Treatment options in otitis media with effusion

Investigating the epidemiological relevance of secretory otitis media and neighboring organ diseases through an Internet search

Background

This study examined the epidemiological correlations between secretory otitis media (SOM) and diseases of neighboring organs. We measured changes in disease incidences during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic using Internet big data spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Methods

This study used the Baidu Index (BI) to determine the search volume for the terms "secretory otitis media (SOM)", "tonsillitis", "pharyngolaryngitis", "adenoid hypertrophy (AH)", "nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)", "nasal septum deviation (NSD)", "rhinosinusitis", "allergic rhinitis (AR)", and "gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)" in Mandarin from January 2011 to December 2021. The correlations between these terms were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The results were compared search data from 2019 and 2021 to assess the effects of isolation on SOM in 2020.

Results

The seasonal variations trends of SOM and other diseases coincided well (P < 0.05), except for AR. During the 11-year timeframe, the monthly searches for rhinosinusitis, NSD, tonsillitis, pharyngolaryngitis, and NPC were statistically correlated with SOM (R = 0.825, 0.594, 0.650, 0.636, 0.664, respectively; P < 0.05). No correlation was found between SOM and AR, SOM and AH, or SOM and GERD (R =  - 0.028, R = 0.259, R = 0.014, respectively, P > 0.05). The total search volumes for SOM, rhinosinusitis, NPC, and AH decreased in 2020 compared to 2019.

Discussion

SOM exhibited a discernible epidemiological connection with rhinosinusitis, nasal septal deviation (NSD), tonsillitis, pharyngolaryngitis, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A decrease in public gatherings was observed to effectively reduce the incidences of SOM. This underscores the pivotal role of social measures in influencing the prevalence of SOM and emphasizes the intricate interplay between SOM and various associated health factors, with implications for public health strategies.

Prevalence and Co-Morbidities of Adult-Onset Otitis Media With Effusion

BACKGROUND

Adult-onset otitis media with effusion (AO-OME) is relatively difficult to characterize, because of its associated co-morbidities.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the burden, assess co-existing diseases, and management of patients with AO-OME.

DESIGN OF THE STUDY

A descriptive observational prospective study.

SETTING

Clinical department in a tertiary hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with conductive hearing impairment without ear discharge (excluding other pathologies) nor external ear pathology were eligible. The patients also had tympanometry with type B tracings (tympanograms).

INTERVENTIONS

Clinico-demographic characteristics, history of otologic symptoms, affected ear, and hearing impairment were obtained. Pure-tone audiometry (PTA), tympanometry, and radiological investigations were performed. Other existing diseases (co-morbidities) were noted. The main outcome measure was audiologically confirmed AO-OME.

RESULTS

Prevalence of AO-OME was (110/3452) 3.2%. Young adults (age group 18-30 years) constituted 33.7% (28/83), mean age was 37.3 ± 11.5 years, and 46/83 (55.4%) were males and 37/83 (44.6%) were females. The common otologic symptoms were feeling of fullness in the ear in 27.7% (23/83), hearing loss in 24.1% (20/83), and bilateral ear involvement in 32.5% (27/83). PTA revealed 8.2% (9/110) had normal hearing, whereas 62.7% (69/110) ears had conductive hearing loss. Patients had radiological investigations, namely plain X rays in 67.5% (56/83) and computerized tomography scan of sinuses in 10.8% (9/83). Three (3/83) patients (3.6%) each had nasoendoscopy, and nasal and nasopharyngeal examination under anaesthesia and biopsy. The major associated diseases (co-morbidities) were allergy in 38.6% (32/83), infective rhinosinusitis in 24.1% (20/83), and upper respiratory tract infection in 14.5% (12/83).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of AO-OME was 3.2%. AO-OME co-existed commonly with allergy and other inflammatory diseases of the upper respiratory tract. The management was conservative medical management.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios in otitis media with effusion in children: Diagnostic role and audiologic correlations

AIM

To investigate the relationship between hearing loss and complete blood count parameters including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in children with otitis media with effusion (OME).

