A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Genetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Migraine

Alteration in the expression of long non-coding RNAs in the circulation of migraineurs

BACKGROUND

Current studies have shown emerging roles of lncRNAs in the pathobiology of neuropathic pain and migraine.

METHODS

We have chosen five lncRNAs, namely, PVT1, DSCAM-AS, MEG3, LINC-ROR, and SPRY4-IT1 for assessment of their expression in the circulation of migraineurs.

RESULTS

Expressions of PVT1 and MEG3 were higher in total migraineurs and both subgroups compared with controls (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, expression of both lncRNA was higher in migraineurs with aura versus migraineurs without aura (P value < 0.0001 and = 0.01, respectively). Expression of DSCAM-AS1 was not different between any groups of patients compared with controls. Expression of LINC-ROR was elevated in total patients and patients with aura compared with controls (P value = 0.0002 and < 0.0001, respectively). It was also over-expressed in migraineurs with aura vs. migraineurs without aura (P = 0.01). Finally, expression of SPRY4-IT1 was higher in total patients and patients without aura compared with migraine-free persons (P values < 0.0001). Expressions of five mentioned lncRNAs were correlated in almost all study groups. In patients without aura, correlations were significant only for two pairs (SPRY4-IT1/PVT1 and SPRY4-IT1/DSCAM-AS1). PVT1 and MEG3 had the appropriate AUC, sensitivity and specificity values for separation of total migraineurs and both groups of patients from controls. The highest AUC value was reported for PVT1 in separation of migraineurs with aura from healthy controls (AUC = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Cumulatively, our study shows evidence for deregulation of lncRNAs in migraineurs.

A new gene for autosomal dominant facial palsy/migraine identified in a family by whole exome sequencing

BACKGROUND

Facial palsy manifests as unilateral or bilateral weakness and inability to move some of the facial muscles. The aetiology may be different including idiopathic, trauma, infections or brain tumours or it can be associated with chronic neurological diseases. For instance, in recurrent migraine, an increased risk of idiopathic facial palsy (often unilateral) has been observed. Migraine is a neurovascular disorder characterized by mild to severe intensity of headaches, often associated with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms.

METHODS

A family is reported where five members were affected by facial palsy associated with other clinical features including migraine, diplopia, facial swelling, eye conjunctivitis following a vertical transmission. Whole exome sequencing was performed in three members (two affected and one healthy) in order to identify potential variants causative of their phenotype.

RESULTS

A missense variant c.304G>A was found leading to the p.(Ala102Thr) substitution in the TRPM8 gene, previously related to migraine by genome wide association studies. This variant was classified as deleterious by several predictor tools, and the mutant residue was predicted to alter the protein structure in terms of flexibility and interactions with the surrounding residues.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that TRPM8 could be a new causative gene further linking migraine and recurrent facial palsy.

The association between multiple sclerosis and migraine: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive condition marked by the deterioration of myelin and impairment of neurological function. The global prevalence of MS is approximately 2.2 million. Migraines are common in MS patients, with inconclusive data on their relationship. Our systematic review aimed to assess the prevalence and odds of migraine in pwMS and investigate the potential factors that may influence these associations.

METHOD

Through an extensive search and meticulous study selection, we identified pertinent literature investigating the occurrence and odds of migraines among pwMS. Additionally, we explored the comparative risk of migraines in MS patients compared to healthy controls. Data were extracted, including publication details, diagnostic criteria, and migraine prevalence in MS patients.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included, involving 279,620 pwMS and 279,603 healthy controls. The overall prevalence of migraine in pwMS was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.21-0.28). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to investigate the potential impact of various factors on the relationship between migraine and MS. These factors included age, duration of MS, study design, and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), migraine diagnosis method, study design, publication year of the study, country and continent of the study population. The results of these analyses revealed no significant influence of these factors on the relationship between migraine and MS. The meta-analysis indicated that pwMS had significantly increased odds of having migraine compared to healthy controls (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.20-3.20). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights that approximately 24% of pwMS experience migraine. The method of diagnosis significantly affects the reported prevalence, with questionnaires yielding higher rates. Furthermore, pwMS have a 1.96-fold increased odds of having migraine compared to healthy individuals. These findings emphasize the importance of further research and interventions to address the significant burden of migraine in the MS population.

