1
|
Santero M, Meade AG, Selva A, Savall-Esteve O, Bracchiglione J, Macías I, Leache L, Cerdà P, Bonfill Cosp X. Utilising systematic reviews to assess potential overtreatment and claim for better evidence-based research: an analysis of anticancer drugs versus supportive care in advanced esophageal cancer. Syst Rev 2024; 13:186. [PMID: 39026378 PMCID: PMC11256491 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02594-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highlighting the identified gaps in evidence-based research concerning advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment and care, this review evaluates the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs compared to supportive care for advanced EC patients, aiming to assess the appropriateness of usual treatments and identify the gaps that need to be filled with primary research. METHODS We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarised using GRADE summary of finding tables. RESULTS We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies. CONCLUSION RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of supportive care in advanced EC is low or very low, and this information should be actively shared with affected patients. More and better RCTs should be conducted to assess whether any old or new proposed treatment for advanced EC patients provides a better balance of benefits and harms than the supportive care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The study protocol was registered in OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6 ) on 2022-03-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilina Santero
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Adriana-Gabriela Meade
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Selva
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació I Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT_CERCA), Sabadell, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Savall-Esteve
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Bracchiglione
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ismael Macías
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital de Sabadell-Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leire Leache
- Unit of Innovation and Organization, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Paula Cerdà
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR, SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deffert F, Vilela APO, Cobre ADF, Furlan LHP, Tonin FS, Fernandez-Lllimos F, Pontarolo R. Methodological quality and clinical recommendations of guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review and an appraisal through AGREE II and AGREE REX tools. Fam Pract 2024:cmae029. [PMID: 38831566 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are statements to assist practitioners and stakeholders in decisions about healthcare. Low methodological quality guidelines may prejudice decision-making and negatively affect clinical outcomes in non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases worsted by poor lipid management. We appraised the quality of CPGs on dyslipidemia management and synthesized the most updated pharmacological recommendations. METHODS A systematic review following international recommendations was performed. Searches to retrieve CPG on pharmacological treatments in adults with dyslipidaemia were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Trip databases. Eligible articles were assessed using AGREE II (methodological quality) and AGREE-REX (recommendation excellence) tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. The most updated guidelines (published after 2019) had their recommendations qualitatively synthesized in an exploratory analysis. RESULTS Overall, 66 guidelines authored by professional societies (75%) and targeting clinicians as primary users were selected. The AGREE II domains Scope and Purpose (89%) and Clarity of Presentation (97%), and the AGREE-REX item Clinical Applicability (77.0%) obtained the highest values. Conversely, guidelines were methodologically poorly performed/documented (46%) and scarcely provided data on the implementability of practical recommendations (38%). Recommendations on pharmacological treatments are overall similar, with slight differences concerning the use of supplements and the availability of drugs. CONCLUSION High-quality dyslipidaemia CPG, especially outside North America and Europe, and strictly addressing evidence synthesis, appraisal, and recommendations are needed, especially to guide primary care decisions. CPG developers should consider stakeholders' values and preferences and adapt existing statements to individual populations and healthcare systems to ensure successful implementation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávia Deffert
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Oliveira Vilela
- Pharmaceutical Assistance Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
| | - Alexandre de Fátima Cobre
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
| | | | - Fernanda Stumpf Tonin
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
- Pharmaceutical Assistance Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
- H&TRC - Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL - Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Avenida D. João II, Lote 4.69.01, Parque das Nações, Lisboa 1990-096, Portugal
| | - Fernando Fernandez-Lllimos
- Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit (UCIBIO), Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Laboratory of Pharmacology Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto 4050-313, Portugal
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
- Pharmaceutical Assistance Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, PR 80210-170, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Santero M, Requeijo C, Quintana MJ, Rodríguez D, Bottaro D, Macias I, Pericay C, Farina N, Blanco JM, Urreta-Barallobre I, Punti L, Nava MA, Bonfill Cosp X. How appropriate is treating patients diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer with anticancer drugs? A multicenter retrospective cohort Spanish study. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03436-1. [PMID: 38662169 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03436-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM To assess the appropriateness of systemic oncological treatments (SOT) provided to patients diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer (EC) across a group of participating hospitals. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective cohort study in five Spanish hospitals including newly confirmed advanced EC cases between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, with a 5-year follow-up. RESULTS We identified 157 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (median age: 65 years, 85.9% males). Most patients, 125 (79.6%) were treated at least with one active treatment, and 33% received two or more lines of SOT. The 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 30.3% [95%CI: 23.8, 38.7], 14.0% [95%CI: 9.3, 21.0], and 7.1% [95% CI: 3.8, 13.1] respectively, and the median survival time 8 months (95% CI: 6, 19) for stages IIIb IIIc and 7 months (95% CI: 5, 9) for stage IV. Clinical stage, receiving more than one line of SOT, and treatment with radiotherapy accelerated the time to death (0.4, 0.9-, and 0.8-times shorter survival respectively, p < 0.05). Better performance status (ECOG < 2) extended survival time by 2.2 times (p = 0.04). Age < 65 years (OR 9.4, 95% CI 3.2, 31.4, p < 0.001), and being treated in one particular hospital (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0, 0.8, p < 0.01) were associated with the administration of two or more lines of SOT. Altogether, 18.9% and 9.0% of patients received chemotherapy in the last four and two weeks of life, respectively. Moreover, 2.5% of patients were prescribed a new line of chemotherapy during the last month of life. The proportion of all patients who did not have access to palliative care reached 29.3%, and among those who had access to it, 34.2% initiated it in the last month of life. CONCLUSION A high proportion of advanced EC patients receive many treatments not based on sound evidence and they do not benefit enough from palliative care services. The most accepted appropriateness indicators point out that some of the analyzed patients could have been overtreated. This study provides important insights into the quality of care provided to advanced EC, and furthermore, for giving valuable insight and opportunities for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilina Santero
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
- Institut de Reserca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Carolina Requeijo
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Reserca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jesus Quintana
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Reserca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - David Bottaro
- Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Iratxe Urreta-Barallobre
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Epidemiology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Laura Punti
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Maria Angeles Nava
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Reserca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Hospital de Mataró, Mataró, Spain
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santero M, de Mas J, Rifà B, Clavero I, Rexach I, Bonfill Cosp X. Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:85-97. [PMID: 37368198 PMCID: PMC10761528 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03219-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) has provided open-access guidelines for cancer since 2014. However, no independent assessment of their quality has been conducted to date. This study aimed to critically evaluate the quality of SEOM guidelines on cancer treatment. METHODS Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and AGREE-REX tool was used to evaluate the qualities of the guidelines. RESULTS We assessed 33 guidelines, with 84.8% rated as "high quality". The highest median standardized scores (96.3) were observed in the domain "clarity of presentation", whereas "applicability" was distinctively low (31.4), with only one guideline scoring above 60%. SEOM guidelines did not include the views and preferences of the target population, nor did specify updating methods. CONCLUSIONS Although developed with acceptable methodological rigor, SEOM guidelines could be improved in the future, particularly in terms of clinical applicability and patient perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Júlia de Mas
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Rifà
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inés Clavero
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Rexach
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cortés-Jofré M, Madera M, Tirado-Amador L, Asenjo-Lobos C, Bonfill-Cosp X. Treatments for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3541-3555. [PMID: 37254015 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03223-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CPG developer websites, lung cancer societies, and oncology organizations to identify CPGs providing recommendations on treatments for NSCLC. The methodological quality for each CPG was determined independently by three appraisers using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) instrument. RESULTS Twenty-two CPGs met the eligibility criteria. The median scores per AGREE II domain were: scope and purpose 90.7% (64.8-100%), stakeholder involvement 76.9% (27.8-96.3%); rigor of development 80.9% (27.1-92.4%); clarity of presentation 89.8% (50-100%); applicability 46.5% (12.5-87.5%); and editorial independence 91.7% (27.8-100%). Most of the CPGs (54.5%) were rated as "recommended with modifications" for clinical use. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the methodological quality of CPGs proving recommendations on the management of NSCLC is moderate, but there is still room for improvement in their development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Cortés-Jofré
- Doctoral Program in Research Methodology and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Meisser Madera
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Research, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
| | - Lesbia Tirado-Amador
- Programa de Odontología, Grupo GINOUS, Universidad del Sinú, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Claudia Asenjo-Lobos
- Centro de Estudios Clínicos, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina (ICIM), Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad de Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Xavier Bonfill-Cosp
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Institute of Biomedical Research Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Public Health and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng F, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Chen Q, Liang CL, Liu H, Qiu F, Chen Y, Huang H, Lu W, Dai Z. Polyphyllin I suppresses the gastric cancer growth by promoting cancer cell ferroptosis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1145407. [PMID: 37081971 PMCID: PMC10110865 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1145407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Ferroptosis is a new form of regulated cell death characterized by the accumulation of iron-dependent lipid peroxides and membrane damages. Recent studies have identified an important role for cancer cell ferroptosis in antitumor therapy. On the other hand, polyphyllin I (PPI) has been reported to exert antitumor effects on some types of cancers. However, it remains unknown whether or not PPI regulates cancer cell ferroptosis.Methods: Two types of human gastric cancer cells (AGS and MKN-45) were used to establish tumor xenograft models in nude mice that were treated with polyphyllin I (PPI) to observe tumor growth, while cells also were cultured for in vitro studies. Ferroptosis, based on the intracellular ROS/lipid ROS production and accumulation of ferrous ions, was detected using a fluorescence microscope and flow cytometer, while the expression of NRF2/FTH1 was measured using Western blotting assays.Results: Here we found that PPI inhibited the gastric cancer growth in vivo and in vitro while increasing the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)/lipid peroxides and ferrous ions in the gastric cancer cells. PPI also decreased the levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) in gastric cancer cells in vitro. Moreover, liproxstain-1, an inhibitor of cell ferroptosis, mostly reversed the cell ferroptosis and tumor growth arrest induced by PPI. Finally, the effects of PPI on cancer cell ferroptosis were diminished by the overexpression of NRF2.Conclusion: For the first time, our results have demonstrated that PPI exerts its antitumor activity on the gastric cancer by, at least partially, inducing cancer cell ferroptosis via regulating NRF2/FTH1 pathway. These findings may be implicated for clinical replacement therapy of the gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Zheng
