SEOM clinical guidelines for pancreatic and biliary tract cancer (2020)

Building on the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma represents one of the solid tumors showing the worst prognosis worldwide, with a high recurrence rate after adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Circulating tumor DNA analysis raised as a promising non-invasive tool to characterize tumor genomics and to assess treatment response. In this study, surgical tumor tissue and sequential blood samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and were correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics. Thirty resectable/borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients treated at the Hospital Universitario de Navarra were included. Circulating tumoral DNA sequencing identified pathogenic variants in KRAS and TP53, and in other cancer-associated genes. Pathogenic variants at diagnosis were detected in patients with a poorer outcome, and were correlated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in borderline pancreatic ductal adneocarcinoma patients. Higher variant allele frequency at diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis, and thesum of variant allele frequency was greater in samples at progression. Our results build on the potential value of circulating tumor DNA for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, by complementing tissue genetic information and as a non-invasive tool for treatment decision. Confirmatory studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice

OBJECTIVES

Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. ‍This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.

RESULTS

Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.

Update on the management of older patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a perspective from medical oncology

In the context of pancreatic cancer, surgical intervention is typically recommended for localized tumours, whereas chemotherapy is the preferred approach in the advanced and/or metastatic setting. However, pancreatic cancer is closely linked to ageing, with an average diagnosis at 72 years. Paradoxically, despite its increased occurrence among older individuals, this population is often underrepresented in clinical studies, complicating the decision-making process. Age alone should not determine the therapeutic strategy but, given the high comorbidity and mortality of this disease, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is necessary to define the best treatment, prevent toxicity, and optimize older patient care. In this review, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (Grupo Español de Tratamiento de los Tumores Digestivos, TTD), and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo, GEMCAD) have assessed the available scientific evidence and propose a series of recommendations on the management and treatment of the older population with pancreatic cancer.

A prognostic binary classifier comprised of five critical mRNAs stratified pancreatic cancer patients following resection

Background

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by an extremely poor prognosis, even following potentially curative resection. Classical prognostic markers such as histopathological or clinical parameters have limited predictive power. The present study aimed to establish a prognostic model combining mRNA expression data with histopathological and clinical data to better predict survival and stratify pancreatic cancer patients following resection. We pioneered three models in one study and systematically evaluated the clinical benefits of all three models.

Methods

To identify differentially expressed genes in pancreatic cancer, mRNA data from normal (GTEx database) and pancreatic cancer (TCGA database) tissues were used. Survival analysis was carried out to identify prognosis-relevant genes from the identified differentially expressed genes and LASSO regression was used to filter out hub genes. The risk score of several hub genes was calculated according to gene expression and coefficients. Validation was carried out using an independent set of GEO microarray data. Multivariate COX regression was used for identifying independent clinical and pathological risk factors related to patient's survival in the TCGA database and a prognostic model combining mRNA expression data with histopathological and clinical data was established. Another prognostic model using clinicopathological factors from the SEER database was conceived based on multivariate COX regression. NRI (net reclassification improvement) and IDI (integrated discrimination index) were used to compare the predictive capabilities of the different models.

Results

We identified 1589 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through the comparison of normal and pancreatic cancer tissues, of whom 317 were associated with prognosis(p < 0.05). LASSO regression identified five hub genes, MYEOV, ANXA2P2, MET, CEP55, and KRT7, that were used for the five-mRNA-classifier prognostic model. The classifier could stratify patients into a short and long survival group: 5-year overall survival in the training set (TCGA, 6 % vs 52 %, p < 0.001), test set (TCGA, 18 % vs 55 %,p < 0.01) and external validation set (GEO, 0 % vs 25 %, p < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that the mRNA model (model 1) was better than the clinicopathological no-mRNA model (model 2) in predicting 5-year survival in the TCGA database (AUC: 0.877 vs 0.718, z = 3.165, p < 0.01) and better than the multi-factor prognostic model (model 3) from the SEER database (AUC: 0.754, z = 2.637, p < 0.01). On predictive performance, model 1 improved model 2 (NRI = 0.084, z = 1.288, p = 0.198; IDI = 0.055, z = 1.041,p = 0.298) and model 3 (NRI = 0.167,z = 1.961,p = 0.05; IDI = 0.086, z = 1.427, p = 0.154).