The Role of MicroRNA in Migraine: A Systemic Literature Review

Migraine is a common primary headache disorder, affecting about 14% of the population. Importantly, it was indicated as the second cause of disability globally and the leading cause among young women. Despite the widespread prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The possible solution may be microRNAs-small, non-coding molecules. Until now, multiple studies have shown the great value of microRNA in both the diagnosis and treatment of different human diseases. Furthermore, a significant role in neurological disorders has been suggested. Little research regarding the utility of microRNA in migraine has been conducted, however, the results so far appear to be promising. We performed an electronic article search through PubMed and Embase Database to further explore the topic. After the analysis, according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we included 21 studies. The dysregulation was observed in migraine in general, as well as in different types and phases; thus, miRNAs emerge as promising diagnostic biomarkers. Additionally, some studies showed the influence of the intervention with miRNA levels on neuroinflammation and the expression of peptides, which are crucial in migraine pathogenesis. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about the role of miRNAs in migraine and encourage to further research in this field.Kindly check and confirm the edit made in the title.I checked and confirm.

Expression of NF-κB-associated lncRNAs in different types of migraine

PURPOSE

NF-κB partakes in the pathophysiology of neurologic conditions. We quantified levels of NF-κB-associated genes in 119 patients with migraine versus healthy controls.

METHODS

We measured levels of NF-κB-associated genes in 42 patients with migraine compared with age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

Comparison between patients without aura and controls revealed down-regulation of PACER [expression ratio (95% CI) 0.15 (0.06-0.36), P value < 0.0001]. Similar results were detected when comparing expression of PACER in patients with aura and controls [expression ratio (95% CI) 0.05 (0.02-0.12), P value < 0.0001]. Both DILC and CEBPA were over-expressed in patients with aura [expression ratio (95% CI) 4.9 (2.96-7.83), P value < 0.0001 and expression ratio (95% CI) 3.65 (2.39-5.24), P value < 0.0001, respectively] and in patients without aura compared with controls [expression ratio (95% CI) 3.6 (2.21-5.69), P value < 0.0001 and expression ratio (95% CI) 4.5 (2.53-7.11), P value < 0.0001, respectively]. ADINR was over-expressed in patients with aura [expression ratio (95% CI) 4.98 (3.09-8.33), P value < 0.0001] as well as patients without aura compared with controls [expression ratio (95% CI) 13.15 (7.41-23.58), P value < 0.0001]. Notably, ADINR levels were lower in patients with aura compared with patients without aura. When comparing ATG5 levels in patients with aura and controls, significant up-regulation was detected [expression ratio (95% CI) 4.4 (3.01-6.32), P value < 0.0001]. This pattern was also detected in patients without aura compared with controls [expression ratio (95% CI) 3.5 (2.28-5.35), P < 0.0001]. Finally, expression of DICER1-AS1 was elevated in patients with aura compared with patients without aura [expression ratio (95% CI) 2.47 (1.14-5.85), P = 0.03]. This lncRNA was under-expressed in patients without aura compared with controls [expression ratio (95% CI) 0.4 (0.21-1.31), P = 0.03]. CEBPA, ATG5 and ADINR had the best AUC values for distinguishing patients with aura from controls (AUC values = 0.91, 0.85 and 0.83, respectively). The AUC values for separation between patients without aura and controls were 0.90, 0.86 and 0.75 for CEBPA, ATG5 and ADINR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, several genes in the NF-κB pathway has been revealed to be dysregulated in migraineurs and expression of these genes can be used as markers for this neurological condition.

