An Update on Sinonasal Round Cell Undifferentiated Tumors

DNA methylation-based classification of sinonasal tumors

The diagnosis of sinonasal tumors is challenging due to a heterogeneous spectrum of various differential diagnoses as well as poorly defined, disputed entities such as sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUCs). In this study, we apply a machine learning algorithm based on DNA methylation patterns to classify sinonasal tumors with clinical-grade reliability. We further show that sinonasal tumors with SNUC morphology are not as undifferentiated as their current terminology suggests but rather reassigned to four distinct molecular classes defined by epigenetic, mutational and proteomic profiles. This includes two classes with neuroendocrine differentiation, characterized by IDH2 or SMARCA4/ARID1A mutations with an overall favorable clinical course, one class composed of highly aggressive SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas and another class with tumors that represent potentially previously misclassified adenoid cystic carcinomas. Our findings can aid in improving the diagnostic classification of sinonasal tumors and could help to change the current perception of SNUCs.

Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Poorly Differentiated Sinonasal Tumors

The sinonasal cavities harbor a wide variety of rare cancer types. Histopathological classification can be challenging, especially for poorly differentiated tumors. Despite advances in surgery and radio-chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate is still very low. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for new therapeutic options. We retrospectively evaluated poorly differentiated tumors of 9 different histological subtypes from 69 patients who had received conventional treatments for the presence of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), as well as the expression of PD-L1 and microsatellite instability (MSI) markers MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, as biomarkers for immunotherapy. CD8+ TILs were present in 23/69 (33%) cases, PD-L1 expression was observed in 23/69 (33%), and markers for MSI positivity in 5/69 (7%) cases. CD8+ TILs correlated with PD-L1 positivity, while both were mutually exclusive with MSI markers. None of the biomarkers were associated with clinical features as age, gender or tumor stage. Cases with CD8+ TILs and PD-L1 positivity showed a tendency toward worse disease-specific survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are emerging as new options for treatment of many tumor types. Our results indicate that also a substantial subset of patients with poorly differentiated sinonasal tumors may be a candidate to be treated with this promising new therapy.

Clinical management of localized undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma: our experience and review of the literature

Undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma (SNUC) is defined as a small round blue cell tumor that is immunohistochemically distinct from other sinonasal malignancies, such as lymphoma, mucosal melanoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and olfactory neuroblastoma. SNUCs are very aggressive malignancies, provoking quick destruction of the splanchnocranium structures. Being a very rare neoplasm, there are no prospective clinical trials assessing their treatment strategies, so lots of data are derived by small retrospective trials. Tri-modality treatments (namely those treatments which use together surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy) are now considered the best of care for this category of poor prognosis tumors, and whenever possible they should be employed. Despite the tri-modality treatments and the multidisciplinary management, SNUCs are characterized by poor prognosis with a median overall survival reaching 14 months. Ameliorating radiotherapy techniques and performing therapies adapted to the genetics of the disease could represent a promising strategy of therapy in the near future. In this report, we have presented our experience, describing the treatment and the prognosis of four patients seen at our Institution. Moreover, we have performed a review of the literature analyzing the now available therapy options and the possible future strategies.

Variable Expression of S100 Protein in Sinonasal Malignant Mucosal Melanoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Sinonasal malignant mucosal melanoma (SNM) is a rare, aggressive malignancy. The diagnosis of SNM is often quite challenging due to anatomical limitations, frequent lack of pigmentation, variable histologic appearances, and aberrant differentiation (e.g., positivity for cytokeratin, desmin, or neuroendocrine markers). S100 protein is routinely used as a standard screening marker for SNM, but it may lack optimal sensitivity. Our objective was to study the extent of immunohistochemical expression of S100 protein in SNM, and determine its diagnostic value by comparing it to a newer melanoma marker, SOX10. Twenty-three cases of sinonasal MMM were retrieved from the archival files of the Department of Pathology at UT Southwestern Medical Center. The patients included 14 men and 9 women, and ranged from 36 to 90 years (mean 64.9 years). Sections from blocks of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue were used for immunohistochemical analysis with S100 protein and SOX10. The extent and intensity of immunostaining was recorded, and H-score was calculated. For a subset of negative or focally positive cases, S100 protein was repeated at a high-volume reference laboratory. S100 protein immunoexpression was quite variable in the SNM cases, with H-scores ranging from 0 to 300 (mean 123). While 11 of 23 cases exhibited strong and diffuse staining (H-score > 100) as expected for melanoma, 7 were weak and/or focal (H-score 1-100), and 5 were completely S100 protein-negative. For 10 cases, the negative or focal results were confirmed by reference laboratory staining. In contrast, all 23 SNM cases were diffusely and strongly positive for SOX10 (H-scores 210-300, mean 296). Our study demonstrated that S100 protein immunoexpression is extremely variable in SNM. Weak or even absent S100 protein staining is not uncommon in SNM, and should not dissuade pathologists from that diagnosis. Our data demonstrates that S100 protein is insufficiently sensitive to be used as a screening marker for SNM, but that SOX10 is consistently and robustly positive, and should therefore replace S100 protein for that purpose. Indeed, for any high-grade sinonasal tumor, pathologists must have a low threshold for utilizing additional markers to exclude the possibility of SNM.

