with strict avoidance being classically the only available reliable treatment. The main objective of this review is to cover the latest information about the tools available for the diagnosis and treatment of food allergies. In recent years, many efforts have been made to better understand the humoral and cellular mechanisms involved in food allergy and to improve the strategies for diagnosis and treatment. This review illustrates IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity and provides a current description of the diagnostic strategies and advances in different treatments. Specific immunotherapy, including different routes of administration and new therapeutic approaches, such as hypoallergens and nanoparticles, are discussed in detail. Other treatments, such as biologics and microbiota, are also described. Therefore, we conclude that although important efforts have been made in improving therapies for food allergies, including innovative approaches mainly focusing on efficacy and safety, there is an urgent need to develop a set of basic and clinical results to help in the diagnosis and treatment of food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristobalina Mayorga
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29009 Málaga, Spain; (F.P.); (J.A.C.); (R.N.)
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (N.P.-S.); (M.J.T.); (F.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-951-290-224
| | - Francisca Palomares
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29009 Málaga, Spain; (F.P.); (J.A.C.); (R.N.)
| | - José A. Cañas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29009 Málaga, Spain; (F.P.); (J.A.C.); (R.N.)
| | - Natalia Pérez-Sánchez
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (N.P.-S.); (M.J.T.); (F.G.)
| | - Rafael Núñez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29009 Málaga, Spain; (F.P.); (J.A.C.); (R.N.)
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (N.P.-S.); (M.J.T.); (F.G.)
- Medicine Department, Universidad de Málaga-UMA, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - Francisca Gómez
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (N.P.-S.); (M.J.T.); (F.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Peters RL, Krawiec M, Koplin JJ, Santos AF. Update on food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:647-657. [PMID: 33370488 PMCID: PMC8247869 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is a major public health issue with growing prevalence in the urbanized world and significant impact on the lives of allergic patients and their families. Research into the risk factors that have contributed to this increase and their underlying immune mechanisms could lead us to definitive ways for treatment and prevention of food allergy. For the time being, introduction of peanut and other allergenic foods in the diet at the time of weaning seems to be an effective way to prevent the development of food allergy. Improved diagnosis and appropriate management and support of food allergic patients are central to patient care with food immunotherapy and biologics making the transition to clinical practice. With the new available treatments, it is becoming increasingly important to include patients' and family preferences to provide a management plan tailored to their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Marta Krawiec
- Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wasserman RL, Factor J, Windom HH, Abrams EM, Begin P, Chan ES, Greenhawt M, Hare N, Mack DP, Mansfield L, Ben-Shoshan M, Stukus DR, Leek TV, Shaker M. An Approach to the Office-Based Practice of Food Oral Immunotherapy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:1826-1838.e8. [PMID: 33684637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) provides an active treatment option for patients with food allergies. OIT may improve quality of life and raise the threshold at which a patient with food allergy may react to an allergen, but it is a rigorous therapy that requires a high degree of commitment by the clinician, patients, and families. Recent guidelines from the Canadian Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology have provided a framework for the ethical, evidence-based, and patient-oriented clinical practice of OIT, and the European Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology guidelines have also recommended that OIT can be used as a potential treatment. The recent Food and Drug Administration approval of an OIT pharmaceutical has accelerated the adoption of OIT. This review provides a summary of the recent Canadian Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines and a consensus of practical experience of clinicians across the United States and Canada related to patient selection, office and staff preparation, the general OIT process, OIT-related reaction management, and treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey Factor
- New England Food Allergy Treatment Center, West Hartford, Conn
| | - Hugh H Windom
- Windom Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Specialists, Sarasota, Fla
| | - Elissa M Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Philippe Begin
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Edmond S Chan
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy/Immunology, Food Challenge and Research Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | | | - Douglas P Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Moshe Ben-Shoshan
- Division of Allergy Immunology and Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David R Stukus
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Marcus Shaker
