Sorafenib versus capecitabine in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib and Metronomic Capecitabine in Child-Pugh B patients with advanced HCC: A real-life comparison with best supportive care

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of systemic therapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has not been proven in patients with Child-Pugh (C-P) B cirrhosis. Nevertheless, in real-world these patients are treated both with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and with metronomic capecitabine (MC). This study aimed to compare sorafenib and MC outcomes versus best supportive care (BSC) in C-P B patients.

METHOD

Between 2008 and 2020, among 774 C-P B patients with aHCC not amenable/responsive to locoregional treatments, 410 underwent sorafenib, 62 MC, and 302 BSC. The propensity score matching method was used to correct the baseline unbalanced prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the unmatched population, median OS was 9.7 months in patients treated with sorafenib, 8.0 with MC, and 3.9 months with BSC. In sorafenib vs. BSC-matched patients (135 couples), median OS was 7.3 (4.9-9.6) vs. 3.9 (2.6-5.2) months (p<0.001). ECOG-Performance Status, tumor size, macrovascular invasion, AFP, treatment-naive, and sorafenib were independent predictors of survival. In MC vs. BSC-matched patients (40 couples), median OS was 9.0 (0.2-17.8) vs.3.0 (2.2-3.8) months (p<0.001). Median OS did not differ (p = 0.283) in sorafenib vs. MC-matched patients (55 couples).

CONCLUSION

C-P B patients with aHCC undergoing BSC have poor survival. Both Sorafenib and MC treatment improve their prognosis.

Transcriptional elongation control of hypoxic response

The release of paused RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) from promoter-proximal regions is tightly controlled to ensure proper regulation of gene expression. The elongation factor PTEF-b is known to release paused RNAPII via phosphorylation of the RNAPII C-terminal domain by its cyclin-dependent kinase component, CDK9. However, the signal and stress-specific roles of the various RNAPII-associated macromolecular complexes containing PTEF-b/CDK9 are not yet clear. Here, we identify and characterize the CDK9 complex required for transcriptional response to hypoxia. Contrary to previous reports, our data indicate that a CDK9 complex containing BRD4 but not AFF1/4 is essential for this hypoxic stress response. We demonstrate that BRD4 bromodomains (BET) are dispensable for the release of paused RNAPII at hypoxia-activated genes and that BET inhibition by JQ1 is insufficient to impair hypoxic gene response. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the C-terminal region of BRD4 is required for Polymerase-Associated Factor-1 Complex (PAF1C) recruitment to establish an elongation-competent RNAPII complex at hypoxia-responsive genes. PAF1C disruption using a small-molecule inhibitor (iPAF1C) impairs hypoxia-induced, BRD4-mediated RNAPII release. Together, our results provide insight into potentially targetable mechanisms that control the hypoxia-responsive transcriptional elongation.

DN200434, an orally available inverse agonist of estrogen-related receptor γ, induces ferroptosis in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib, originally identified as an inhibitor of multiple oncogenic kinases, induces ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Several pathways that mitigate sorafenib-induced ferroptosis confer drug resistance; thus strategies that enhance ferroptosis increase sorafenib efficacy. Orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ) is upregulated in human HCC tissues and plays a role in cancer cell proliferation. The aim of this study was to determine whether inhibition of ERRγ with DN200434, an orally available inverse agonist, can overcome resistance to sorafenib through induction of ferroptosis. Sorafenib-resistant HCC cells were less sensitive to sorafenibinduced ferroptosis and showed significantly higher ERRγ levels than sorafenib-sensitive HCC cells. DN200434 induced lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells. Mechanistically, DN200434 increased mitochondrial ROS generation by reducing glutathione/glutathione disulfide levels, which subsequently reduced mTOR activity and GPX4 levels. DN200434 induced amplification of the antitumor effects of sorafenib was confirmed in a tumor xenograft model. The present results indicate that DN200434 may be a novel therapeutic strategy to re-sensitize HCC cells to sorafenib. [BMB Reports 2022; 55(11): 547-552].

