Conservative management of patients with early endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review

Prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia after complete remission with fertility-sparing therapy

PURPOSE

Although many patients with endometrial cancer (EC) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) achieve complete remission (CR) after high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) treatment, no consensus has been reached on management after CR. Currently, patients receive estrogen-progestin maintenance therapy, but no recommendations exist regarding the duration of maintenance therapy or whether hysterectomy should be considered. This study aimed to provide insights into the management of EC/AEH after achieving CR.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the prognosis of 50 patients with EC or AEH who achieved CR after MPA therapy. We assessed the association between disease recurrence and clinicopathological features and the pre- and post-operative histological diagnoses of patients who underwent hysterectomy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 34 months (range: 1-179 months). Recurrence was observed in 17 patients. Among the clinical characteristics investigated, only the primary disease was significantly associated with disease recurrence; patients with EC had a higher risk of recurrence than those with AEH (p = 0.037). During the observation period, 27 patients attempted pregnancy, and 14 pregnancies resulted in delivery. Patients who gave birth had significantly longer relapse-free survivals than those who did not (p = 0.031). Further, 16 patients underwent hysterectomies, and AEH was detected postoperatively in 4 of 11 patients (36.4%) with no preoperative abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several clinical features of patients with EC and AEH after CR. Given the high probability of endometrial abnormalities detected postoperatively, hysterectomy may be considered for patients who no longer want children.

Fertility-sparing hormonal treatment in patients with stage I endometrial cancer of grade 2 without myometrial invasion and grade 1-2 with superficial myometrial invasion: Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion study (GORILLA-2001)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate oncologic and pregnancy outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment (FST) using progestin in patients with stage I grade 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) without myometrial invasion (MI) or grade 1-2 with superficial MI.

METHODS

Multicenter data of patients with stage I grade 2 EC without MI or grade 1-2 EC with superficial MI, who received FST between 2005 and 2021, were analyzed. Cox regression analysis identified independent factors for progressive disease (PD) during the FST.

RESULTS

Altogether, 54 patients received FST [medroxyprogesterone acetate (500-1000 mg) in 44, megestrol acetate (40-800 mg) in 10] with concurrent levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices use in 31. With median time to achieve a complete response (CR) of 10 (3-24) months, 39 patients (72.2%) achieved CR. Of the 15 patients who attempted to conceive after achieving CR, 7 (46.7%) became pregnant (2 abortions, 5 live births). During a median FST duration of 6 (3-12) months, nine patients (16.6%) were diagnosed with PD. Fifteen (38.5%) experienced recurrence with a median recurrence-free survival of 23 (3-101) months. In the multivariable analysis, tumor size before FST ≥2 cm (HR 5.456, 95% CI 1.34 to 22.14; p = 0.018) was significantly associated with a high PD rate during FST.

CONCLUSION

The overall response rate to FST was promising, however, the PD rate was significant during the first 12 months of FST. Therefore, performing thorough endometrial biopsy and imaging studies is essential to strictly evaluate the extent of the disease every 3 months from FST initiation.

Retreatment with progestin for recurrence after complete response with fertility-sparing treatment in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of retreatment using progestin for recurrence after a complete response with fertility-sparing treatment in patients with early endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with presumed stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer who developed intra-uterine recurrence after a complete response with fertility-sparing treatment using progestin. Oncological and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed after repeated fertility-sparing treatment. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the prognostic factors associated with a complete response with secondary fertility-sparing treatment and recurrence-free survival after secondary fertility-sparing treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with a median age of 31 years (range 23-40) underwent secondary fertility-sparing treatment. With a median secondary progestin treatment duration of 9 months (range 3-55), the complete response rate was 78% (39/50) and no patients had extra-uterine spread of disease. Among the 26 (67%) patients who attempted to conceive after complete response, 10 became pregnant (3 spontaneous abortions, 7 live births). Eighteen (46.1%) patients had a second recurrence, with a median recurrence-free survival after secondary fertility-sparing treatment of 14 months (range 3-36); 15 patients received tertiary fertility-sparing treatment and nine (60%) achieved a complete response. Polycystic ovary on ultrasound (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.1 to 30.6, p=0.037) was associated with an increased complete response rate with secondary fertility-sparing treatment. Multivariable analysis revealed that recurrence-free survival after initial hormonal treatment >6 months (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.51, p=0.005) and pregnancy after secondary fertility-sparing treatment (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.98; p=0.047) were significantly associated with longer recurrence-free survival after secondary fertility-sparing treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated progestin treatment was associated with a 78% response rate and it was safe in patients with intra-uterine recurrent endometrial cancer. Thus, it might help preserve fertility after first and second recurrences.

