Systemic chemotherapy followed by locoregional definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy yields prolonged survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis

A prospective, single-arm trial of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemoradiotherapy for solitary metachronous metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Initial treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (R/M NPC) often involves Gemcitabine plus cisplatin with or without PD-1 inhibitors. However, PD-1 inhibitors' effectiveness varies, prompting for better treatments. This study explores effect and safety of combining PD-1 inhibitors with chemoradiotherapy for oligometastatic NPC patients.

METHODS

Oligometastatic NPC patients underwent radical treatment with PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, followed by concurrent PD-1 inhibitors and chemoradiotherapy, and then maintenance PD-1 inhibitors. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated by irRECIST-1.1, and CTCAE-4.0 was used to evaluate the toxicity.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 47 patients with a median age of 46. The median follow-up lasted 16.5 months, with metastatic lesions receiving a median radiation dose of 45 Gy. The median courses of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy were 9.5 and 5 respectively. The metastasis sites included lung (40.8 %), liver (21.1 %), mediastinal lymph node (7.9 %), abdominal lymph nodes (3.9 %), bone (21.1 %), adrenal gland (3.9 %), and brain (1.3 %). ORR and DCR were 85.1 % and 100 % at 3 months after radiotherapy. The median survival was not reached yet, and 1 and 2-year OS rates were 93.1 % and 78.4 %. The median PFS was 18 months, with 1 and 2-year PFS rates of 70.2 % and 47.7 % respectively. PD-L1 expression showed a positive correlation for PFS. Twenty-five patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) that were possibly related to chemotherapy. No grade 5 AE was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The synergy of concurrent PD-1 inhibitors and chemoradiotherapy shows promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity for oligometastasis NPC patients.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to treat initial distant metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated plus chemotherapy in patients with initially distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2014 and June 2020, 35 patients initially diagnosed with mNPC were enrolled on prospective trial. The enrolled patients were assigned randomly to receive either hypofractionated plus chemotherapy (HFRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CFRT). 60 Gy over 25 fractions was administered to the HFRT group (n = 17) and 69.96 Gy over 33 fractions was administered to the CFRT group (n = 18), both groups five times each week.Progression free survival (PFS) comprised the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and acute and late toxicity comprised the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (seven were excluded) were enrolled. The 2-year PFS was 33.3% (HFRT group) versus 30.0% (CFRT group) (stratified hazard ratio (HR):1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-2.65, P = 0.843). The 2-year OS was 66.7% (HFRT group) versus with 62.5% (CFRT group) (stratified HR, 0.88; 95% CI; 0.31-2.51, P = 0.806). All patients experienced acute grade 1 or 2, skin toxicity, oral mucositis, difficulty swallowing, xerostomia, but no acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities. All patients had grade 1 late xerostomia. Two patients experienced hearing loss in the HFRT group (one grade 1 and one grade 3), and three patients experienced grade 1 hearing loss in the CFRT group. One patient developed mucosal necrosis in the HFRT group.

CONCLUSION

Improving the balance between severe late toxicities and local control by appropriately reducing the total dose but increasing the fractionated dose has marked clinical significance for those patients.

Machine learning explainability in nasopharyngeal cancer survival using LIME and SHAP

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has a unique histopathology compared with other head and neck cancers. Individual NPC patients may attain different outcomes. This study aims to build a prognostic system by combining a highly accurate machine learning model (ML) model with explainable artificial intelligence to stratify NPC patients into low and high chance of survival groups. Explainability is provided using Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) techniques. A total of 1094 NPC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for model training and internal validation. We combined five different ML algorithms to form a uniquely stacked algorithm. The predictive performance of the stacked algorithm was compared with a state-of-the-art algorithm-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to stratify the NPC patients into chance of survival groups. We validated our model with temporal validation (n = 547) and geographic external validation (Helsinki University Hospital NPC cohort, n = 60). The developed stacked predictive ML model showed an accuracy of 85.9% while the XGBoost had 84.5% after the training and testing phases. This demonstrated that both XGBoost and the stacked model showed comparable performance. External geographic validation of XGBoost model showed a c-index of 0.74, accuracy of 76.7%, and area under curve of 0.76. The SHAP technique revealed that age of the patient at diagnosis, T-stage, ethnicity, M-stage, marital status, and grade were among the prominent input variables in decreasing order of significance for the overall survival of NPC patients. LIME showed the degree of reliability of the prediction made by the model. In addition, both techniques showed how each feature contributed to the prediction made by the model. LIME and SHAP techniques provided personalized protective and risk factors for each NPC patient and unraveled some novel non-linear relationships between input features and survival chance. The examined ML approach showed the ability to predict the chance of overall survival of NPC patients. This is important for effective treatment planning care and informed clinical decisions. To enhance outcome results, including survival in NPC, ML may aid in planning individualized therapy for this patient population.

An Exploratory Study of Refining TNM-8 M1 Categories and Prognostic Subgroups Using Plasma EBV DNA for Previously Untreated De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

(1) Background: NPC patients with de novo distant metastasis appears to be a heterogeneous group who demonstrate a wide range of survival, as suggested by growing evidence. Nevertheless, the current 8th edition of TNM staging (TNM-8) grouping all these patients into the M1 category is not able to identify their survival differences. We sought to identify any anatomic and non-anatomic subgroups in this study. (2) Methods: Sixty-nine patients with treatment-naive de novo M1 NPC (training cohort) were prospectively recruited from 2007 to 2018. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses (UVA and MVA) to explore anatomic distant metastasis factors, which were significantly prognostic of overall survival (OS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) with the incorporation of significant factors from MVA was then performed to derive a new set of RPA stage groups with OS segregation (Set 1 Anatomic-RPA stage groups); another run of MVA was performed with the addition of pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA. A second-round RPA with significant prognostic factors of OS identified in this round of MVA was performed again to derive another set of stage groups (Set 2 Prognostic-RPA stage groups). Both sets were then validated externally with an independent validation cohort of 67 patients with distant relapses of their initially non-metastatic NPC (rM1) after radical treatment. The performance of models in survival segregation was evaluated by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and concordance index (C-index) under 1000 bootstrapping samples for the validation cohort; (3) Results: The 3-year OS and median follow-up in the training cohort were 36.0% and 17.8 months, respectively. Co-existence of liver-bone metastases was the only significant prognostic factor of OS in the first round UVA and MVA. Set 1 RPA based on anatomic factors that subdivide the M1 category into two groups: M1a (absence of co-existing liver-bone metastases; median OS 28.1 months) and M1b (co-existing liver-bone metastases; median OS 19.2 months, p = 0.023). When pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA was also added, it became the only significant prognostic factor in UVA (p = 0.001) and MVA (p = 0.015), while co-existing liver-bone metastases was only significant in UVA. Set 2 RPA with the incorporation of pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA yielded good segregation (M1a: EBV DNA ≤ 2500 copies/mL and M1b: EBV DNA > 2500 copies/mL; median OS 44.2 and 19.7 months, respectively, p < 0.001). Set 2 Prognostic-RPA groups (AIC: 228.1 [95% CI: 194.8−251.8] is superior to Set 1 Anatomic-RPA groups (AIC: 278.5 [254.6−301.2]) in the OS prediction (p < 0.001). Set 2 RPA groups (C-index 0.59 [95% CI: 0.54−0.67]) also performed better prediction agreement in the validation cohort (vs. Set 1: C-index 0.47 [95% CI: 0.41−0.53]) (p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: Our Anatomic-RPA stage groups yielded good segregation for de novo M1 NPC, and prognostication was further improved by incorporating plasma EBV DNA. These new RPA stage groups for M1 NPC can be applied to countries/regions regardless of whether reliable and sensitive plasma EBV DNA assays are available or not.

Addition of chemoradiotherapy to palliative chemotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

To determine whether concurrent chemotherapy is necessary during locoregional radiotherapy (RT) after palliative chemotherapy (PCT) in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).