The Epigenetics of Migraine

Migraine is a complex neurological disorder and a major cause of disability. A wide range of different drug classes such as triptans, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, analgesics, and beta-blockers are used in acute and preventive migraine therapy. Despite a considerable progress in the development of novel and targeted therapeutic interventions during recent years, e.g., drugs that inhibit the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, therapy success rates are still unsatisfactory. The diversity of drug classes used in migraine therapy partly reflects the limited perception of migraine pathophysiology. Genetics seems to explain only to a minor extent the susceptibility and pathophysiological aspects of migraine. While the role of genetics in migraine has been extensively studied in the past, the interest in studying the role of gene regulatory mechanisms in migraine pathophysiology is recently evolving. A better understanding of the causes and consequences of migraine-associated epigenetic changes could help to better understand migraine risk, pathogenesis, development, course, diagnosis, and prognosis. Additionally, it could be a promising avenue to discover new therapeutic targets for migraine treatment and monitoring. In this review, we summarize the state of the art regarding epigenetic findings in relation to migraine pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets, with a focus on DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and microRNA-dependent regulation. Several genes and their methylation patterns such as CALCA (migraine symptoms and age of migraine onset), RAMP1, NPTX2, and SH2D5 (migraine chronification) and microRNA molecules such as miR-34a-5p and miR-382-5p (treatment response) seem especially worthy of further study regarding their role in migraine pathogenesis, course, and therapy. Additionally, changes in genes including COMT, GIT2, ZNF234, and SOCS1 have been linked to migraine progression to medication overuse headache (MOH), and several microRNA molecules such as let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p, let-7f-5p, miR-155, miR-126, let-7g, hsa-miR-34a-5p, hsa-miR-375, miR-181a, let-7b, miR-22, and miR-155-5p have been implicated with migraine pathophysiology. Epigenetic changes could be a potential tool for a better understanding of migraine pathophysiology and the identification of new therapeutic possibilities. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify these early findings and to be able to establish epigenetic targets as disease predictors or therapeutic targets.

The holistic approach to the CHRNA7 gene, hsa-miR-3158-5p, and 15q13.3 hotspot CNVs in migraineurs

Migraine is a neurological disease characterized by severe headache attacks. Combinations of different genetic variations such as copy number variation (CNV) in a gene and microRNA (miRNA) expression can provide a holistic approach to the disease as a pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic target. CNVs, the Cholinergic Receptor Nicotinic Alpha 7 Subunit (CHRNA7) gene, and expression of gene-targeting miRNAs (hsa-miR-548e-5p and hsa-miR-3158-5p) in migraineurs (n = 102; with aura, n = 43; without aura, n = 59) and non-migraines (n = 120) aged 15-60 years, comparative, case-control study was conducted. Genetic markers were compared with biochemical parameters (BMI, WBC, Urea, GFR, ESR, CRP, HBG). All analyzes were performed by quantitative Real-Time PCR (q-PCR) and fold change was calculated with the 2-ΔΔCT method. The diagnostic power of the CHRNA7 gene, CNV, and miRNAs were analyzed with the receiver operating curve (ROC). CHRNA7 gene and hsa-miR-3158-5p are down-regulated in migraineurs and the gene is controlled by this miRNA via CNVs (p < .05). Both deletion and duplication were detected in patients with migraine for CVN numbers (p = .05). The number of CNV deletions was higher than duplications. When CHRNA7-CNV-hsa-miR-3158-5p was modeled together in the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.805, and the diagnostic power was "good". In migraineurs, the CHRNA7 gene can be controlled by hsa-miR-3158-5p via CNVs to modulate the mechanism of pain. These three genetic markers have diagnostic potential and may be used in antimigraine treatments.