DN200434, an orally available inverse agonist of estrogen-related receptor γ, induces ferroptosis in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib, originally identified as an inhibitor of multiple oncogenic kinases, induces ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Several pathways that mitigate sorafenib-induced ferroptosis confer drug resistance; thus strategies that enhance ferroptosis increase sorafenib efficacy. Orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ) is upregulated in human HCC tissues and plays a role in cancer cell proliferation. The aim of this study was to determine whether inhibition of ERRγ with DN200434, an orally available inverse agonist, can overcome resistance to sorafenib through induction of ferroptosis. Sorafenib-resistant HCC cells were less sensitive to sorafenibinduced ferroptosis and showed significantly higher ERRγ levels than sorafenib-sensitive HCC cells. DN200434 induced lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells. Mechanistically, DN200434 increased mitochondrial ROS generation by reducing glutathione/glutathione disulfide levels, which subsequently reduced mTOR activity and GPX4 levels. DN200434 induced amplification of the antitumor effects of sorafenib was confirmed in a tumor xenograft model. The present results indicate that DN200434 may be a novel therapeutic strategy to re-sensitize HCC cells to sorafenib. [BMB Reports 2022; 55(11): 547-552].

Systematic literature review of trials assessing recommended systemic treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To identify and evaluate the similarity of all trials assessing recommended treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Single arm and randomized trials from any phase and published any time up to February 2021 were systematically searched.

RESULTS

From 5677 records reviewed, 50 trials were included in the review, and 24 for assessed for similarity. In the first-line (1L) setting, several trials assessing sorafenib were noted for enrolling patients with more severe disease and/or performance status than other 1L trials; trials within the second-line (2L) setting were generally similar. Median survival was <2 years in all trial arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials assessing recommended treatments are largely similar and appropriate for quantitative comparisons of several efficacy and safety outcomes.

The power of kindness: curative treatment with metronomic combination in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

The administration of approved systemic treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited to patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A/B7) and performance status. Conversely, metronomic chemotherapy can be safely administered to patients with poor clinical conditions and severe liver impairment. The metronomic schedule demonstrated to exert different anticancer mechanisms compared to that of the same agent administered at its standard schedule, including immune stimulation and the inhibition of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Nevertheless, metronomic chemotherapy is a nearly neglected option for the treatment of advanced HCC patients, even among those who cannot afford standard treatments. Herein, we report the case of a 40-year-old patient affected by HBV-HDV-related cirrhosis who was diagnosed with advanced HCC. The severe liver impairment (Child-Pugh B9) did not allow to administer first-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors so that the patient received metronomic capecitabine as upfront therapy. Due to the suspect of progressive disease at the first radiologic assessment, metronomic cyclophosphamide was added to capecitabine aiming to enhance its efficacy. After 4 months of treatment, complete tumor response, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) normalization and the recovery of a Child-Pugh A were achieved. The patient was then able to undergo liver transplantation, and, after 18 months from the diagnosis, he is still free of disease recurrence. This experience emphasizes the reliability of metronomic capecitabine as a well-tolerated and effective treatment when patient's conditions prevent the administration of standard first-line treatments. In fact, metronomic capecitabine demonstrated its effectiveness in advanced HCC in retrospective and prospective analyses, leading to median progression-free survival and overall survival of, respectively, 6.03 and 14.47 months in phase II single-arm trial. Moreover, in consideration of the raising interest in immune-checkpoint inhibition in HCC, we believe that the immunomodulating effects of metronomic chemotherapy, either capecitabine or cyclophosphamide, warrant future trials exploring its combination with immunotherapy.

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Systemic Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Developing Countries

Systemic therapy options nowadays for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are either immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. As the incidence of liver cancer is much higher in developing countries, these new medications are not readily accessible for most of the patients. Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents are more available and affordable in developing countries. We are trying to explore the effectiveness of the newer cytotoxic agents in the systematic treatment for advanced HCC. This is a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials since 1997 that utilized systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy agents in the systemic treatment for advanced HCC using Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane library up to February 2020. Six randomized trials were found. Different drugs and dosages were used, so it was statistically inappropriate to conduct a meta-analysis. No Phase III trial showed statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit for cytotoxic chemotherapy, except subgroup analysis of Chinese patients in one study who had leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. There was no significant progression-free survival (PFS) or response rate in the Phase II trials. There are not enough data to infer the actual benefits of systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced HCC. However, oxaliplatin-based regimens may give feasible results. Health systems with limited access to targeted therapy and immunotherapy agents may use oxaliplatin-based regimens in clinical trials for advanced HCC. These results should be confirmed in multiple future randomized clinical trials.

BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF HEPATOLOGY UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH) published in 2015 its first recommendations about the management of HCC. Since then, new data have emerged in the literature, prompting the governing board of SBH to sponsor a single-topic meeting in August 2018 in São Paulo. All the invited experts were asked to make a systematic review of the literature reviewing the management of HCC in subjects with cirrhosis. After the meeting, all panelists gathered together for the discussion of the topics and the elaboration of updated recommendations. The text was subsequently submitted for suggestions and approval of all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology through its homepage. The present manuscript is the final version of the reviewed manuscript containing the recommendations of SBH.

