Surface TREM-1 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Pediatric Sepsis

Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review

A biomarker describes a measurable indicator of a patient's clinical condition that can be measured accurately and reproducibly. Biomarkers offer utility for diagnosis, prognosis, early disease recognition, risk stratification, appropriate treatment (theranostics), and trial enrichment for patients with sepsis or suspected sepsis. In this narrative review, we aim to answer the question, "Do biomarkers in patients with sepsis or septic shock predict mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), or organ dysfunction?" We also discuss the role of pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers and biomarkers associated with intestinal permeability, endothelial injury, organ dysfunction, blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, brain injury, and short and long-term mortality. For sepsis, a range of biomarkers is identified, including fluid phase pattern recognition molecules (PRMs), complement system, cytokines, chemokines, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), non-coding RNAs, miRNAs, cell membrane receptors, cell proteins, metabolites, and soluble receptors. We also provide an overview of immune response biomarkers that can help identify or differentiate between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, septic shock, and sepsis-associated encephalopathy. However, significant work is needed to identify the optimal combinations of biomarkers that can augment diagnosis, treatment, and good patient outcomes.

Evaluation of sTREM1 and suPAR Biomarkers as Diagnostic and Prognostic Predictors in Sepsis Patients

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic role of sTREM1 in the diagnosis of sepsis and in differentiating between sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We also aimed to assess the prognostic value of suPAR in comparison to sequential organ-failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores, and 28-day mortality.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department and Central Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University from June 2019 to January 2021. The study population was classified into two groups: SIRS (no evidence of infection) and sepsis (with SIRS and evidence of infection). Patients were rated on the SOFA and APACHE II scoring systems at admission and after 7 days. Serum levels of sTREM1 and suPAR were measured by ELISA at the same time points.

Results

CRP and sTREM1 values were significantly higher in the sepsis group than the SIRS group on both days (P<0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) for CRP was 0.87 on the first day and 0.97 on the seventh, while the AUC for sTREM1 was 1.00 and 0.93 on the first and seventh days, respectively. The sensitivity of sTREM1 was 100% and specificity 84% at a cutoff of 49 pg/mL. There was a significantly positive correlation between CRP and sTREM1 values (P<0.0001). On the seventh day, nonsurvivors had significantly higher serum levels of suPAR (median 4.9 ng/mL) than survivors (median 2.9 ng/mL; P<0.0001). Nonsurvivors also had significantly higher SOFA and APACHE II scores than survivors (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

sTREM1 can be used as a good indicator for diagnosing sepsis in intensive care–unit patients. suPAR can also be used as a predictor of bad prognosis and poor survival at 7 days following admission.

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 as pediatric sepsis biomarker

OBJECTIVE

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 concentration can be used as a predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic marker in patients with sepsis. The objective of this study was to determine the validity of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 levels as a biomarker of sepsis in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This was an integrative literature review. PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, MEDLINE, and VHL databases were searched for papers published between 2015 and 2020, using the keywords triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, sepsis, and child.

RESULTS

The review included ten studies, of which four used triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 as a predictive biomarker; four, as a diagnostic biomarker; and two, as a prognostic biomarker. A total of 1,409 and 1,628 patients were included in primary and review studies, respectively. There was a predominance of significant results for the validity of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 levels in the prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of sepsis in pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 is a valid predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic biomarker of sepsis with good sensitivity and specificity in the pediatric population.

Role of soluble triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells-1 in distinguishing SIRS, sepsis, and septic shock in the pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Research into new markers has been intensified for early diagnosis, prognosis, and differentiation of SIRS, sepsis, and septic shock in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the role of soluble triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) and interleukin (IL)-6 in distinguishing between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, and septic shock in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients.

METHODS

Between June 2014 and July 2015, 90 consecutive patients who were treated in the PICU were included in this prospective observational study. Patients were divided into four groups: control (n = 23), SIRS (n = 22), sepsis (n = 23), and septic shock (n = 22). All patients were evaluated for white blood cell (WBC), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), IL-6, and sTREM-1 levels at 0, 24, and 72 h of admission. The prognostic evaluations were made using the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, prognosis, pathogen growth in culture, PRISM III and PELOD score, WBC, CRP, PCT, IL-6, and sTREM-1 levels and a comparison was made between groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between all groups in terms of the 0-, 24-, and 72-h sTREM-1 values (p = 0.761, p = 0.360, and p = 0.822, respectively). CRP and PCT values did not differ between the septic shock, sepsis, and SIRS groups at 0, 24, and 72 h. In the septic shock group, the 0-h IL-6 value was significantly higher than that of the SIRS group (p = 0.025). The 24-h IL-6 value in the septic shock group was significantly higher than the values of the sepsis and SIRS groups (p = 0.048 and p = 0.043, respectively). No significant difference was detected between the septic shock, sepsis, and SIRS groups in terms of IL-6 values at 72 h.

CONCLUSION

sTREM-1 is not useful for the diagnosis of infection and for distinguishing between sepsis, septic shock, and SIRS since it does not offer a clear diagnostic value for PICU patients, unlike other reliable markers such as WBC, CRP, and PCT. Elevated IL-6 levels may indicate septic shock in PICU patients. More research on sTREM-1 is needed in this setting.