Should Endometrial Cancer Treatment Be Centralized?

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in Western and emerging countries. In 2012, new cancer cases numbered 319,605, and 76,160 cancer deaths were diagnosed worldwide. ECs are usually diagnosed after menopause; 70% of ECs are diagnosed at an early stage with a favorable prognosis and a 5-year overall survival rate of 77%. On the contrary, women with advanced or recurrent disease have extremely poor outcomes because they show a low response rate to conventional chemotherapy. EC is generally considered easy to treat, although it presents a 5-year mortality of 25%. Though the guidelines (GLs) recommend treatment in specialized centers by physicians specializing in gynecologic oncology, most women are managed by general gynecologists, resulting in differences and discrepancies in clinical management. In this paper we reviewed the literature with the aim of highlighting where the treatment of EC patients requires gynecologic oncologists, as suggested by the GLs. Moreover, we sought to identify the causes of the lack of GL adherence, suggesting useful changes to ensure adequate treatment for all EC patients.

Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients After Primary Fertility-Sparing Therapy

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of fertility-sparing re-treatment on patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) who wish to preserve their uterus after complete remission (CR) for primary conservative therapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study on recurrent EC or AEH patients who received fertility-sparing re-treatment after achieving CR. Data regarding clinicopathological factors, adverse events, treatment efficacy, tumor prognosis, and reproductive outcome were analyzed.

Results

Of the 98 recurrent patients with a median disease-free interval period of 19 (3–96) months, 18 patients decided to receive hysterectomy directly, and 80 patients received fertility-preserving re-treatment. Seventy-one (88.6%) cases achieved CR, 96.0% in AEH and 75.8% in EC patients, with the 6 (3–16) months’ median CR time. Seven (8.8%) patients failed to achieve CR and then underwent the hysterectomy: one partial response (PR), four stable disease (SD), and two progressive disease (PD). Forty-nine women attempted to get pregnant after CR, 13 (26.5%) became pregnant, seven (14.3%) successfully delivered, and six (12.2%) miscarried. During the follow-up period, 22 (31.0%) women had developed a second relapse with the median recurrence time of 12 (4–90) months, and 10 patients decided to receive the third round of fertility-sparing treatment. Seven (70.0%) patients, 33.3% in EC and 85.7% in AEH, achieved CR again. Hysterectomy was performed in two (20.0%) patients due to SD. After the third-round treatment, six women had the desire to conceive but no one became pregnant successfully.

Conclusion

For patients with recurrent EC and AEH after primary conservative treatment, fertility-preserving re-treatment can still achieve a promising response, and patients have possibilities of completing childbirth.

Prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes after fertility-preservative management with progestin in early-stage of endometrial cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of various fertility-preservative treatments with progestin and analyze prognostic factors in Stage 1A of endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study involved four Korean university hospitals. Data were collected from 43 women who were under the age of 40 with presumed stage IA endometrial cancer determined by magnetic resonance imaging and treated from January 2014 to December 2017. All of the patients were administered hormonal therapy for fertility preservation. Twenty-five patients received oral progestin with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for 6-24 months, and 18 patients received high-dose oral progestin for the same period of time. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated. Prognostic factors for pathologic response to progestin were identified by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Complete response (CR) was achieved by 72.1% of patients (31/43), and the average time to CR was 4.2 (Stable disease [SD] 3.4) months (range, 3-9 months). Partial response was achieved by 7.0% of patients (3/43), SD by 9.3% (4/43), and progressive disease by 11.6% (5/43). Of the CR patients, 41.9% (13/31) achieved pregnancy with the median follow-up period of 12.5 (SD 7.6) months (range: 3-50 months). No irreversible toxicity or therapy-associated death occurred. Multivariate analysis showed that high endometrial thickness ratio of pre- and posttreatment measured at 2 months from the treatment initiation (≥0.55, Odds ratio [OR]: 19.018; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.854-195.078; P = 0.013) and oral progestin without LNG-IUS (OR: 13.483; 95% CI: 1.356-134.069; P = 0.026) might be related with unfavorable prognostic factors for CR.

Conclusion

This study shows that progestin-based fertility-preservative treatment might be a feasible option for stage 1A endometrial cancer. It also identifies that low endometrial thickness ratio and oral progestin with LNG-IUS combination therapy might be related with favorable response to hormonal treatment.