Aqueous Ocimum gratissimum extract induces cell apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has exhibited a poor overall survival rate of only six to ten months, and the urgency of the development of more effective novel agents is ever present. In this line of research, we aimed to investigate the effects and inhibitive mechanisms of aqueous Ocimum gratissimum leaf extract (OGE), the extract of Ocimum gratissimum, which is commonly used as a therapeutic herb for its numerous pharmacological properties, on malignant HCC cells. Our results showed that OGE decreased the cell viability of HCC SK-Hep1 and HA22T cells in a dose-dependent manner (from 400 to 800 µg/mL), while there is little effect on Chang liver cells. Moreover, cell-cycle analysis shows increased Sub-G1 cell count in SK-Hep1 and HA22T cells which is not observed in Chang liver cells. These findings raise suspicion that the OGE-induced cell death may be mediated through proteins that regulate cell cycle and apoptosis in SK-Hep1 and HA22T cells, and further experimentation revealed that OGE treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in caspase 3 and PARP expressions and in CDK4and p-ERK1/2expressions. Moreover, animal tests also exhibited decreased HCC tumor growth by OGE treatment. We therefore suggest that the inhibition of cell viability and tumor growth induced by OGE may be correlated to the alteration of apoptosis-related proteins.

Capecitabine in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest a potential activity and a good tolerability of capecitabine in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

AIMS

To evaluate capecitabine activity and safety in a wide cohort of advanced HCC patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 143 capecitabine-treated patients (January 2010 to December 2017) in three centers of the Veneto Oncology Network.

RESULTS

Capecitabine was administered in second and third line, but also in first line instead of sorafenib in Child-Pugh B patients (70%), compromised clinical conditions (14%) or contraindications to antiangiogenetics (16%). Median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 6.9 and 2.8 months, respectively. There were no differences in OS and TTP between the 32 patients treated with non-metronomic scheme (2000 mg/day for 14 days) and the 111 patients treated with metronomic scheme (1000 mg/day) after correction for prognostic factors at baseline with a propensity score analysis. Capecitabine was more active in patients intolerant to sorafenib than in those progressing during treatment (p = 0.024). At least one adverse event (mainly hematological) was experienced by 73% of patients but discontinuation was necessary only in 11 (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine can be considered an active and safe option in advanced HCC, especially for patients unfit for other treatments.

Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: current state and future perspectives

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been focusing on overcoming tumor angiogenesis and immunosuppression. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) promote both angiogenesis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Multiple clinical studies have demonstrated the prognostic implications of and suggested the translational significance of MDSCs in patients with HCC. In preclinical HCC models, targeting MDSCs has been shown to enhance antitumor efficacy of sorafenib or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Reversing the protumor effects of MDSCs could be achieved by depleting MDSCs, blocking MDSC trafficking and migration into TME, and inhibiting the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs. To date, these strategies have not yet been validated to be clinically useful in patients with malignancy including HCC. Future studies should focus on identifying specific markers for human MDSCs and developing combination approaches incorporating MDSC-targeting therapy in the treatment of HCC.

Sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced Child-Pugh B hepatocellular carcinoma-a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib has demonstrated survival benefit in first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); utility of sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh B (CP-B) liver function remains a subject of debate.

METHODS

A systematic review identified studies using first-line sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC and CP-A/B liver function. Meta-regression analysis comprising linear regression was conducted to explore the association between the baseline factors and overall survival (OS). Differences between efficacy/safety and tolerability parameters were explored using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (12 Asian) comprising 8678 patients (August 2002 - September 2012) were included (four randomised controlled trials, 26 cohort studies). Median age was 61 years and 83% were men. Hepatitis B/C status was positive in 35%/22%, respectively. The CP status was available for 8577 patients (99%); CP-A, 79% and CP-B, 19%. Median OS on sorafenib for entire cohort was 7.2 months; 8.8 months in CP-A and 4.6 months in CP-B. Multivariable meta-regression analysis showed significant negative association between OS and proportion of patients with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 (P = 0.04) and CP-B liver function (P = 0.001). Among four studies reporting multivariable comparison of the CP status, CP-B was associated with significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the response rate to sorafenib between patients with CP-A (4.6%) and CP-B (4.2%) liver function. Safety and tolerability were similar; 35% of patients with CP-A/B liver function developed grade III/IV adverse events (P = 0.7). Meta-regression analysis showed similar rates of treatment discontinuation without progression (P = 0.31) and treatment-related death (P = 0.94) in patients with CP-B liver function.

CONCLUSION

CP-B liver function (versus CP-A) is associated with worse OS (but the similar response rate, safety and tolerability of first-line sorafenib, is unlikely to be clinically meaningful).

Emerging therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Prognosis is very poor for advanced HCC patients partially due to lack of effective systemic treatment. Sorafenib was the only approved agent for advanced HCC since 2007 until recent breakthroughs. In this article, we will review the newer approved and promising agents in the treatment of advanced HCC in the first line setting and beyond progression.

Main body

The Food and Drug Administration approved sorafenib as it demonstrated 3 months overall survival benefit compared to placebo in the first line setting over 10 years ago. Multiple single agent and combination therapies have been studied but failed to show benefit. Chemotherapy has limited role in patients with advanced HCC given poor hepatic reserve due to underlying cirrhosis. A new era of treatment for advanced HCC arrived recently with exciting data presented for lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, nivolumab, ramucirumab and several other promising clinical trials.

Conclusion

Advanced HCC patients are difficult to treat with poor outcomes. After initial approval of sorafenib in 2007, we recently have multiple new agents that showed benefit and promising activity, and are set to change the landscape of HCC treatment.

Sustained complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with metronomic capecitabine: a report of three cases

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death. Sorafenib, a multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor, is an approved frontline treatment for advanced HCC in Western countries, although a complete response (CR) to treatment is infrequently reported. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has been shown to be effect in both treatment-naïve patients and those previously treated with sorafenib. To date, however, only one case of sustained CR to metronomic capecitabine has been reported.

Case presentation

We describe three cases of advanced HCC treated with metronomic capecitabine where a CR was obtained. In the first case, capecitabine was administered as first line therapy; in the second case, capecitabine was used after intolerance to sorafenib; while in the third case, capecitabine was administered after sorafenib failure.

Conclusion

Capecitabine is a potentially important treatment option for patients with advanced HCC and may even represent a cure in certain cases.

Role of Systemic Therapy and Future Directions for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor that often arises in the setting of liver cirrhosis. Although early-stage disease is often amenable for surgical resection, transplant, or locoregional therapies, many patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage or have poor liver reserve. Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for these patients. At present, the only approved therapy for the treatment of advanced disease is the tyrosine multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Candidacy for treatment is based on liver reserve. Novel agents for the treatment of this disease are urgently needed. In this article, we review systemic therapy trials and upcoming data for the treatment of HCC.

Alternative treatments in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with progressive disease after sorafenib treatment: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that has been approved to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), though it is unclear how much benefit advanced HCC patients with progressive disease (PD) derive from sorafenib treatment. This study aimed to assess survival risk factors and evaluate therapeutic strategies for advanced HCC patients with PD after sorafenib treatment. We analyzed the clinical data and treatment outcomes for 315 consecutive advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Univariate analyses of overall survival identified therapeutic effect as an independent risk factor in all patients. Among all patients, 141 developed PD. Of those, 58 (41%) were treated with sorafenib monotherapy, 70 (50%) with agents other than sorafenib, and 13 (9%) were not treated at all. The median survival time was 6.1 months for PD patients with sorafenib monotherapy and 12.2 months for those administered alternative treatments (p < 0.0001). Our results indicated that sorafenib treatment may have negative long-term therapeutic effects in advanced HCC patients with PD, and that alternative treatments should be considered for these patients after sorafenib administration.

Metronomic capecitabine as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib discontinuation

PURPOSE

Metronomic capecitabine (MC) is a well-tolerated systemic treatment showing promising results in one retrospective study, as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

117 patients undergoing MC were compared to 112 patients, eligible for this treatment, but undergoing best supportive care (BSC) after sorafenib discontinuation for toxicity or HCC progression. The two groups were compared for demographic and clinical features. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to detect independent prognostic factors. To balance confounding factors between the two groups, a propensity score model based on independent prognosticators (performance status, neoplastic thrombosis, causes of sorafenib discontinuation and pre-sorafenib treatment) was performed.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing MC showed better performance status, lower tumor burden, lower prevalence of portal vein thrombosis, and better cancer stage. Median (95% CI) post-sorafenib survival (PSS) was longer in MC than in BSC patients [9.5 (7.5-11.6) vs 5.0 (4.2-5.7) months (p < 0.001)]. Neoplastic thrombosis, cause of sorafenib discontinuation, pre-sorafenib treatment and MC were independent prognosticators. The benefit of capecitabine was confirmed in patients after matching with propensity score [PSS: 9.9 (6.8-12.9) vs. 5.8 (4.8-6.8) months, (p = 0.001)]. MC lowered the mortality risk by about 40%. MC achieved better results in patients who stopped sorafenib for adverse events than in those who progressed during it [PSS: 17.3 (10.5-24.1) vs. 7.8 (5.2-10.1) months, (p = 0.035)]. Treatment toxicity was low and easily manageable with dose modulation.

