Benefit of ablative versus palliative-only radiotherapy in combination with nivolumab in patients affected by metastatic kidney and lung cancer

Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient's prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Clinical Outcomes and Targeted Genomic Analysis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Molecular profiles of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases (BMs) are not well characterized. Effective management with locoregional therapies, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is critical as systemic therapy advancements have improved overall survival (OS).

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinicogenomic features of RCC BMs treated with SRS in a large patient cohort.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of all RCC BM patients treated with SRS from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2021.

INTERVENTION

SRS for RCC BMs.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify gene alterations more prevalent in BM patients. Clinical factors and genes altered in ≥10% of samples were assessed per patient using Cox proportional hazards models and per individual BM using clustered competing risks regression with competing risk of death.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Ninety-one RCC BM patients underwent SRS to 212 BMs, with a median follow-up of 38.8 mo for patients who survived. The median intracranial progression-free survival and OS were 7.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.7-11) and 21 (IQR 16-32) mo, respectively. Durable local control of 83% was achieved at 12 mo after SRS, and 59% of lesions initially meeting the radiographic criteria for progression at 3-mo evaluation would be considered to represent pseudoprogression at 6-mo evaluation. A comparison of genomic alterations at both the gene and the pathway level for BM+ patients compared with BM- patients revealed phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations to be more prevalent in BM+ patients (43% vs 16%, p = 0.001, q = 0.01), with the majority being PTEN alterations (17% vs 2.7%, p = 0.003, q = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest study investigating genomic profiles of RCC BMs and the only such study with annotated intracranial outcomes. SRS provides durable in-field local control of BMs. Recognizing post-SRS pseudoprogression is crucial to ensure appropriate management. The incidence of PI3K pathway alterations is more prevalent in BM+ patients than in BM- patients and warrants further investigation in a prospective setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We examined the outcomes of radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases in kidney cancer patients at a single large referral center. We found that radiation provides good control of brain tumors, and certain genetic mutations may be found more commonly in patients with brain metastasis.

Systematic review of the efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligoprogressive disease in metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of oligometastatic disease can improve survival and delay the requirement for systemic therapy. The benefits of SABR in oligoprogressive disease are less well-defined. Here, we evaluate the available evidence investigating the efficacy of SABR in the treatment of oligoprogressive disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. Medline and Embase databases were searched using the terms "stereotactic radiotherapy" OR "SABR" OR "Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SRT" AND "oligoprogression" in May 2022, June 2023, and February 2024. Studies were excluded where: SABR was used as a radical treatment, a specific oligoprogressive cohort could not be identified, publication was as a conference abstract or where fewer than 10 patients were recruited. Studies treating only brain metastases were also excluded. The site of primary tumour, oligoprogressive sites, rates of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and time to next systemic therapy were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-three full text studies were included. These consisted of single centre and multi-institutional observational studies, case series and phase II trials. Twenty-two studies were related to a specific tumour type: 12 urological cancer (9 prostate, 3 renal cancer), 6 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 colorectal cancer, 2 breast cancer and 11 were studies covering multiple tumour sites (5 studies involving SABR to a single organ and 6 studies involving SABR to multi-organ). Median PFS was >6 months in patients with oligoprogressive prostate, non-small cell lung cancer and renal cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SABR appears to have clinical benefit in oligoprogresssive prostate, lung, and renal patients. However, the optimal management of patients with oligoprogressive disease is still somewhat uncertain due to lack of prospective data. This will hopefully become clearer in the near future with the publication of further randomised trials.

Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.