Conclusion

The five-mRNA-classifier is a reliable and feasible instrument to predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients following resection. It might help in patiens counseling and assist clinicians in providing individualized treatment for patients in different risk groups.

Utility of a partially covered metal stent for salvage sealing therapy for bleeding caused by duodenal invasion of pancreatobiliary cancers: Case series

Pancreatobiliary cancer-related gastrointestinal bleeding caused by duodenal invasion can be a life-threatening condition that is hard to control. It is unclear whether a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) is useful for hemostasis of bleeding related to advanced pancreatobiliary cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a CSEMS for hemostasis of bleeding caused by duodenal invasion of pancreatobiliary cancer. Between January 2020 and January 2022, seven patients in whom a duodenal CSEMS was inserted to control pancreatobiliary cancer-related bleeding were enrolled. The technical and clinical success rates with respect to hemostasis, procedure time, and adverse events were assessed. All patients were inoperable cases (six with pancreatic cancer [five, stage IV; one, stage III]; and one with gallbladder cancer [stage IV]) in whom CSEMs were inserted to treat refractory bleeding caused by cancer invasion. Hemostasis was achieved in all cases (100% [7/7]). The mean procedure time was 17 ± 7.9 min. There were no adverse events, including migration and rebleeding. No rebleeding occurred up until the time of death in any of the cases (mean follow-up period, 73 ± 27 days). Deployment of duodenal CSEMS is a useful salvage therapy for bleeding caused by advanced pancreatobiliary cancer invasion.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Recent Advances in Molecular Pathobiology and Therapeutic Approaches

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) pose a complex challenge in oncology due to diverse etiologies, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches. This review discusses the risk factors, molecular pathology, and current therapeutic options for CCA and explores the emerging strategies encompassing targeted therapies, immunotherapy, novel compounds from natural sources, and modulation of gut microbiota. CCA are driven by an intricate landscape of genetic mutations, epigenetic dysregulation, and post-transcriptional modification, which differs based on geography (e.g., for liver fluke versus non-liver fluke-driven CCA) and exposure to environmental carcinogens (e.g., exposure to aristolochic acid). Liquid biopsy, including circulating cell-free DNA, is a potential diagnostic tool for CCA, which warrants further investigations. Currently, surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for CCA despite the technical challenges. Adjuvant chemotherapy, including cisplatin and gemcitabine, is standard for advanced, unresectable, or recurrent CCA. Second-line therapy options, such as FOLFOX (oxaliplatin and 5-FU), and the significance of radiation therapy in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and palliative settings are also discussed. This review underscores the need for personalized therapies and demonstrates the shift towards precision medicine in CCA treatment. The development of targeted therapies, including FDA-approved drugs inhibiting FGFR2 gene fusions and IDH1 mutations, is of major research focus. Investigations into immune checkpoint inhibitors have also revealed potential clinical benefits, although improvements in survival remain elusive, especially across patient demographics. Novel compounds from natural sources exhibit anti-CCA activity, while microbiota dysbiosis emerges as a potential contributor to CCA progression, necessitating further exploration of their direct impact and mechanisms through in-depth research and clinical studies. In the future, extensive translational research efforts are imperative to bridge existing gaps and optimize therapeutic strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes for this complex malignancy.

Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine and FOLFOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND: Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) (nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX) showed a good safety and clinical profile in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) in the phase I SEQUENCE trial. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX was compared with standard nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) as first-line treatment in a multi-institutional, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in patients with untreated mPDAC. We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by mFOLFOX on day 29 of a 6-week cycle (experimental group) or nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (control group). The primary end point was the 12-month overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned: 78 to nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 79 to nab-P/Gem. Patients receiving nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX had a 12-month overall survival of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2 to 66.5) versus 35.4% (95% CI, 24.9 to 46) in the control group (P=0.02). Similarly, the 24-month survival was 22.4% (95% CI, 13 to 31.8) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX versus 7.6% (95% CI, 1.8 to 13.4) with control treatment. The median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 16.2) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 12) with nab-P/Gem (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95). The safety profile showed a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (35 of 76 vs. 19 of 79 patients, P=0.004), grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (18 of 78 vs. 6 of 79 patients, P=0.007), and two treatment-related deaths (2.6%) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX compared with none with control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX showed a significantly higher 12-month survival when compared with the standard nab-P/Gem treatment; this came with greater treatment toxicity. (Funded by Celgene; EuCT number, 2014-005350-19; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02504333.)

Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool

BACKGROUND

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) has provided open-access guidelines for cancer since 2014. However, no independent assessment of their quality has been conducted to date. This study aimed to critically evaluate the quality of SEOM guidelines on cancer treatment.

METHODS

Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and AGREE-REX tool was used to evaluate the qualities of the guidelines.

RESULTS

We assessed 33 guidelines, with 84.8% rated as "high quality". The highest median standardized scores (96.3) were observed in the domain "clarity of presentation", whereas "applicability" was distinctively low (31.4), with only one guideline scoring above 60%. SEOM guidelines did not include the views and preferences of the target population, nor did specify updating methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Although developed with acceptable methodological rigor, SEOM guidelines could be improved in the future, particularly in terms of clinical applicability and patient perspectives.

Annals of Surgical Oncology Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Primary Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers

Primary cancers of the liver and biliary tract are rare and aggressive tumors that often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. For patients with localized disease amenable to resection, surgery typically offers the best chance at curative-intent therapy. Unfortunately, the incidence of recurrence even after curative-intent surgery remains high. In turn, patients with hepatobiliary cancers commonly require multimodality therapy including a combination of resection, systemic therapy (i.e., targeted therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy), and/or loco-regional therapies. With advancements in the field, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to remain updated on the latest guidelines and recommendations for surgical management and optimal patient selection. Given the complex and evolving nature of treatment, this report highlights the latest practice guidelines for the surgical management of hepatobiliary cancers.

Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for prediction of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) plays an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CH-EUS is useful for predicting the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) determined by pathological response.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CH-EUS before chemotherapy and surgical resection were divided into two groups according to poor (group-P) or rich tumor vascularity (group-R) determined by enhancement pattern on early- and late-phase CH-EUS. The pathological response to chemotherapy was categorized according to Evans' classification. Pathological analysis showing tumor cell destruction (>50 %) defined a good response.

RESULTS

Early-phase CH-EUS classified 44 patients into group-R and 50 into group-P, whereas late-phase CH-EUS classified 10 into group-R and 84 into group-P. Early-phase CH-EUS classification resulted in significantly higher numbers of patients with a good response in the rich group (n = 19) than in the poor group (n = 4; P = 0.0015). Multivariate analysis showed that assignment to the rich group was the strongest independent factor associated with chemosensitivity (P = 0.006, hazard ratio = 5.66, 95 % confidence interval: 1.17-19.27). In resectable patients, the enhancement pattern was the only independent factor associated with chemosensitivity (group-P vs. group-R, P = 0.003; HR [95 % CI], 14.59 [1.38-154.38]). Late-phase CH-EUS did not reveal a significant difference between group-P and group-R.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of vascular pattern on CH-EUS could be useful for predicting the efficacy of NAC in patients with pancreatic cancer. The enhancement pattern on CH-EUS could be a one of the useful features for determining NAC indications in resectable pancreatic cancer patients.

Analysis of the efficacy and factors influencing survival of adjuvant radiotherapy for stage II-III biliary tract carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy for stage II-III biliary tract carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 37 patients who underwent radical resection of biliary tract carcinomas at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between 2016 and 2020. We analyzed survival differences between patients who did (n = 17) and did not (n = 20) receive postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test and Cox univariate analysis were used. The Cox proportional risk regression model was used for the multifactorial analysis of factors influencing prognosis.

RESULTS

The median survival time (28.9 vs. 14.5 months) and the 1-year (82.40% vs. 55.0%) and 2-year survival rates (58.8% vs. 25.0%) were significantly higher among patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy than among those who did not (χ2 = 6.381, p = 0.012). Multifactorial analysis showed that pathological tumor type (p = 0.004), disease stage (p = 0.021), and adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors in biliary tract carcinoma. Subgroup analyses showed that compared to no radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved median survival time in patients with stage III disease (21.6 vs. 12.7 months; p = 0.017), positive margins (28.9 vs. 10.5 months; p = 0.012), and T3 or T4 tumors (26.8 vs. 16.8 months; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved the survival of patients with biliary tract carcinoma, and is recommended especially for patients with stage III disease, positive surgical margins, or ≥ T3.

