Intraperitoneal bevacizumab combined with cytoreductive surgery: a pre-clinical study of tolerance and pharmacokinetics in an animal model. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14:931-936. [PMID: 22855172 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0888-x]

Phase 1b study of intraperitoneal ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown poor response rates in recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) ICB may result in enhanced T cell activation and anti-tumor immunity.

METHODS

In this phase 1b study, registered at Clinical.

TRIALS

gov (NCT03508570), initial cohorts received i.p. nivolumab monotherapy, and subsequent cohorts received combination i.p. nivolumab every 2 weeks and i.p. ipilimumab every 6 weeks, guided by a Bayesian design. The primary objective was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

FINDINGS

The trial enrolled 23 patients: 18 with ovarian cancer, 2 with uterine cancer, and 3 with cervical cancer. Study evaluable patients (n = 16) received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range: 1-8). Partial response was observed in 2 patients (12.5%; 1 ovarian, 1 uterine), and complete response was observed in 1 patient (6.3%) with cervical cancer, for an ORR of 18.8% (95% confidence interval: 4.0%-45.6%). The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range: 4.1-20.8), with one complete response ongoing. Median PFS and OS were 2.7 months and not reached, respectively. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 2 (8.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

i.p. administration of dual ICB is safe and demonstrated durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy. The RP2D is 3 mg/kg i.p. nivolumab every 2 weeks plus 1 mg/kg ipilimumab every 6 weeks.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb (CA209-9C7), an MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CA016672), the Ovarian Cancer Moon Shots Program, the Emerson Collective Fund, and a T32 training grant (CA101642).

Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy: a pharmacist's perspective

Objectives

To explore the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancy and highlight the challenges this provides for the hospital pharmacist.

Methods

A literature search for relevant articles was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The following keywords and phrases were used: 'hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy', 'early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy', 'carrier solutions' and 'cytoreductive surgery'. Local experience was also shared, referencing national guidelines and published literature.

Results

The rationale behind intraperitoneal chemotherapy is to directly administer drugs into the peritoneal cavity and achieve exposure of higher concentrations of cytotoxic agents to tumour nodules within the abdomen and on peritoneal surfaces for a prolonged period of time, without significant systemic toxicity. This has been widely demonstrated in intraoperative and early postoperative settings. Hydrophilic chemotherapy drugs with high molecular weights and permeable to the peritoneum, but slow plasma clearance create high concentrations of the drug in the peritoneal cavity, with lower systemic circulation. Commonly used drugs include mitomycin C, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil. Newer drugs such as the taxanes and bevacizumab have also shown promise. Heat increases drug penetration into body tissues and destroys tumour cells directly by causing damage to cells that have inherently faulty heat regulation pathways and also increases the cytotoxic effect of selected chemotherapeutic agents. Optimal temperature for hyperthermic intraperitoneal drug administration is between 41 and 43°C in a carrier solution that is compatible with the drug chosen. For early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy high molecular weight starch carrier solutions prolong intraperitoneal dwell time and exposure of drug to tumour cells. Drugs are administered intraoperatively with the abdomen open or closed for between 30 and 120 min depending on the drug chosen and local protocols. Drug doses are traditionally calculated using body surface area. Toxicity such as neutropenia is encountered far less than with systemic chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This paper discusses the rationale for intraperitoneal drug administration following cytoreductive surgery and describes appropriate drug selection, methods of drug delivery and potential challenges in the use of the intraperitoneal route. It provides evidence and practical guidance for hospital pharmacists who may be involved in the surgical management of peritoneal malignancy particularly in dose calculation, preparation and administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Angiogenesis-Related Markers and Prognosis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PM) of colorectal cancer (CRC) can be curatively treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Angiogenesis is under control of multiple molecules of which HIF1a, SDF1, CXCR4, and VEGF are key players. We investigated these angiogenesis-related markers and their prognostic value in patients with PM arising from CRC treated with CRS and HIPEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data and tissue specimens were collected in 2 tertiary referral centers from 52 patients who underwent treatment for isolated PM of CRC. Whole tissue specimens were subsequently analyzed for protein expression of HIF1a, SDF1, CXCR4, and VEGF by immunohistochemistry. Microvessel density (MVD) was analyzed by CD31 immunohistochemistry. The relationship between overall survival (OS) and protein expression as well as other clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that high peritoneal cancer index (PCI), resection with residual disease and high expression of VEGF were negatively correlated with OS after treatment with CRS and HIPEC (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). However, no association was found between the other markers and OS (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed an independent association between OS and PCI, resection outcome and VEGF expression (multivariate HR: 6.1, 7.8 and 3.8, respectively, P ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An independent association was found between high VEGF expression levels and worse OS after CRS and HIPEC. The addition of VEGF expression to the routine clinicopathological workup could help to identify patients at risk for early treatment failure. Furthermore, VEGF may be a potential target for adjuvant treatment in these patients.

Cytoreductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience and technical details

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to present our initial experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the light of current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of 27 consecutive patients who were treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Medical Park Samsun Hospital, between November 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and HIPEC-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54 (32-72). Nineteen patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 12 patients, ovarian cancer in 12 patients, gastric cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 1 patient. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 12 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 420 (300-660) minutes. Perioperative morbidity, HIPEC-related toxicity and perioperative mortality were observed in eight (30%), one (3.7%) and four patients (14.8%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 13 (1-22) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 95.8% and 82.6%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal cancer (after 9 and 12 months) and one patient with ovarian cancer (after 11 months) had intra-abdominal recurrence. One patient with ovarian cancer had liver metastases 13 months after surgery, and underwent resection of segments 6-7. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality that have been recently popularized in our country. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Intraperitoneal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: A Prognostic Factor and the Potential for Intraperitoneal Bevacizumab Use in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Intraperitoneal (IP) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels have been shown to vary in the peritoneal cavity of patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Our purpose was to correlate levels of IP VEGF with overall and disease-free survival to identify whether IP VEGF can be used to prognosticate patients and the possible role of IP bevacizumab.

METHODS

From February to October 2012, 97 consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis were treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Intravenous (IV) VEGF levels were taken before surgery, whereas IP VEGF levels were taken at various time points during and after surgery.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 19.48 months. On univariate analysis, a lower IP VEGF taken just after incision (T1) was associated with improved overall (P = 0.0004) and disease-free survival (P = 0.0006) at 2 years. A lower T1/IV VEGF ratio also was associated with improved overall (P = 0.004) and disease-free survival (P = 0.0051). On multivariate analysis, a lower T1 was associated with improved overall survival, whereas a lower T1/IV VEGF was associated with improved disease-free survival. On subset analysis, these two variables were associated with improved survival in colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower IP VEGF level prior to surgery is associated with improved survival. The use of preoperative intraperitoneal bevacizumab for patients with a heavy disease load should be considered, especially in colorectal cancers.

Peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin treated by cytoreduction and HIPEC: An overview

Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis was considered a terminal condition with a merely palliative treatment that included only supportive care, palliative surgery and the best systemic chemotherapy. Since the birth of a new approach, cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy procedures together with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and/or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis, many research groups contributed with promising results using this procedure being up to date this strategy the only one that has shown curative benefits on colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis achieving reported overall survival rates up to 64 mo and five-year survival rates up to 51%. The aim of this paper is to expose an updated overview of the therapeutic possibilities of these procedures in colorectal peritoneal metastases in the same way that our Unit of Oncologic Surgery has performed since 1997 with more than four hundred procedures.

Indikationen und Resultate der Peritonektomie bei nichtkolorektaler Peritonealkarzinose

<b><i>Hintergund:</i></b> In dieser Übersichtsarbeit soil der Stellenwert der zytoreduktiven chirurgischen Therapie (CRS) in Kombination mit einer hyperthermen intraperitonealen Chemotherapie (HIPEC) der Peritonealkarzinose bei nichtkolorektalen Karzinomen dargestellt werden. Hierzu zählen als primäre Tumoren des Peritoneums das Mesotheliom und das Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Zu den wichtigsten sekundären malignen Erkrankungen des Peritoneums zählen die Peritonealkarzinose des Magenkarzinoms, des Pankreaskarzinoms und des Ovarialkarzinoms sowie die Sarkomatose. <b><i>Methode:</i></b> Pathologische Besonderheiten der einzelnen Entitäten und Therapieempfehlungen anhand der aktuellen Literatur werden im Einzelnen beschrieben. <b><i>Ergebnisse:</i></b> Prinzipiell ist die chirurgische Behandlung der Peritonealkarzinose im Sinne einer CRS in Kombination mit einer HIPEC ein sinnvolles Therapiekonzept - vorausgesetzt, dass eine nahezu komplette Tumorentfernung erzielt werden kann. <b><i>Schlussfolgerung: </i></b>Aufgrund der erhöhten Morbidität sollte ein chirurgischer Eingriff gut indiziert sein. Bei ausgewählten Patienten ist eine CRS der Peritonealkarzinose in Kombination mit einer HIPEC ein sinnvolles und lebensverlängerndes Verfahren.