1
|
Fischer S, Gillessen S, Stalder O, Terbuch A, Cathomas R, Schmid FA, Zihler D, Müller B, Fankhauser CD, Hirschi-Blickenstorfer A, Kluth LA, Seifert B, Templeton AJ, Mingrone W, Ufe MP, Fischer N, Beyer J, Woelky R, Omlin A, Vogl U, Hoppe K, Kamradt J, Rothschild SI, Rothermundt C. First Indicator of Relapse in Testicular Cancer and Implications for Follow-up: Analysis of the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study (SAG TCCS). EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 68:68-74. [PMID: 39308640 PMCID: PMC11416594 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Follow-up for patients with testicular cancer should ensure early detection of relapses. Optimal schedules and minimum requirements for cross-sectional imaging are not clearly defined, and guideline recommendations differ. Our aim was to analyse the clinical impact of different imaging modalities for detection of relapse in a large prospective cohort (Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study, SAG TCCS). Methods Patients with seminoma or nonseminoma were prospectively enrolled between January 2014 and February 2023 after initial treatment (n = 1175). Follow-up according to the study schedule was individualised for histology and disease stage. Only patients who had received primary treatment were considered. We analysed the total number of imaging modalities and scans identifying relapse and the timing of relapse. Key findings and limitations We analysed data for 1006 patients (64% seminoma, 36% nonseminoma); 76% had stage I disease. Active surveillance was the most frequent management strategy (65%). Recurrence occurred in 82 patients, corresponding to a 5-yr relapse-free survival rate of 90.1% (95% confidence interval 87.7-92.1%). Median follow-up for patients without relapse was 38.4 mo (interquartile range 21.6-61.0). Cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen was the most important indicator of relapse 57%, abdominal CT accounting for 46% and MRI for 11%. Marker elevation indicated relapse in 24% of cases. Chest X-ray was the least useful modality, indicating relapse in just 2% of cases. Conclusions and clinical implications On the basis of findings from our prospective register, we have adapted a follow-up schedules with an emphasis on abdominal imaging and a reduction in chest X-rays. This schedule might provide additional guidance for clinicians and will be prospectively evaluated as SAG TCCS continues to enrol patients. Patient summary We analysed the value of different types of imaging scans for detection of relapse of testicular cancer. We used our findings to propose an optimum follow-up schedule for patients with testicular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Odile Stalder
- Department of Clinical Research, CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Angelika Terbuch
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Medical Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Florian A. Schmid
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Beat Müller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luis Alex Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bettina Seifert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Liestal, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J. Templeton
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Claraspital/St. Clara Research and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Walter Mingrone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland
| | | | - Natalie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Regina Woelky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich und Uro-Onkologisches Zentrum, Hirslanden Klinik Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Vogl
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Jörn Kamradt
- Urologie Zentrum Bern und Hirslanden Bern, Bern Switzerland
| | - Sacha I. Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xia L, Daneshmand S. Update on the Management of Low-stage Seminoma. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:377-385. [PMID: 38925740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The contemporary paradigm of testicular cancer management is achieving high and durable cure rates while minimizing the burden of treatment given the potential long-term toxicities associated with radiation therapy and systemic therapies. The management of low-stage seminoma has seen significant changes in recent years. Nuances of surveillance strategies for stage I seminoma exist and continue to evolve. Emerging data show retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a viable treatment option for selected patients with clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Xia
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Speicher P, Fankhauser CD, Lorch A, Ardizzone D, Helnwein S, Hoch D, Hermanns T, Beyer J, Akhoundova D. Excellent survival in relapsed stage I testicular cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:870. [PMID: 37715132 PMCID: PMC10503206 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11388-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two thirds of patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) present as clinical stage I (CSI). Following orchiectomy, active surveillance (AS) has become their standard management. However, 15-50% of patients eventually relapse with metastatic disease after AS. Relapses need to be detected early in order to achieve cure and avoid overtreatment. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive GCC patients treated at two Swiss academic centers between 2010 and 2020. Patients with stage IS and extragonadal primaries were excluded. We compared disease characteristics and survival outcomes of patients relapsed from initial CSI to patients with de novo metastatic disease. Primary endpoint was the IGCCCG category at the time of relapse. Main secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 360 GCC patients with initial CSI and 245 de novo metastatic patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, 81 of 360 (22.5%) CSI patients relapsed: 41 seminoma (Sem) and 40 non-seminoma (NSem) patients. All Sems relapsed in the IGCCCG good prognosis group. NSem relapsed with good 29/40 (72.5%) and intermediate 11/40 (27.5%) prognostic features; 95.1% of relapses occurred within five years post-orchiectomy. Only 3 relapsed NSem patients died from metastatic disease. Five-year OS for relapsed CSI patients was 100% for Sem and 87% (95% CI: 61-96%) for NSem patients; five-year PFS was 92% (95% CI: 77-97) and 78% (95% CI: 56-90) for Sem and NSem, respectively. When stratified by IGCCCG prognostic groups, good risk relapsed patients had a trend towards better OS and PFS as compared to de novo metastatic patients. CONCLUSIONS GCC patients who relapse after initial CSI can be detected early by active surveillance and have an excellent survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Speicher
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hospital of Thun, 3600, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Ardizzone
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Helnwein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dennis Hoch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Dilara Akhoundova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaufmann E, Antonelli L, Albers P, Cary C, Gillessen Sommer S, Heidenreich A, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Pierorazio PM, Stephenson AJ, Fankhauser CD. Oncological Follow-up Strategies for Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: A Narrative Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 44:142-149. [PMID: 36106144 PMCID: PMC9465095 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonssspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Clint Cary
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Silke Gillessen Sommer
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biosciences, USI University, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Oing
- Sir Bobby Robson Cancer Trials Research Centre, Department of Cancer Services, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital and Medical Faculty of University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Phillip Martin Pierorazio
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonssspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse 6000, 16 Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy amongst young men, and a large proportion present with stage I disease. The options for management following radical orchiectomy are multifold. We review here approaches to treatment in this setting, providing an update on recent publications. RECENT FINDINGS At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we maintain a nonrisk adapted active surveillance approach. With a dedicated surveillance program using low-dose computed tomography imaging, patients are appropriately identified early for treatment on relapse. There are ongoing investigations into minimizing toxicities of treatments for relapse, and in particular, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) presents an attractive alternative. This, though, remains investigational in the setting of seminoma. SUMMARY Testicular cancer is a highly curable malignancy. In stage I disease, an active surveillance approach following radical orchiectomy is preferred, irrespective of risk-profile. This approach serves to limit the toxicity of adjuvant treatment in a significant proportion of patients, while maintaining excellent survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Roderick Clark
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|