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Balneger N, Kroesen M, Lindau D, Wassink M, Boon L, den Brok MH, Büll C, Adema GJ. Generation of αCD11b-CpG antibody conjugates for the targeted stimulation of myeloid cells. J Control Release 2021; 332:148-159. [PMID: 33609622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CpG oligonucleotides are short single-stranded synthetic DNA molecules. Upon binding to Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), CpG activates immune cells in humans and mice. This results in robust Th1 type immunity potentially resulting in clearance of pathogens, reduction of allergy and anti-tumor immunity. However, the effectiveness of CpG as an adjuvant depends on its administration route, with only strong effects seen when CpG is administered locally. As local administration is not always feasible, we generated conjugates to specifically deliver CpG to myeloid cells often abundantly present in tumors. For this we coupled CpG (3'-Thiol-modified phosphorothioate (PTO) CpG-ODN1826 type B (5'-tccatgacgttcctgacgtt-3')) to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the myeloid cell marker CD11b using maleimide-thiol coupling. The CD11b-CpG mAb (αCD11b-CpG) conjugates contained about four CpG molecules/conjugate and displayed binding and internalization characteristics similar to unconjugated CD11b mAbs (αCD11b). The αCD11b-CpG conjugates readily induced maturation of murine dendritic cells (DCs) in a TLR9-dependent manner in vitro. Following intravenous injection, αCD11b-CpG conjugates efficiently targeted CD11b+ immune cells in the blood, lymph nodes and spleen. Finally, injection of αCD11b-CpG conjugates, but not untargeted conjugates, induced maturation of CD11b+ cell subsets in vivo. In conclusion, conjugating CpG to αCD11b enabled specific targeting and activation of myeloid cells in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Balneger
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Kroesen
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - D Lindau
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Henkel IP and Holding GmbH, Henkelstr. 67, 40589 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - M Wassink
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - L Boon
- Bioceros BV, Yalelaan 46, 3584 CM Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M H den Brok
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - C Büll
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - G J Adema
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brar KK, Lanser BJ, Schneider A, Nowak-Wegrzyn A. Biologics for the Treatment of Food Allergies. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2020; 40:575-591. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
20
|
Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Curr Opin Immunol 2020; 66:57-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
21
|
Johnson L, Duschl A, Himly M. Nanotechnology-Based Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Potentials and Challenges of Conventional and Novel Adjuvants under Research. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8020237. [PMID: 32443671 PMCID: PMC7349961 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of allergic diseases demands efficient therapeutic strategies for their mitigation. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal rather than symptomatic treatment method available for allergy. Currently, AIT is being administered using immune response modifiers or adjuvants. Adjuvants aid in the induction of a vigorous and long-lasting immune response, thereby improving the efficiency of AIT. The successful development of a novel adjuvant requires a thorough understanding of the conventional and novel adjuvants under development. Thus, this review discusses the potentials and challenges of these adjuvants and their mechanism of action. Vaccine development based on nanoparticles is a promising strategy for AIT, due to their inherent physicochemical properties, along with their ease of production and ability to stimulate innate immunity. Although nanoparticles have provided promising results as an adjuvant for AIT in in vivo studies, a deeper insight into the interaction of nanoparticle-allergen complexes with the immune system is necessary. This review focuses on the methods of harnessing the adjuvant effect of nanoparticles by detailing the molecular mechanisms underlying the immune response, which includes allergen uptake, processing, presentation, and induction of T cell differentiation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Yu D, Liu JQ, Mo LH, Luo XQ, Liu ZQ, Wu GH, Yang LT, Liu DB, Wang S, Liu ZG, Yang PC. Specific antigen-guiding exosomes inhibit food allergies by inducing regulatory T cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2020; 98:639-649. [PMID: 32378751 DOI: 10.1111/imcb.12347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The therapies for food allergy (FA) need to be improved. The generation of inducible regulatory T cells (Tregs) can support immune tolerance in the body. This study aims to suppress experimental FA by inducing Tregs through the employment of modified exosomes (mExosomes). In this study, mExosomes were prepared by incubating dendritic cells with interleukin (IL)-2 and ovalbumin (OVA, used as a specific antigen) in the culture. Exosomes were purified from culture supernatant and used as the mExosomes. A murine FA model was developed to test the effects of mExosomes on the generation of Tregs in the mouse intestinal tissues and inhibiting FA. The results showed that mExosomes, which carried IL-2 and a complex of OVA peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II on the surface of exosomes, bound to OVA-specific CD4+ T cells and induced CD4+ T cells to differentiate into Tregs. In the FA mouse intestinal tissues, we found low IL-2 levels that were positively correlated with the number of Tregs. Depletion of IL-2 in mice prevented the generation of Tregs. The levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ were increased in the FA intestinal tissues with inhibited IL-2 production. Administration of mExosomes induced Tregs in the intestinal tissues and efficiently suppressed FA in mice. We conclude that the mExosomes can suppress FA in mice through inducing Tregs. The data suggest that the mExosomes have translational potential in the treatment of FA and other allergic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dian Yu
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiang-Qi Liu
- Department of Allergy, Longgang ENT Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of ENT, Institute of ENT, Shenzhen, China
| | - Li-Hua Mo
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiang-Qian Luo
- Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Liu
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Allergy, Longgang ENT Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of ENT, Institute of ENT, Shenzhen, China
| | - Gao-Hui Wu
- Department of Respirology & Allergy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Li-Teng Yang
- Department of Respirology & Allergy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Da-Bo Liu
- Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Allergy, Longgang ENT Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of ENT, Institute of ENT, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhi-Gang Liu
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ping-Chang Yang
- Research Center of Allergy & Immunology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Immunity and Diseases, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Long A, Borro M, Sampath V, Chinthrajah RS. New Developments in Non-allergen-specific Therapy for the Treatment of Food Allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2020; 20:3. [PMID: 31950290 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-020-0897-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The prevalence of food allergy is increasing. At the current time, there are no approved treatments for food allergy. Major limitations of immunotherapy are long treatment periods (months or years), frequent clinic visits, high costs, increased risk of adverse events during treatment, and lack of durability of desensitization. Additionally, it is allergen-specific, and in those allergic to multiple allergens, the length and cost of treatment are further increased. In this review, we summarize recent developments in novel non-allergen-specific treatments for food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS A number of monoclonal antibodies that block IgE or specific pro-allergenic cytokines or their receptors have shown promise in clinical trials for food allergy. The insight we have gained through the use of one drug for the treatment of an atopic disease is quickly being translated to other atopic diseases, including food allergy. The future for food allergy treatment with biologics looks bright.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Long
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Grant Building, S093, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA, 94305-5101, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matteo Borro
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Grant Building, S093, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA, 94305-5101, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Genoa and Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vanitha Sampath
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Grant Building, S093, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA, 94305-5101, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Grant Building, S093, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA, 94305-5101, USA. .,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergies is increasing worldwide. To understand the regional specificities of food allergies and develop effective therapeutic interventions, extensive regional epidemiological studies are necessary. While data regarding incidence, prevalence, regional variation, and treatment in food allergies are available for western countries, such studies may not be available in many Asian countries. China accounts for almost 20% of the world's population and has a vast ethnic diversity, but large-scale meta-analyses of epidemiological studies of food allergy in China are lacking. A literature search revealed 22 publications on the prevalence of food allergy in Chinese populations. A review of these studies showed that the prevalence of food allergies in China is comparable to that in western countries, even though the Chinese diet is vastly different from that of the West and may vary even greatly within China, and finally, specific antigenic triggers of food allergy vary between China and the West and also within China. Current clinical management of food allergy in China includes allergen-specific immunotherapy, Chinese herbal medicine, acupuncture, and Western medicine. This study demonstrates an unmet need in China for a thorough investigation of the prevalence of food allergies in China, the specific foods involved, and characterization of the specific antigenic triggers of food allergy with respect to ethnicity, age, and diet in China.
Collapse
|
26
|
Eiwegger T, Hung L, San Diego KE, O'Mahony L, Upton J. Recent developments and highlights in food allergy. Allergy 2019; 74:2355-2367. [PMID: 31593325 DOI: 10.1111/all.14082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The achievement of long-lasting, safe treatments for food allergy is dependent on the understanding of the immunological basis of food allergy. Accurate diagnosis is essential for management. In recent years, data from oral food challenges have revealed that routine allergy testing is poor at predicting clinical allergy for tree nuts, almonds in particular. More advanced antigen-based tests including component-resolved diagnostics and epitope reactivity may lead to more accurate diagnosis and selection of therapeutic intervention. Additional diagnostic accuracy may come from cellular tests such as the basophil activation test or mast cell approaches. In the context of clinical trials, cellular tests have revealed specific T-cell and B-cell populations that are more abundant in food-allergic individuals with distinct mechanistic features. Awareness of clinical markers, such as the ability to eat baked forms of milk and egg, continues to inform the understanding of natural tolerance development. Mouse models have allowed for investigation into multiple mechanisms of food allergy including modification of epithelial metabolism, and the induction of regulatory cell subsets and the microbiome. Increasing numbers of children who underwent food immunotherapy enlarged the body of evidence on mechanisms and predictors of treatment success. Experimental immunological markers in conjunction with clinical determinants such as lower age and lower initial specific IgE appear to be of benefit. More research on the optimal dose, preparation, and route of application integrating a high-level safety and efficacy is demanded. Alternatively, biologics blocking TSLP, IL-33, IL-4 and IL-13, or IgE may help to achieve that.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Eiwegger
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program Departments of Paediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Lisa Hung