Methods

A total of 746 patients with mNPC from 2000 to 2017 at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 355 patients received PCT followed by RT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazards models, landmark analyses, propensity score matching, and subgroup analyses were used to address confounding.

Results

Of the patients included in our study, 192 received radiotherapy alone after PCT (PCT + RT), and 163 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy after PCT (PCT + CCRT). The prognosis of PCT + CCRT was significantly better than that of PCT + RT (5 year OS, 53.0 vs 36.2%; P = 0.004). After matching, the 5 year OS rates of the two groups were 55.7 and 39.0%, respectively (P = 0.034) and the median DPFS were 29.4 and 18.7 months, respectively (P = 0.052). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that PCT + CCRT was an independent favorable prognostic factor (P = 0.009). In addition, conducting concurrent chemoradiotherapy after 4–6 cycles of PCT or conducting concurrent chemotherapy with single-agent platinum was associated with significant survival benefit in the matched cohort (5 year OS rate, 60.4 or 57.4%, respectively). The survival difference between groups remained significant when evaluating patients who survived for ≥ 1 year (P = 0.028).

Conclusions

The optimal treatment strategy of mNPC is the combination of PCT followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. More specifically, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with single-agent platinum after 4–6 cycles of PCT is suggested.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02464-7.

Local radiotherapy versus nonradiotherapy to distant lesions for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficiency of local radiotherapy to metastatic lesions in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).

METHODS

The overall survival was observed and compared for mNPC patients who received local radiotherapy versus nonradiotherapy to metastatic lesions by using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine patients with NPC were involved in this study, with 61 (56.0%) received radiotherapy to metastatic sites and 48 (44.0%) did not receive radiotherapy to metastatic sites. The 2- and 5-year OS for patients who received local radiotherapy to metastatic lesions were 65.8% and 35.7%, and for patients who did not receive radiotherapy to metastatic lesions were 45.3% and 26.2%. The multivariable adjusted hazard radios for local radiotherapy versus nonradiotherapy to metastatic lesions were 0.482 (95% confidence interval is 0.278-0.834, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Local radiotherapy to metastatic lesions might be a protective factor for patients with mNPC.

Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for 129 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients With Synchronous Metastases: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To analyze the therapeutic effect and prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with distant metastases at initial diagnosis receiving induction chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods

A total of 129 patients who underwent platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by definitive IMRT with or without concurrent or adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed distant metastatic NPC in our center between March 2008 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. 41 patients underwent local therapy for metastatic sites. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to figure out independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 66 patients had been dead (median follow-up time, 51.5 months). The median overall survival (OS) time was 54.2 months (range, 7-136 months), and the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year overall survival rates were 88.0%,71.0%,58.0%, and 47.0%. Multivariate analysis found that the factors correlated with poor overall survival were pre-treatment serum lactate dehydrogenase (SLDH) >180U/L, chemotherapy cycles<4, and M1 stage subdivision (M1b, single hepatic metastasis and/or multiple metastases excluding the liver; and M1c, multiple hepatic metastases). The 5-year OS rates for M1a, M1b and M1c were 62.6%,40.4% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Platinum-containing induction chemotherapy combined with IMRT seemed to be advantageous to prolong survival for some NPC patients with synchronous metastases at initial diagnosis. The independent factors to prognosticate OS were pre-treatment SLDH, number of chemotherapy cycles, and M1 subcategories. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the result.

Identifying the optimal candidates for locoregional radiation therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the value of locoregional radiation therapy (LRRT) in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) and identify suitable candidates for additional LRRT after palliative chemotherapy (PCT).

METHODS

Patients with de novo mNPC received platinum-based chemotherapy for a minimum of four cycles with or without definitive LRRT via intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were all candidates for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included for this analysis. Additional LRRT was associated with significantly longer median OS (69.5 vs. 17.8 months, p < 0.001) when compared with PCT alone. However, this survival benefit of LRRT was only reflected in patients with oligometastatic diseases (90.8 vs. 17 months, p < 0.001), but not for those with polymetastatic disease (p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional LRRT after PCT may only improve OS for oligometastatic patients. For patients with polymetastatic disease, intensive systemic treatment such as the combination of immunotherapy and adequate PCT might be necessary.

Prognostic model for risk stratification of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy followed by locoregional radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

There is no clinically applicable prognostic model designed for patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) treated with chemotherapy followed by locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). We sought to develop a predictive tool of overall survival for individualized prediction and risk stratification in this heterogeneous patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 244 eligible patients with de novo mNPC, who were treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy followed by LRRT, were included in this retrospective study. We divided patients into the training and validation sets based on the date of initial treatment, with 152 patients treated between 2008 and 2013 comprising the training set for model development and 92 patients treated at a later time (2014 to 2015) forming the validation set. We applied Cox proportional hazards model to examine factors associated with overall survival (OS). We developed and subsequently validated a prognostic model to predict OS. We assessed the performance of this prognostic model and stratified patients based on prognostic scores obtained from this proposed model.

RESULTS

The median OS of the entire cohort was 60.9 months. C-creative protein, number of metastatic sites, liver metastasis, post-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA, and response of metastasis were significantly associated with OS. A prognostic model for individual survival prediction was developed and graphically represented as a nomogram. The model showed favorable discrimination (C-index: 0.759), predictive accuracy [time dependent area under the curve (tAUC) at 5 years: 0.800], and calibration, and was further validated in an independent dataset. A risk stratification derived from the model can stratify these patients into three prognostic subgroups with significantly different survival.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a prognostic model that exhibited adequate performance in individualized prediction and risk stratification for patients with de novo mNPC treated with chemotherapy followed by LRRT.

Optimizing the Treatment Pattern for De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives

To investigate the optimal treatment pattern in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

We assessed 502 consecutive and unselected de novo metastatic NPC patients in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from November 2006 to October 2016 in our study. All patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) and 308 patients received locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) subsequently. Our primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results

The patients treated with LRRT were associated with improved survival on univariate analysis (3-year OS rate 63.7% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001). The overall survival benefit of more than 4 PCT cycles was significant in female (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.86, P = 0.016) and patients with multiple metastatic sites (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66, P < 0.001). The application of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) was not associated with better survival among patients receiving LRRT (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86, P = 0.141).

Conclusion

LRRT prolonged survival in de novo metastatic NPC. For patients treated with multiple metastatic sites, more than 4 cycles of PCT is necessary. CCT does not improve survival in de novo metastatic NPC patients.

Synchronous Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Characteristics and Survival of Patients Adding Definitive Nasopharyngeal-Neck Radiotherapy to Systematic Chemotherapy

Purpose

To determine the M1 sub-staging in synchronous metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (smNPC) and to examine the effect of nasopharyngeal-neck radiotherapy (RT) and local treatment of metastases on overall survival (OS) of smNPC patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 150 patients with smNPC were included. Metastatic characteristics associated with their potential prognostic significance were analyzed. Then, a stratification system of the M1 sub-staging in smNPC was provided according to metastatic features. Moreover, the OS of patients with or without nasopharyngeal-neck RT was compared by Log rank test. The OS of patients who received or did not receive local treatment of metastases was also analyzed.

Results

We successfully divided the M1 stage into three sub-staging: M1a (a single site with a single lesion), M1b (a single site with multiple lesions), and M1c (multiple sites with multiple lesions). The median OS was 53.2, 25.8, and 18.9 months for M1a, M1b, and M1c, respectively (p < 0.001). Nasopharyngeal-neck RT plus systematic chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved OS compared to systematic CT (median OS, 34.0 vs 15.2 months, p = 0.002). However, incorporation of local treatment of metastases did not bring survival benefit to smNPC patients who received nasopharyngeal-neck RT plus systematic CT (median OS, 25.8 vs 35.1 months, p = 0.374).