CONCLUSIONS

MC may be an efficient and safe second-line systemic therapy for HCC patients who discontinued sorafenib for toxicity or tumor progression.

Hypoxia induces universal but differential drug resistance and impairs anticancer mechanisms of 5-fluorouracil in hepatoma cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most refractory cancers. The mechanisms by which hypoxia further aggravates therapeutic responses of advanced HCC to anticancer drugs remain to be clarified. Here, we report that hypoxia (1% O₂) caused 2.55-489.7-fold resistance to 6 anticancer drugs (sorafenib, 5-fluorouracil [5-FU], gemcitabine, cisplatin, adriamycin and 6-thioguanine) in 3 HCC cell lines (BEL-7402, HepG2 and SMMC-7721). Among the 6 drugs, sorafenib, the sole one approved for HCC therapy, inhibited proliferation with little influence from hypoxia and displayed the smallest variation among the 3 HCC cell lines tested. By contrast, the inhibition of proliferation by 5-FU, which has been extensively tested in clinical trials but has not been approved for HCC therapy, was severely affected by hypoxia and showed a large variation among these cell lines. In 5-FU-treated HCC cells, hypoxia reduced the levels of basal thymidylate synthase (TS) and functional TS, leading to decreased dTMP synthesis and DNA replication. Hypoxia also affected the accumulation of FdUTP and its misincorporation into DNA. Consequently, both single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks in DNA were reduced, although hypoxia also inhibited DNA repair. In 5-FU-treated HCC cells, hypoxia further abated S-phase arrest, alleviated the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, diminished the activation of caspases, and finally resulted in reduced induction of apoptosis. Thus, hypoxia induces universal but differential drug resistance. The extensive impacts of hypoxia on the anticancer mechanisms of 5-FU contributes to its hypoxia-induced resistance in HCC cells. We propose that hypoxia-induced drug resistance and interference of hypoxia with anticancer mechanisms could be used as candidate biomarkers in selecting and/or developing anticancer drugs for improving HCC therapy.

Management of pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma: A multimodal approach

HCC is rare in the pediatric population, but is the second most common liver malignancy in children. Survival rates for primary unresectable HCC have been dismal. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with a multimodal approach for the management of unresectable HCC in two adolescent patients and to review the literature. Both patients are currently alive with no recurrence at 51 and 29 months post-transplant. Multimodality treatment involving chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and sorafenib; TACE; timely liver transplantation; and post-transplant therapy with sorafenib and mTOR inhibitors may help improve outcomes and prolong survival in pediatric patients with unresectable HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): beyond sorafenib-chemotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with poor prognosis. The incidence of HCC and HCC-related deaths have increased over the last several decades. However, the treatment options for advanced HCC are very limited. Sorafenib remains the only drug approved for systemic treatment for advanced HCC. However, prior to sorafenib era conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies have been studied in advanced HCC. In this review, clinical studies of systemic chemotherapy for advanced HCC will be summarized and discussed.

Efficacy of low dose capecitabine and sorafenib in patients with advanced alfa-fetoprotein secreting hepatocellular carcinoma: a 1 year experience

BACKGROUND

There is no global consensus for the optimal management of HCC. Most of patients at the time of diagnosis are not candidate for potentially curative therapy. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low dose capecitabine combined with sorafenib in subset of Egyptian HCV patients presented with advanced HCC unfit for surgical or locoregional therapies.

METHODS

15 patients with advanced HCC, unfit for surgical or locoregional intervention, with PS <2 recieved Capecitabine 500 mg/day with sorafeneb 200 mg twice daily till normalization of AFP then the treatment was modified to capecitabine 250 mg every other day and sorafenib 400 mg once daily. They were followed every 3 months for size, number of focal masses and AFP. 30 patients were selected as a control group, they received supportive therapy (n = 15) or sorafenib only (n = 15).

RESULTS

After 10 months of therapy, 6 patients showed complete response (40 %) with complete recanalization of portal vein (n = 2) and treatment was stopped and the others (n = 4) showed partial portal vein recanalization so, treatment is continued till now. 1 patient (6.7 %) showed recurrence of the disease and died after 1 month, 8 patients showed partial response (53.3 %) and still on treatment. The control groups showed a highly significant reduction in survival when compared to patients who received capecitabine and sorafenib (12.9 ± 2.1, 7.9 ± 0.9, 4.5 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined low dose capecitabine and sorafenib proved to be safe with low toxicity profile and deserves further attention as a convenient, outpatient-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced HCC.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Past and Future of Molecular Target Therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer related mortality worldwide. The incidence of HCC has been increasing annually. Viral infection, alcohol usage, and other causes of cirrhosis have been identified as major risk factors for HCC development. The underlying pathogenesis has not been as well defined. There have been multiple hypotheses to the specific mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis and they share the common theme of chronic inflammation, increase oxidative stress, and genomic alteration. Therapeutic options of HCC have been primarily local and/or regional including transplantation, resection, and radial frequency ablation, chemoembolization or radio-embolization. For unresectable or metastatic disease, the options are limited. Conventional chemotherapeutic options have been noted to have limited benefit. Sorafenib has been the one and only systemic therapy which has demonstrated modest overall survival benefit. This has led to more extensive research with focus on targeted therapy. Numerous pre-clinical and early phase clinical studies have been noted but failed to show efficacy in later phase clinical trials. In an effort to identify new potential therapeutic options, new understanding of underlying pathways to hepatocarcinogenesis should be one of the main focuses. This leads to development of more molecularly targeted agents to specific pathways, and immunotherapy. This article provides a review of major studies of molecular targeted agents which attempts to target these specific pathways in HCC.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with sorafenib: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular toxicities associated with sorafenib.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized Phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors receiving daily sorafenib treatment that described the following events: hypertension, bleeding, venous thromboembolism, left ventricular dysfunction myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular events.

RESULTS

A total of 18 randomized clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. Patients treated with sorafenib had a significantly increased risk of hypertension (relative risk [RR]: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.52-5.66), bleeding (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.63-3.62) and left ventricular dysfunction (RR: 9.38; 95% CI: 1.24-71.22). The risk for venous thromboembolism, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular events was nonsignificant. Subgroup analyses showed that tumor type and treatment regimen had no effect on the RR of cardiovascular toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that sorafenib is associated with a higher risk of developing all grade hypertension and bleeding compared with controls.

Risk of mucocutaneous toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with lapatinib: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the risk of mucocutaneous adverse events associated with lapatinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on lapatinib; describing events of stomatitis, skin rash, hand foot syndrome, pruritus and alopecia.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 380 potentially relevant citations on lapatinib from PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL Cochrane Registry and ASCO Meeting Library. After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 19 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The RRs of all-grade skin rash, stomatitis, hand foot syndrome and pruritus were 3.04 (95% CI 2.33-3.96; p < 0.00001), 1.67 (95% CI 1.02-2.3; p < 0.04), 4.45 (95% CI 1.15-17.19; p = 0.03), and 2.02 (95% CI 1.46-2.8; p < 0.0001), respectively. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed no effect of treatment regimen on the RRs of the relevant adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that lapatinib is associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade skin rash, hand foot skin reaction and pruritus. Clinicians should be aware of these risks and perform regular clinical monitoring.

Combination of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus antivirals for the management of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently occurring liver neoplasm and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Intermediate-stage HCC is a distinct disease entity that is traditionally treated with transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). However, the risk of viral reactivation and subsequent hepatic decompensation is considerable. Therefore, in this systematic review, we explore the evidence surrounding the benefits of using TACE/antiviral combination in this subset of HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, Trip Database, and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "Hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "Hepatoma" or "Liver cancer" AND "Transarterial chemoembolisation" OR "Chemoembolisation" AND "Antivirals" and specifying only English literature. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumour response, and toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of six potentially relevant trials were identified, from which one study was excluded. Hence, five trials involving 818 patients were included, encompassing three phase II studies and two retrospective studies. The median PFS was reported in one out of the five studies, which was 23 months in the combination arm versus 20 months in the TACE-only arm. The median OS was reported in one out of the four studies: 29 months in the combination arm versus 26 months in the TACE-only arm. The hepatic toxicity parameters showed consistent benefit for the combination arm versus the TACE-only arm in the five studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

An antiviral/TACE combination shows promise as an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for intermediate-stage HCC. The reported efficacy and toxicity of the antiviral/TACE combination appears to compare favorably with TACE monotherapy, the most commonly implemented strategy for intermediate-stage HCC. Further clinical studies are warranted to accurately determine which patients are expected to benefit most from such combination strategies.

Risk of fatigue and hepatic and metabolic toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with everolimus: a meta-analysis

ABSTRACT 

Background: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of fatigue, hepatic and metabolic toxicities associated with everolimus intake in patients with solid tumors. Methods: Eligible studies included randomized trials of patients with solid tumors on everolimus describing events of fatigue, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Results: After the exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of ten clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risks of all-grade fatigue, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and elevated ALT were 1.31 (p < 0.002), 3.06 (p < 0.0001), 2.54 (p = 0.0001) and 2.96 (p < 0.003), respectively. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that everolimus is associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade fatigue, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and elevated ALT.

An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

The efficacy of sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib for treating patients with advanced HCC.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced HCC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicities. Hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) were used for the meta-analysis and were expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Seven RCTs, with a total of 3807 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. All patients received sorafenib alone, or with other chemotherapeutic regimens. Pooled estimates showed that sorafenib improved the OS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.90; P = 0.002), or TTP outcomes (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.86; P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that sorafenib was more effective in the patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1–2 (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60, 1.0; P = 0.05), or macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), and/or extrahepatic spread (EHS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.93; P = 0.02), in terms of OS. Patients who received sorafenib did not have a higher ORR (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.11; P = 0.10). In addition, there was a slight increase in toxicity in the sorafenib group.

Conclusion

Treatment with sorafenib significantly improved OS and TTP in patients with advanced HCC. Additional large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib-based therapy in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Adjuvant systemic treatment for elderly breast cancer patients; addressing safety concerns

INTRODUCTION

The issue of systemic treatment for early breast cancer in the elderly has always been challenging and in spite of the clear evidence of the potential benefits of adjuvant treatment in older women, they are usually undertreated with the potential consequence of worse outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This article will review the evidence surrounding the various systemic options in the treatment armamentarium of early-stage breast cancer in elderly patients. The risks and benefits, with particular attention to a number of newly introduced targeted agents, along with the potential role of incorporating a combined geriatric/oncologic assessment as a routine part of the management of elderly patients with breast cancer are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Administration of available options for (neo)adjuvant endocrine, chemo, as well as targeted therapeutics in fit elderly patients is feasible and tolerable; however, a routine input from geriatric medicine and psycho-oncology experts as well as the training of specialized oncology staff with special interest in geriatric oncology are believed to improve the outcome of elderly patients.

Bevacizumab-based combination therapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) consist of a large heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation that arises in gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic tissues. Advanced GEP-NENs are considered distinct disease entity with limited approved treatment options and poor prognosis. So, we will explore in this systematic review the value of using bevacizumab-based combination in this subset of NENs.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, trip database and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "GEP-NENs" OR "Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors" AND "systemic anticancer therapy" AND "Bevacizumab" and selecting only the English literature. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response and toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of 17 potentially relevant trials were identified, of which eight studies were excluded. Hence, nine trials involving 320 patients were included. Median PFS was reported in eight out of the nine studies ranging from 8.2 to 16.5 months. Median OS was reported in one study, and it was 33.3 months for the whole group. The disease control rate was reported in the seven studies, and it ranged from 80 to 96%. The overall response rate was reported in eight studies, and it ranged from 0 to 64%. Frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities, mucocutaneous toxicities and hematologic toxicities (particularly leucopenia).

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence from the available clinical trials suggests that bevacizumab in combination with some other anticancer agents (especially mTOR inhibitors and interferons) could be a more effective and tolerable treatment for advanced GEP-NENs in the future. However, such bevacizumab-based combination cannot be recommended outside the setting of clinical trials.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with sunitinib, axitinib, cediranib or regorafenib: an updated systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of cardiovascular toxicities associated with sunitinib, axitinib, cediranib or regorafenib; oral multi tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on sunitinib, axitinib, cediranib or regorafenib describing daily events of hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, bleeding or thrombosis.

RESULTS

Patients treated with these four agents had a significantly increased risk of all-grade hypertension and bleeding. The RR of all-grade hypertension, bleeding, thrombosis and cardiac dysfunction were 2.78 (95% CI 2.03-3.81; p<0.00001), 1.93 (95% CI 1.41-2.64; p<0.00001), 0.85 (95% CI 0.60-1.19; p=0.50), 2.36 (95% CI 0.95-5.87; p=0.06), respectively. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed no effect of the agent used (sunitinib vs. axitinib vs. cediranib) in the risk of hypertension; while for bleeding, only the sunitinib subgroup RR was significant compared to axitinib or cediranib.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that sunitinib, axitinib, cediranib and regorafenib are associated with a higher risk of developing all grade and high grade hypertension compared with control. While for bleeding, only the sunitinib subgroup RR was significant compared to axitinib or cediranib. Clinicians should be aware of these risks and perform regular cardiovascular monitoring.

