Management of Shoulder Instability in Patients with Underlying Hyperlaxity

Sensorimotor control of functional joint stability: Scientific concepts, clinical considerations, and the articuloneuromuscular cascade paradigm in peripheral joint injury

Human movement depends on sensorimotor control. Sensorimotor control refers to central nervous system (CNS) control of joint stability, posture, and movement, all of which are effected via the sensorimotor system. Given the nervous, muscular, and skeletal systems function as an integrated "neuromusculoskeletal system" for the purpose of executing movement, musculoskeletal conditions can result in a cascade of impairments that affect negatively all three systems. The purpose of this article is to revisit concepts in joint stability, sensorimotor control of functional joint stability (FJS), joint instability, and sensorimotor impairments contributing to functional joint instability. This article differs from historical work because it updates previous models of joint injury and joint instability by incorporating more recent research on CNS factors, skeletal muscle factors, and tendon factors. The new 'articuloneuromuscular cascade paradigm' presented here offers a framework for facilitating further investigation into physiological and biomechanical consequences of joint injury and, in turn, how these follow on to affect physical activity (functional) capability. Here, the term 'injury' represents traumatic joint injury with a focus is on peripheral joint injury. Understanding the configuration of the sensorimotor system and the cascade of post-injury sensorimotor impairments is particularly important for clinicians reasoning rational interventions for patients with mechanical instability and functional instability. Concurrently, neurocognitive processing and neurocognitive performance are also addressed relative to feedforward neuromuscular control of FJS. This article offers itself as an educational resource and scientific asset to contribute to the ongoing research and applied practice journey for developing optimal peripheral joint injury rehabilitation strategies.

Outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) often experience high rates of joint subluxations and dislocations, and associated pain that may require surgical interventions. Orthopaedic surgical management is challenging in this population, and patients will often undergo multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Outcomes data specific to patients with EDS are sparse in the orthopaedic surgery literature. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate the evidence and outcomes for orthopaedic surgery specifically for the EDS population.

METHODS

PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), CINHL, and Scopus from their inception to February 28, 2024 for all studies that reported outcomes for orthopaedic surgery in patients with EDS. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The studies in this scoping review include Level III (retrospective cohort and case control) and Level IV (case series) evidence.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded a total of 71 citations published between 1990 and 2023. All were primary studies. 38 were single case studies, 14 were case series, and 19 were retrospective cohort studies. No randomized clinical studies or systematic reviews were identified. Overall, the reported findings for the various anatomical sites and procedures indicated that surgery outcomes were inconsistent. Our review highlights the need for future research to determine whether currently established surgical approaches for various orthopaedic conditions offer long-term clinical benefit in patients with EDS. This is clearly a challenging diagnosis, and more rigorous clinical studies are required to identify optimal treatment approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review found little evidence-based research to guide optimal surgical treatment in EDS. Established surgical techniques that have been shown to be successful in the wider orthopaedic population should be studied to determine their efficacy in the EDS population.

Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. Materials and Methods: In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. Results: A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 ± 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 ± 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 ± 6.40 cm3) compared to the control group (23.15 ± 3.48 cm3, p = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. Conclusions: 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.

The influence of pain and kinesiophobia on motor control of the upper limb: how pointing task paradigms can point to new avenues of understanding

ABSTRACT

People experiencing kinesiophobia are more likely to develop persistent disabilities and chronic pain. However, the impact of kinesiophobia on the motor system remains poorly understood. We investigated whether kinesiophobia could modulate shoulder pain-induced changes in (1) kinematic parameters and muscle activation during functional movement and (2) corticospinal excitability. Thirty healthy, pain-free subjects took part in the study. Shoulder, elbow, and finger kinematics, as well as electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles, were recorded while subjects performed a pointing task before and during pain induced by capsaicin at the shoulder. Anterior deltoid cortical changes in excitability were assessed through the slope of transcranial magnetic stimulation input-output curves obtained before and during pain. Results revealed that pain reduced shoulder electromyographic activity and had a variable effect on finger kinematics, with individuals with higher kinesiophobia showing greater reduction in finger target traveled distance. Kinesiophobia scores were also correlated with the changes in deltoid corticospinal excitability, suggesting that the latter can influence motor activity as soon as the motor signal emerges. Taken together, these results suggest that pain and kinesiophobia interact with motor control adaptation.

Physical therapy interventions in generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Physical therapy (PT) plays a central role in treating individuals with Generalized Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (G-HSD) and Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). However, there is limited research describing these individuals' PT management. This review aims to systematically map the evidence on PT interventions to treat this patient population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase from January 2000 to April 2023 was performed. After the screening process, studies were appraised and classified based on the type of PT interventions used. Five reviewers independently assessed the articles.

