1
|
Sterpin E, Widesott L, Poels K, Hoogeman M, Korevaar EW, Lowe M, Molinelli S, Fracchiolla F. Robustness evaluation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110365. [PMID: 38830538 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Compared to conventional radiotherapy using X-rays, proton therapy, in principle, allows better conformity of the dose distribution to target volumes, at the cost of greater sensitivity to physical, anatomical, and positioning uncertainties. Robust planning, both in terms of plan optimization and evaluation, has gained high visibility in publications on the subject and is part of clinical practice in many centers. However, there is currently no consensus on the methods and parameters to be used for robust optimization or robustness evaluation. We propose to overcome this deficiency by following the modified Delphi consensus method. This method first requires a systematic review of the literature. We performed this review using the PubMed and Web Of Science databases, via two different experts. Potential conflicts were resolved by a third expert. We then explored the different methods before focusing on clinical studies that evaluate robustness on a significant number of patients. Many robustness assessment methods are proposed in the literature. Some are more successful than others and their implementation varies between centers. Moreover, they are not all statistically or mathematically equivalent. The most sophisticated and rigorous methods have seen more limited application due to the difficulty of their implementation and their lack of widespread availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Sterpin
- KU Leuven - Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; UCLouvain - Institution de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Center of Molecular Imaging Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - L Widesott
- Proton Therapy Center - UO Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - K Poels
- Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium; UZ Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - E W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M Lowe
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Molinelli
- Fondazione CNAO - Medical Physics Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Fracchiolla
- Proton Therapy Center - UO Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ranjith CP, Krishnan M, Raveendran V, Chaudhari L, Laskar S. An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:035033. [PMID: 38652667 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad3ce0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in thex-axis,y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in thex-axis andy-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Ranjith
- Department of Medical Physics, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, D. Y. Patil Education Society (Deemed to be University), Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mayakannan Krishnan
- Department of Medical Physics, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, D. Y. Patil Education Society (Deemed to be University), Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vysakh Raveendran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lalit Chaudhari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Siddhartha Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Das A, Gaikwad U, Krishnan G, Rajendran A, Patil S, Subramaniam P, Krishna U, Wakde MG, Chilukuri S, Jalali R. Successful Implementation of Image-Guided Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Medulloblastomas. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3378. [PMID: 37958274 PMCID: PMC10647744 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumour in children, while much rarer in adults. Although the prognosis and outcomes have greatly improved in the era of modern multidisciplinary management, long-term treatment-induced toxicities are common. Craniospinal irradiation followed by a boost to the primary and metastatic tumour sites forms the backbone of treatment. Proton therapy has been endorsed over conventional photon-based radiotherapy due to its superior dosimetric advantages and subsequently lower incidence and severity of toxicities. We report here our experience from South-East Asia's first proton therapy centre of treating 40 patients with medulloblastoma (38 children and adolescents, 2 adults) who received image-guided, intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning between 2019 and 2023, with a focus on dosimetry, acute toxicities, and early survival outcomes. All patients could complete the planned course of proton therapy, with mostly mild acute toxicities that were manageable on an outpatient basis. Haematological toxicity was not dose-limiting and did not prolong the overall treatment time. Preliminary data on early outcomes including overall survival and disease-free survival are encouraging, although a longer follow-up and data on long-term toxicities are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindita Das
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Utpal Gaikwad
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Ganapathy Krishnan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Adhithyan Rajendran
- Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Sushama Patil
- Department of Pathology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Preethi Subramaniam
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Uday Krishna
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Manoj G. Wakde
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Srinivas Chilukuri
- Paediatric Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharma DS, Padanthaiyil NM, Krishnan G, Arjunan M, Reddy AK, Mahammood S, Gayen S, Thiyagarajan R, Gaikwad U, Sudarsan RT, Chilukuri S, Jalali R. Critical Appraisal of Paediatric Embryonal Cancers Treated with Image-guided Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:227-236. [PMID: 36609026 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To carry out a comprehensive critical appraisal of image-guided intensity-modulated proton therapy practice for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS An image-guided intensity-modulated proton therapy database of 45 consecutive paediatric patients with central nervous system embryonal malignancies treated between January 2019 and April 2022 were critically appraised for demography, diagnosis, treatment planning strategy and treatment delivery accuracy. RESULTS Most patients (median age: 7.5 years; male:female ratio: 34:11) had medulloblastoma (56%), followed by recurrent ependymoma (19%), pinealoblastoma (5%), germ cell (5%) and others (15%). The dose to the planning target volume-craniospinal (PTV-CS; length 39.06-79.59 cm) varied from 21 to 35 GyRBE, whereas the combined median dose to craniospinal and boost was 54 GyRBE. In all patients, the 95% isodose line covered the cribriform plate completely and optic nerves mostly, with a median V95% of 100% and 82.96%, keeping Dmax to the lens <3.9 GyRBE. In skeletally immature patients (88.38%), the anterior vertebral body was