1
|
Yoshimura T, Yamada R, Kinoshita R, Matsuura T, Kanehira T, Tamura H, Nishioka K, Yasuda K, Taguchi H, Katoh N, Kobashi K, Hashimoto T, Aoyama H. Probability of normal tissue complications for hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies using intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization. J Radiat Res 2024:rrae008. [PMID: 38499489 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
This retrospective treatment-planning study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization (ro-IMPT) reduces the risk of acute hematologic toxicity (H-T) and acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity (GI-T) in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies when compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated X-ray (IMXT) and single-field optimization proton beam (SFO-PBT) therapies. All plans were created for 13 gynecologic-malignancy patients. The prescribed dose was 45 GyE in 25 fractions for 95% planning target volume in 3D-CRT, IMXT and SFO-PBT plans and for 99% clinical target volume (CTV) in ro-IMPT plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of each toxicity was used as an in silico surrogate marker. Median estimated NTCP values for acute H-T and acute and late GI-T were 0.20, 0.94 and 0.58 × 10-1 in 3D-CRT; 0.19, 0.65 and 0.24 × 10-1 in IMXT; 0.04, 0.74 and 0.19 × 10-1 in SFO-PBT; and 0.06, 0.66 and 0.15 × 10-1 in ro-IMPT, respectively. Compared with 3D-CRT and IMXT plans, the ro-IMPT plan demonstrated significant reduction in acute H-T and late GI-T. The risk of acute GI-T in ro-IMPT plan is equivalent with IMXT plan. The ro-IMPT plan demonstrated potential clinical benefits for reducing the risk of acute H-T and late GI-T in the treatment of gynecologic malignances by reducing the dose to the bone marrow and bowel bag while maintaining adequate dose coverage to the CTV. Our results indicated that ro-IMPT may reduce acute H-T and late GI-T risk with potentially improving outcomes for postoperative gynecologic-malignancy patients with concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Ryota Yamada
- Department of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Rumiko Kinoshita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamura
- Department of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaulfers T, Lattery G, Cheng C, Zhao X, Selvaraj B, Wu H, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Lin H, Simone CB, Hasan S, Kang M, Chang J. Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:798. [PMID: 38398188 PMCID: PMC10886659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy (RT) uses a distal tracking method to eliminate exit doses and can achieve superior OAR sparing. This study explores the application of this novel method in stereotactic body radiotherapy prostate FLASH-RT. An in-house platform was developed to enable intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning using a single-energy Bragg peak distal tracking method. The patients involved in the study were previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to 40 Gy in five fractions. FLASH plans were optimized using a four-beam arrangement to generate a dose distribution similar to the conventional opposing beams. All of the beams had a small angle of two degrees from the lateral direction to increase the dosimetry quality. Dose metrics were compared between the conventional PBS and the Bragg peak FLASH plans. The dose rate histogram (DRVH) and FLASH metrics of 40 Gy/s coverage (V40Gy/s) were investigated for the Bragg peak plans. There was no significant difference between the clinical and Bragg peak plans in rectum, bladder, femur heads, large bowel, and penile bulb dose metrics, except for Dmax. For the CTV, the FLASH plans resulted in a higher Dmax than the clinical plans (116.9% vs. 103.3%). For the rectum, the V40Gy/s reached 94% and 93% for 1 Gy dose thresholds in composite and single-field evaluations, respectively. Additionally, the FLASH ratio reached close to 100% after the application of the 5 Gy threshold in composite dose rate assessment. In conclusion, the Bragg peak distal tracking method can yield comparable plan quality in most OARs while preserving sufficient FLASH dose rate coverage, demonstrating that the ultra-high dose technique can be applied in prostate FLASH SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Kaulfers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Grant Lattery
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Xingyi Zhao
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Balaji Selvaraj
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Hui Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China;
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jehee Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
- Northwell, 2000 Marcus Ave, Suite 300, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bobić M, Christensen JB, Lee H, Choulilitsa E, Czerska K, Togno M, Safai S, Yukihara EG, Winey BA, Lomax AJ, Paganetti H, Albertini F, Nesteruk KP. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for simultaneous measurement of point dose and dose-weighted LET in an adaptive proton therapy workflow. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1333039. [PMID: 38510267 PMCID: PMC10951997 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1333039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To demonstrate the suitability of optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) for accurate simultaneous measurement of the absolute point dose and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETD) in an anthropomorphic phantom for experimental validation of daily adaptive proton therapy. Methods A clinically realistic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plan was created based on a CT of an anthropomorphic head-and-neck phantom made of tissue-equivalent material. The IMPT plan was optimized with three fields to deliver a uniform dose to the target volume covering the OSLDs. Different scenarios representing inter-fractional anatomical changes were created by modifying the phantom. An online adaptive proton therapy workflow was used to recover the daily dose distribution and account for the applied geometry changes. To validate the adaptive workflow, measurements were performed by irradiating Al2O3:C OSLDs inside the phantom. In addition to the measurements, retrospective Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare the absolute dose and dose-averaged LET (LETD) delivered to the OSLDs. Results The online adaptive proton therapy workflow was shown to recover significant degradation in dose conformity resulting from large anatomical and positioning deviations from the reference plan. The Monte Carlo simulations were in close agreement with the OSLD measurements, with an average relative error of 1.4% for doses and 3.2% for LETD. The use of OSLDs for LET determination allowed for a correction for the ionization quenched response. Conclusion The OSLDs appear to be an excellent detector for simultaneously assessing dose and LET distributions in proton irradiation of an anthropomorphic phantom. The OSLDs can be cut to almost any size and shape, making them ideal for in-phantom measurements to probe the radiation quality and dose in a predefined region of interest. Although we have presented the results obtained in the experimental validation of an adaptive proton therapy workflow, the same approach can be generalized and used for a variety of clinical innovations and workflow developments that require accurate assessment of point dose and/or average LET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mislav Bobić