Overview of the synergistic use of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment: current challenges and scopes of improvement

INTRODUCTION

Oncological treatments are changing rapidly due to the advent of several targeted anticancer drugs and regimens. The primary new area of research in oncological medicine is the implementation of a combination of novel therapies and standard care. In this scenario, radioimmunotherapy is one of the most promising fields, as proven by the exponential growth of publications in this context during the last decade.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the synergistic use of radiotherapy and immunotherapy and addresses questions like the importance of this subject, aspects clinicians look for in patients to administer this combined therapy, individuals who would benefit the most from this treatment, how to achieve abscopal effect and when does radio-immunotherapy become standard clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Answers to these queries generate further issues that need to be addressed and solved. The abscopal and bystander effects are not utopia, rather physiological phenomena that occur in our bodies. Nevertheless, substantial evidence regarding the combination of radioimmunotherapy is lacking. In conclusion, joining forces and finding answers to all these open questions is of paramount importance.

Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sequential ICIs with radiotherapy for symptomatic brain and bone metastases in NSCLC patients

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the brain and bones are common metastatic sites, and the disease seriously affects the survival time and quality of life. For metastatic lesions with symptoms, local treatment often precedes systemic treatment. However, in clinical trials, patients with symptomatic brain or bone metastases are often excluded. Therefore, limited data are available on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in those patients. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of local radiotherapy followed by ICIs in driver gene-negative NSCLC patients with symptomatic local metastasis in the brain and bone. This is a 29-month 2 centered retrospective cohort study performed in China between March 2019 and August 2021. A total of 22 patients with advanced NSCLC were included. All patients received radiotherapy in the brain or bone before the administration of ICIs. For all patients, the overall response rate was 59.09%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months, the PFS rate at 6 months was 72.73%, and the PFS rate at 1 year was 13.64%. Waterfall plots showed that tumor size was mostly reduced compared with baseline. The spider map showed that the tumor continued to shrink. In terms of symptom improvement, 100% pain control and 83.33% improvement were observed in epilepsy and neurological function. Sequential ICIs with local radiotherapy is effective for the treatment of patients with symptomatic brain and bone metastases of driver gene-negative NSCLC, which will benefit patients and improve their symptoms.

Clinical application of radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic ovarian cancer: a sharp tool to prolong the interval of systemic treatment

BACKGROUND

With the advances of radiation technology, treatment of oligometastatic disease, with limited metastatic burden, have more chances to achieve long-term local control. Here we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) in oligometastatic ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis collecting 142 patients (189 lesions) with oligometastatic ovarian cancer were included in the study. All pateints received radiotherapy and the curative effect and response rate were evaluated by diagnostic imaging after 1-3 months of radiotherapy with RECIST. Endpoints were the rate of complete response (CR), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), local control (LC) rate and overall survival (OS) rate. Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival outcomes.

RESULTS

From 2013.1.1 to 2020.12.30, a total of 142 ovarian cancer patients (189 oligometastasis lesions) were included in the analysis. Prescribed doses to an average GTV of 3.10 cm were 1.8-8 Gy/fraction, median BED (28-115, a/b = 10 Gy), 5-28 fractions. For 179 evaluable lesions, the cases of CR, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) after radiotherapy were 22,39,38 and 80 respectively. The disease control rate (DCR): CR + PR + SD was 55.31%, and the objective response rate (ORR): CR + PR was 34.08%. No patient developed grade 3 or higher side effect. The median CFI was 14 months (1-99 months), and the LC rate was 69.7%, 54.3% and 40.9% in 1 year, 2 years and 5 years respectively. GTV < 3 cm before treatment, platinum sensitivity, time from the last treatment ≥ 6 months, single lesion and BED(a/b = 10 Gy) ≥ 60 are the factors of good LC (p < 0.05). The total OS of 1 year, 2 years and 5 years were 67.1%, 52.6% and 30.3%, respectively. Single lesion (HR 0.598, 95%CI 0.405-0.884), DCR (HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.448-0.918) and ORR(HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.308-0.707) were the significant factors influencing 5-year OS.

CONCLUSION

For patients with oligometastatic ovarian cancer, radiotherapy has high LC, long chemotherapy-free interval, and survival benefits. Subgroup analysis shows that patients with single lesion and good local treatment results have higher overall survival rate, suggesting that active treatment is also beneficial for oligometastatic ovarian cancer patients.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy extends the clinical benefit of PD-1 inhibitors in refractory recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose

Emerging evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors lead to durable responses in a variety of cancers, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), however, combination approaches (i.e., stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) are required to extend this benefit beyond a subset of patients. This study retrospectively evaluated eight recurrent/metastatic NPC patients, to investigate how radiation could potentiate PD-1 checkpoint inhibition therapy.