DLL3 Is a Prognostic and Potentially Predictive Biomarker for Immunotherapy Linked to PD/PD-L Axis and NOTCH1 in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive neoplasm with very poor patient survival outcomes despite available treatments. There is an urgent need for new potential treatment options and novel biomarkers for these patients. Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 3 (DLL3) interacts with the Notch receptor and causes inhibition of Notch signaling, which confers a survival advantage to PDAC cells. Thus, DLL3 expression could affect cell survival, and its inhibition could increase a patient's survival. To test this hypothesis, a survival analysis was conducted using the progression-free and overall survival from two independent datasets of PDAC patients, with one using mRNA z-score levels and the other using the Hscore protein expression level; both were carried out using a log-rank test and plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves. DLL3 at the mRNA expression level showed an association between high mRNA expression and both a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients. Then, we designed a retrospective study with resected PDAC samples. Our primary objective with this dataset was to assess the relationship between PFS and OS and DLL3 protein expression. The secondary assessment was to provide a rationale for the use of anti-DLL3-based treatments in combination with immunotherapy that is supported by the link between DLL3 and other factors that are involved in immune checkpoints. The survival analyses revealed a protective effect of high DLL3 protein expression levels in both PFS and OS. Interestingly, high DLL3 protein expression levels were significantly correlated with PD-L1/2 and negatively correlated with NOTCH1. Therefore, DLL3 could be considered a biomarker for better prognosis in resectable PDAC patients as well as a therapeutic biomarker for immunotherapy response. These facts set a rationale for testing anti-DLL3-based treatments either alone or combined with immunotherapy or other NOTCH1 inhibitors.

Current clinical practice in the management of Brazilian patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the routine clinical practice of physicians involved in the treatment of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in Brazil.

METHODS

Physicians were invited through email and text messages to participate in an electronic survey sponsored by the Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group (GTG) and the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO). We evaluated the relationship between variable categories numerically with false discovery rate-adjusted Fisher's exact test p values and graphically with Multiple Correspondence Analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 255 physicians answered the survey. Most (52.5%) were medical oncologists, treated patients predominantly in the private setting (71.0%), and had access to multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTDTB; 76.1%). Medical oncologists were more likely to describe neoadjuvant therapy as beneficial in the resectable setting and surgeons in the borderline resectable setting. Most physicians would use information on risk factors for early recurrence, frailty, and type of surgery to decide treatment strategy. Doctors working predominantly in public institutions were less likely to have access to MTDTB and to consider FOLFIRINOX the most adequate regimen in the neoadjuvant setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable differences exist in the management of localized PDAC, some of them possibly explained by the medical specialty, but also by the funding source of health care.

Intestinal Flora in Chemotherapy Resistance of Biliary Pancreatic Cancer

Biliary pancreatic malignancy has an occultic onset, a high degree of malignancy, and a poor prognosis. Most clinical patients miss the opportunity for surgical resection of the tumor. Systemic chemotherapy is still one of the important methods for the treatment of biliary pancreatic malignancies. Many chemotherapy regimens are available, but their efficacy is not satisfactory, and the occurrence of chemotherapy resistance is a major reason leading to poor prognosis. With the advancement of studies on intestinal flora, it has been found that intestinal flora is correlated with and plays an important role in chemotherapy resistance. The application of probiotics and other ways to regulate intestinal flora can improve this problem. This paper aims to review and analyze the research progress of intestinal flora in the chemotherapy resistance of biliary pancreatic malignancies to provide new ideas for treatment.

Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment

Background

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, which is attributed to limited treatment options. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have been proposed to provide benefits in treating pancreatic cancer. Despite its importance in treatment, clinicians are not generally well equipped to counsel their patients about CAM therapies. This review identified the quantity and assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) providing CAM recommendations for the treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to identify pancreatic cancer CPGs. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 2011 to 2022. The Guidelines International Network (GIN) and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) websites were also searched. Eligible CPGs published by non-profit agencies on treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer for adults were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.

