Reviewing multi-disciplinary papers: a challenge in neuroscience?

Spiking Neural Networks and Mathematical Models

Neural networks are applied in various scientific fields such as medicine, engineering, pharmacology, etc. Investigating operations of neural networks refers to estimating the relationship among single neurons and their contributions to the network as well. Hence, studying a single neuron is an essential process to solve complex brain problems. Mathematical models that simulate neurons and the way they transmit information are proven to be an indispensable tool for neuroscientists. Constructing appropriate mathematical models to simulate information transmission of a biological neural network is a challenge for researchers, as in the real world, identical neurons in terms of their electrophysiological characteristics in different brain regions do not contribute in the same way to information transmission within a neural network due to the intrinsic characteristics. This review highlights four mathematical, single-compartment models: Hodgkin-Huxley, Izhikevich, Leaky Integrate, and Fire and Morris-Lecar, and discusses comparison among them in terms of their biological plausibility, computational complexity, and applications, according to modern literature.

Physiological models of the lateral superior olive

In computational biology, modeling is a fundamental tool for formulating, analyzing and predicting complex phenomena. Most neuron models, however, are designed to reproduce certain small sets of empirical data. Hence their outcome is usually not compatible or comparable with other models or datasets, making it unclear how widely applicable such models are. In this study, we investigate these aspects of modeling, namely credibility and generalizability, with a specific focus on auditory neurons involved in the localization of sound sources. The primary cues for binaural sound localization are comprised of interaural time and level differences (ITD/ILD), which are the timing and intensity differences of the sound waves arriving at the two ears. The lateral superior olive (LSO) in the auditory brainstem is one of the locations where such acoustic information is first computed. An LSO neuron receives temporally structured excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs that are driven by ipsi- and contralateral sound stimuli, respectively, and changes its spike rate according to binaural acoustic differences. Here we examine seven contemporary models of LSO neurons with different levels of biophysical complexity, from predominantly functional ones (‘shot-noise’ models) to those with more detailed physiological components (variations of integrate-and-fire and Hodgkin-Huxley-type). These models, calibrated to reproduce known monaural and binaural characteristics of LSO, generate largely similar results to each other in simulating ITD and ILD coding. Our comparisons of physiological detail, computational efficiency, predictive performances, and further expandability of the models demonstrate (1) that the simplistic, functional LSO models are suitable for applications where low computational costs and mathematical transparency are needed, (2) that more complex models with detailed membrane potential dynamics are necessary for simulation studies where sub-neuronal nonlinear processes play important roles, and (3) that, for general purposes, intermediate models might be a reasonable compromise between simplicity and biological plausibility.

Computational models help our understanding of complex biological systems, by identifying their key elements and revealing their operational principles. Close comparisons between model predictions and empirical observations ensure our confidence in a model as a building block for further applications. Most current neuronal models, however, are constructed to replicate only a small specific set of experimental data. Thus, it is usually unclear how these models can be generalized to different datasets and how they compare with each other. In this paper, seven neuronal models are examined that are designed to reproduce known physiological characteristics of auditory neurons involved in the detection of sound source location. Despite their different levels of complexity, the models generate largely similar results when their parameters are tuned with common criteria. Comparisons show that simple models are computationally more efficient and theoretically transparent, and therefore suitable for rigorous mathematical analyses and engineering applications including real-time simulations. In contrast, complex models are necessary for investigating the relationship between underlying biophysical processes and sub- and suprathreshold spiking properties, although they have a large number of unconstrained, unverified parameters. Having identified their advantages and drawbacks, these auditory neuron models may readily be used for future studies and applications.

Dynamical Mean Field Model of a Neural-Glial Mass

Our goal is to model the behavior of an ensemble of interacting neurons and astrocytes (the neural-glial mass). For this, a model describing N tripartite synapses is proposed. Each tripartite synapse consists of presynaptic and postsynaptic nerve terminals, as well as the synaptically associated astrocytic microdomain, and is described by a system of 13 stochastic differential equations. Then, by applying the dynamical mean field approximation (DMA) (Hasegawa, 2003a , 2003b ) the system of 13N equations is reduced to 13(13 + 2) = 195 deterministic differential equations for the means and the second-order moments of local and global variables. Simulations are carried out for studying the response of the neural-glial mass to external inputs applied to either the presynaptic terminals or the astrocytes. Three cases were considered: the astrocytes influence only the presynaptic terminal, only the postsynaptic terminal, or both the presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals. As a result, a wide range of responses varying from singles spikes to train of spikes was evoked on presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals. The experimentally observed phenomenon of spontaneous activity in astrocytes was replicated on the neural-glial mass. The model predicts that astrocytes can have a strong and activity-dependent influence on synaptic transmission. Finally, simulations show that the dynamics of astrocytes influences the synchronization ratio between neurons, predicting a peak in the synchronization for specific values of the astrocytes’ parameters.

Towards reproducible descriptions of neuronal network models

Progress in science depends on the effective exchange of ideas among scientists. New ideas can be assessed and criticized in a meaningful manner only if they are formulated precisely. This applies to simulation studies as well as to experiments and theories. But after more than 50 years of neuronal network simulations, we still lack a clear and common understanding of the role of computational models in neuroscience as well as established practices for describing network models in publications. This hinders the critical evaluation of network models as well as their re-use.

We analyze here 14 research papers proposing neuronal network models of different complexity and find widely varying approaches to model descriptions, with regard to both the means of description and the ordering and placement of material. We further observe great variation in the graphical representation of networks and the notation used in equations. Based on our observations, we propose a good model description practice, composed of guidelines for the organization of publications, a checklist for model descriptions, templates for tables presenting model structure, and guidelines for diagrams of networks. The main purpose of this good practice is to trigger a debate about the communication of neuronal network models in a manner comprehensible to humans, as opposed to machine-readable model description languages.

We believe that the good model description practice proposed here, together with a number of other recent initiatives on data-, model-, and software-sharing, may lead to a deeper and more fruitful exchange of ideas among computational neuroscientists in years to come. We further hope that work on standardized ways of describing—and thinking about—complex neuronal networks will lead the scientific community to a clearer understanding of high-level concepts in network dynamics, and will thus lead to deeper insights into the function of the brain.

Scientists make precise, testable statements about their observations and models of nature. Other scientists can then evaluate these statements and attempt to reproduce or extend them. Results that cannot be reproduced will be duly criticized to arrive at better interpretations of experimental results or better models. Over time, this discourse develops our joint scientific knowledge. A crucial condition for this process is that scientists can describe their own models in a manner that is precise and comprehensible to others. We analyze in this paper how well models of neuronal networks are described in the scientific literature and conclude that the wide variety of manners in which network models are described makes it difficult to communicate models successfully. We propose a good model description practice to improve the communication of neuronal network models.