Methods

Between September 2016 and July 2017, eight consecutive cases with histologically confirmed PDL1-positive status, for which prior standard therapy had been ineffective (five patients), were treated at our institution and Macao Clinics and two patients had disease progression within 6 months of completion of definitive chemoradiation, or one patient refused to receive chemoradiotherapy. All received PD-1 inhibitors first, seven of them accepted SBRT with an unmodified PD-1 inhibitors regimen after first evaluation as they were unresponsive to PD-1 inhibitors alone. Treatment was discontinued as long as patients were experiencing a clinical benefit in the opinion of the physicians and at least five cycles were given before stoppage.

Results

Median follow-up time was 56.7 months. The confirmed objective response rate based on RECIST-v1.1 at first evaluation was 12.5% (1/8). For the seven cases who received SBRT, six of them experience an objective response (6/7, 85.7%) after SBRT. Only one patient showed rapid progress and die within 95 days after the initiation of SBRT intervention. Three patients who did not have all lesions exposed to irradiation were available to evaluate the incidence of an abscopal effect, however, it did not occur as expected. Median PFS and OS for the seven patients were 8.0 and 30.8 months after SBRT intervention, respectively. Two-year OS as indicated was 71.0%.

Conclusions

PD-1 inhibitors combined with SBRT demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with PD-L1 positive RM-NPC. Patients may benefit from continue immunotherapy beyond disease progression when SBRT was introduced.

The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in addition to immunotherapy in the management of melanoma brain metastases: results of a systematic review

Aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in combination with immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). The literature was searched using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Studies comparing SRT plus immunotherapy versus SRT or immunotherapy alone were deemed eligible for inclusion. Two studies showed improved overall survival after SRT plus immunotherapy in melanoma cancer patients with brain metastases. Three studies reported data on LC and DFS showing as SRT plus immunotherapy did not improve local control and DFS rates. G3-G4 toxicity was reported in only one study (20% in the SRT plus immunotherapy group versus 23% in the immunotherapy group). Despite SRT plus concurrent immunotherapy seems associated with possible survival advantage and low ≥ G3 late toxicity rates, the quality of evidence is very low. Therefore, in patients with brain metastases from melanoma, SRT plus immunotherapy should be evaluated on an individual basis after discussion by a multidisciplinary team.

CircNEIL3 mediates pyroptosis to influence lung adenocarcinoma radiotherapy by upregulating PIF1 through miR-1184 inhibition

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) belong to an abundant category of non-coding RNAs that are stable and specific, and thus have great potential in cancer treatment. However, little is known about the role of circRNAs during radiotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Here, we established the expression profiles of 1,875 dysregulated circRNAs in non-irradiated and irradiated A549 cells and identified circNEIL3 as a significantly downregulated circRNA in A549 cells treated with 0, 2, or 4 Gy of radiation, respectively. Functional assays demonstrated that circNEIL3 knockdown promoted radiation-induced cell pyroptosis, whereas circNEIL3 overexpression had the opposite effects. Importantly, the effects of circNEIL3 overexpression on inhibiting pyroptosis were reversed by PIF1 knockdown. Mechanistically, circNEIL3-mediated pyroptosis was achieved through directly binding to miR-1184 as a sponge, thereby releasing the inhibition of miR-1184 on PIF1, which ultimately induces DNA damage and triggers AIM2 inflammasome activation. In vivo, circNEIL3 knockdown significantly enhanced the efficacy of radiotherapy as evidenced by decreases in tumor volume and weight. Collectively, the circNEIL3/miR-1184/PIF1 axis that mediate pyroptosis induction may be a novel, promising therapeutic strategy for the clinical treatment of lung cancer.