Conclusion

The sub-staging of the M1 stage in smNPC had promising prognostic value. Adding nasopharyngeal-neck RT on the basis of systematic CT markedly improved the survival of smNPC patients, while addition of local treatment of metastases to nasopharyngeal-neck RT plus systematic CT for smNPC needed further exploration.

Development of a Prognostic Model to Identify the Suitable Definitive Radiation Therapy Candidates in de Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop an accurate prognostic model to identify suitable candidates for definitive radiation therapy (DRT) in addition to palliative chemotherapy (PCT) among patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with de novo mNPC who received first-line PCT with or without DRT were included. Overall survival for patients who received PCT alone versus PCT plus DRT was estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted survival analyses. We developed and validated a prognostic model to predict survival and stratify risks in de novo mNPC. A model-based trees approach was applied to estimate stratified treatment effects using prognostic scores obtained from the prognostic model and to identify suitable DRT candidates. Dominance analysis was used to determine the relative importance of each predictor of receiving DRT.

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients were enrolled; 244 received PCT plus DRT and 216 received PCT alone. The 6-month conditional landmark, inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that PCT plus DRT was associated with a significant survival benefit (hazard ratio: 0.516; 95% confidence interval, 0.403-0.660; P < .001). A prognostic model based on 5 independent prognostic factors, including serum lactate dehydrogenase, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastasis, posttreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA level, and response of metastases to chemotherapy was developed and subsequently validated. Prognostic scores obtained from the prognostic model were used for risk stratification and efficacy estimation. High-risk patients identified using the proposed model would not benefit from additional DRT, whereas low-risk patients experienced significant survival benefits. Socioeconomic factors, including insurance status and education level, played an important role in receipt of DRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional DRT after PCT was associated with increased overall survival in patients with de novo mNPC, especially low-risk patients identified with a newly developed prognostic model.

Therapeutic Effect of Chemotherapy Cycle in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Patients Who Developed Bone-Only Metastasis

Background

To compare the effects of chemotherapy dose escalation on survival and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who developed bone-only metastasis.

Material/Methods

Between October 2000 to March 2017, 58 NPC patients with initial bone-only metastasis were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received <6 or ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy were matched and grouped using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The median OS for the entire group was 24 months, while the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 78.5%, 49.4%, and 26.8%, respectively. The median OS for patients who received <6 cycles of chemotherapy was 21 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 64.8%, 34.3%, and 17.2%, respectively. The median OS of patients who received ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy was 26 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 92.6%, 54.9%, and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic sites (≥3 vs. <3) and chemotherapy cycles (<6 vs. ≥6) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

NPC patients who had less than 3 bone metastatic sites and who received ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy had better survival and prognosis.

Systemic chemotherapy and sequential locoregional radiotherapy in initially metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Retrospective analysis with 821 cases

BACKGROUND

We designed this retrospective study to explore the best treatment modality for patients with initially metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

From 2008 to 2017, 821 patients were enrolled. Treatment modalities and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with chemotherapy alone and radiotherapy-based treatment, systemic chemotherapy-sequential locoregional radiotherapy to the nasopharyngeal primary tumor site were associated with a significantly increased 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (40.3%, 11.7%, and 22.9%, P < .001). The overall response rate of the paclitaxel combined with platinum and fluorouracil (TPF) regimen as first-line chemotherapy was higher than that of the paclitaxel plus platinum (TP) regimen (78.2% vs 70.0%, P = .038). A better OS was achieved in the TPF group compared to doublet drug regimens (3-year OS, 35.7% vs 25.3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic chemotherapy-sequential locoregional radiotherapy may prolong OS and progression-free survival for selected patients with initially metastatic NPC.

Oral Maintenance Chemotherapy Using S-1/Capecitabine in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients After Systemic Chemotherapy: A Single-Institution Experience

Background

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated a series of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) patients who received oral maintenance chemotherapy using S-1/capecitabine after systemic chemotherapy and local radiation therapy, and aimed to explore potential efficient treatment strategies for this subset of patients.