Results

From 31 eligible search results, 7 CPGs mentioned CAM and 3 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The mean scaled domain percentages of the CPGs in this study (overall, CAM-specific) were as follows: scope and purpose (81.3%, 77.8%), stakeholder involvement (63.9%, 42.6%), rigor-of-development (51.0%, 40.3%), clarity-of-presentation (83.3%, 54.6%), applicability (42.3%, 30.5%), and editorial independence (58.3%, 58.3%).

Conclusions

Evaluation of the CPGs demonstrated that quality varied both within and between CPGs. CPGs that scored well could be used by patients and clinicians as the basis for discussion for the use of CAM therapies. Future research should identify other appropriate CAM therapies for further development of CPGs for pancreatic cancer.

Registration

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022334025).

State of the Art: ctDNA in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive source to characterize genetic alterations related to the tumor. Upper gastrointestinal cancers, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEC), biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PADC) are poor prognostic malignancies, usually diagnosed at advanced stages when no longer amenable to surgical resection and show a poor prognosis even for resected patients. In this sense, ctDNA has emerged as a promising non-invasive tool with different applications, from early diagnosis to molecular characterization and follow-up of tumor genomic evolution. In this manuscript, novel advances in the field of ctDNA analysis in upper gastrointestinal tumors are presented and discussed. Overall, ctDNA analyses can help in early diagnosis, outperforming current diagnostic approaches. Detection of ctDNA prior to surgery or active treatment is also a prognostic marker that associates with worse survival, while ctDNA detection after surgery is indicative of minimal residual disease, anticipating in some cases the imaging-based detection of progression. In the advanced setting, ctDNA analyses characterize the genetic landscape of the tumor and identify patients for targeted-therapy approaches, and studies show variable concordance levels with tissue-based genetic testing. In this line, several studies also show that ctDNA serves to follow responses to active therapy, especially in targeted approaches, where it can detect multiple resistance mechanisms. Unfortunately, current studies are still limited and observational. Future prospective multi-center and interventional studies, carefully designed to assess the value of ctDNA to help clinical decision-making, will shed light on the real applicability of ctDNA in upper gastrointestinal tumor management. This manuscript presents a review of the evidence available in this field up to date.

Validation of the Prognostic Role for Surgical Treatment in Stage II Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER Population-Based Study

Background: This study aimed to determine the role of surgical treatment in patients with stage II intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Methods: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We divided stage II iCCAs into solitary tumors with vascular invasion (T2sN0M0) and multiple tumors with/without vascular invasion (T2mN0M0) according to the criteria of AJCC v.8. The Kaplan−Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS). We performed two propensity score-matching analyses with (PSM2) or without (PSM1) surgical treatment. Results: 667 and 778 iCCA patients with stage II and IIIB were recruited. After PSM2, there was no survival difference in stage II iCCA patients in hypothetical conditions with similar surgical proportions (p = 0.079). However, OS was significantly worse in patients with T2mN0M0 than T2sN0M0 when the actual surgical proportion existed after PSM1 (p < 0.001). OS was similar between T2mN0M0 and IIIB regardless of whether PSM1 (p = 0.907) or PSM2 (p = 0.699) was performed. The surgical treatment was verified to associate with prognosis. Conclusions: The survival benefit by surgical treatment was existed in Stage II but not in Stage IIIB iCCA patients. The OS for T2mN0M0 will approach that of T2sN0M0 if the surgical proportion is gradually increased.

Comparison of current guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma: 2022 update

As a consequence of breakthroughs in the area of guidelines research, the therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has significantly improved the efficacy rate of diagnosis and survival outcomes. We compared the most recently updated clinical practice guidelines and consensus to provide recommendations based on the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment available in various countries. Following a systematic review, we discovered that these guidelines and consensus had both similarities and differences in terms of what organizations or groups drafted the guidelines and the approach, applicability, content and recent updates of the guidelines as well as in terms of diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The disparities could be attributable to a variety of etiological factors, high risk patients, health resources, medical technology, treatment options, and income levels. Additionally, while complete adoption of guidelines may benefit physicians, patients, and authorities, there remains a disconnect between expected goals and implementation.

Identification of Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression Processes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using High-Throughput Proteomics

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with an overall 5-year survival rate of just 5%. A better understanding of the carcinogenesis processes and the mechanisms of the progression of PDAC is mandatory. Fifty-two PDAC patients treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy, with available primary tumors, normal tissue, preneoplastic lesions (PanIN), and/or lymph node metastases, were selected for the study. Proteins were extracted from small punches and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using data-independent acquisition. Proteomics data were analyzed using probabilistic graphical models, allowing functional characterization. Comparisons between groups were made using linear mixed models. Three proteomic tumor subtypes were defined. T1 (32% of patients) was related to adhesion, T2 (34%) had metabolic features, and T3 (34%) presented high splicing and nucleoplasm activity. These proteomics subtypes were validated in the PDAC TCGA cohort. Relevant biological processes related to carcinogenesis and tumor progression were studied in each subtype. Carcinogenesis in the T1 subtype seems to be related to an increase of adhesion and complement activation node activity, whereas tumor progression seems to be related to nucleoplasm and translation nodes. Regarding the T2 subtype, it seems that metabolism and, especially, mitochondria act as the motor of cancer development. T3 analyses point out that nucleoplasm, mitochondria and metabolism, and extracellular matrix nodes could be involved in T3 tumor carcinogenesis. The identified processes were different among proteomics subtypes, suggesting that the molecular motor of the disease is different in each subtype. These differences can have implications for the development of future tailored therapeutic approaches for each PDAC proteomics subtype.

Prediction of Early Recurrence After R0 Resection for Gallbladder Carcinoma of Stage T1b-T3

Purpose

The time-to-tumor recurrence can predict the prognosis of hepatobiliary cancers following curative-intent resection. Therefore, for patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) of stage T1b–T3 who had undergone R0 resection, we investigated the risk factors for early recurrence of GBC and their prognosis.

Patients and Methods

A total of 260 patients with GBC with T1b–T3 disease and an R0 margin were identified. Their clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative details and prognostic data were reviewed. Survival analyses were carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method. Logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for early recurrence.

Results

The optimal cutoff for early recurrence was 29 months. Early recurrence tended to result in relapse far from the primary tumor, and such patients tended to have significantly worse overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that T3 disease, N1/N2 stage, poor differentiation of tumor, and lymphovascular invasion (LI) were associated with a greater risk of early recurrence. Patients diagnosed as having GBC incidentally and who had the risk factors of early recurrence were more likely to benefit from re-resection 2–4 weeks after a cholecystectomy.

Conclusion

T3 stage, N1–N2 stage, poor differentiation, and LI were independent risk factors associated with early recurrence for patients with GBC with stage T1b–T3 disease after R0 resection.

Hsa_circ_0074298 promotes pancreatic cancer progression and resistance to gemcitabine by sponging miR-519 to target SMOC

Objective: To investigate the expression of hsa_circ_0074298 (circular RNA) and the molecular mechanism that promotes tumor growth and enhances the chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to detect hsa_circ_0074298 expression in pancreatic cancer. The intracellular localization of hsa_circ_0074298 was determined by RNA in situ hybridization. The CCK8 method, colony formation assay, Transwell assay, and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the effects of hsa_circ_0074298 on the proliferation, migration, invasion, cell cycle, apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells. Bioinformatics analysis and dual luciferase assays were employed to detect the association of hsa_circ_0074298 and miR-519d and the binding of miR-519d to the target gene SMOC2. A subcutaneous xenograft model was established to observe the effect of hsa_circ_0074298 in vivo.

Results: The hsa_circ_0074298 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm. Hsa_circ_0074298 was highly expressed in pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines. The expression of hsa_circ_0074298 was significantly correlated with pancreatic cancer tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and pathological grade. hsa_circ_0074298 could sponge miR-519, and miR-519d bound to SMOC2. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0074298 expression significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration, invasion, colony forming ability and promoted cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and chemo-resistance of pancreatic cancer in vitro and vivo. However, the effects could be reversed by a miR-519d inhibitor or SMOC2 overexpression.

Conclusion: By sponging miR-519 and targeting SMOC2, hsa_circ_0074298 promotes the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer and increases the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine.