Giustina A, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Petersenn S, Casanueva FF, Sert C, Houchard A, Melmed S. International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;
106:3555-3568. [PMID:
34313752 DOI:
10.1210/clinem/dgab536]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT
The SAGIT® instrument (SAGIT) has been developed to enable accurate characterization of acromegaly disease activity.
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the ability of SAGIT to discriminate acromegaly disease control status.
METHODS
This multicenter, noninterventional, prospective and retrospective, longitudinal study, conducted at academic and private clinical practice sites, included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of controlled (n = 109) or non-controlled (n = 105) acromegaly, assessed by clinical global evaluation of disease control (CGE-DC) questionnaire, investigator therapeutic decision, and international guidelines. Control status was not determined at baseline for 13 patients. Since 9 patients were enrolled retrospectively, all presented analyses are based on the prospective population (N = 227). Patients were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to investigate how SAGIT components at baseline (signs/symptoms [S], associated comorbidities [A], growth hormone levels [G], insulin-like growth factor 1 levels [I], tumor features [T]) discriminate between controlled and non-controlled acromegaly.
RESULTS
Baseline mean subscores S, G, I, and T were significantly lower in patients with CGE-DC controlled vs CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly. SAGIT components I and G for CGE-DC and S, A, G, I, and T for the clinician's therapeutic decision were retained by CART analyses. For international guidelines, only SAGIT component I was retained. The risk for undergoing ≥ 1 treatment change during the study was 3.44 times greater for CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly relative to CGE-DC controlled acromegaly.
CONCLUSION
The SAGIT instrument is a valid and sensitive tool to comprehensively and accurately assess acromegaly severity.
Collapse