Refractory nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) comprise silent tumors of different pituitary lineages that tend to escape early detection and present as invasive macroadenomas with symptoms of mass effect. Incomplete surgical resection is common and may be followed by significant rates of subsequent remnant progression. Pituitary tumors are defined as refractory when resistance to optimal standard therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, and medical treatment is documented. In the absence of approved medications for the treatment of NFPAs, the last criterion to classify these tumors as refractory is ill defined. Silent corticotroph and null cell adenomas have been reported, albeit not in all studies, to be larger and recur more often compared with silent gonadotroph tumors. Nevertheless, it is currently unknown if certain NFPA subtypes are more often refractory using well defined criteria. The response rate to temozolomide is lower in NFPA compared to that seen in functioning tumors. Refractory NFPAs present a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates.

Knowing when to discontinue Temozolomide therapy in responding aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas: a systematic review and Padua (Italy) case series

INTRODUCTION

Pituitary adenomas can show a tendency to grow, despite multimodal treatment. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been used in the last 15 years in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors. TMZ requires a careful balance of different expertise, especially for selection criteria.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted: (1) a systematic review of the published literature from 2006 to 2022, collecting only cases with a complete description of patient follow-up after TMZ discontinuation; (2) a description of all patients with aggressive pituitary adenoma or carcinoma treated in Padua (Italy).

EXPERT OPINION

There is considerable heterogeneity in the literature: TMZ cycles duration ranged from 3 to 47 months; the follow-up time after TMZ discontinuation ranged from 4 to 91 months (mean 24 months, median 18 months), at least a stable disease has been reported in 75% of patients after a mean 13 months (range 3-47 months, median 10 months). The Padua (Italy) cohort reflects the literature. Future directions to explore are to understand the pathophysiological mechanism of TMZ resistance escape, to develop predicting factors to TMZ treatment (especially through the delineation of the underlying transformation processes), and to further expand the therapeutic applications of TMZ (as neoadjuvant, combined with radiotherapy).

Targeted systemic and peptide radio-ligand therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas

Aggressive pituitary tumors comprise a rare but challenging subset of pituitary tumors. A major issue currently is the absence of a holistic definition that reliably identifies these tumors in a prospective manner. Although comprehensive evaluation of patient gender, age, local invasiveness, treatment responses, radiological and histopathological features may be informative to assess the potential for aggressiveness, a definitive diagnosis of this entity cannot be confidently made until disease progression is actually observed despite standard medical and surgical therapy. Failure to diagnose these aggressive pituitary tumors early may impede initiation of suitable intensive stepwise multimodal treatments, and lessen their ultimate therapeutic success. Even though current therapeutic options for aggressive pituitary tumors are suboptimal in many cases, large-scale randomized prospective clinic trials are impractical and will likely never be conducted due to the rarity of this disease entity. Therefore, the majority of novel therapies in this subset of tumors derive from case reports or small case series, which greatly reduces their validity to make strong recommendations. This chapter, as part of this series on aggressive pituitary tumors, focuses on the role of systemic targeted medical and peptide radio-receptor therapy in treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas, and discusses future directions in these fields.

Multimodal therapy in aggressive pituitary tumors

The concept of aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) has been precisely defined in recent years. These tumors are characterized by morphological (radiological or histopathological) data of invasion, proliferative activity superior to that of typical adenomas and a clinical behavior characterized by resistance to standard therapies and frequent recurrences. The absence of cerebrospinal or distant metastases differentiates them from the pituitary carcinoma. APTs account for about 10% of all pituitary neoplasm. Proper diagnostic implies participation not only of radiological and hormonal investigation but also a thorough pathological assessment including proliferation markers and immunohistochemistry for hormones and transcription factors. Surgical resection, aiming gross total resection or tumor debulking, is the mainstay initial therapy in most patients. Most patients with APTs need more than one surgical intervention, pituitary radiation, sometimes on more than one occasion, and multiple sequential or combined medical treatments, to finally be doomed to unusual treatments, such as alkylating agents (temozolomide alone or in combination), molecular targeted therapies, or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Multimodal therapy, implemented by experts, preferably in specialized centers with high volume caseload, is the only way to improve the prognosis of patients with these uncommon tumors. The research needs in this area are multiple and include a greater knowledge of the molecular biology of these tumors, establishment of protocols for monitoring and sequencing of treatments, development of multicenter studies and international registries.