Sclerosing Odontogenic Carcinoma with Local Recurrence: Case Report and Review of Literature

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma misnomering previously as central odontogenic fibroma-A case report with review of literature

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) was first described by Koutlas et al. in 2008. Despite its inclusion in the World Health Organization (WHO) as a distinct entity, it is a tumour that remains poorly defined in the literature, with only 10 reported cases to date. The mandibular premolar and molar region is more commonly affected compared to the maxilla. In the maxilla, the anterior and the molar regions are most commonly affected. This article describes a case report of a Sclerosing Odontogenic Carcinoma in a 50 year old male patient in the mandibular region. The radiograph showed a well-defined radiolucency extending from the left ramus of the mandible to the right lower molar region. SOC is low grade with mild atypia and frequent mitosis and diffused infiltrative and perineural spread.

Proceedings of the 2023 North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology Companion Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 12, 2023: Odontogenic Tumors: Have We Achieved an Evidence-Based Classification

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization's (WHO) chapter on odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors provides a global reference for diagnosis of these tumors. In the fifth edition, the inclusion of consensus definitions and development of essential and desirable diagnostic criteria help improve recognition of distinct entities. These are key enhancements since the diagnosis of odontogenic tumors is largely based on histomorphology which is taken in combination with clinical and radiographic appearances.

METHODS

Review.

RESULTS

Despite delineation of diagnostic criteria for ameloblastoma, adenoid ameloblastoma, and dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, a subset of these tumors continues to show overlapping histological features that can potentially lead to misdiagnosis. Accurate classification may be challenging on small biopsies, but potentially enhanced by refining existing diagnostic criteria and utilization of immunohistochemistry and/or molecular techniques in a specific cases. It has become clear that the clinical and histologic features of the non-calcifying Langerhans cell-rich subtype of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor and the amyloid-rich variant of odontogenic fibroma converge into a single tumor description. In addition, this tumor shows remarkable clinical, histological overlap with a subset of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma located in the maxilla. Benign perineural involvement vs perineural invasion is an underexplored concept in odontogenic neoplasia and warrants clarification to reduce diagnostic confusion with sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

While controversial issues surrounding classification and discrete tumor entities are addressed in the WHO chapter, ambiguities inevitably remain. This review will examine several groups of odontogenic tumors to highlight persistent knowledge gaps, unmet needs and unresolved controversies.

A Current Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Oral Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Technologies, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions

Cancer is a problematic global health issue with an extremely high fatality rate throughout the world. The application of various machine learning techniques that have appeared in the field of cancer diagnosis in recent years has provided meaningful insights into efficient and precise treatment decision-making. Due to rapid advancements in sequencing technologies, the detection of cancer based on gene expression data has improved over the years. Different types of cancer affect different parts of the body in different ways. Cancer that affects the mouth, lip, and upper throat is known as oral cancer, which is the sixth most prevalent form of cancer worldwide. India, Bangladesh, China, the United States, and Pakistan are the top five countries with the highest rates of oral cavity disease and lip cancer. The major causes of oral cancer are excessive use of tobacco and cigarette smoking. Many people’s lives can be saved if oral cancer (OC) can be detected early. Early identification and diagnosis could assist doctors in providing better patient care and effective treatment. OC screening may advance with the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. AI can provide assistance to the oncology sector by accurately analyzing a large dataset from several imaging modalities. This review deals with the implementation of AI during the early stages of cancer for the proper detection and treatment of OC. Furthermore, performance evaluations of several DL and ML models have been carried out to show that the DL model can overcome the difficult challenges associated with early cancerous lesions in the mouth. For this review, we have followed the rules recommended for the extension of scoping reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA-ScR). Examining the reference lists for the chosen articles helped us gather more details on the subject. Additionally, we discussed AI’s drawbacks and its potential use in research on oral cancer. There are methods for reducing risk factors, such as reducing the use of tobacco and alcohol, as well as immunization against HPV infection to avoid oral cancer, or to lessen the burden of the disease. Additionally, officious methods for preventing oral diseases include training programs for doctors and patients as well as facilitating early diagnosis via screening high-risk populations for the disease.

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma of maxilla: A case report

BACKGROUND

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma is a rare primary intraosseous neoplasm that was featured recently as a single entity in the World Health Organization classification of Head and Neck Tumors 2017, with only 14 cases published to date. The biological characteristics of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma remain indistinct because of its rarity; however, it appears to be locally aggressive, with no regional or distant metastasis reported to date.

CASE SUMMARY

We reported a case of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma of the maxilla in a 62-year-old woman, who presented with an indolent right palatal swelling, which progressively increased in size over 7 years. Right subtotal maxillectomy with surgical margins of approximately 1.5 cm was performed. The patient remained disease free for 4 years following the ablation surgery. Diagnostic workups, treatment, and therapeutic outcomes were discussed.

CONCLUSION

More cases are needed to further characterize this entity, understand its biological behavior, and justify the treatment protocols. Resection with wide margins of approximately 1.0 to 1.5 cm is proposed, while neck dissection, post-operative radiotherapy, or chemotherapy are deemed unnecessary.