Patients and Methods

Thirty-seven patients with mNPC (19 newly diagnosed metastatic patients and 18 metastatic cases after definitive chemoradiotherapy) who received the treatment strategies mentioned above were analyzed.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 37 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 47.6% and 87.7%, respectively. The median time to progression was 27.6 months, while the median OS was not reached at time of last follow-up. The most common acute adverse events were hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, and all were tolerable and curable.

Conclusion

Oral maintenance chemotherapy using S-1/capecitabine in mNPC patients after systemic chemotherapy could yield a superb outcome. Further multicenter prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Effects of oral maintenance chemotherapy and predictive value of circulating EBV DNA in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background/Objectives

Oral maintenance chemotherapy can effectively prolong overall survival (OS) in many types of metastatic cancer, but its role in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is unclear. In this study, the efficacy of oral maintenance chemotherapy in mNPC and the effectiveness of circulating tumor EBV‐DNA for screening patients were evaluated.

Methods

Between June 2016 and December 2017, 141 patients with mNPC who received platinum‐based systemic chemotherapy were included (median follow‐up time, 21 months). Patients were classified into two groups according to the administration of oral maintenance chemotherapy. Plasma samples were collected before, during, and after treatment for the measurement of circulating EBV DNA.

Results

The 2‐year OS was higher for patients who received maintenance chemotherapy than for patients without maintenance chemotherapy (78.9% vs 62.7%, P = .016). Patients with undetectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA after 4‐6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (n = 73) had a higher 2‐year OS than that of patients with detectable EBV‐DNA (n = 68) (82.16% vs 51.45%, P = .001). For patients with undetectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA, OS was better for those with maintenance chemotherapy than for those without (86.7% vs 73%, P = .027). For patients with detectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA, maintenance chemotherapy did not improve outcomes (49.5% vs 55.4%, P = .824). The most common acute events were hematological toxicity, and all were tolerable and curable.

Conclusions

Oral maintenance chemotherapy with S1 or capecitabine can improve OS in mNPC. Posttreatment EBV‐DNA was not only an independent prognosis factor for mNPC but also can screen out beneficiaries of maintenance chemotherapy.

Prognostic model and optimal treatment for patients with stage IVc nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis

The treatment for patients with stage IVc nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at diagnosis was still controversial. In this study, we tried to build a prognostic score model and optimize the treatment for the patients. The prognostic model was based on the primary cohort involving 289 patients from 2002 to 2011 and the validation involving another 156 patients from 2012 to 2015.The prognostic model was built based on the hazard ratios of significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). By multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor OS were Karnofsky performance score ≤70, liver metastases, multiple-organ metastases, ≥2 metastatic lesions, lactate dehydrogenase >245 IU/I and poor response to chemotherapy (all P < 0.01). Based on these prognostic factors, patients were divided into the low-risk (0-2 points), intermediate-risk (3-6 points) and high-risk (≥7 points) groups. Five-year OS rates for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups were 49.3%, 9.7% and 0.0%, respectively (P < 0.01). Furthermore, loco-regional radiotherapy was associated with significantly better OS in low- and intermediate-risk patients, but not in high-risk patients. These results demonstrated that the prognostic score model based on six negative factors can effectively predict OS in patients with stage IVc NPC at diagnosis. Loco-regional radiotherapy may be beneficial for low- and intermediate-risk patients, but not for high-risk patients.

