The clinical and pathological features of 133 colorectal cancer patients with brain metastasis: a multicenter retrospective analysis of the Gastrointestinal Tumors Working Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

Clinical, Radiologic, and Surgical Features of Brain Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. A Strong Correlation Between Surgical Patterns and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are a small percentage of metastatic patients and surgery is considered the best choice to improve survival. While most research has focused on the risk of CRC spreading to the brain, no studies have examined the characteristics of BMs in relation to surgery and outcome. In this study, we evaluate the clinical and radiologic features of BMs from CRC patients who underwent surgery and analyze their outcomes.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective observational analysis that included a cohort of 31 patients affected by CRC surgically-treated for their related BMs. For all patients, clinical and surgical data (number, site, side, tumor and edema volume, and morphology) were recorded.

RESULTS

Analysis found that synchronous diagnosis and lesion morphology, particularly cystic versus solid, had the most significant impact on survival (6 vs. 22 months, P = 0.04). To compare BMs with cystic morphology to those with solid morphology, a multivariate analysis was conducted. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, clinical onset, or performance status. The analysis revealed no significant differences in localization with regard to site, tumor and edema volume, biology, or complications rate.

CONCLUSIONS

BMs derived from CRC have a significantly different prognosis depending on whether they present as a solid or cystic pattern. Although solid pattern is more common, cystic BMs in this tumor type are less frequent and are associated with a poorer prognosis, regardless of molecular expression, location, size, and adjuvant treatment.

Survival nomograms for colorectal carcinoma patients with lung metastasis and lung-only metastasis, based on the SEER database and a single-center external validation cohort

Background

We analysed the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with lung metastasis and lung-only metastasis and determined the risk factors for lung metastasis in CRC patients.

Methods

Data from colorectal cancer patients with lung metastasis diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were obtained from the SEER database. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, the Cox proportional hazards regression model, and a competing risk model. The predictive ability of the nomgram was assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. The data from the SEER database for the period 2016–2019 was used as an external validation set. The characteristics of 70 CRC patients treated at Shanghai East Hospital between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed and data from China was chosen as an external validation set.

Results

The median survival time for colorectal cancer patients with lung metastasis was 12 months, while this value was 24 months in patients with lung-only metastasis. Among all CRC patients with lung metastasis, age, grade, T stage, N stage, presence of liver, brain or bone metastasis, anatomic site and surgery were related to overall survival (OS). In CRC patients with lung-only metastasis, age, T stage, marital status, chemotherapy and surgery were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. Two nomograms predicting OS were established, with great discrimination (C-index between 0.67 and 0.81) and excellent calibration. Factors including age, race, sex, tumour grade, T stage, N stage, presence of liver, brain or bone metastasis, marital status, insurance status and anatomic location were related to the occurrence of lung metastasis in CRC patients.

Conclusion

We developed two reliable clinical prediction models among CRC patients to predict the OS rates in patients with lung metastasis and lung metastasis only.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02547-9.

Where Are We Now and Where Might We Be Headed in Understanding and Managing Brain Metastases in Colorectal Cancer Patients?

OPINION STATEMENT

Compared to liver and lung metastases, brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare and remain poorly investigated despite the anticipated rise in their incidence. CRC patients bearing BM have a dismal prognosis with a median survival of 3-6 months, significantly lower than that of patients with BM from other primary tumors, and of those with metastatic CRC manifesting extracranially. While liver and lung metastases from CRC have more codified treatment strategies, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of BM in CRC, and their management follows the approaches of BM from other solid tumors. Therapeutic strategies are driven by the number and localisation of the lesion, consisting in local treatments such as surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or whole-brain radiotherapy. Novel treatment modalities are slowly finding their way into this shy unconsented armatorium including immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or a combination of those, among others.This article reviews the pioneering strategies aiming at understanding, diagnosing, and managing this disease, and discusses future directions, challenges, and potential innovations in each of these domains.

HIGHLIGHTS

• With the increasing survival in CRC, brain and other rare/late-onset metastases are rising. • Distal colon/rectal primary location, long-standing progressive lung metastases, and longer survival are risk factors for BM development in CRC. • Late diagnosis and lack of consensus treatment strategies make BM-CRC diagnosis very dismal. • Liquid biopsies using circulating tumor cells might offer excellent opportunities in the early diagnosis of BM-CRC and the search for therapeutic options. • Multi-modality treatment including surgical metastatic resection, postoperative SRS with/without WBRT, and chemotherapy is the best current treatment option. • Recent mid-sized clinical trials, case reports, and preclinical models show the potential of unconventional therapeutic approaches as monoclonal antibodies, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Graphical abstract.