A case of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma of the mandible with a review of the literature

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) is a very rare malignant odontogenic tumor characterized by sclerotic stroma and single-file cord-like tumor cell structures. A 38-year-old man presented with extraoral swelling and right mental region paralysis. Panoramic radiography revealed an ill-defined radiolucent lesion extending from the right mandibular ramus to the right lower canine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed tumor invasion into the right inferior alveolar nerve and masseter muscle. Hemimandibulectomy, bilateral neck dissection, and mandibular reconstruction were performed using a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap and a titanium plate. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed SOC diagnosis. No recurrence occurred in the 1-year follow-up. In this paper, a case of SOC with a high Ki-67 labeling index was reported. Since SOC is prone to nerve invasion, treatment is resection with an appropriate surgical margin.

Maxillary clear cell odontogenic carcinoma with EWSR1-ATF1 fusion gene mimicking sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma: A case report and literature review

Both clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) are rare odontogenic malignancies. Here, we report a case of maxillary CCOC whose clinical and histologic features resembled those of SOC. Radiologically, the tumor presented as an ill-defined, expansile radiolucency with local bone destruction. Histologically, the tumor was comprised of thin cords or strands of odontogenic epithelium permeating through a sclerosed fibrous stroma with occasional clear cell foci. It damaged the cortical plates and invaded the adjacent soft tissue. Immunohistochemical expression of Pancytokeratin, Cytokeratin 19, p63, Cytokeratin 5/6, and Cytokeratin 14, as well as focal expression of Cytokeratin 7, demonstrated the epithelial nature of the tumor. Alcian Blue Periodic acid Schiff staining revealed a lack of intracellular mucin. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed Ewing sarcoma RNA binding protein 1 and activating transcription factor 1 gene translocation, further confirming the diagnosis of CCOC. Lastly, we contextualized the genetic analysis of our case to that of CCOC in the literature.

Sclerosing Odontogenic Carcinoma: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma is an exceedingly rare gnathic malignancy first described by Koutlas et al. in 2008, and was only recently designated as a distinct pathologic entity by World Health Organization in the 2017 Classification of Head and Neck Tumors. To date, fewer than fifteen cases of this neoplasm have been reported in the English language literature. This tumor is characterized by thin cords, strands, and small nests of epithelium in a densely sclerotic stroma. In some tumor foci, the density of the stroma may be sufficient to compress the epithelial component beyond detection in the absence of immunohistochemistry, thus rendering this entity a particularly challenging diagnosis in small sample sizes.

METHODS

A 55-year-old male presented with an asymptomatic lesion of posterior left maxilla. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) demonstrated a large, well-defined bony lesion with scalloped border, spanning from canine to first molar. External root resorption of the adjacent teeth was also noted. Microscopic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed an odontogenic tumor with features consistent with sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to confirm the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The tumor was positive for CK5/6, CK19, E-cadherin, p63 and negative for CK20 and CK7.

CONCLUSION

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma is a rare, low-grade malignancy of odontogenic origin, which represents a diagnosis of exclusion in many cases. An immunohistochemical profile demonstrating positivity for markers including CK5/6, CK19, p63, and E-cadherin, in addition to a set of pertinent negative findings, can aid in the diagnosis of this tumor. This entity appears to lack metastatic potential despite its locally destructive behavior and a common histologic finding of perineural invasion.

Malignant Odontogenic Tumours: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature

Background: Malignant odontogenic tumours (MOTs) arise either de novo from the tooth forming tissues, their developmental residues or from existing odontogenic epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms in the jaws. Their management requires extensive surgery due to their infiltrative nature and risk of metastasis. There is a need to understand the clinical and pathological features of MOTs to inform both treatment algorithms and prognostication. This is an area of diagnostic pathology which presents substantial difficulties in diagnosis, compounded by inconsistent use of terminology. Thus, this systematic review aimed to describe the clinical and pathological features of MOTs with a view to consolidating the literature and defining problematic areas in diagnosis and classification. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Additionally, the grey literature and reference lists of selected papers searched for completeness. Nine hundred and sixty articles were initially identified. Following removal of duplicates and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 312 articles were included for qualitative analysis. Results: The 312 articles encompassed a total of 507 patients with most lesions located within the mandible (74.3%). The most common first histological diagnosis was ameloblastic carcinoma (25.7% of all diagnoses), but there is considerable variation in how and when various diagnostic terms are used, and several misdiagnoses were reported. An initial benign diagnosis was made in 24.7% of patients, followed by a later malignant diagnosis and in this sub-group, the most common benign first diagnosis was ameloblastoma (42.4%). Cervical lymph nodes were the most common site of metastasis (9.3% of patients). With respect to distant metastasis (DM), the lungs were the most common organ affected (11.2% of DM patients) with metastasising ameloblastoma the most commonly reported tumour which metastasised to the lungs. Overall, 26.8% of patients developed recurrence. Conclusion: Overall, the quality of the literature on MOTs is poor. This review of the literature has highlighted variations in diagnostic terms and criteria which has resulted in areas of confusion with potential for misdiagnosis. This consolidation of primary data has identified key areas for targeted research including further discussion on the malignant potential of ameloblastoma.

