In silico characterization of functional SNP within the oestrogen receptor gene

British Journal of Biomedical Science in 2020. What have we learned?

Each year the British Journal of Biomedical Science publishes a 'What have we learned' editorial designed to introduce readers within the major disciplines of laboratory medicine to developments outside their immediate area. In addition it is designed to inform a wider readership of the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. To this end, in 2020 the journal published 39 articles covering the disciplines within Biomedical Science in the 4 issues comprising volume 77. These included a review of COVID-19 in this issue, 27 original articles, 6 Biomedical Science 'In Brief' and 4 case histories. 27 of the articles involved molecular techniques, with one of these comparing results with a mass spectrometry based method. The preponderance of molecular genetic studies gives us a good idea of the likely future direction of the disciplines.

Increased frequency of ESR1 mutation in metastatic breast cancer by dosing selective estrogen receptor modulator followed by aromatase inhibitor

In several recent studies on metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ligand binding domain mutations of the estrogen receptor, which is coded by the ESR1 gene, were induced by long-term endocrine therapy and resulted in acquired endocrine therapy resistance and poor outcomes. Knowledge of the association between the development of ESR1 mutation and the clinicopathologic features may guide the decision-making process of metastatic breast cancer treatment, including endocrine therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the development of ESR1 mutation and the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with MBC. To evaluate the association between the development of ESR1 mutation and clinicopathologic features, a cohort of 22 patients with MBC were retrospectively analyzed using next generation sequencing. In 14 of 22 patients, four mutations were detected on the metastatic site, including Tyr537Ser, Glu542Asp, Leu536Arg and Arg548Cys. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the duration of aromatase inhibitor and selective estrogen receptor modulator treatment, as well as the age of treatment initiation for early-stage breast cancer, were significantly associated with the development of ESR1 mutation. ESR1 mutation was identified in all five patients who received selective estrogen receptor modulators in the adjuvant setting followed by aromatase inhibitors in the metastatic setting, as well as in two of the three patients who received no selective estrogen receptor modulators in adjuvant setting followed by aromatase inhibitors in the metastatic setting. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that administrating adjuvant selective estrogen receptor modulator followed by aromatase inhibitor for metastasis may increase the frequency of ESR1 mutation.

R269C variant of ESR1: high prevalence and differential function in a subset of pancreatic cancers

Background

Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) plays a critical role in promoting growth of various cancers. Yet, its role in the development of pancreatic cancer is not well-defined. A less studied region of ESR1 is the hinge region, connecting the ligand binding and DNA domains. rs142712646 is a rare SNP in ESR1, which leads to a substitution of arginine to cysteine at amino acid 269 (R269C). The mutation is positioned in the hinge region of ESR1, hence may affect the receptor structure and function. We aimed to characterize the activity of R269C-ESR1 and study its role in the development of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Transcriptional activity was evaluated by E2-response element (ERE) and AP1 –luciferase reporter assays and qRT-PCR. Proliferation and migration were assessed using MTT and wound healing assays. Gene-expression analysis was performed using RNAseq.

Results

We examined the presence of this SNP in various malignancies, using the entire database of FoundationOne and noted enrichment of it in a subset of pancreatic non-ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 2800) compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as well as other tumor types (0.53% vs 0.29%, p = 0.02). Studies in breast and pancreatic cancer cells indicated cell type-dependent activity of ESR1 harboring R269C. Thus, expression of R269C-ESR1 enhanced proliferation and migration of PANC-1 and COLO-357 pancreatic cancer cells but not of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Moreover, R269C-ESR1 enhanced E2-response elements (ERE) and AP1-dependent transcriptional activity and increased mRNA levels of ERE and AP1-regulated genes in pancreatic cancer cell lines, but had a modest effect on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Accordingly, whole transcriptome analysis indicated alterations of genes associated with tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer cells and upregulation of genes associated with cell metabolism and hormone biosynthesis in breast cancer cells.

Conclusions

Our study shed new light on the role of the hinge region in regulating transcriptional activity of the ER and indicates cell-type specific activity, namely increased activity in pancreatic cancer cells but reduced activity in breast cancer cells. While rare, the presence of rs142712646 may serve as a novel genetic risk factor, and a possible target for therapy in a subset of non-ductal pancreatic cancers.

Estrogen receptor alpha gene variant, PvuII (rs2234693), as a potential pharmacogenetic biomarker for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in postmenopausal women

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) occurs more often in postmenopausal women than in men. Estrogen plays an important role in vascular homeostasis. Our aim was to elucidate whether a drop in circulating estradiol in conjunction with variants of estrogen receptor genes have a role in female gender susceptibility to aSAH. A total of 709 subjects were enrolled (349 aSAH patients, 360 controls) and genotyped for rs2234693 or PvuII (intron 1, T>C) in the ESR1 gene and rs4986938 or AluI (exon 8, 1730G>A) of ESR2 gene by PCR-RFLP. Serum estradiol was estimated by ELISA. Estrogen receptor gene expression was studied by qRT-PCR. Logistic regression analysis indicated a significant recessive effect of the T allele of PvuII on aSAH in females, and this association remained statistically significant even after adjusting for confounders (OR 1.702, CI 95% 1.062, 2.726, P value = 0.027). ESR1 gene expression was significantly reduced (P value = 0.0089) in subjects carrying PvuII T allele. In postmenopausal women with TT genotype and low serum estradiol, the odds for developing aSAH were found to be 3.5-fold increase compared with premenopausal women (CI 95% 1.424-8.828, P value = 0.0074). However, this variant showed no significant association with aSAH in men. No significant difference was found in genotype and allelic distribution of AluI polymorphism in ESR2 gene, between patients and controls. We propose that the PvuII T allele could be a potential pharmacogenetic marker for strategizing personal medicine for preventing aSAH in postmenopausal women with low circulating estradiol. Further larger studies in other population are warranted.

The estrogen receptor-alpha S118P variant does not affect breast cancer incidence or response to endocrine therapies

PURPOSE

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) is a therapeutic target of ER-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Although ER signaling is complex, many mediators of this pathway have been identified. Specifically, phosphorylation of ER at serine 118 affects responses to estrogen and therapeutic ligands and has been correlated with clinical outcomes in ER+ breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that a newly described germline variant (S118P) at this residue would drive cellular changes consistent with breast cancer development and/or hormone resistance.

METHODS

Isogenic human breast epithelial cell line models harboring ER S118P were developed via genome editing and characterized to determine the functional effects of this variant. We also examined the frequency of ER S118P in a case-control study (N = 536) of women with and without breast cancer with a familial risk.

RESULTS

In heterozygous knock-in models, the S118P variant demonstrated no significant change in proliferation, migration, MAP Kinase pathway signaling, or response to the endocrine therapies tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Further, there was no difference in the prevalence of S118P between women with and without cancer relative to population registry databases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the ER S118P variant does not affect risk for breast cancer or hormone therapy resistance. Germline screening and modification of treatments for patients harboring this variant are likely not warranted.