RESULTS

The search produced 757 articles. Twenty-eight met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 630 participants, mostly female, with a mean age of 26.2 (ranging from 2 to 69). The PT interventions used were therapeutic exercise, patient instruction, motor function training, adaptive equipment, manual therapy, and functional training.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates that therapeutic exercise and motor function training are efficacious methods to treat individuals with G-HSD and hEDS. There is also weak evidence for using adaptive equipment, patient instruction, manual therapy, and functional training. Recent studies emphasize multidisciplinary care and understanding of the psychological impact of G-HSD/hEDS. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and dosage of PT interventions.

Defining Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension as Predictor of Recurrent Instability After Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

BACKGROUND

The glenoid track concept for shoulder instability primarily describes the medial-lateral relationship between a Hill-Sachs lesion and the glenoid. However, the Hill-Sachs position in the craniocaudal dimension has not been thoroughly studied.

HYPOTHESIS

Hill-Sachs lesions with greater inferior extension are associated with increased risk of recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (without remplissage) between 2007 and 2019 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Recurrent instability was defined as recurrent dislocation or subluxation after the index procedure. The craniocaudal position of the Hill-Sachs lesion was measured against the midhumeral axis on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using either a Hill-Sachs bisecting line through the humeral head center (sagittal midpoint angle [SMA], a measure of Hill-Sachs craniocaudal position) or a line tangent to the inferior Hill-Sachs edge (lower-edge angle [LEA], a measure of Hill-Sachs caudal extension). Univariate and multivariate regression were used to determine the predictive value of both SMA and LEA for recurrent instability.

RESULTS

In total, 176 patients were included with a mean age of 20.6 years, mean follow-up of 5.9 years, and contact sport participation of 69.3%. Of these patients, 42 (23.9%) experienced recurrent instability (30 dislocations, 12 subluxations) at a mean time of 1.7 years after surgery. Recurrent instability was found to be significantly associated with LEA >90° (ie, Hill-Sachs lesions extending below the humeral head equator), with an OR of 3.29 (P = .022). SMA predicted recurrent instability to a lesser degree (OR, 2.22; P = .052). Post hoc evaluation demonstrated that LEA >90° predicted recurrent dislocations (subset of recurrent instability) with an OR of 4.80 (P = .003). LEA and SMA were found to be collinear with Hill-Sachs interval and distance to dislocation, suggesting that greater LEA and SMA proportionally reflect lesion severity in both the craniocaudal and medial-lateral dimensions.

CONCLUSION

Inferior extension of an otherwise on-track Hill-Sachs lesion is a highly predictive risk factor for recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Evaluation of Hill-Sachs extension below the humeral equator (inferior equatorial extension) on sagittal MRI is a clinically facile screening tool for higher-risk lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss. This threshold for critical humeral bone loss may inform surgical stratification for procedures such as remplissage or other approaches for at-risk on-track lesions.

Arthroscopic Labral Repair and Pancapsular Shift With Knotless All-Suture Anchors in the Setting of Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder

In the management of multidirectional type of shoulder instability (MDI), arthroscopic surgical stabilization is a preferred treatment option after failed conservative therapy regimens because of the ability to easily access all aspects of the capsule with one surgical procedure. As arthroscopic techniques have evolved, factors critical to postoperative success have been elucidated. Currently, optimal arthroscopic treatment of MDI involves circumferentially restoring labral integrity, a tailored, patient-specific surgical reduction of capsular volume, and adequately managing potential lesions of the biceps anchor. The purpose of this article and accompanying video is to present our technique for arthroscopic circumferential labral repair and pancapsular shift using knotless all-suture anchors in the setting of MDI with a concurrent type II SLAP lesion.

Bone loss in shoulder instability: putting it all together

Glenohumeral bone loss is frequently observed in cases of recurrent anterior and posterior shoulder instability and represents a risk factor for failure of nonoperative treatment. Patients with suspected glenoid or humeral bone loss in the setting of recurrent instability should be evaluated with a thorough history and physical examination, as well as advanced imaging including computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In cases of both anterior and posterior instability, the magnitude and location of bone loss should be determined, as well as the relationship between the glenoid track (GT) and any humeral defects. While the degree and pattern of osseous deficiency help guide treatment, patient-specific risk factors for recurrent instability must also be considered when determining patient management. Treatment options for subcritical anterior bone loss include labral repair and capsular plication, while more severe deficiency should prompt consideration of bony augmentation including coracoid transfer or free bone block procedures. Concomitant humeral lesions are treated according to the degree of engagement with the glenoid rim and may be addressed with soft tissue remplissage or bony augmentation procedures. While critical and subcritical thresholds of glenoid bone loss guide the management of anterior instability, such thresholds are less defined in the setting of posterior instability. Furthermore, current treatment algorithms are limited by a lack of long-term comparative studies. Future high-quality studies as well as possible modifications in indications and surgical technique are required to elucidate the optimal treatment of anterior, posterior, and bipolar glenohumeral bone loss in the setting of recurrent shoulder instability.