MATERIALS-METHOD

The study group was formed by 244 paediatric patients who underwent ventilation tube placement because of OME, and was split into two groups as serous and mucoid. The control group included 112 individuals who have no hearing problems. Hearing levels were determined with pure tone audiometry in the study group, preoperatively, and control group. The blood parameters were compared between the serous, mucoid and control groups. The correlation analysis was performed between the blood parameters and hearing levels in the study group. The blood parameters were compared between the groups identified by hearing loss classification.

FINDINGS

There were significant negative correlations between hearing levels and each of NLR, PLR and MPV. There were significant positive correlations between hearing levels and each of the lymphocyte and PLT. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, serous OME can be estimated with 68% sensitivity and 61% specificity by the NLR value more than 1.1, and 77% sensitivity and 77% specificity by the PLR value more than 102.4. The ROC curve revealed that slight hearing loss could be estimated with 70% sensitivity and 73% specificity by the NLR value more than 1.31, and 78% sensitivity and 77% specificity by the PLR value more than 102.4.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that NLR and PLR values were valuable parameters in the diagnosis of serous OME and predicting a hearing loss. These parameters may provide additional information to the audiogram that could influence the therapeutic decision.

Cost and Value of Routine Histopathologic Analysis after Adenoidectomy and Tonsillectomy

Introduction  Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common procedures. Most surgeries in children and young adults are recommended due to recurring infections or obstructive constraints. However, occult malignant findings are reported in the literature. The clinical guidelines still refrain from recommending routine histopathologic analyses when discussing these procedures. Objective  The present study aims to define the value of a routine histopathologic analysis after tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and tonsillotomy. Methods  We conducted a prospective survey including all German ear, nose and throat (ENT) departments, asking physicians about their current clinical practice and opinion. Furthermore, we reviewed all patients attending our department for tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy/tonsillotomy or a combination of these procedures between 2011 and 2016. In addition to this, a cost analysis was conducted to assess the financial burden of a routine histopathologic analysis. Results  Most German ENT departments perform a routine histopathologic analysis after tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy/tonsillotomy. Despite this, only a minority deemed this approach necessary. Our retrospective review of the histopathologic analysis after tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy/tonsillotomy in our department rendered a cohort size of 2,157 patients. Within this group, there were no occult malignant findings. We found a yearly burden of 2,509,401€ for routine histopathologic analyses in patients under the age of 15 years in Germany in 2016. Conclusion  We found a divergence between the physicians opinions and their current clinical practice concerning the question of whether to conduct routine histopathologic analyses. Even though there was no occult malignant finding in our cohort, unsuspected malignant findings are reported in the literature. Therefore, we call for a discussion on clinical practice guidelines.

Is there a need for a histological examination of the adenoid tissue after adenoidectomy?

OBJECTIVES

In Germany there is no uniform practice regarding the histological examination of removed tissue after an adenoidectomy. In addition, the unique benefits of routine histological examination of adenoid tissue cannot be ascertained from current literature due to varying opinion and evidence.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Medical Association and Ethics Committee in Cottbus, Brandenburg, Germany. We evaluated the pre- and intra-operative examination findings (direct and indirect epipharyngoscopy, digital palpation, intraoperative macroscopic assessment and examination of removed tissue) and the histopathological findings of excised adenoid tissue. A statistical analysis of obtained results was undertaken thereafter.

RESULTS

It was found that in all young patients included in the study, the histological results invariably represented lymphoepithelial hypertrophic mucosa with a varying inflammatory response, matching a clinical picture of adenoid vegetation and in keeping with the pre- and intraoperative investigations and findings.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic history of adenoid vegetation in combination with a classic pre- and intraoperative clinical examination and an inconspicuous macroscopic examination of removed tissue, renders routine histopathological workup dispensable. On suspicion of deviant pathology a histopathological examination is recommended and should be undertaken.