Primary Tumor Resection Provides Survival Benefits for Patients with Synchronous Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Background: Brain metastases (BMs), particularly synchronous brain metastases, in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are uncommon. The survival benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is controversial. Whether PTR can bring survival benefits to patients with BMs of CRC has not been reported. Methods: From 2010 to 2016, 581 CRC patients with BMs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were divided into PTR and non-PTR groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival distributions. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. By controlling additional prognostic factors, a Cox proportional multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the survival benefit of PTR. Results: The median overall survival for CRC patients with synchronous BMs was 3 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 27.2% and a 2-year survival rate of 12.8%. The PTR group contained 171 patients (29.4%), whereas the non-PTR group had 410 patients (70.6%). Patients who underwent PTR had a 1-year survival rate of 40.2% compared to 21.7% in those who did not (p < 0.0001). Cox proportional analysis showed that patients ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.718, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.423−2.075, p < 0.0001) had a shorter OS than patients < 60 years of age. OS was better in CEA-negative than in CEA-positive patients (HR 0.652, 95% CI 0.472−0.899, p = 0.009). Patients in whom the primary tumor was removed had considerably improved prognoses (HR 0.654, 95% CI 0.531−0.805, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the PTR group achieved a survival advantage except for patients with CEA negative. Conclusions: Patients with synchronous BMs from CRC may benefit from primary tumor resection (PTR). Age, CEA level, and PTR were independent prognostic risk factors for CRC patients with synchronous BMs.

Treatment of brain metastases from gastrointestinal primaries: Comparing whole-brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of survival

Objective:

The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical features and prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal primaries treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Methods:

We retrospectively investigated patients with BMs resulting from gastrointestinal primaries who underwent WBRT or SRS. The effects of treatment modalities on overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results:

WBRT and SRS were applied to 24 and 17 patients, respectively. In the WBRT group, radiotherapy was delivered at 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions (fx). In the SRS group, a median dose of 22 Gy (range: 18–27 Gy) was applied in 1–3 fx. At BM diagnosis, all patients had synchronous extracranial metastases which were mostly detected in the lung and liver. Median OS values were 9 months and 4 months in the SRS and WBRT groups, respectively (p=0.005). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (≥70 vs. <70), diagnosis-specific graded prognostic index, gastrointestinal (GI) graded prognostic index, cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), controlled systemic disease, and treatment modality (WBRT vs. SBRT) were found to be related with OS.

Conclusion:

In patients with GI cancer-related BMs, SRS should be preferred in those with longer OS expectancy who have controlled extracranial disease, good KPS and CITV values of <10 cm³.

The impact of neurological performance and volumetrics on overall survival in brain metastasis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center case series

Background

Brain metastasis (BM) of colorectal cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis of only a few months survival. However, it is difficult to estimate the individual prognosis of each patient due to the lack of definitive prognosis parameters. The number of metastases and the Karnofsky performance score are known predictors for survival. We investigated whether or not the neurological performance score and the tumor volumetrics are equally suitable predictors for survival.

Design

All patients with histologically diagnosed BM linked to colorectal cancer between 2012 and March 2020 were reviewed. The Medical Research Council Neurological Performance Score was used to quantify neurological performance. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier estimate and log-rank test was performed. Survival prediction and multivariate analysis were performed employing Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included in our analysis with an overall survival of 4.9 months after surgery of the BM. Survival decreased in the univariate analysis with increasing postoperative neurological performance score, low Karnofsky performance score, absence of radiation therapy and radiation therapy modality. The neurological performance score is a reliable scoring parameter for estimating the prognostic course analogous to the Karnofsky performance score. Neither preoperative nor post resection residual tumor volume had any impact on overall survival in our small cohort.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the postoperative neurological performance is a valuable prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients with BM. Tumor volumetrics show no correlation to survival. Further investigations with a larger number of cases are mandatory.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09435-1.

Risk Factors on the Incidence and Prognostic Effects of Colorectal Cancer With Brain Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with brain metastases (BM) is uncommon and often diagnosed at a late stage. The aims of this study were to identify the clinical factors that can influence the incidence of CRC patients with BM (CRCBM) and to investigate the impact of clinical factors and therapies on the outcomes of CRCBM.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2018, patients with CRCBM were enrolled under the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors and prognostic factors of BM. Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and tumor-specific survival (CSS) of CRCBM patients.

Results

A total of 195 (0.34%) CRC patients initially diagnosed with BM were included for analysis. The positive level of CEA, pN2a-b, and additional organ metastases were positively associated with developing BM from the CRC cohort (p < 0.05). The median OS and CSS of the BM patients were both 4.0 months, while the corresponding survival time in CRC patients without BM was 14.0 and 16.0 months, respectively (HR = 2.621, 95% CI = 2.061–3.333 for CSS; HR = 2.556, 95% CI = 2.026–3.225 for OS; log rank p < 0.001, each). Only systematic treatment was independently associated with better survival (p < 0.05, each).

Conclusions

Although the overall prognosis of CRCBM patients was extremely poor, the positive level of CEA, pN2a-b, and distant metastases could be bad risk factors for the incidence of CRCBM. In addition, only systematic treatment was found to be a negative prognostic factor for CRCBM patients. These related factors can provide more valuable reference for clinical individualized treatments.

New Artificial Intelligence Score and Immune Infiltrates as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer With Brain Metastases

Incidence of brain metastases has increased in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) as their survival has improved. CD3 T-cells and, lately, DGMate (DiGital tuMor pArameTErs) score, have been identified as prognostic factors in locally advanced CRC. Until now, there is no data concerning the prognostic value of these markers in patients with CRC-derived brain metastases. All consecutive patients with CRC-derived brain metastases diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Staining for CD3, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1 and DGMate analyses were performed using tissue micro-array from primary tumors and, if available, brain metastases. All in all, 83 patients were included with 80 primary tumor samples and 37 brain metastases samples available. CD3 and CD8 T-cell infiltration was higher in primary tumors compared to brain metastases. We observed a significant higher DGMate score in rectal tumors compared to colon tumors (p=0.03). We also noted a trend of higher CD3 T-cell infiltration in primary tumors when brain metastases were both supra and subtentorial compared to brain metastases that were only subtentorial or supratentorial (p=0.36 and p=0.03, respectively). No correlation was found between CD3 or CD8 infiltration or DGMate score in primary tumors or brain metastases and overall survival (OS) in the overall population. In patients with rectal tumors, a high DGMate score in brain metastases was associated with longer OS (13.4 ± 6.1 months versus 6.1 ± 1.4 months, p=0.02). High CD3 T-cell infiltration in brain metastases was associated with lower OS in patients with supratentorial brain metastases (9.8 ± 3.3 months versus 16.7 ± 5.9 months, p=0.03). PD-L1 overexpression was rare, both in primary tumors and brain metastases, but PD-L1 positive primary tumors were associated with worse OS (p=0.01). In contrast to breast and lung cancer derived brain metastases, CD3 and CD8 infiltration and DGMate score are not major prognostic factors in patients with CRC-derived brain metastases.

Factors Prognostic for Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience in China

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze clinicopathological, survival, prognostic factors, as well as the timing of brain metastases (BM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) using data from a Chinese center.

Patients and Methods

Data of 65 consecutive CRC patients with BM were collected from a single institution in China. The time from primary tumor surgery to the occurrence of BM was calculated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate cumulative survival of patients. Factors associated with prognosis of overall survival (OS) were explored using Cox's proportional hazard regression models.

Results

The median time interval from CRC surgery to the diagnosis of BM was 24 months. After diagnosis of BM, median OS values for patients were 11 months. Extracranial metastases occurred in 45 cases (69.2%) when BM was diagnosed, and 58.5% of these patients with lung metastases Time of BMs (P=0.018), presence of extracranial metastases (P=0.033), treatment (P=0.003), CA199 (P=0.034), CA125 (P<0.001), CA242 (P=0.018), and CA211 (P=0.012) were associated with OS of patients through univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model showed that only treatment was an independent predictor for OS (conservative treatment; HR=1.861, 95% CI=1.077-3.441; P=0.048).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of metastatic lesions may be an alternative choice for CRC patients with BM. Identifying the timing of brain metastases can help to detect this disease early, leading to a better survival outcome.

Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis to Establish a Guideline for Daily Treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide. Most patients with metastatic CRC develop liver or lung metastases, while a minority suffer from brain metastases. There is little information available regarding the presentation, treatment, and overall survival of brain metastases (BM) from CRC. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes data collected from three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) based on the key words "brain", "metastas*", "tumor", "colorectal", "cancer", and "malignancy". In total, 1318 articles were identified in the search and 86 studies matched the inclusion criteria. The incidence of BM varied between 0.1% and 11.5%. Most patients developed metastases at other sites prior to developing BM. Lung metastases and KRAS mutations were described as risk factors for additional BM. Patients with BM suffered from various symptoms, but up to 96.8% of BM patients were asymptomatic at the time of BM diagnosis. Median survival time ranged from 2 to 9.6 months, and overall survival (OS) increased up to 41.1 months in patients on a multimodal therapy regimen. Several factors including age, blood levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), multiple metastases sites, number of brain lesions, and presence of the KRAS mutation were predictors of OS. For BM diagnosis, MRI was considered to be state of the art. Treatment consisted of a combination of surgery, radiation, or systemic treatment.

Prognostic factors of colorectal cancer patients with brain metastases

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare (≈2%) but are increasing with the improvement of CRC prognosis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of BM from CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients with BM from CRC diagnosed between 2000 and 2017.

THEORY/CALCULATION

Prognostic factors of OS were evaluated in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate analyses (Cox regression model). These prognostic factors could help the management of patients with BM from CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients were included with a median age of 65.5 years. Primary tumors were mostly located in the rectum (42.4%) or left colon (37.2%) and frequently KRAS-mutated (56.9%). The median time from metastatic CRC diagnosis to BM diagnosis was 18.5 ± 2.5 months. BMs were predominantly single (56.9%) and only supratentorial (54.4%). BM resection was performed in 33.0% of the cases and 73.2% of patients had brain radiotherapy alone or after surgery. Median OS was 5.1 ± 0.3 months. In multivariate analysis, age under 65 years, ECOG performance status 0-1, single BM and less than 3 chemotherapy lines before BM diagnosis were associated with better OS. Prognostic scores, i.e. recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), Disease Specific-Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA), Gastro-Intestinal-Graded Prognostic Assessment (GI-GPA) and the nomogram were statistically significantly associated with OS but the most relevant prognosis criteria seemed the ECOG performance status 0-1.

CONCLUSIONS

ECOG performance status, number of BM and number of chemotherapy lines are the most relevant factors in the management of patients with BM from CRC.

Brain metastases from primary colorectal cancer: is radiosurgery an effective treatment approach? Results of a multicenter study of the radiation and clinical oncology Italian association (AIRO)

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of brain metastatic colorectal cancer patients (BMCRC) is poor. Several local treatments have been used, but the optimal treatment choice remains an unresolved issue. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a large series of BMCRC patients treated in several Italian centers using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

185 BMCRC patients for a total of 262 lesions treated were evaluated. Treatments included surgery followed by post-operative SRS to the resection cavity, and SRS, either single-fraction, then hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Outcomes was measured in terms of local control (LC), toxicities, brain distant failure (BDF), and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors influencing survival were assed too.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 3-183 months). Surgery plus SRS have been performed in 28 (10.7%) cases, SRS in 141 (53.8%), and HSRS in 93 (35.5%). 77 (41.6%) patients received systemic therapy. The main total dose and fractionation used were 24 Gy in single fraction or 24 Gy in three daily fractions. Local recurrence occurred in 32 (17.3%) patients. Median, 6 months,1-year-LC were 86 months (95%CI 36-86), 87.2% ± 2.8, 77.8% ± 4.1. Median,6 months,1-year-BDF were 23 months (95%CI 9-44), 66.4% ± 3.9, 55.3% ± 4.5. Median,6 months,1-year-OS were 7 months (95% CI 6-9), 52.7% ± 3.6, 33% ± 3.5. No severe neurological toxicity occurred. Stage at diagnosis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), presence and number of extracranial metastases, and disease-specific-graded-prognostic-assessment (DS-GPA) score were observed as conditioning survival.

CONCLUSION

SRS/HSRS have proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors as well as a multidisciplinary evaluation is a valid aid to manage the optimal therapeutic strategy for CTC patients with BMs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The prognosis of BMCRC is poor. Several local treatments was used, but optimal treatment choice remains undefined. Radiosurgery has proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors and a multidisciplinary evaluation needed.

Validation of the graded prognostic assessment for gastrointestinal cancers with brain metastases (GI-GPA)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to validate a new prognostic model (GI-GPA) originally derived from a multi-center database (USA, Canada, Japan).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 92 German and Norwegian patients treated with individualized approaches, always including brain radiotherapy. Information about age, extracranial spread, number of brain metastases, performance status and other variables was collected. The GI-GPA score was calculated as described by Sperduto et al. RESULTS: Median survival was 4 months. The corresponding figures for the 4 different prognostic strata were 2.3, 4.4, 9.4 and 12.7 months, respectively (p = 0.0001). Patients whose management included surgical resection had longer median survival than those who were treated with other approaches (median 11.9 versus 3.0 months, p = 0.002). Comparable results were seen for additional systemic therapy (median 8.5 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the validity of the GI-GPA in an independent dataset from a different geographical region, despite the fact that overall survival was shorter in all prognostic strata, compared to Sperduto et al. Potential explanations include differences in molecular tumor characteristics and treatment selection, both brain metastases-directed and extracranially. Long-term survival beyond 5 years is possible in a small minority of patients.

Pulmonary metastasis in newly diagnosed colon-rectal cancer: a population-based nomogram study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high worldwide incidence with a tendency to metastasize to the lungs. We aimed to identify clinical factors related to lung metastasis (LM) and analyze the prognosis of patients after LM.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for LM from CRC. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to identify potentially important prognostic factors for patients with LM.

RESULTS

Age (p = 0.010), tumor size (p < 0.001), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), race (p < 0.001), tumor site (p < 0.001), liver metastasis (p < 0.001), brain metastasis (p < 0.001), bone metastasis (p < 0.001), serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p < 0.001), and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (p < 0.001) were associated with a risk of LM from CRC. All factors (all, p < 0.001) except tumor size (p = 0.095) and race (p = 0.650) were related to the overall survival of patients. Two nomograms were formulated to visually predict lung metastasis risk and 1-, 3-, and 5- year overall survivals for patients with LM. The concordance indices were 0.754 and 0.749, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, tumor size, histological grade, serum levels of CEA, tumor site, surgery modalities of CRC, CRM, number of positive lymph nodes, and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for LM from CRC. The nomograms we developed can be effectively used to forecast the risk of LM and predict the survival for LM from CRC.

Treatment modalities and relative survival in patients with brain metastasis from colorectal cancer

Standard treatment options for brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment modalities and provide optimal therapeutic strategies for selected patients with different clinical characteristics. All eligible patients diagnosed with BM from CRC during the past two decades (1997-2016) were identified in our center. Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and relative survival were retrospectively analyzed. Median overall survival after the identification of BM was 6 months. The 1- and 2- year survival rates were 29.40% and 5.70%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the number of BMs, Karnofsky performance score and the treatment modalities were found to be independent prognostic factors (the p-value was 0.006, 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, multidisciplinary treatment is supported to be the optimal treatment for patients with BM from CRC. For patients with single brain metastases and KPS > 70, neurosurgery combined with chemotherapy could provide an additional survival benefit. For patients with multiple brain metastases or KPS ≤ 70, radiotherapy plus chemotherapy may be appropriate.

Pathological and Molecular Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer with Brain Metastases

Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) with brain metastases (BM) are scarcely described. The main objective of this study was to determine the molecular profile of CRC with BM. Methods: We included 82 CRC patients with BM. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and mismatch repair (MMR) status were investigated on primary tumors (n = 82) and BM (n = 38). ALK, ROS1, cMET, HER-2, PD-1, PD-L1, CD3 and CD8 status were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and when recommended, by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: In primary tumors, KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations were observed in 56%, 6%, and 6% of cases, respectively. No ROS1, ALK and cMET rearrangement was detected. Only one tumor presented HER-2 amplification. Molecular profiles were mostly concordant between BM and paired primary tumors, except for 9% of discordances for RAS mutation. CD3, CD8, PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions presented some discordance between primary tumors and BM. In multivariate analysis, multiple BM, lung metastases and PD-L1+ tumor were predictive of poor overall survival. Conclusions: CRCs with BM are associated with high frequency of RAS mutations and significant discordance for RAS mutational status between BM and paired primary tumors. Multiple BM, lung metastases and PD-L1+ have been identified as prognostic factors and can guide therapeutic decisions for CRC patients with BM.

Brain metastases in colorectal cancer: prognostic factors and survival analysis

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) brain metastases (BM) are an uncommon and late event. We aim to investigate the impact of clinical factors, treatment modalities and RAS/BRAF status on the outcomes of CRC patients with BM.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively analysed CRC patients who developed BM in our centre between January 1997 and June 2017. Clinical factors, treatment modalities, RAS/BRAF status and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were recorded; 82% had left-sided (LS) CRC and 71% had lung metastases. Median time to BM diagnosis was 36 months (m) and 93% of patients received local treatment of BM (43% whole brain radiotherapy, 50% surgery). Right-sided (RS) CRC showed shorter time to BM, not previously described (9.3 vs 46.6 m for RS and LS CRC, respectively; HR = 4.7, p = 0.006). Median overall survival (mOS) from BM treatment was 9.5 m, better in patients who underwent surgery than those treated with radiotherapy alone (12.1 vs 4.6 m, respectively; HR = 0.3, p = 0.019) and in those without progressive metastatic extracranial disease (7.2 vs 20.9 m, for progressive and non-progressive, respectively; HR = 0.3, p = 0.056). Patients with two or more metastatic extracranial locations showed worse prognosis (5.9 vs 16.3 m, for > 2 vs 0-1, respectively; HR = 3.7, p = 0.015). RAS/BRAF status did not showed prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

Time to BM diagnosis is shorter in RS CRC. The presence of two or more metastatic extracranial locations and progressive metastatic extracranial disease at the time of BM diagnosis could be bad prognosis factors for CRC BM patients.

Novel graded prognostic assessment for colorectal cancer patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

It is important to take into account potential prognostic factors to select patients with brain metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) who will benefit from active neurosurgical treatment. Therefore, we experimentally investigated our single institutional data to develop a novel CRC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) and to help clinicians determine the optimal management.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 107 patients with brain metastases from CRC who received any kind of treatment in our hospital and had sufficient clinical information.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 5.2 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 23.7 and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of brain metastases ≥ 6, presence of neurologic symptoms, and elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (≥ 30 ng/ml) were the independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival, while performance status was not. Based on this, we developed the CRC-specific GPA index and stratified patients into three categories. The median overall survival for patients with GPA scores of 0-0.5, 1.0-1.5, and 2.0-2.5 was 2.3, 4.3, and 12.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery ± whole-brain radiotherapy showed a better survival than palliative whole-brain radiotherapy alone in patients with high GPA scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel CRC-specific GPA index, which could help physicians to stratify patients with brain metastases. Further efforts are needed to validate and improve this index.

Colorectal cancer and brain metastases: An aggressive disease with a different response to treatment

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases (BM) are rare in colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with a dismal prognosis. This work aims to report the rate of BM in CRC patients treated in a single institution, along with survival and prognostic factors.

METHODS

Medical charts for patients with histologically proven CRC were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 538 patients were identified, of whom 33% developed any metastatic disease and 4.4% presented BM. Lung was the most frequently associated metastatic site (in 68% of the cases). The only factor independently associated with BM development was the presence of metastatic disease at the time of initial presentation. The median duration from initial diagnosis to BM development was 38.6 months (SD 29.1 months). Median survival after BM development was 62 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 56-68). Patients diagnosed with BM within 1 year of cancer diagnosis responded significantly better to treatment than those who acquired BM later, with a median survival after BM diagnosis of 261 days versus 61 days, respectively (p = .002). Patients with BM who received antiangiogenic therapy had an improved median survival compared to those who did not (151 days vs 59 days, p = 0.02; hazard ratio for death 0.29 [95% CI 0.09-0.94]).

CONCLUSION

CRC with BM is an aggressive disease resistant to standard treatment and is associated with poor outcomes. Adding antiangiogenic therapy might be of value for those patients. Patients with BM developing early in the disease course might respond better to treatment.

Brain metastasis from colorectal cancer: a single center experience

Purpose

The detection rate of brain metastasis (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. This study was designed to analyze the clinical features of BM and prognosis according to the therapeutic modalities.

Methods

A total of 19 cases were collected in this study between November 2008 and December 2015. We reviewed the patients' demographic data and the clinical features of BM retrospectively and investigated their prognostic significance.

Results

Nineteen patients included 8 male and 11 female patients. The median age at diagnosis of BM was 62.4 years (range, 32–83 years). The median interval between diagnosis of CRC and BM was 39 months (range, 0–98 months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) had extracranial metastasis at the diagnosis of BM. Lung was the most common site of extracranial metastasis in 14 patients (73.7%). Synchronous BMs were found at the diagnosis of primary CRC in 2 patients (10.5%). The location of primary CRC was the colon in 6 patients (31.6%) and the rectum in 13 patients (68.4%). At the diagnosis of BM, 10 patients (52.6%) had a solitary BM. The common neurologic symptoms were headache in 8 cases (42.1%) and ataxia in 6 cases (31.6%). The median survival after the diagnosis of BM was 3 months (range, 1–10 months). The patients who underwent surgery plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) had an improved survival (range, 3–10 months) than the other patients (range, 1–6 months) (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

In patients with BM from CRC, surgical resection plus SRS might improve survival.

Brain metastases from colorectal cancer: characteristics and management

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults, but they rarely arise from colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this study was to report an overview of the characteristics and current management of CRC BMs.

METHODS

A systematic review on CRC BMs was performed using Medline database from 1983 to 2015. The search was limited to studies published in English. Review articles, not relevant case report or studies or studies relating to animal and in vitro experiments were excluded.