completely covered in 18.18% and underdosed in 70.15% of the cases, resulting in a median Dmean of 10.11 GyRBE to the oesophagus. Lateral spine coverage was maintained on the edges of the vertebral body in 52.2%, whereas it extended beyond in 48.8%. The median V98% for clinical target volumes and V95% for PTVs of the brain, spine and craniospinal were >97%, with excellent conformity (0.89) and homogeneity (0.07) indices for PTV-CS. All neurological organs at risk received a median Dmax ranging from 36 to 44 GyRBE from the combined CSI and boost regimens. Analysis of patient-specific quality assurance results revealed that 545 (97.67%) planar dosage verification had gamma (3% at 3 mm) values >95%. The online patient set-up verification showed translational and rotational deviation within 2 mm and 0.5° in 88-94% and 97% of the cases. Systematic and random error were within 0.90 mm and 1.71 mm in translation and 0.1° and 0.2° in rotation. CONCLUSION A change in practice pattern was observed. The findings from our comprehensive critical appraisal add to the growing library of CSI practice and may serve as a reference for inter-institutional comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Sharma
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - N M Padanthaiyil
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - G Krishnan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M Arjunan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - A K Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - S Mahammood
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - S Gayen
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R Thiyagarajan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - U Gaikwad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R T Sudarsan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - S Chilukuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Padannayil NM, Sharma DS, Nangia S, Patro KC, Gaikwad U, Burela N. IMPT of head and neck cancer: unsupervised machine learning treatment planning strategy for reducing radiation dermatitis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36639667 PMCID: PMC9840252 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02201-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation dermatitis is a major concern in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) despite its demonstrated superiority over contemporary photon radiotherapy. In this study, dose surface histogram data extracted from forty-four patients of HNC treated with IMPT was used to predict the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of skin. Grades of NTCP-skin were clustered using the K-means clustering unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithm. A new skin-sparing IMPT (IMPT-SS) planning strategy was developed with three major changes and prospectively implemented in twenty HNC patients. Across skin surfaces exposed from 10 (S10) to 70 (S70) GyRBE, the skin's NTCP demonstrated the strongest associations with S50 and S40 GyRBE (0.95 and 0.94). The increase in the NTCP of skin per unit GyRBE is 0.568 for skin exposed to 50 GyRBE as compared to 0.418 for 40 GyRBE. Three distinct clusters were formed, with 41% of patients in G1, 32% in G2, and 27% in G3. The average (± SD) generalised equivalent uniform dose for G1, G2, and G3 clusters was 26.54 ± 6.75, 38.73 ± 1.80, and 45.67 ± 2.20 GyRBE. The corresponding NTCP (%) were 4.97 ± 5.12, 48.12 ± 12.72 and 87.28 ± 7.73 respectively. In comparison to IMPT, new IMPT-SS plans significantly (P < 0.01) reduced SX GyRBE, gEUD, and associated NTCP-skin while maintaining identical dose volume indices for target and other organs at risk. The mean NTCP-skin value for IMPT-SS was 34% lower than that of IMPT. The dose to skin in patients treated prospectively for HNC was reduced by including gEUD for an acceptable radiation dermatitis determined from the local patient population using an unsupervised MLA in the spot map optimization of a new IMPT planning technique. However, the clinical finding of acute skin toxicity must also be related to the observed reduction in skin dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noufal Manthala Padannayil
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Sapna Nangia
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| | - Kartikeshwar C. Patro
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Utpal Gaikwad
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| | - Nagarjuna Burela
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaikwad U, Noufal MP, Sylvia J, Reddy AK, Panda PK, Chilukuri S, Sharma D, Jalali R. Encouraging early outcomes with image guided pencil beam proton therapy for cranio-spinal irradiation: first report from India. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:115. [PMID: 35773667 PMCID: PMC9248189 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02085-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To report our experience with image guided pencil beam proton beam therapy (PBT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Materials and Methods Between January 2019 and December 2021, we carried out a detailed audit of the first forty patients treated with PBT. We had recorded acute toxicities, reporting early outcomes and discuss limitations of current contouring guidelines during CSI PBT planning. Results Median age of the patient cohort was 8 years, and histologies include 20 medulloblastoma, 7 recurrent ependymoma, 3 pineoblastoma, 3 were germ cell tumors and remaining 7 constituted other diagnoses. Forty percent patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy (Gray; range 21.6–35 Gy). Thirty-five patients (87.5%) completed their CSI without interruption, 5 required hospital admission. No patient had grade 2/ > weight loss during the treatment. Forty-five percent (18) developed grade 1 haematological toxicities and 20% (8) developed grade 2 or 3 toxicities; none had grade 4 toxicities. At median follow up of 12 months, 90% patients are alive of whom 88.9% are having local control. Special consideration with modification in standard contouring used at our institute helped in limiting acute toxicities in paediatric CSI patients. Conclusion Our preliminary experience with modern contemporary PBT using pencil beam technology and daily image guidance in a range of tumours suitable for CSI is encouraging. Patients tolerated the treatment well with acceptable acute toxicity and expected short-term survival outcome. In paediatric CSI patients, modification in standard contouring guidelines required to achieve better results with PBT.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02085-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utpal Gaikwad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M P Noufal
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jacinthlyn Sylvia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ashok K Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar Panda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Srinivas Chilukuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Dayananda Sharma
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| |
Collapse
|