Simultaneous PET/MR body imaging in rats: initial experiences with an integrated PET/MRI scanner

Deep learning-enabled quantification of simultaneous PET/MRI for cell transplantation monitoring

Current methods of in vivo imaging islet cell transplants for diabetes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are limited by their low sensitivity. Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI has greater sensitivity and ability to visualize cell metabolism. However, this dual-modality tool currently faces two major challenges for monitoring cells. Primarily, the dynamic conditions of PET such as signal decay and spatiotemporal change in radioactivity prevent accurate quantification of the transplanted cell number. In addition, selection bias from different radiologists renders human error in segmentation. This calls for the development of artificial intelligence algorithms for the automated analysis of PET/MRI of cell transplantations. Here, we combined K-means++ for segmentation with a convolutional neural network to predict radioactivity in cell-transplanted mouse models. This study provides a tool combining machine learning with a deep learning algorithm for monitoring islet cell transplantation through PET/MRI. It also unlocks a dynamic approach to automated segmentation and quantification of radioactivity in PET/MRI.

Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging as a research tool in musculoskeletal conditions

Compared to positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), the uptake of PET- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been slow, even more so in clinical practice compared to the (pre-)clinical research setting. However, for applications in musculoskeletal (MSK) research, the combination of PET and MRI into a single modality offers attractive advantages over other imaging modalities. Most importantly, MRI has exquisite soft-tissue detail without the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation, superior bone marrow visualization, and an extensive spectrum of distinct multiparametric assessment methods. In the preclinical setting, the introduction of PET inserts for small-animal MRI machines has proven to be a successful concept in bringing this technology to the lab. Initial hurdles in quantification have been mainly overcome in this setting. In parallel, a promising range of radiochemistry techniques has been developed to create multimodality probes that offer the possibility of simultaneously querying different metabolic pathways. Not only will these applications help in elucidating disease mechanisms, but they can also facilitate drug development. The clinical applications of PET/MRI in MSK are still limited, but encouraging initial results with novel radiotracers suggest a high potential for use in various MSK conditions, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and inflammation and infection. Further innovations will be required to bring down the cost of PET/MRI to justify a broader clinical implementation, and remaining issues with quality control and standardization also need to be addressed. Nevertheless, PET/MRI is a powerful platform for MSK research with distinct qualities that are not offered by other techniques.

Principles of Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging

Combined PET/MR imaging scanners capable of acquiring simultaneously the complementary information provided by the 2 imaging modalities are now available for human use. After addressing the hardware challenges for integrating the 2 imaging modalities, most of the efforts in the field have focused on developing MR-based attenuation correction methods for neurologic and whole-body applications, implementing approaches for improving one modality by using the data provided by the other and exploring research and clinical applications that could benefit from the synergistic use of the multimodal data.

PET/MR Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders

There is emerging evidence suggesting that PET/MR imaging will have a role in many aspects of musculoskeletal imaging. The synergistic potential of hybrid PET/MR imaging in terms of acquiring anatomic, molecular, and functional data simultaneously seems advantageous in the diagnostic workup, treatment planning and monitoring, and follow-up of patients with musculoskeletal malignancies, and may also prove helpful in assessment of musculoskeletal infectious and inflammatory disorders. The application of more sophisticated MR imaging sequences and PET radiotracers other than FDG in the diagnostic workup and follow-up of patients with musculoskeletal disorders should be explored.

Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information?

INTRODUCTION

Although positron emission tomography PET-MR imaging is emerging into clinical practice, many aspects of this imaging technique such as attenuation correction have yet to be validated for myocardial imaging. Thus, it is uncertain whether PET-MR FDG images provide clinical information which is comparable to PET-CT FDG images. The study goal was to systematically compare relative myocardial FDG concentrations obtained from cardiac PET-MR images to those derived from same day PET-CT images.

METHODS

Myocardial FDG images of 27 patients undergoing PET-CT imaging, followed by PET-MR imaging 42 ± 13 minutes later as part of a prospective oncology study were analyzed. Mean segmental standardized uptake measurements (SUVmean) were obtained in each of the 17 standard myocardial segments and normalized to the brightest segment.

RESULTS

Normalized segmental SUVmean values did not differ significantly between the PET-MR and PET-CT images (mean difference 0.002, P = .826). The specific segment was a marginally significant predictor of the differences (P = .057), with the largest difference in the anteroseptal basal segment.

CONCLUSIONS

PET-MR, vis-à-vis PET-CT, does not significantly raise segmental uptake relative to the brightest segment, suggesting that PET-MR can be used similarly to PET-CT for applications where relative uptake is important.

Preclinical and Translational PET/MR Imaging

Combined PET and MR imaging (PET/MR imaging) has progressed tremendously in recent years. The focus of current research has shifted from technologic challenges to the application of this new multimodal imaging technology in the areas of oncology, cardiology, neurology, and infectious diseases. This article reviews studies in preclinical and clinical translation. The common theme of these initial results is the complementary nature of combined PET/MR imaging that often provides additional insights into biologic systems that were not clearly feasible with just one modality alone. However, in vivo findings require ex vivo validation. Combined PET/MR imaging also triggers a multitude of new developments in image analysis that are aimed at merging and using multimodal information that ranges from better tumor characterization to analysis of metabolic brain networks. The combination of connectomics information that maps brain networks derived from multiparametric MR data with metabolic information from PET can even lead to the formation of a new research field that we would call cometomics that would map functional and metabolic brain networks. These new methodologic developments also call for more multidisciplinarity in the field of molecular imaging, in which close interaction and training among clinicians and a variety of scientists is needed.

Competitive advantage of PET/MRI

Multimodality imaging has made great strides in the imaging evaluation of patients with a variety of diseases. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is now established as the imaging modality of choice in many clinical conditions, particularly in oncology. While the initial development of combined PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) was in the preclinical arena, hybrid PET/MR scanners are now available for clinical use. PET/MRI combines the unique features of MRI including excellent soft tissue contrast, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, fMRI and other specialized sequences as well as MR spectroscopy with the quantitative physiologic information that is provided by PET. Most evidence for the potential clinical utility of PET/MRI is based on studies performed with side-by-side comparison or software-fused MRI and PET images. Data on distinctive utility of hybrid PET/MRI are rapidly emerging. There are potential competitive advantages of PET/MRI over PET/CT. In general, PET/MRI may be preferred over PET/CT where the unique features of MRI provide more robust imaging evaluation in certain clinical settings. The exact role and potential utility of simultaneous data acquisition in specific research and clinical settings will need to be defined. It may be that simultaneous PET/MRI will be best suited for clinical situations that are disease-specific, organ-specific, related to diseases of the children or in those patients undergoing repeated imaging for whom cumulative radiation dose must be kept as low as reasonably achievable. PET/MRI also offers interesting opportunities for use of dual modality probes. Upon clear definition of clinical utility, other important and practical issues related to business operational model, clinical workflow and reimbursement will also be resolved.