Phase 1b study of intraperitoneal ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown poor response rates in recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) ICB may result in enhanced T cell activation and anti-tumor immunity.

METHODS

In this phase 1b study, registered at Clinical.

TRIALS

gov (NCT03508570), initial cohorts received i.p. nivolumab monotherapy, and subsequent cohorts received combination i.p. nivolumab every 2 weeks and i.p. ipilimumab every 6 weeks, guided by a Bayesian design. The primary objective was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

FINDINGS

The trial enrolled 23 patients: 18 with ovarian cancer, 2 with uterine cancer, and 3 with cervical cancer. Study evaluable patients (n = 16) received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range: 1-8). Partial response was observed in 2 patients (12.5%; 1 ovarian, 1 uterine), and complete response was observed in 1 patient (6.3%) with cervical cancer, for an ORR of 18.8% (95% confidence interval: 4.0%-45.6%). The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range: 4.1-20.8), with one complete response ongoing. Median PFS and OS were 2.7 months and not reached, respectively. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 2 (8.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

i.p. administration of dual ICB is safe and demonstrated durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy. The RP2D is 3 mg/kg i.p. nivolumab every 2 weeks plus 1 mg/kg ipilimumab every 6 weeks.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb (CA209-9C7), an MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CA016672), the Ovarian Cancer Moon Shots Program, the Emerson Collective Fund, and a T32 training grant (CA101642).

Initiation and evaluation of a research-based fall prevention program

This study evaluated the effectiveness of research-based interventions in preventing falls. The interventions were based on research studies, experts' opinions, and a pilot study. Thirteen units (72%) had reduced fall rates. The fall rate two years before (O = 7.07; SD = 1.7) and two years after (O = 6.33; SD = 1.731) the intervention was significantly different at p < 0.003. Sixteen patients who fell were at risk (fall assessment score = 17.4 +/- 5.3) and had a history of falls. The most common site for falls was at the bedside. Most falls occurred during walking, climbing over the siderails, and accidentally rolling out of bed. Thus, a research-based fall prevention is effective in reducing falls.