RESULTS

BMs occurred in 0.06-4% of patients with CRC. Most BMs were metachronous and were associated with lung (27-92%) and liver (12-80%) metastases. Treatment options depended on the number of BMs, the general conditions of the patient and the presence of other metastases. Most frequent treatment was whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone (36%), with median overall survival comprised between 2 and 9 months. Median overall survival was better after surgery alone (from 3 to 16.2 months), or combined with WBRT (from 7.6 to 14 months). After stereotactic radiosurgery alone, overall survival could reach 9.5 months. Many favourable prognostic factors were identified, such as high Karnofsky performance status, low recursive partitioning analysis classes, lack of extracranial disease, low number of BMs and possibility to perform surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

BMs from CRC are rare. In the presence of favourable prognostic factors, an aggressive management including surgical resection with or without WBRT or stereotactic radiosurgery can improve the overall survival.

Stereotactic radiation therapy of brain metastases from colorectal cancer: A single institution cohort

PURPOSE

The brain remains an uncommon site of colorectal cancer metastases. Due to the improvement of overall colorectal cancer patient survival, the incidence of brain metastases will likely rise. We report the efficacy and safety of hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, and its role in colorectal cancer brain metastasis management.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Between June 2010 and December 2014, fifteen consecutive patients received hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery as first local therapy or following surgical removal for colorectal cancer brain metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were brain progression free survival, in field control rates and safety.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 41 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: [8.9-73.1 months]), median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI [4.7-11.3 months]), and median brain progression-free survival was 5 months (95% CI [3.9-6.1 months]). Five in field recurrences were observed, which makes a control rate per metastases at 6 and 12 months of 77.8% (95% CI [74.34%-81.26%]), 51.9% (95% CI [44.21%-59.59%]) respectively. Over the 19 treatment sequences, five in field recurences were observed: 6, 12 and 18 months control rate per treatment sequence were 93.3% (95% CI [90.42%-96.18%]), 68.1% (95% CI [62.03%-74.17%]) and 45.4% (95% CI [36.14%-54.66%]) respectively. Immediate tolerance was good with no toxicity grade III or more. Long-term toxicity included two radionecrosis among which, one was symptomatic.

DISCUSSION

The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery are effective and safe treatment modalities for single and multiple small brain metastases from colorectal cancer. However, results need to be confirmed by multicenter, collected data.

Risk factors for brain metastases in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare, but the incidence is suspected to rise as treatment of metastatic (m) CRC improves. The aim of this study was to identify possible biological and clinical characteristics at initial presentation of mCRC that could predict later risk of developing BM. Furthermore, we wished to estimate the incidence of BM in long-term surviving patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on a Danish multicenter cohort of patients with mCRC who received cetuximab and irinotecan (CetIri) as third-line treatment. All patients had previously progression on 5-FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin containing regimens and received CetIri treatment independent of RAS mutations status. We subsequently performed KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PTEN, ERBB2 and EGFR sequencing of DNA extracted from primary tumor tissue.

RESULTS

Totally, 480 patients were included in our study. BM were diagnosed in 42 [8.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4-11.6%] patients. Patients with BM had a significantly longer survival from mCRC diagnosis than non-BM patients (median = 32 versus 28 months, p = 0.001). On univariate cox regression analysis, the risk of developing BM was significantly increased in patients with rectal cancer (HR = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.2-13.3), metachronous metastatic disease (HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.2-4.4) and lung metastases (HR = 4.2; 95% CI = 2.2-7.9). On multivariate cox regression analysis only lung metastases were significantly associated BM (HR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.8-6.8). None of the investigated mutations were associated with BM.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of BM was 8.8% in patients with mCRC who received third-line therapy. The most important risk factor for developing BM was lung metastases. Furthermore, rectal cancer, metachronous metastatic disease and long survival were linked to BM development.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer who develop brain metastasis: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

The development of brain metastasis (BM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is a rare and late event. We sought to investigate the clinical characteristics, disease course and safety using biologic agents in our patients with CRC who develop brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with CRC with brain metastases treated at our institution from 01/2005-01/2015 was performed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 55.5 years, 67.5% were males, and 28% had a KRAS mutation. Twenty-four percent were treatment-naive at the time of BM diagnosis. Patients had a median of two brain lesions. Sixty-five percent of the patients were treated with radiotherapy alone, 22.5% had both surgical resection and brain radiotherapy. Median overall survival was 3.2 months after development of BM. Overall survival was longer in patients who received combined modality local therapy compared to patients treated with surgical resection or radiotherapy alone. Patients who received systemic treatment incorporating biologics following development of BM had a median overall survival of 18.6 months. Overall, the administration of biologic agents was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, BM is an uncommon and late event in the natural history of metastatic CRC. The ability to deliver combined-modality local brain therapy as well as availability of more systemic therapy options appear to lead to improved outcomes.