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma - review of all published cases: is it a justifiable addition as a malignancy?

INTRODUCTION

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma was a new addition to the list of head and neck tumors by World Health Organization in 2017. This lesion has scarcely been reported and a lack of pathognomonic markers for diagnosis exists.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to summarize findings from the available literature to provide up-to-date information on sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma and to analyse clinical, radiological, and histopathological features to obtain information for and against as an odontogenic malignancy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of literature by searching Pubmed, EBSCO and Web of Science databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. All the cases reported as sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma in English were included. Data retrieved from the articles were gender, age, clinical features, site, relevant medical history, radiographical findings, histopathological findings, immunohistochemical findings, treatments provided and prognosis.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma was 54.4 years with a very slight female predilection. Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma was commonly reported in the mandible as an expansile swelling which can be asymptomatic or associated with pain or paraesthesia. They appeared radiolucent with cortical resorption in radiograph evaluation. Histologically, sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma was composed of epithelioid cells in dense, fibrous, or sclerotic stroma with equivocal perineural invasion. Mild cellular atypia and inconspicuous mitotic activity were observed. There is no specific immunohistochemical marker for sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma. AE1/AE3, CK 5/6, CK 14, CK19, p63 and E-cadherin were the widely expressed markers for sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma. Surgical resection was the main treatment provided with no recurrence in most cases. No cases of metastasis were reported.

CONCLUSION

From the literature available, sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma is justifiable as a malignant tumor with no or unknown metastatic potential which can be adequately treated with surgical resection. However, there is insufficient evidence for histological grading or degree of malignancy of this tumor.

Central Odontogenic Fibroma with the Presence of Large Fibroblasts of Varying Morphology

A patient with an odontogenic fibroma (OF) with the presence of fibroblasts of varying morphology is presented, and the main microscopic differential diagnosis is discussed. Case report: a 51-year-old man complained of a swelling in the anterior region of the mandible. The panoramic radiograph showed a radiolucent, well-defined multilocular image, with displacement of the roots of the left mandibular incisors and canine. A cone beam computed tomography examination revealed a hypodense image, with delicate bone spicules inside, divergence of the tooth roots and destruction of the buccal cortical bone. Under the differential diagnosis of a desmoplastic ameloblastoma or a squamous odontogenic tumor, an incisional biopsy was made. Microscopically, deeply collagenized tissue with scarce odontogenic epithelium islands, large fibroblasts of varying morphology and calcified material was observed. A diagnosis of OF was made. Surgical removal was carried out, and the specimen was examined. Identical aspects were found, and the immunohistochemical reaction for pan-cytokeratin was carried out to identify the odontogenic epithelial cells. The definitive diagnosis of OF was confirmed, and we emphasize the importance of the correlation of all characteristics for a definitive diagnosis.

Amyloid Variant of Central Odontogenic Fibroma in the Mandible: A Case Report and Literature Review

Patient: Male, 35-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Central odontogenic fibroma

Symptoms: Asymptomatic

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: Enucleation • surgery removal

Specialty: Dentistry

Central odontogenic fibroma: an international multicentric study of 62 cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the clinicopathologic features of 62 cases of central odontogenic fibroma (COdF).

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical and radiographic data were collected from the records of 13 oral pathology laboratories. All cases were microscopically reviewed, considering the current World Health Organization classification of tumors and were classified according to histopathologic features.

RESULTS

There were 43 females and 19 males (average age 33.9 years; range 8-63 years). Clinically, COdF lesions appeared as asymptomatic swellings, occurring similarly in the maxilla (n = 33) and the mandible (n = 29); 9 cases exhibited palatal depression. Imaging revealed well-defined, interradicular unilocular (n = 27), and multilocular (n = 12) radiolucencies, with displacement of contiguous teeth (55%) and root resorption (46.4%). Microscopically, classic features of epithelial-rich (n = 33), amyloid (n = 10), associated giant cell lesion (n = 7), ossifying (n = 6), epithelial-poor (n = 3), and granular cell (n = 3) variants were seen. Langerhans cells were highlighted by CD1a staining in 17 cases. Most patients underwent conservative surgical treatments, with 1 patient experiencing recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the largest clinicopathologic study of COdF. Most cases appeared as locally aggressive lesions located in tooth-bearing areas in middle-aged women. Inactive-appearing odontogenic epithelium is usually observed within a fibrous/fibromyxoid stroma, occasionally exhibiting amyloid deposits, multinucleated giant cells, or granular cells.

An extensive sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma in mandible: a case report and literature review

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) is a primary intraosseous carcinoma of the jaw that was listed as a separate entity for the first time in the latest version of the World Health Organization classification of Head and Neck Tumors (2017). In this report, we present a case of SOC involving a circuitous diagnostic process because of the inadequately detailed biopsy findings and inherent impression based on the imaging manifestations. Through an extensive literature review, the histopathological and immunohistochemical features of the disease were briefly summarized. Radiological findings of SOC have been characterized in detail, and an imaging classification scheme has been proposed to further discuss the diversity of radiographic features. Due to the rarity of the disease, a comprehensive understanding of SOC is needed, and close collaboration between clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis.