Effect of rituximab on primary central nervous system lymphoma: a meta-analysis

Impact of Postoperative Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Study Based on the SEER Database

Aims/Background We aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) on survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods This study included 786 PCNSL patients, of which 605 received chemotherapy after surgery, and 181 did not. Data from the SEER registry database (2007-2020) were used to analyze PCNSL. Baseline information, including age, sex, race, marital status, primary tumour site, histological type, summary stage, surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, was analyzed. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) (1:1) was employed to balance the effects of confounding variables between the two groups. Subsequently, Cox regression and bidirectional stepwise regression were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves were constructed to assess the impact of POCT on patient prognosis. Additionally, two cases of PCNSL with typical magnetic resonance imaging appearances were presented. Results Multivariate Cox regression results revealed that age older than 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.786; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.272-2.509; p = 0.001) and absence of POCT (HR = 2.841; 95% CI: 2.159-3.738; p < 0.001) were independent prognostic risk factors, while primary tumour locations in the meninges (HR = 0.136; 95% CI: 0.032-0.569; p = 0.006) and other nervous system regions (HR = 0.552; 95% CI: 0.326-0.936; p = 0.027), as well as histological morphologies such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HR = 0.233; 95% CI: 0.128-0.425; p < 0.001) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 0.559; 95% CI: 0.356-0.876; p = 0.011), were associated with favourable patient outcomes. K-M curves demonstrated that the group undergoing POCT had a significantly more favourable prognosis compared to the non-POCT group, before (HR = 0.454; 95% CI: 0.343-0.600; p < 0.0001) or after PSM (HR = 0.580; 95% CI: 0.431-0.780; p < 0.0001). For patients with PCNSL, those with tumours located in the infratentorial region (HR = 0.231; 95% CI: 0.078-0.682; p = 0.046), supratentorial region (HR = 0.250; 95% CI: 0.163-0.383; p < 0.0001), overlapping brain regions (HR = 0.201; 95% CI: 0.056-0.727; p = 0.0058), and those who underwent biopsy (HR = 0.740; 95% CI: 0.463-1.182; p = 0.003), subtotal resection (STR) (HR = 0.490; 95% CI: 0.265-0.906; p = 0.0064), or gross total resection (GTR) (HR = 0.613; 95% CI: 0.292-1.287; p = 0.0003) had better prognoses in the postoperative chemotherapy group compared to the non-chemotherapy group. Conclusion POCT significantly improves the prognosis of PCNSL patients and identifies the characteristics of the benefiting population. This information aids clinical practitioners in designing personalized treatment plans for individuals and advancing precise treatment.

All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.

METHODS

Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.

RESULTS

Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.

Role of Rituximab in Treatment of Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma involving the brain, cerebrospinal fluid, spinal cord and eyes. Rituximab has played a prominent role in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphomas, including aggressive diffuse large B lymphoma. However, as a macromolecular drug, the role of rituximab in the treatment of PCNSL has been controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the role of rituximab in the treatment of PCNSL. We searched articles in the following electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until October 20, 2022.We included 11 studies (3 RCTS and 8 retrospective studies) with a total of 1182 patients. We extracted the baseline characteristics and outcomes of the studies and assessed the risk of bias, then used Review Manager 5.4 for this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included complete response rate (CR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Odds ratios (ORS) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIS) for the primary outcome were analyzed and compared. The results of our statistical analysis show that the use of rituximab was closely correlated with a higher CR(OR 1.70,95%CI 1.17-2.46, P = .005), 3-year OS (OR 2.40, 95%CI 1.53-3.77, P = .0001), 5-year OS (OR 2.75, 95%CI 1.68-4.49, P < .0001), 3-year PFS(OR 4.42, 95%CI 1.15-16.97, P < .0001), 5-year PFS(OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.39-2.78, P = .0001).These results suggest that rituximab may have a positive impact on the prognosis of patients with PCNSL, and may be helpful in the determination of treatment plan for patients with PCNSL.

Challenges in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Stereotactic biopsy remains the gold standard for the pathological diagnosis of PCNSL. However, certain new auxiliary diagnostic methods are considered to have good application prospects; these include cytokine and tumor circulating DNA, among others. Although new drugs such as immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have brought hope owing to their improved efficacy, the high recurrence rate and subsequent high mortality remain barriers to long-term survival. Increasing emphasis is therefore being placed on consolidation treatments. Consolidation treatment strategies include whole brain radiotherapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and non-myeloablative chemotherapy. As studies directly comparing the effectiveness and safety of different consolidation treatment schemes are lacking, the optimal consolidation strategy remains uncertain. This article will review the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, focusing on the progress in research pertaining to consolidation therapy.

Nanomedicine Applications in Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Current State of the Art

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare but highly aggressive subtype of extra nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which is confined in the central nervous system (CNS). Despite recent advancements in treatment options, the overall prognosis of PCNSL remains poor. Among many unfavorable factors affecting efficacy, inadequate drug delivery into the CNS is still the thorniest challenge. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) constitutes a significant impediment, restricting entry of most therapeutics to the brain. Nanotechnology has offered great promise for brain diseases, as various nano-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs) have been developed for delivery of theranostic agents in to the CNS. These drug delivery systems possess significant advantages, including good feasibility, reliable safety profile, excellent BBB penetration and potent antitumor effects. As for treatment of PCNSL, numerous well-developed BBB-crossing nano-based strategies can be applied with proper modifications and improvements. Some exquisitely designed NDDSs specific for PCNSL have shown great potential. In this review, we provide a summary on current status of diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, followed by an overview of BBB-crossing strategies applied in management of PCNSL, both novel and wellestablished. Finally, challenges and future perspectives in this field are also discussed.

The Role of Rituximab in the Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of cancer and the treatment of newly diagnosed patients is challenging. Many chemotherapy regimens are being used, and methotrexate is an important component in most. The role of the immunotherapy rituximab is not as clear. This review focuses on the available evidence for the use of this monoclonal antibody in the treatment of patients with PCNSL.

Abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma limited to the central nervous system. It has a poor prognosis. Consensus has been reached on the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, but whether the addition of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab improves survival, as it does in systemic B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, remains disputed. In this review, we reflect on the available evidence of the use of rituximab in PCNSL. Whether rituximab has any beneficial effect remains uncertain.

The Efficacy and Safety of Cytarabine on Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The role of cytarabine on newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. The present study mainly aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cytarabine in the induction treatment of PCNSL.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials comparing treatment of PCNSL patients with or without cytarabine. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for complete remission (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR), grade 3–4 toxic effects, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Stata 12.0.

Results: In total, three randomized clinical trials were analyzed in this study. The result of our statistical analysis demonstrated that the application of cytarabine was closely correlated with a higher CR (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.29–3.99, P < 0.01) and ORR (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14–3.93, P = 0.02). No significant difference was found in OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50–1.13, P = 0.17), but PFS had been improved (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45–0.97, P = 0.04) when cytarabine was added to the treatment regimen. The grade 3–4 side effect rate of the cytarabine group was higher (overall OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.37–6.34, P < 0.01) than that of the cytarabine-free group.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis verifies that adding cytarabine to the therapeutic regimen is helpful for newly diagnosed PCNSL patients in terms of CR, ORR, and PFS. Moreover, it should be noted that the grade 3–4 toxic effects, especially hematological toxicity, are higher in the cytarabine group than in the cytarabine-free group. The results indicate that cytarabine plays an important role in the induction therapy of PCNSL. Large-sample and high-quality RCTs should be conducted to verify our results and confirm the effects of cytarabine on newly diagnosed PCNSL.

Risk Prediction for Early Mortality in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma

Background: Overall survival of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) has improved since the introduction of immunochemotherapy. However, up to 10-15% of PCNSL patients still die shortly after diagnosis. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors of early mortality (death within 60 days after diagnosis) in patients with PCNSL.

Methods: We included newly diagnosed PCNSL patients in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan between January 1, 2002 and May 31, 2018. Clinical risk factors were collected and compared between PCNSL patients who had and did not have early mortality.

Results: A total of 133 consecutive patients with PCNSL were included in this study. Approximately 9.8% of the PCNSL patients had early mortality. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-11.04, p = 0.048) and involvement of the basal ganglia (adjusted HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.47-15.95, p = 0.009) were identified as independent risk factors of early mortality. Use of MTX-based chemotherapy served as an independent protective factor for early mortality (adjusted HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.67, p = 0.010). Infection and tumor-associated mass effect contributed most to early mortality.

Conclusion: Early mortality is not uncommon in patients with PCNSL. Identification of patients with higher risk may help clinicians with initiating appropriate surveillance and management.

High-dose Methotrexate plus temozolomide with or without rituximab in patients with untreated primary central nervous system lymphoma: A retrospective study from China

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose methotrexate plus temozolomide (MT regimen) and rituximab plus MT (RMT regimen) in patients with untreated primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). A total of 62 patients with untreated PCNSL were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2015, with the median age of 53.5 years (range 29-77).In this study, 32 patients received RMT as induction therapy, and 30 received MT. Objective responses were noted in 93.7% of the patients in the RMT group and in 69.0% of the patients in the MT group (P = 0.018), while complete responses were noted in 53.2% of the patients in the RMT group and 27.6% of the patients in the MT group (P < 0.001). The 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 81.3% and 53.3%, respectively, for the RMT group and 46.5% and 29.1%, respectively, for the MT group (P = 0.019). The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82.3% and 82.3%, respectively, for the RMT group and 65.7% and 50.0%, respectively, for the MT group (P = 0.015). Multivariate analyses showed that therapeutic regimen (RMT vs MT) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Our encouraging results suggest that the RMT regimen may be a feasible and safe therapeutic approach for first-line treatment of PCNSL.

Primary CNS Lymphoma in India: A 17-Year Experience From the All India Institute of Medical Sciences

PURPOSE

The information about the outcome of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) in India is scarce, because there is no population-based or large hospital-based data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study that spanned 17 years (2001 to 2017) to study the outcome of PCNSL at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), which is a tertiary care center in Northern India.

RESULTS

Only one of 99 patients was positive for HIV serology. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common histology (97.7%). The median patient age was 50 years (range, 13 to 70 years), and the ratio of men to women was 1.9. The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 3.5 months (range, 0.5 to 48 months), and 58.5% had a performance status (PS) of 3 or more. Multiple intracranial lesions were present in 81.8% of patients. Surgical resection was performed in 45%, and approximately 22% of patients were ineligible for treatment. Most patients (n = 73) were treated with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)–based regimens (ie, methotrexate, vincristine, and procarbazine with or without rituximab). Pharmacokinetic monitoring of methotrexate was not available at our center. HDMTX-related mortality was 3.9%. The median follow-up duration, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were 34 months, 20.4 months, and 31.7 months, respectively. Addition of rituximab (n = 27) to MVP resulted in a higher objective response rate (88.9% v 73.9% without rituximab; P = .12), complete remission (81.5% v 56.5%; P = .03), 2-year EFS (57.3% v 40.4%; P = .02), and 2-year OS (61.6% v 53.4%; P = .056).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study of PCNSL from India. The patients were immunocompetent and young but presented with a high-burden disease that precluded treatment in approximately 22%. The treatment with HDMTX appears safe without pharmacokinetic monitoring. The outcome is comparable to those observed in the West, and rituximab use showed additional benefit. There are notable barriers with respect to management of PCNSL in the real world, and efforts are required to improve the outcome more.

Impact of front line relative dose intensity for methotrexate and comorbidities in immunocompetent elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are non-Hodgkin lymphomas strictly localized to the CNS, occurring mainly in elderly patients with comorbidities. Current treatment in fit patients relies on high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of this treatment in elderly patients and to assess potential prognostic factors associated with survival. We conducted a retrospective study in two centers between January 2008 and September 2015 including 35 elderly immunocompetent patients who received first-line treatment with high-dose methotrexate. With a median follow-up of 19.8 months (range: 1.7-73.4 months), median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 18.3-60.7) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.8 months (95% CI: 5.2-46.4). In univariate analysis, administration of high-dose cytarabine and achieving a relative dose intensity for methotrexate > 75% were associated with increased OS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04, respectively) whereas comorbidities, defined by a CIRS-G score ≥ 8, were associated with decreased OS and PFS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). A high MSKCC score was associated with decreased OS (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, administration of high-dose cytarabine was associated with increased OS and PFS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007, respectively). Comorbidities and relative dose intensity for methotrexate are important for the prognosis of elderly patients with PCNSL. These results must be confirmed in prospective trials.

Clinical response and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine as a component of salvage R-B(O)AD therapy for the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

Background

A relatively high proportion of patients diagnosed with primary CNS lymphoma will experience recurrent disease, yet therapy options are limited in salvage therapy. This is the first study to evaluate a bendamustine-based combination regimen for the treatment of relapsed/refractory PCNSL and to characterize bendamustine pharmacokinetics in the human CSF.

Methods

Patients received bendamustine 75 mg/m² for two days as part of R-B(O)AD administered intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 4 cycles. Response and adverse events of the regimen were assessed. A sparse sampling strategy and population based modeling approach was utilized for evaluation of plasma and CSF levels of bendamustine.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled into study of whom 70% were of refractory disease and with high IELSG prognostic risk scores. The ORR of R-BOAD was 50% (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.76) with one patient achieving CR and four PR. Primary toxicity of the regimen was reversible myelosuppression, mostly grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. The C_max mean for plasma and CSF were 2669 ng/mL and 0.397 ng/mL, respectively, and patients with response at deep tumor sites displayed higher trends in peak exposure. Pharmacokinetic data was best described by a four-compartment model with first-order elimination of drug from central plasma and CSF compartments.

Conclusions

R-BOAD is an effective salvage option for PCNSL, but with significant hematologic toxicity. Bendamustine CSF levels are minimal; however correspond to plasma exposure and response.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03392714; retrospectively registered January 8, 2018.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4632-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.