Role of Omics in Migraine Research and Management: A Narrative Review

Migraine is a neurological disorder defined by episodic attacks of chronic pain associated with nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. It is known to be a complex disease with several environmental and genetic factors contributing to its susceptibility. Risk factors for migraine include head or neck injury (Arnold, Cephalalgia 38(1):1-211, 2018). Stress and high temperature are known to trigger migraine, while sleep disorders and anxiety are considered to be the comorbid conditions with migraine. Studies have reported various biomarkers, including genetic variants, proteins, and metabolites implicated in migraine's pathophysiology. Using the "omics" approach, which deals with genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, more specific biomarkers for various migraine can be identified. On account of its multifactorial nature, migraine is an ideal study model focusing on integrated omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. The current review has been compiled with an aim to focus on the genomic alterations especially involved in the regulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission, cortical excitability, ion channels, solute carrier proteins, or receptors; their expression in migraine patients and also specific proteins and metabolites, including some inflammatory biomarkers that might represent the migraine phenotype at the molecular level. The systems biology approach holds the promise to understand the pathophysiology of the disease at length and also to identify the specific therapeutic targets for novel interventions.

Immunological findings in patients with migraine and other primary headaches: a narrative review

Experimental findings suggest an involvement of neuroinflammatory mechanisms in the pathophysiology of migraine. Specifically, preclinical models of migraine have emphasized the role of neuroinflammation following the activation of the trigeminal pathway at several peripheral and central sites including dural vessels, the trigeminal ganglion, and the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The evidence of an induction of inflammatory events in migraine pathophysiological mechanisms has prompted researchers to investigate the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) phenotypes as well as cytokine genetic polymorphisms in order to verify their potential relationship with migraine risk and severity. Furthermore, the role of neuroinflammation in migraine seems to be supported by evidence of an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, both ictally and interictally, together with the prevalence of Th1 lymphocytes and a reduction in regulatory lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of migraineurs. Cytokine profiles of cluster headache (CH) patients and those of tension-type headache patients further suggest an immunological dysregulation in the pathophysiology of these primary headaches, although evidence is weaker than for migraine. The present review summarizes available findings to date from genetic and biomarker studies that have explored the role of inflammation in primary headaches.

Expression of PIAS Genes in Migraine Patients

Migraine is a complex disabling condition which is associated with dysregulation of several pathways particularly those being associated with immune responses. In order to assess contribution of protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS) in the pathogenesis of migraine, we quantified expression levels of PIAS1-PIAS4 genes in the circulation of patients with migraine compared with controls. Expression of PIAS1 was substantially lower in total migraineurs compared with controls (ratio of mean expressions (RME) = 0.18, SE = 0.29, P value < 0.001) and in both male and female migraineurs compared with sex-matched controls. Expression of PIAS2 was lower in migraineurs without aura compared with controls (RME = 0.64, SE = 0.31, P value = 0.04) and in male subgroup of these patients compared with male controls (RME = 0.60, SE = 0.22, P value < 0.001). In migraineurs with aura, downregulation of PIAS2 was only observed among male subgroups (RME = 0.37, SE = 0.49, P value = 0.01). PIAS3 was downregulated in total male migraineurs (RME = 0.52, SE = 0.43, P value = 0.04) and in male migraineurs with aura (RME = 0.49, SE = 0.45, P value = 0.03) compared with male controls. Finally, PIAS4 was upregulated in total migraineurs (RME = 3.78, SE = 0. 34, P value < 0.001), female migraineurs (RME = 5.26, SE = 0.36, P value < 0.001), migraineurs with aura (RME = 4.24, SE = 0.42, P value < 0.001), female migraineurs with aura (RME = 6.13, SE = 0.47, P value < 0.001), migraineurs without aura (RME = 3.33, SE = 0.38, P value < 0.001), and female migraineurs without aura (RME = 4.47, SE = 0.41, P value < 0.001) compared with the corresponding controls. The present study suggests contribution of PIAS genes in the pathogenesis of migraine and warrants future studies to clarify the functional routes of their contribution.