Conservative treatment for well-differentiated endometrial cancer: when and why it should be considered in young women

The aim of this review was to update current knowledge on the conservative treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) based on a literature review. A web-based search in the MEDLINE database was carried out on EC management and treatment. All relevant information has been collected and analysed. Case series were mainly found in the literature search. Conservative treatments were offered to young patients with stage I low-grade endometrioid carcinomas of the endometrium. Different options included high/low dose progestin treatments, hysteroscopic resection of the disease, a levonorgestrel intrauterine device or a combination of various strategies. The overall complete response rate was near 76.5% with a recurrence rate of up to 33.8%. Pregnancy outcomes reached rates of 64.8% for live births. The current clinical outcomes show that conservative treatment aimed at preserving fertility is feasible for stage I endometrial well-differentiated adenocarcinomas in motivated patients under close monitoring.

Special issues in fertility preservation for gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies account for 1,09 million new cancer cases worldwide consisting of about 12% of tumors affecting female population. About 10% of all female cancer survivors are younger than 40 years of age. Since cancers affecting female genital organs are usually treated by radical surgery, chemotherapy or chemoradiation approaches that induce permanent damage of reproductive functions, the development of strategies for fertility preservation represent one of the most important goals for gynecologic oncology. In this scenario, the newly defined oncofertility discipline acquires increasing interest, offering patients maximal chances to make an adequate decision about future fertility, based on their oncologic diagnosis and prognosis. However, the majority of physicians do not pay particular attention to these issues, even if impressive progresses have been made in this field in the last decades. Possibly, it is due to the lack of strong evidences from clinical trials without an adequate number of cases to establish safety and efficacy of these procedures. In this review we will discuss the most recently debated options for fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology, highlighting issues and controversies related to oncofertility.

Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries. Approximately 3%-14% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women under 40 who want to preserve their fertility. The incidence of endometrial cancer in this age group is increasing, for which fertility-sparing therapy is increasingly used because it is one of the most important quality of life issues in these women. Progestin therapy is the most common type of fertility-sparing therapy. In this review, the most up-to-date findings regarding fertility-sparing progestin therapy for young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer is addressed in terms of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. The selection of appropriate patients through comprehensive pretreatment evaluation is of paramount importance to achieve the best outcomes without compromising survival. Because of the high rate of recurrence after successful fertility-sparing therapy, close surveillance is mandatory, and prophylactic hysterectomy is the best option for patients who have completed family planning. Pregnancy outcomes are very promising with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. Continuous daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate are the preferred progestins for fertility-sparing therapy, but future studies should be performed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration of these agents.

Hysteroscopic surgery for conservative management in endometrial cancer: a review of the literature

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecologic malignancy, usually diagnosed in postmenopausal women. However, an incidence rate of 2-14% of cases consisting of women under the age of 45 years old has been reported. Multiple reports have described the conservative treatment of this tumour in selected patients with the objective of preserving fertility. In this article, we review the literature to evaluate the results of conservative treatment of endometrial cancer with hysteroscopic resection.

Preserving fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer: current perspectives

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and affects predominantly postmenopausal women. It is estimated, however, that 15%–25% of women will be diagnosed before menopause. As more women choose to defer childbearing until later in life, the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing EC management have been increasingly studied. Definitive treatment of total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy precludes future fertility and may thus be undesirable by women who wish to maintain their reproductive potential. However, the consideration of conservative management carries the oncologic risks of unstaged EC and the risk of missing a synchronous ovarian cancer. It is further complicated by the lack of consensus regarding the initial assessment, treatment, and surveillance. Conservative treatment with progestins has been shown to be a feasible and safe fertility-sparing approach for women with low grade, early stage EC with no myometrial invasion. The two most commonly adopted regimens are medroxyprogesterone acetate at 500–600 mg daily and megestrol acetate at 160 mg daily for a minimum of 6–9 months, with initial response rates commonly reported between 60% and 80% and recurrence rates between 25% and 40%. Photodynamic therapy and hysteroscopic EC excision have recently been reported as alternative approaches to progestin therapy alone. However, limited efficacy and safety data exist. Live birth rates after progestin therapy have typically been reported around 30%; however, when focusing only on those who do pursue fertility after successful treatment, the live birth rates were found to be higher than 60%. Assisted reproductive technology has been associated with a higher live birth rate compared with spontaneous conception, most likely reflecting the presence of infertility at baseline. Close follow-up is of paramount importance, and definitive treatment after completion of childbearing is advised.

Pregnancy outcomes after fertility-sparing management in young women with early endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze pregnancy outcomes in young women with stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 141 women with stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus who had complete remission after progestin treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, using χ or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and using log-rank test for survival comparison.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (38.3%) women in the study cohort had a history of infertility. Seventy (49.6%) of the 141 patients tried to conceive with 44 (62.9%) receiving fertility drugs. The median interval to attempted pregnancy after treatment was 5 months (range 1-31 months). The median age at the time of the pregnancy trial was 32.4 years (range 23-40 years). Fifty-one (73%) of 70 women who tried to conceive were successful and 46 (66%) gave birth to 58 live neonates. The spontaneous abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and preterm delivery rates in our cohort were 24%, 2.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was similar between patients who received fertility drugs (n=44) or who did not (n=97) (73% compared with 62%, P=.335), and this rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved at least one pregnancy (n=51) than those who did not (n=90) (76% compared with 62%, P=.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the proportion of patients with a history of subfertility or infertility was high in our cohort, the pregnancy outcomes were very promising using assisted reproductive technology. The use of fertility drugs was not associated with a higher incidence of cancer recurrence after successful fertility-sparing management in this study population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Conservative treatment of early endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract in Europe and in the United States. Endometrial cancer has increased 21% in incidence since 2008, and the death rate has increased more than 100% over the past two decades. Approximately 15% of patients with endometrial cancer are pre-menopausal. The aim of this review is to discuss the conservative management of endometrial cancer. A number of studies largely support the conservative treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) in women desiring future fertility. We focus on the role of progestin hormonal therapy, including the risks associated with non-standard care, appropriate candidate selection, expected outcomes, various progestin agents and recommended follow-up.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and levonorgestrel-intrauterine device followed by in vitro fertilization program as management strategy for an infertile endometrial cancer patient: a case report

BACKGROUND

A progressive delay in the age of first conception results in an increased frequency of endometrial cancer patients in reproductive age and desiring childbearing.

CASE

A 38-year-old infertile woman with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma was treated with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD). After disease remission, she underwent a controlled ovarian stimulation for standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) program and had a pregnancy delivering a healthy male baby. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed four months after delivery. The patient is free of disease after 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

GnRHa plus LNG-IUD followed by IVF program is a safe and effective fertility-sparing strategy to manage infertile patients with stage I endometrial cancer.

Progestin re-treatment in patients with recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcomes of second round of fertility-sparing management using progestin in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin.

METHODS

We reviewed 45 patients who had recurrence after achieving complete remission by fertility-sparing management using progestin for presumed stage IA, grade 1, endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Of 45 patients, 33 tried progestin re-treatment at recurrence and were included in this study.

RESULTS

Recurrent disease was atypical hyperplasia in 13 patients (39%) and grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma in 20 patients (61%) which were confined to the endometrium. Thirty patients (91%) received medroxyprogesterone acetate (dose range, 80-500 mg/day) and three patients (9%) received megestrol acetate (dose range, 80-160 mg/day), with 29 patients receiving a dose of 500 mg/day of medroxyprogesterone acetate. The median duration of treatment was 6 months (range, 3-19 months). Five patients failed to respond to progestin re-treatment and underwent definitive surgical treatment including hysterectomy. Twenty eight patients (85%) showed complete response to progestin re-treatment. The median follow-up time after progestin re-treatment in 28 patients who achieved complete remission was 51 months (range, 24-160 months). During follow-up, five patients had second recurrence after median time interval of 14 months (range, 4-82 months). All patients who tried progestin re-treatment are alive without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

Progestin re-treatment in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer was effective and safe. Therefore, this can be recommended for young women who still want to preserve fertility at recurrence after complete response to progestin.

Medical and psychosocial aspects of fertility after cancer

Survival for cancer has improved significantly in the last 25 years with excellent overall 5- and 10-year survival rates. Hence, the majority of young women diagnosed with cancer can expect to live for decades, making quality of life issues such as fertility increasingly important. Risks of infertility vary based on the chemotherapy and treatments employed, as well as a woman's age. In general, younger women are less likely to experience permanent amenorrhea than older women, but even women who continue to menstruate have a greatly increased risk of premature menopause. Options for patients with cancer entering chemotherapy treatment, who wish to preserve fertility range from clinically well-established techniques such as embryo cryopreservation to more experimental techniques such as ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Pregnancy does not appear to increase the risk of cancer recurrence. Discussions of fertility issues in premenopausal women diagnosed with cancer present important challenges to the provider and to the patient. However, failure to discuss these options adequately can have lasting negative consequences on a woman's quality of life. Physician education interventions should seek to improve the knowledge of fertility preservations options, and of locally and nationally available resources.