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | | | - Liam O'Mahony
- Departments of Medicine and Microbiology APC Microbiome Ireland National University of Ireland Cork Ireland
| | - Julia Upton
- Translational Medicine Program Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program Departments of Paediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Costa C, Coimbra A, Vítor A, Aguiar R, Ferreira AL, Todo-Bom A. Food allergy-From food avoidance to active treatment. Scand J Immunol 2019; 91:e12824. [PMID: 31486118 DOI: 10.1111/sji.12824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy (FA) has increased too rapidly, possibly due to environmental factors. The guidelines recommend strict allergen avoidance, but FA is still the main cause of anaphylaxis in all age groups. Immunotherapy is the only treatment able to change the course of allergic disease, and oral immunotherapy (OIT) is the more effective route in FA. However, it carries the risk of adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis. To improve OIT safety, adjuvant therapy with the immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody omalizumab has been extensively used. Results suggest particular benefit in patients with high risk of fatal anaphylaxis. An alternative approach is to use omalizumab instead of OIT to prevent severe allergic reactions upon accidental exposure. This paper reviews current evidence regarding IgE-mediated FA, focusing on natural tolerance and food sensitization acquisition, and on avoidance measures and their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Célia Costa
- Immunoallergology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte (CHLN), EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alice Coimbra
- Immunoallergology Department, Hospital de S. João EPE, Centro Hospitalar de São João (CHSJ), Porto, Portugal
| | - Artur Vítor
- Pediatrics Department, Hospital de S. João EPE, Centro Hospitalar de São João (CHSJ), Porto, Portugal
| | - Rita Aguiar
- Immunoallergology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte (CHLN), EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Luísa Ferreira
- Immunoallergology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (CHVNGE), Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Ana Todo-Bom
- Immunoallergology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Food allergy is an immune-mediated disease and must be differentiated from other adverse effects related to food that are non-immune mediated. Symptoms of immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated allergy can range from mild to severe, and life-threatening anaphylaxis may occur. Current recommended strategies for diagnosis include the use of skin prick tests, allergen-specific serum IgE, and/or oral food challenges. Management entails allergen avoidance and appropriate treatment of allergic reactions should accidental ingestions occur. Treatment approaches under investigation include immunotherapy as well as biologics and novel vaccines. Attention has also recently focused on implementing strategies for prevention of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Carbonell Oriel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy & Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy & Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1198, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Abstract
The gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) faces a considerable challenge. It encounters antigens derived from an estimated 1014 commensal microbes and greater than 30 kg of food proteins yearly. It must distinguish these harmless antigens from potential pathogens and mount the appropriate host immune response. Local and systemic hyporesponsiveness to dietary antigens, classically referred to as oral tolerance, comprises a distinct complement of adaptive cellular and humoral immune responses. It is increasingly evident that a functional epithelial barrier engaged in intimate interplay with innate immune cells and the resident microbiota is critical to establishing and maintaining oral tolerance. Moreover, innate immune cells serve as a bridge between the microbiota, epithelium, and the adaptive immune system, parlaying tonic microbial stimulation into signals critical for mucosal homeostasis. Dysregulation of gut homeostasis and the subsequent disruption of tolerance therefore have clinically significant consequences for the development of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyinye I Iweala
- UNC Food Allergy Initiative and Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7280, USA;
| | - Cathryn R Nagler
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1824, USA;
- Committee on Immunology, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review We reviewed the existing evidence base to desensitisation for food allergy, applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to discuss whether desensitisation is likely to become part of routine treatment for patients with food allergy. Recent Findings Desensitisation for food allergy to peanut, egg and cow’s milk is efficacious, but whether such interventions are cost-effective is less clear, due to the issues over a sustained desensitisation effect and the increase in allergic reactions occurring in patients on treatment. Few studies have assessed the change in health-related quality of life associated with treatment, and most have not considered discordance between parent-reported changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes compared to those of the patients themselves; none to date have controlled for the improvement in HRQL occurring after initial challenge which will confound outcomes. Summary The lack of longer-term safety and cost-effectiveness data, as well as an absence of current consensus in the reporting of patient-relevant outcomes, must be addressed in order to be able to recommend the introduction of desensitisation as a routine treatment in healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Duca
- Section of Paediatrics (Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Nandinee Patel
- Section of Paediatrics (Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Paul J Turner
- Section of Paediatrics (Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|