Positron emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of sinonasal small round blue cell tumors

AIM

The sinonasal tract hosts numerous types of undifferentiated neoplasms, having small round cell morphology. The aim of this study was to determine whether sinonasal small round blue cell tumors (SRBCT) have distinct imaging features on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET)/CT.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (43 male; M_age = 61.2 years) with histopathologically proven sinonasal SRBCT were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging features of SRBCTs including location, maximum dimension, margin characteristics, presence of calcification, sclerotic bone changes, intratumoral necrosis, tumor extension, bone destruction, bone remodeling, perineural spread, T1- and T2-weighted MRI signal intensity, qualitative features on diffusion-weighted imaging and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, and pattern of contrast enhancement were analyzed using Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean) values of SRBCT were compared by utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between SRBCT type regarding the tumor location (p = 0.006), ¹⁸F-FDG uptake pattern (p = 0.006), involvement of the orbit (p = 0.016) and pterygopalatine fossa (p = 0.043), the presence of perineural spread (p < 0.001), bone destruction (p = 0.034), and intratumoral necrosis (p = 0.022). Bone destruction and necrosis were more common in rhabdomyosarcoma. Perineural spread was common in sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Qualitative ¹⁸F-FDG uptake features as well as tumor location were significantly different between sinonasal ACC and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. The ADC_mean and SUV_max values were not statistically different between SRBCT types.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinonasal SRBCTs have numerous distinct imaging features on CT, MRI, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT that could be useful in the differentiation between lesions when the histopathologic diagnosis is inconclusive.

Undifferentiated sinonasal malignant melanoma: A case report

Undifferentiated sinonasal malignant melanoma (MM) is a rare type of tumor, which can be easily misdiagnosed. The present study reports a 41-year-old male patient who presented with a 4-day history of epistaxis. Clinical examination and radiological imaging lead to the detection of a mass in the right sinonasal region. Histopathological examination revealed that the mass was composed of malignant epithelioid cells arranged in nests and sheets. These cells displayed a hemangiopericytoma-like pattern with antler-like branching vessels. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor cells exhibited negative expression of melanocytic markers. This increased the difficulty of distinguishing undifferentiated MM from other malignant tumors located in the sinonasal area, particularly undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The diagnosis of undifferentiated MM was determined by ultrastructures, including the mature melanosomes and premelanosomes, in tumor cells by transmission electron microscopy. The present study suggests that the analysis of cancer stem cell marker and vasculogenic mimicry may be an important auxiliary tool for the diagnosis of MM.

CD3+ CD56+ EBER1+ atypical extraosseous plasmacytoma of the nasal cavity

We present a case of atypical extraosseous plasmacytoma (EP) with a plasmablastic morphology and CD3⁺ CD56⁺ Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA-1 (EBER1)⁺ phenotypes of the nasal cavity. A 51-year-old male attended a local hospital with a tumor located in his left nasal cavity that was histologically diagnosed as extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type. We reviewed the specimens and re-biopsied the tumor, and confirmed that the tumor was positive for CD3, CD56, and EBER1; however, the tumor showed a plasmablastic morphology without necrosis and angiocentricity, and was positive for CD138, but negative for CD20 and PAX5. Given a plasmablastic morphology and EBER1 positivity, but a relatively low Ki67 index (30%), we diagnosed the case as atypical EP. The CHOP regimen was administered and complete remission achieved. This case indicated that EP should be considered as a differential diagnosis even when a tumor shows large cell morphology and is positive for CD3, CD56, and EBER1.

Genetic profiling of poorly differentiated sinonasal tumours

The sinonasal cavities harbour a variety of rare tumour types. Many carry a poor prognosis while therapeutic options are limited. Histopathological classification can be difficult, especially for poorly differentiated tumours such as olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC). We analysed Affymetrix OncoScan genome-wide copy number profiles of these three tumour types, both as originally diagnosed and as regrouped by their cytokeratin (Ck) and neuroendocrine (Ne) expression pattern, aiming to find a relation between phenotype and genotype. According to the original histopathological classification our series consisted of 24 ONB, 11 SNEC and 19 SNUC, while immunohistochemistry indicated 11 Ck−Ne+/ONB, 18 Ck+Ne+/SNEC, 24 Ck+Ne−/SNUC, and 1 Ck−Ne−/unclassified. As originally diagnosed, the three tumour types showed similar copy number profiles. However, when regrouped by Ck/Ne immunostaining we found a distinct set of gains and losses; Ck−Ne+/ONB harboured few and predominantly whole chromosomes abnormalities, Ck+Ne+/SNEC carried both gains and losses in high frequency, and Ck+Ne−/SNUC showed mostly gains. In addition, each tumour carried a number of unique chromosomal deletions. Genome-wide copy number profiling supports the value of immunohistochemical CkNe staining of ONB, SNEC and SNUC for tumour classification, which is important for prognosis and therapeutic decision-making.

Newly Described Tumor Entities in Sinonasal Tract Pathology

Surgical pathology of the sinonasal tract (nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses) is extremely challenging due in part to the tremendous diversity of tumor types that may arise in this region. Compounding the difficulty, a number of new sinonasal tumor entities have been recently described, and pathologists may not yet be familiar with these neoplasms. This manuscript will review the clinicopathologic features of some of the newly described sinonasal tumor types: NUT midline carcinoma, HPV-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic-like features, SMARCB1 (INI-1) deficient sinonasal carcinoma, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma, and renal cell-like adenocarcinoma.