Characteristic And Novel Therapeutic Strategies Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Synchronous Metastasis

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in Western countries, but its incidence in China and Southeast Asia is notably high. NPC shows a high rate of distant metastasis including metachronous metastasis (mmNPC, metastasis after definitive chemo-radiotherapy) and synchronous metastasis (smNPC, metastasis at initial diagnosis). 4–10% of patients would be diagnosed as smNPC annually, and the survival outcomes of these patients are quite poor. As with few clinical trials exclusively focusing on this population, treatment on smNPC is not unified and many problems remain unsolved. To date, systematic chemotherapy (CT) still remains a fundamental treatment in smNPC. Although no randomized trial has been conducted to compare different CT regimens in smNPC, gemcitabine and taxanes in combination with platinum seem optimal in first-line setting. In second-line CT, there is no consensus: mono-chemotherapy with drugs such as gemcitabine, taxanes or capecitabine could be taken into consideration. Immunotherapy based on checkpoint inhibitors shows promising efficacy both in first-line and in the following lines of therapy. In addition to CT, local therapy in smNPC is also very important. Locoregional radiotherapy (RT) for primary tumor in combination with CT could strikingly increase OS with acceptable toxicities. And local treatment, such as surgery and RT, for metastatic lesions could bring extra survival benefit in patients with solitary or limited metastases. Overall, the present study provides an overview of the literature on the various studies of smNPC.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

No nomogram has been established for de novo metastatic NPC patients previously. Thus, we retrospectively involved 502 de novo NPC patients to develop a practical clinical tool by combining prognostic biomarkers to estimate individual risk.

METHODS

The nomogram was based on a primary cohort involving 353 patients from 2007 to 2013; all independent prognostic factors were integrated for inclusion in the model. The predictive accuracy of the model was evaluated by concordance index (C-index). A calibration curve was used to compare predicted and observed survival. We confirmed the results using a validation cohort study on 149 patients enrolled from 2014 to 2016.

RESULTS

Five independent prognostic factors derived from multivariable analysis were entered into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.724. The calibration curves for probability of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) showed satisfactory agreement between predicted survival and actual observed survival. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant difference in survival among different risk groups according to the total score. All results were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

We established a convenient nomogram that provides individual prediction of OS for patients with de novo metastatic NPC.

The combination of systemic therapy and locoregional radiotherapy prolongs survival in newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess the role of locoregional radiotherapy (RT) when used in combination with systemic chemotherapy, for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), in a non-endemic region of northern China.

Methods

In total, 611 patients with NPCs were newly diagnosed between June 2011 and June 2016 following visits to our hospital; of these, 32 patients presented with metastasis at initial diagnosis. Among these 32 patients, 29 had single-organ metastasis and 3 had multiple-organ metastasis. All patients were treated with RT for local and regional disease.

Results

The median follow-up for all patients was 20 months (range 9-59 months), and median survival was not achieved (some patients had succumbed) at the time of the last follow-up. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 75.2%, and 3-year OS rate was 50.1%. There was a significant difference between patients with single- and multiple-organ metastasis: 2-year OS was 67.5% for single- vs 0% for multiple-organ metastasis (p=0.039). Patients treated with intensity-modulated RT had a better prognosis than patients treated by conventional RT: 2-year OS was 76.6% for single- vs 44.4% for multiple-organ metastasis (no significant difference was found between the 2 groups, p=0.297). For patients with progression (all were with distant disease progression), the median progression time was 8 months (6-22 months), and the median survival after disease progression was 6 months (2-14 months).

Conclusion

For patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NPCs, especially with single-organ metastasis, the addition of RT to systemic chemotherapy improved survival and disease control compared with historical cohort.

[Reappraisal role of locoregional radiation therapy in metastatic cancers]

Recent innovations in oncology area helped to improve the prognosis of certain cancers including metastatic ones with a decrease in mortality. Recommendations describe the treatment of metastatic cancer as systemic therapy or complementary care and the role of locoregional treatment in the treatment plan only occurs in a palliative context. Currently, in the clinical practice, out of "the evidence based medicine", an early locoregional therapy (surgery or radiation therapy) can be proposed in several cases of metastatic cancers. The aim of the present review is to describe the role of the primary tumor radiation therapy in metastatic disease. In metastatic breast, prostate, cervix, rectal or nasopharyngeal cancers, locoregional treatment including radiation therapy can, in some cases, be discussed and decided in MDT. Ongoing clinical trials in these locations should soon precise the benefit of this locoregional treatment. It will also be important to define the specific criteria in order to select patients who could benefit from this treatment.