Immune Checkpoints Inhibitors and SRS/SBRT Synergy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Background: Several immunotherapy (IT) agents are FDA approved for treatment of melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The addition of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to immunotherapy looks promising. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the possible synergistic effects of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) and stereotactic radiation therapy in melanoma and NSCLC. Materials and methods: Pubmed databases from January 2010 to December 2020 were reviewed to identify English language studies reporting control of local and abscopal effect of the combination of ICI-SBRT/SRS in metastatic NSCLC and melanoma cancer. The inclusion criteria were followed according to PICO criteria. Results: Thirty-nine articles were included of the 2141 initial results. The reported rates for local control were 16.5–100% and 40–94% in brain and extracerebral metastases, respectively. Distant/abscopal response rates were 1–45% in extracerebral metastases. Abscopal effect could not be evaluated in brain metastases because it was not reported in studies. Treatments were well tolerated with few grade 4 toxicities and no grade 5. Conclusions: The combined treatment of ICI-SBRT/SRS achieves high local control and non-negligible abscopal response in patients with extracerebral metastases, with its benefit in cerebral metastases being more controversial. Clinical trials are needed to better characterize the potential synergism.

Do endocrine adverse events predict longer progression-free survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving nivolumab?

The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence and nature of immune-related endocrine adverse events (irAEs) among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab.

METHODS

The study group included 35 patients (15 women, 20 men, 65.8 ± 7.1 years) with NSCLC in stage IIIB (n = 16, 45.7%) and IV (n = 19,54.3%) who were treated with nivolumab.

RESULTS

Of the studied patients, 34.3% (n = 12) developed endocrine irAEs (irAE group): 22.9% (n = 8) hyperthyroidism and 8.6% (n = 3) hypothyroidism, and in one case, hypophysitis was observed. The median irAEs onset time was 2 months. In the group of patients with thyroid disorders, permanent hypothyroidism eventually developed in 58.3%. The severity of the analyzed irAEs ranged from mild to moderate (Grade 1-2); the case of hypophysitis was estimated as Grade 3. The comparison of progression-free survival time (PFS) between the two groups showed longer PFS in patients in the irAE group (p = 0.021). Patients with irAE were treated significantly longer with nivolumab and they received more doses of nivolumab, however in Cox analysis we did not find patients with irAE to experience progression later than patients without them.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab therapy is associated with an increased risk of endocrine adverse effects, particularly thyroid dysfunction. Endocrine adverse effects can be successfully treated pharmacologically and usually do not require discontinuation of immunotherapy. The relationship between a better cancer prognosis in patients who developed endocrine irAE has not been found.

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Older Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Era: Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

BACKGROUND

Older cancer patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease may benefit from chemotherapy alone or combined with radiotherapy. However, chemotherapy is often omitted either because of physician bias or because of its underlying comorbidity, thus compromising their survival. The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is compounding this issue because of the fear of immunosuppression induced by chemotherapy on the elderly which makes them more vulnerable to the virus.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy has less effect on the patient bone marrow compared to chemotherapy. The potential synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy may improve local control and survival for older patients with selected cancer. Preliminary data are encouraging because of better survival and local control in diseases which are traditionally resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Key Message: We propose a new paradigm combining immunotherapy at a reduced dose and/or extended dosing intervals and hypofractionated radiotherapy for older patients with selected cancer which needs to be tested in future clinical trials.

The NIPRO Study: An Observational, Retrospective, Multicenter Study on the Safety of the Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy Combination for Advanced-Stage NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

In this observational, retrospective, multicenter study, we aimed to assess the safety of the combination of local metastasis-directed radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy (IT) in a cohort of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We collected clinical data of aNSCLC patients who received concomitant RT and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in seven Italian centers from September 2015 to June 2019. Concomitant RT was defined as delivered ≤4 weeks before or after the first or last administration of immunotherapy, or within two consecutive cycles of ICI. All adverse events apparently related to RT and/or IT were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, and reported in terms of incidence and severity as immune related or RT related, or combined.

