The clinical value of tumor FDG uptake for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes

18F-Alfatide II for the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: comparison with 18F-FDG

PURPOSE

¹⁸F-Alfatide II has been translated into clinical use and been proven to have good performance in identifying breast cancer. In this study, we investigated ¹⁸F-Alfatide II for evaluation of axillary lymph nodes (ALN) in breast cancer patients and compared the performance with ¹⁸F-FDG.

METHODS

A total of 44 female patients with clinically suspected breast cancer were enrolled and underwent ¹⁸F-Alfatide II and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT within a week. Tracer uptakes in ALN were evaluated by visual analysis, semi-quantitative analysis with maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean), and SUV_max ratio of target/non-target (T/NT).

RESULTS

Among 44 patients, 37 patients were pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer with metastatic (17 cases) or non-metastatic (20 cases) ALN. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of visual analysis were 70.6%, 90%, 81.1%, 85.7%, and 78.3% for ¹⁸F-Alfatide II, 64.7%, 90%, 78.4%, 84.6%, and 75% for ¹⁸F-FDG, respectively. By combining ¹⁸F-Alfatide II and ¹⁸F-FDG, the sensitivity significantly increased to 82.4%, the specificity was 85%, the accuracy increased to 83.8%, the PPV was 82.4%, and the NPV significantly increased to 85.0%. Three cases of luminal B subtype were false negative for both ¹⁸F-Alfatide II and ¹⁸F-FDG. The other 2 false negative cases of ¹⁸F-Alfatide II were triple-negative subtype and 3 false negative cases of ¹⁸F-FDG were luminal B subtype too. The AUCs of three semi-quantitative parameters (SUV_max, SUV_mean, T/NT) for ¹⁸F-Alfatide II were between 0.8 and 0.9, whereas those for ¹⁸F-FDG were more than 0.9. ¹⁸F-Alfatide II T/NT had the highest Youden index (76.5%), specificity (100%), accuracy (89.2%), and PPV (100%) among these semi-quantitative parameters. ¹⁸F-Alfatide II uptake as well as ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in metastatic axillary lymph nodes (MALN) was significantly higher than that in benign axillary lymph nodes (BALN). Both ¹⁸F-Alfatide II and ¹⁸F-FDG did not show difference in primary tumor uptake irrespective of ALN status.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-Alfatide II can be used in breast cancer patients to detect metastatic ALN, however, like ¹⁸F-FDG, with high specificity but relatively low sensitivity. The combination of ¹⁸F-Alfatide II and ¹⁸F-FDG can significantly improve sensitivity and NPV. ¹⁸F-Alfatide II T/NT may serve as the most important semi-quantitative parameter to evaluate ALN.

Pretherapeutic Imaging for Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ultrasound, MRI and FDG PET

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed at comparing performances of ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) for axillary staging, with a focus on micro- or micrometastases.

METHODS

A search for relevant studies published between January 2002 and March 2018 was conducted in MEDLINE database. Study quality was assessed using the QUality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist. Sensitivity and specificity were meta-analyzed using a bivariate random effects approach; Results: Across 62 studies (n = 10,374 patients), sensitivity and specificity to detect metastatic ALN were, respectively, 51% (95% CI: 43-59%) and 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) for US, 83% (95% CI: 72-91%) and 85% (95% CI: 72-92%) for MRI, and 49% (95% CI: 39-59%) and 94% (95% CI: 91-96%) for PET. Interestingly, US detects a significant proportion of macrometastases (false negative rate was 0.28 (0.22, 0.34) for more than 2 metastatic ALN and 0.96 (0.86, 0.99) for micrometastases). In contrast, PET tends to detect a significant proportion of micrometastases (true positive rate = 0.41 (0.29, 0.54)). Data are not available for MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with MRI and PET Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), US is an effective technique for axillary triage, especially to detect high metastatic burden without upstaging majority of micrometastases.

Predictive value of primary tumor parameters using 18F-FDG PET/CT for occult lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph node

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical significance of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary breast cancer using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) with a clinically negative axillary lymph node (cN-ALN).

METHODS

135 patients, newly diagnosed with IDC with _CN-ALN between July 2016 and October 2017, were retrospectively enrolled. We estimated primary tumor PET/CT parameters including the maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and TLG, as well as clinicopathologic findings. All patients received breast surgery followed by pathologic axillary lymph node examination.

RESULTS

Of the 135 patients, 31 (23.0%) were diagnosed with pathologically proven metastatic ALN. In univariate analysis, SUV_max, MTV, and TLG of the primary breast tumor were correlated with metastatic ALN along with tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, CD34, and D2-40. On multivariate analysis, TLG (> 5.74, p = 0.009) had independent significance for predicting ALN metastasis in IDC with cN-ALN.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that TLG of primary tumors can be useful in predicting pathologic ALN metastasis in IDC patients with cN-ALN.

Preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients by ultrasonography combined with mammography: A STROBE compliant article

Preoperative assessment of nodal stage is of importance in breast cancer treatment decision-making. This study was done to determine the power of combined mammography and ultrasonography in differentiating N0-N1 from N2-N3 breast cancer.We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 3944 female patients with invasive breast cancer by preoperative mammography and ultrasonography between January 2006 and December 2013 at our hospital. Pathological diagnosis was available for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of mammography alone, ultrasonography alone, and combination of them for assessment of axillary lymph node (ALN) status were calculated, using definitive histological results as the baseline.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy was 90.4%, 68.2%, 36.5%, 97.2%, and 71.9% for ultrasonography; was 66.9%, 80.8%, 41.3%, 92.3%, and 78.4% for mammography; and was 94.9%, 62.4%, 33.8%, and 98.4% for combined mammography and ultrasonography. For combination, accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 67.9% and 0.85, respectively.In conclusion, combining ultrasonography and mammography improves the sensitivity in differentiating N0-N1 breast cancer from N2-N3 breast cancer, but leading to a reduced specificity. Addition of mammography to ultrasonography seems not to provide significant benefits in predicting ALN status in breast cancer patients.

Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive evaluation of the extent of axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients and accurate assessment of multifocality are both challenging. Few reports have explored whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) might be more useful than other diagnostic methods in these contexts.

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic utility of FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI and DWI), and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB), in detection of axillary metastatic lymph nodes in ESBC patients; and to explore the utilities of FDG PET/CT and DCE-MRI for identification of multifocality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-four female patients (mean age, 47 ± 9.9 years; range, 24-68 years) with ESBC underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and breast MRI prior to operation. SNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were performed on all patients, as was mastectomy or wide local tumor excision. Histopathological findings served as the gold standard when evaluating either multifocality or axillary nodal involvement.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, of PET/CT and DCE-MRI, used to detect multifocality, were as follows: 67% versus 78%, 100% versus 53%, 100% versus 50%, 83% versus 80%, and 88% versus 63%. SNB afforded the highest sensitivity (93%) in terms of detection of axillary metastasis. The sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 67%, 62%, and 75% respectively, thus higher than the equivalent values of either DCE-MRI or DWI.

CONCLUSION

For assessment of multifocality in ESBC patients, highly specific results of PET/CT should be taken into account along with DCE-MRI findings. For evaluation of axillary nodal involvement, PET/CT has higher sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy values than DCE-MRI and DWI and may guide a surgical decision to proceed or not to SNB or ALND.

Axillary Lymph Node-to-Primary Tumor Standard Uptake Value Ratio on Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT: A Prognostic Factor for Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer

Purpose

This study assessed the axillary lymph node (ALN)-to-primary tumor maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) ratio (ALN/T SUV ratio) in invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) on preoperative ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) to determine the effectiveness in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods

One hundred nineteen IDC patients (mean age, 50.5±10.5 years) with pathologically proven ALN involvement without distant metastasis and preoperative FDG PET/CT were enrolled in the study. SUV_max values of the ALN and primary tumor were obtained on FDG PET/CT, and ALN/T SUV ratio was calculated. Several factors were evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting RFS. These included several parameters on FDG PET/CT as well as several clinicopathological parameters: pathologic tumor/node stage; nuclear and histological grade; hormonal state; status with respect to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (MIB-1), and p53; primary tumor size; and ALN size.

Results

Among 119 patients with breast cancer, 17 patients (14.3%) experienced relapse during follow-up (mean follow-up, 28.4 months). The ALN/T SUV ratio of the group with disease recurrence was higher than that of the group without recurrence (0.97±1.60 and 0.45±0.40, respectively, p=0.005). Univariate analysis showed that the primary tumor SUV_max, ALN SUV_max, ALN/T SUV ratio, ALN status, nuclear and histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, and MIB-1 status were predictors for RFS. Among these variables, ALN/T SUV ratio with hazard ratio of 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-10.13) and ER status with hazard ratio of 4.33 (95% CI, 1.06-17.71) were predictors for RFS according to multivariate analysis (p=0.002 and p=0.042, respectively).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that ALN/T SUV ratio together with ER status was an independent factor for predicting relapse in IDC with metastatic ALN. ALN/T SUV ratio on preoperative FDG PET/CT may be a useful marker for selecting IDC patients that need adjunct treatment to prevent recurrence.

Additional value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the initial workup of breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Whether the status of the clinical axillary nodal involvement can be considered a parameter for making a decision to omit the preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the situation reported herein was also determined. A total of 178 patients who had newly diagnosed breast cancer and for whom the conventional diagnostic modalities showed no sign of axillary node metastasis were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The images and histologic results that were obtained were analyzed. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT detected primary lesions in 156 of the 178 patients, with an overall sensitivity of 87.6 %, and false negative results were obtained for 22 patients (12.4 %). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of axillary nodes were 20.8, 86.9, 37.0, 74.8, and 69.1 %, respectively. Extra-axillary node metastasis was identified in two patients (1.1 %) who had internal mammary nodes. There was no distant metastasis, but coexisting primary tumor was detected in five patients (2.8 %). In total, the therapeutic plan was changed based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in seven (3.9 %) of the 178 patients, but considering only the cases confined to breast cancer, the change occurred in only two patients (1.1 %). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT almost did not affect the initial staging and treatment plan in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary node. If the axillary node is clinically negative in the preoperative workup of breast cancer, then ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be omitted.