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Joint Immunology Program, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yeshu Wang
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qunfang Zhang
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Joint Immunology Program, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiuyuan Chen
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chun-Ling Liang
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huazhen Liu
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Feifei Qiu
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuchao Chen
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haiding Huang
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Joint Immunology Program, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Weihui Lu
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Joint Immunology Program, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- *Correspondence: Weihui Lu, ; Zhenhua Dai,
| | - Zhenhua Dai
- Section of Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Joint Immunology Program, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- *Correspondence: Weihui Lu, ; Zhenhua Dai,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zheng Q, Gao Y, Xiong L, Huang H, Li J, OuYang G, Saimire W, Yang J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Luo X. Chinese herbal medicine and COVID-19: quality evaluation of clinical guidelines and expert consensus and analysis of key recommendations. ACUPUNCTURE AND HERBAL MEDICINE 2022; 2:152-161. [PMID: 37808348 PMCID: PMC9746251 DOI: 10.1097/hm9.0000000000000043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To systematically review the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), assess the methodological quality as well as clinical credibility and implementability of specific recommendations, and summarize key recommendations. Methods As of April 2022, we conducted a comprehensive search on major electronic databases, guideline websites, academic society websites, and government websites to assess the methodological quality and clinical applicability of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and Evaluation-Recommendations EXcellence (AGREE-REX) instructions, respectively. Results The search yielded 61 CPGs, which were mostly published in 2020; moreover, 98.4% of the CPGs were published in China. Only five CPGs achieved a high-quality AGREE II rating; further, six CPGs could be directly recommended, with most of the CPGs still showing much room for improvement. CPGs had a low overall score in the AGREE-REX evaluation, with the domains of clinical applicability, values and preferences, and implementability being standardized in 21.80% ± 12.56%, 16.00% ± 11.81%, and 31.33% ± 14.55% of the CPGs, respectively. Five high-quality CPGs mentioned 56 Chinese herbal formulas. Half of the recommendations had moderate or strong evidence level in the GRADE evaluation. The most frequently recommended herbal medicines were Lianhua Qingwen granule/capsule and Jinhua Qinggan granule; however, the strength of recommendation for each prescription varied across CPGs and populations. Conclusions The overall quality of current CPGs for COVID-19 for CHM still needs to be improved; moreover, the strength of the evidence remains to be standardized across CPGs. Graphical abstract http://links.lww.com/AHM/A34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Zheng
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- School of Nursing, Evidence-based Nursing Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ya Gao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lu Xiong
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hengyi Huang
- School of Nursing, Evidence-based Nursing Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junfen Li
- The First Clinical School of Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Guoyuan OuYang
- School of Nursing, Evidence-based Nursing Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wulayin Saimire
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jingjing Yang
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaopeng Wang
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaofeng Luo
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Santero M, Meade AG, Acosta-Dighero R, González L, Melendi S, Solà I, Urrútia G, Quintana MJ, Bonfill Cosp X. European clinical practice guidelines on the use of chemotherapy for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers: a critical review using the AGREE II and the AGREE-REX instruments. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1588-1604. [PMID: 35286560 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02807-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the methodological quality of all relevant and recent European clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers, and to synthesise their recommendations on the use of chemotherapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, guidelines repositories, and other sources from 2010 onwards. We appraised quality using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX. RESULTS 11 CPGs were included (five high, five low, and one moderate quality). Most guidelines showed deficiencies in the domain "applicability", with only three scoring above 60%. Nine did not report having sought the views and preferences of the target population. The lowest scores for AGREE-REX were item Values and Preferences of Target Users (1.6; SD 1.3), and item Values and Preferences of Policy/Decision-Makers (1.8; SD 1.7). The domain Clinical Applicability got the highest score and the domain Implementability got the lowest. CONCLUSIONS An urgent area of research is how to develop credible and implementable recommendations on the clinical use of CT for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42021236753).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilina Santero
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Adriana Gabriela Meade
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Acosta-Dighero
- School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Santiago Melendi
- Hospital General de Agudos Carlos G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ivan Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gerard Urrútia
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Jesús Quintana
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|