Does the use of lapatinib increase the risk of fatigue and hepatic toxicities in patients with solid tumors? A critical literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis of fatigue and hepatic adverse events associated with lapatinib use in solid tumor patients were performed.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized Phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors taking lapatinib. They described events of fatigue, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin. Our search yielded 380 potentially relevant citations on lapatinib from PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL Cochrane registry and ASCO meeting library.

RESULTS

After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 15 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The relative risk (RR) of all-grade fatigue, elevated ALT, AST and total bilirubin were 0.99 (95% CI 0.87 - 1.13; p = 0.87), 1.12 (95% CI 0.87 - 1.44; p = 0.55), 0.79 (95% CI 0.43 - 1.45; p = 0.44), 5.17 (95% CI 0.18 - 149.81; p = 0.34), respectively. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed no effect of comparator regimen on the RR of the relevant adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the evidence for a true increased risk of hepatotoxicity or fatigue with lapatinib-based treatment compared to control is not yet fully convincing. Future studies should investigate this risk further. Clinicians must be aware of these risks and perform regular clinical monitoring.

Sorafenib-based combination as a first line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. Advanced HCC is a distinct disease entity with limited approved treatment options and grave prognosis. So, we will explore in this systematic review the value of using sorafenib-based combination in this poor prognosis subset of HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, trip database and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "Hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "Hepatoma" or "Liver cancer" AND "systemic anticancer therapy" AND "Sorafenib" and specifying only English literature. Outcomes of interest included progression free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response, and toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of 17 potentially relevant trials was identified, of which 9 studies were excluded. Hence, eight trials involving 272 patients were included. Median PFS was reported in 6 out of the 8 trials ranging from 3.7 to 7.5 months. Median OS was reported in 6 out of the 8 studies ranging from 7.4 to 40.1 months. The DCR was reported in the 8 studies, ranging from 48.7% to 76%. Frequently reported Grade 3/4 toxicities were increased AST/ALT, fatigue, hypertension, hand foot skin reaction and diarrhea. However, some chemotherapy-specific side effects were noted in some studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence from the available clinical trials suggests that sorafenib-based combination with some anticancer agents (especially mTOR inhibitors) could be a more effective and tolerable treatment for advanced HCC in the future. However, such sorafenib-based combination cannot be recommended outside the setting of clinical trials.

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): from bench to bedside

Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. For patients with early resectable disease, surgical resection or transplantation is considered a potentially curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); on the other hand, for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, treatment is essentially palliative and prior to the approval of sorafenib, there was no globally approved systemic treatment for patients presenting with unresectable or metastatic HCC. Sorafenib is the only systemic treatment to demonstrate a statistically significant but modest overall survival benefit in a large phase III trial. Thus, novel systemic approaches represent a high unmet medical need in advanced HCC. In this review article, we will try to take a journey through the history of systemic therapeutic options for HCC passing through the current standard options and exploring the potential new systemic options for this disease.

Serglycin (SRGN) overexpression predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is known for its high rate of recurrence and poor prognosis, which makes it necessary to identify new predictive markers for HCC and to explore the underlying mechanism(s). Emerging evidence suggests that the proteoglycan serglycin (SRGN) might play a crucial role in tumor metastasis. However, currently, the function of SRGN in HCC remains unknown. Here, we evaluated the expression pattern of SRGN in 127 HCC specimens and their adjacent, non-tumorous tissues using immunohistochemical assays. We observed that SRGN was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues. Elevated expression levels of SRGN were detectable in 72/127 (56.7%) of the HCC specimens and in 4/127 (3.1%) of adjacent non-tumorous tissues (p < 0.001). Further correlation analysis demonstrated that the increased expression of SRGN was positively associated with HBV infection, GGT level, vascular invasion, advanced BCLC stage and early recurrence (p < 0.05). Increased SRGN expression correlated with unfavorable prognosis in HCC patients. In multivariate analyses, SRGN expression levels were found to represent an independent predictor for overall survival (p = 0.002) and time to recurrence (p = 0.010) of HCC patients. Furthermore, the elevated expression of SRGN in the HCC tissues was accompanied by elevated levels of vimentin and the absence of E-cadherin. Similarly, the reduced expression of SRGN was accompanied by elevated levels of E-cadherin and the absence of vimentin. E-cadherin and vimentin are well-accepted biomarkers of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and the expression of SRGN might correlate with EMT. Our results demonstrate that the elevated expression of SRGN represents a crucial event in HCC patients that is indicative of poor clinical outcome.