Analysis of patients with colorectal cancer and brain metastases

Brain metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) are relatively rare. However, the incidences of brain metastasis have increased. We investigated 516 CRC patients who developed recurrence or metastatic disease. We investigated the primary site, distant metastasis, histological type, clinical features of processes of death and neurological symptoms. Brain metastases were detected in 5.8%. Odds ratios were 6.89 for the lung metastasis (p < 0.001), 0.43 for the liver (p = 0.04). The survival after brain metastasis was significantly poor in multiple brain metastases (hazard ratio: 4.12; p = 0.03) and poor performance status (hazard ratio: 5.38; p = 0.003). Lung metastasis is a higher factor and liver metastasis is a lower factor of brain metastasis. Survival after brain metastasis was poor in multiple brain metastasis and poor performance status.

Systematic review: brain metastases from colorectal cancer--Incidence and patient characteristics

Background

Brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are a rare event. However, the implications for affected patients are severe, and the incidence has been reported to be increasing. For clinicians, knowledge about the characteristics associated with BM is important and could lead to earlier diagnosis and improved survival.

Method

In this paper, we describe the incidence as well as characteristics associated with BM based on a systematic review of the current literature, following the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

We show that the incidence of BM in CRC patients ranges from 0.6 to 3.2 %. BM are a late stage phenomenon, and young age, rectal primary and lung metastases are associated with increased risk of developing BM. Molecular markers such as KRAS, BRAF, NRAS mutation as well as an increase in CEA and CA19.9 levels are suggested predictors of brain involvement. However, only KRAS mutations are reasonably well investigated and associated with an increased risk of BM.

Conclusion

The incidence of BM from CRC is 0.6 to 3.2 % and did not seem to increase over time. Development of BM is associated with young age, lung metastases, rectal primary and KRAS mutation. Increased awareness of brain involvement in patients with these characteristics is necessary.

Predicted survival in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer: Is a current nomogram helpful?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical applicability of a new nomogram by comparing survival of patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy in the authors' institutions with nomogram-predicted median survival.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 64 patients treated with comparable approaches and during the same time period as the patients in the nomogram study. Points were assigned for age, performance status, number and site of brain metastases, as required for nomogram use.

RESULTS

In 46 patients (72%), the observed survival was shorter than the predicted median. The median deviation was -1.4 months. The nomogram underestimated the survival of patients treated with radiosurgery/surgery by a median of 4.2 months, whereas it overestimated the survival of patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) by a median of 2.1 months (p=0.0001). Nevertheless, all 5 patients with predicted median survival ≤3 months died within 3 months. Among 8 patients with predicted median survival >12 months, 6 (75%) survived for >12 months. Not all prognostic factors in the nomogram correlated with survival. In the multivariate Cox model, only performance status and number of brain metastases were significant, both with p=0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in prognostic factors and survival of many individual patients, especially those with intermediate prognosis, the nomogram performed promising in poor- and good-prognosis patients. Evaluation of separate prediction tools for patients treated with WBRT and more aggressive local approaches appears warranted in order to minimize the influence of better local control of the brain metastases.

Colorectal cancer metastatic to the brain: analysis of prognostic factors and impact of KRAS mutations on presentation and outcome

BACKGROUND

Treatment concepts for metastatic colorectal cancer continue to evolve. While the presence of RAS mutations impacts systemic therapy, little is known about the influence of such mutations in patients with brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pooled retrospective analysis was conducted of 57 patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer treated in two different institutions (2005-2013).

RESULTS

The only mutations analyzed in a relatively large subgroup were KRAS mutations (14 wild type, 12 mutated). Mutation status was not associated with baseline characteristics such as number or location of metastases, and did not impact prognosis. Three factors were significantly associated with survival in multivariate analysis: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), management strategy, and systemic treatment. Median survival was 0.6 months with best supportive care, 3.0 months with initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 12.7 months if initial treatment included surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), p = 0.0001. The survival difference between the WBRT and surgery/SRS groups was largest in patients with KPS 80-100.

CONCLUSION

Effective local treatment was a prerequisite for improved survival. The only significant prognostic baseline factor was KPS, which forms the basis of the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) score. Thus, our results validate the DS-GPA in this patient population. So far, neither this nor other studies suggest a clinically important impact of KRAS mutations beyond their previously reported association with development of brain metastases. Studies focusing on patients who develop brain metastases early during the course of metastatic disease might be warranted, because the influence of different systemic therapies might be larger in this subgroup.