RESULTS

We analyzed the clinical charts of 187 patients. Median follow-up time was 23 months, and median overall survival was 16.5 months (range, 3-162). Thirteen patients developed pure RT-related side effects, and 43 patients (23.9%) developed immune-related side effects. No additive toxic effects were observed. A case of grade 5 pulmonary toxicity was recorded as a possible consequence of a combined effect.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that the combination of concomitant RT and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents is safe, and the two toxicity profiles are independent.

Immunoradiotherapy as An Effective Therapeutic Strategy in Lung Cancer: From Palliative Care to Curative Intent

Lung cancer is one of the main causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Over the years, different therapeutic modalities have been adopted depending on tumor stage and patient characteristics, such as surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. Recently, with the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has experienced a revolution that has resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival with an enhanced toxicity profile. Despite this paradigm shift, most patients present some kind of resistance to ICI. In this setting, current research is shifting towards the integration of multiple therapies, with RT and ICI being one of the most promising based on the potential immunostimulatory synergy of this combination. This review gives an overview of the evolution and current state of the combination of RT and ICI and provides evidence-based data that can improve patient selection. The combination in lung cancer is a safe therapeutic approach that improves local control and progression-free survival, and it has the potential to unleash abscopal responses. Additionally, this treatment strategy seems to be able to re-sensitize select patients that have reached a state of resistance to ICI, further enabling the continuation of systemic therapy.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Bladder Cancer and Other Urothelial Malignancies

AIMS

Bladder cancer represents the most common type of urothelial carcinoma, with a median overall survival of 12.5-15 months in the case of metastatic disease. We evaluated the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management oligometastatic urothelial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patients with a maximum of five metastases were collected from three institutions. Concomitant systemic therapy was allowed. End points were the local control of treated metastases, distant progression-free survival (PFS), overall PFS and overall survival.

RESULTS

Data for 82 lesions and 61 patients were included. The primary tumour was located in the bladder in 82% of patients, followed by kidney pelvis (11.5%). The most common treated site was lung (40.2%). Twenty-nine (47.5%) and 14 (23%) patients received systemic therapy before and during SBRT, respectively. The median BED10 value was 78.7 Gy. The median follow-up was 17.2 months. Rates of local control at 1 and 2 years were 92% and 88.9%, respectively, with correlation with systemic therapy before SBRT (hazard ratio 2.62, P = 0.034). Overall PFS at 1 and 2 years was 47.9% and 38.1%, respectively. The number of metastases was a predictive factor (hazard ratio 2.65, P = 0.008). The median overall survival was 25.6 months. Total dose (hazard ratio 0.93, P = 0.003) and BED10 (hazard ratio 0.97, P = 0.006) were correlated with overall survival. No grade ≥2 adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT represents an effective and safe treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Prospective randomised trials are necessary to better evaluate the benefit on delaying the onset of new systemic therapies.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Reboots the Immune Response Assisted by Immunotherapy in Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have represented a revolution in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To improve these results, combined approaches are being tested. The addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to ICI seems promising. A systematic review was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of SABR-ICI combination. Material and Methods: MEDLINE databases from 2009 to March 3, 2019 were reviewed to obtain English language studies reporting clinical outcomes of the combination of ICI-SABR in NSCLC. 18 out of the 429 initial results fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Results: Eighteen articles, including six prospective studies, describing 1736 patients treated with an ICI-SABR combination fulfilled the selection criteria. The reported mean rates for local control and distant/abscopal response rates were 71% and 41%, respectively. Eleven studies reported progression-free survival and overall survival, with a mean of 4.6 and 12.4 months, respectively. Toxicity rates were consistent with the ones attributable to ICI treatment alone. Conclusions: The ICI-SABR combination has a good safety profile and achieves high rates of local control and greater chances of obtaining abscopal responses than SABR alone, with a relevant impact on PFS. More studies are needed to improve patient selection for an optimal benefit from this approach.