Relationships Between Indices of Tumor Aggressiveness in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Value of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of LR‑3 and LR-4 lesions coexisting with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To explore which preoperative clinical data and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features may indicate the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HCC patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

METHODS

HCC Patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions who participated in a prospective clinical trial (XX) were included in this study. Two radiologists independently assessed the preoperative MRI features and each lesion was assigned according to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). The preoperative clinical data were also evaluated. The relative values of these parameters were assessed as potential predictors of HCC for coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

RESULTS

We enrolled 102 HCC patients (58.1 ± 11.5 years; 84.3% males) coexisting with 110 LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (HCCs group [n = 66]; non-HCCs group [n = 44]). The presence of restricted diffusion (OR: 18.590, p < 0.001), delayed enhancement (OR: 0.113, p < 0.001), and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR: 3.084, p = 0.048) were found to be independent predictors of HCC diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the above independent variables for the diagnosis of HCC ranged from 66.7 to 80.3% and 56.8 to 88.6%, respectively. ROC analysis showed that, in discriminating HCC, the AUCs of the above factors were 0.777, 0.686, and 0.670, respectively. Combining these three findings for the prediction of HCC resulted in a specificity greater than 97%, and the AUC further increased to 0.874.

CONCLUSION

The presence of restricted diffusion, delayed enhancement, and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity can be useful features for risk stratification of coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions in HCC patients. Trial registration a prospective clinical trial (ChiCTR2000036201).

Identification of 2 large size HCC phenotypes, with and without associated inflammation

Background

Large HCCs can often be associated with low levels of cirrhosis. However, inflammation is also regarded as a driver of HCC growth.

Objectives

To compare patients with large >5 cm HCCs having high versus low serum inflammation parameters.

Materials and methods

A Turkish patient HCC dataset with known survivals was retrospectively analyzed after dichotomization according to several clinical inflammation markers.

Results

Amongst several parameters examined, only AST levels were significantly associated with elevated AFP levels and increased percent PVT and tumor multifocality. The dichotomization of the cohort according to high or low AST levels resulted in 2 subcohorts with a 5-fold difference in median survival. The 2 AST-dichotomised cohorts comprised patients with similar large-size HCCs, but which were significantly different with respect to serum AFP levels, percent PVT, and percent tumor multifocality.

Conclusions

Two large-sized HCC phenotypes were identified. One had more aggressive HCC characteristics, higher inflammatory indices, and worse survival. The other had the opposite. Despite inflammation being important for the growth of some large tumors, others of a similar size likely have different growth mechanisms.

Tumor Burden in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: Head-to-Head Comparison of Current Scoring Systems

Objectives

Recently, several scoring systems for prognosis prediction based on tumor burden have been promoted for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This multicenter study aimed to perform the first head-to-head comparison of three scoring systems.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 849 treatment-naïve patients with HCC undergoing TACE at six tertiary care centers between 2010 and 2020. The tumor burden score (TBS), the Six-and-Twelve score (SAT), and the Seven-Eleven criteria (SEC) were calculated based on the maximum lesion size and the number of tumor nodes. All scores were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analyses, adjusted for established risk factors.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) times were 33.0, 18.3, and 12.8 months for patients with low, medium, and high TBS, respectively (p<0.001). The median OS times were 30.0, 16.9, and 10.2 months for patients with low, medium, and high SAT, respectively (p<0.001). The median OS times were 27.0, 16.7, and 10.5 for patients with low, medium, and high SEC, respectively (p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, only the SAT remained an independent prognostic factor. The C-Indexes were 0.54 for the TBS, 0.59 for the SAT, and 0.58 for the SEC.

Conclusion

In a direct head-to-head comparison, the SAT was superior to the TBS and SEC in survival stratification and predictive ability. Therefore, the SAT can be considered when estimating the tumor burden. However, all three scores showed only moderate predictive power. Therefore, tumor burden should only be one component among many in treatment decision making.