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Hoyeon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Evangelia Choulilitsa
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Brian A. Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Antony J. Lomax
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Konrad P. Nesteruk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Das A, Gaikwad U, Krishnan G, Rajendran A, Patil S, Subramaniam P, Krishna U, Wakde MG, Chilukuri S, Jalali R. Successful Implementation of Image-Guided Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Medulloblastomas. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3378. [PMID: 37958274 PMCID: PMC10647744 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumour in children, while much rarer in adults. Although the prognosis and outcomes have greatly improved in the era of modern multidisciplinary management, long-term treatment-induced toxicities are common. Craniospinal irradiation followed by a boost to the primary and metastatic tumour sites forms the backbone of treatment. Proton therapy has been endorsed over conventional photon-based radiotherapy due to its superior dosimetric advantages and subsequently lower incidence and severity of toxicities. We report here our experience from South-East Asia's first proton therapy centre of treating 40 patients with medulloblastoma (38 children and adolescents, 2 adults) who received image-guided, intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning between 2019 and 2023, with a focus on dosimetry, acute toxicities, and early survival outcomes. All patients could complete the planned course of proton therapy, with mostly mild acute toxicities that were manageable on an outpatient basis. Haematological toxicity was not dose-limiting and did not prolong the overall treatment time. Preliminary data on early outcomes including overall survival and disease-free survival are encouraging, although a longer follow-up and data on long-term toxicities are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindita Das
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Utpal Gaikwad
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Ganapathy Krishnan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Adhithyan Rajendran
- Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Sushama Patil
- Department of Pathology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Preethi Subramaniam
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Uday Krishna
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Manoj G. Wakde
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| | - Srinivas Chilukuri
- Paediatric Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Neuro-Oncology Cancer Management Team, Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, India; (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lattery G, Kaulfers T, Cheng C, Zhao X, Selvaraj B, Lin H, Simone CB, Choi JI, Chang J, Kang M. Pencil Beam Scanning Bragg Peak FLASH Technique for Ultra-High Dose Rate Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4560. [PMID: 37760528 PMCID: PMC10527307 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH-RT can deliver highly conformal treatment and potentially offer improved normal tissue protection for radiotherapy patients. This study focused on developing ultra-high dose rate (≥40 Gy × RBE/s) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for hypofractionated treatment of early-stage breast cancer. A novel tracking technique was developed to enable pencil beaming scanning (PBS) of single-energy protons to adapt the Bragg peak (BP) to the target distally. Standard-of-care PBS treatment plans of consecutively treated early-stage breast cancer patients using multiple energy layers were reoptimized using this technique, and dose metrics were compared between single-energy layer BP FLASH and conventional IMPT plans. FLASH dose rate coverage by volume (V40Gy/s) was also evaluated for the FLASH sparing effect. Distal tracking can precisely stop BP at the target distal edge. All plans (n = 10) achieved conformal IMPT-like dose distributions under clinical machine parameters. No statistically significant differences were observed in any dose metrics for heart, ipsilateral lung, most ipsilateral breast, and CTV metrics (p > 0.05 for all). Conventional plans yielded slightly superior target and skin dose uniformities with 4.5% and 12.9% lower dose maxes, respectively. FLASH-RT plans reached 46.7% and 61.9% average-dose rate FLASH coverage for tissues receiving more than 1 and 5 Gy plan dose total under the 250 minimum MU condition. Bragg peak FLASH-RT techniques achieved comparable plan quality to conventional IMPT while reaching adequate dose rate ratios, demonstrating the feasibility of early-stage breast cancer clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Lattery
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
| | - Tyler Kaulfers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Xingyi Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Balaji Selvaraj
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
- Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 450 Lakeville Road, Lake Success, NY 11042, USA
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang W, Liu X, Yang Z, Liao Y, Li P, Zhao R, Qin B. Improving delivery efficiency using spots and energy layers reduction algorithms based on a large momentum acceptance beamline. Med Phys 2023; 50:5189-5200. [PMID: 37099491 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is a well-known delivery method of proton therapy. Besides higher plan quality, reducing the delivery time is also essential to IMPT plans. It can enhance patient comfort, reduce treatment costs, and improve delivery efficiency. From the perspective of treatment efficacy, it contributes to mitigating the intra-fractional motions and improving the accuracy of radiotherapy, especially for moving tumors. PURPOSE However, there is a tradeoff problem between the plan quality and delivery time. We consider the potential of a large momentum acceptance (LMA) beamline and apply the spots and energy layers reduction method to reduce the delivery time. METHODS The delivery time for each field consists of the energy layer switching time, spot traveling time, and dose delivery time. The larger momentum spread and higher intensity beam offered by the LMA beamline contribute to reducing the total delivery time compared to the conventional beamline. In addition to the dose fidelity term, an L1 and logarithm items were added to the objective function to increase the sparsity of the low-weighted spots and energy layers. After that, the low-weighted spots and layers were iteratively excluded in the reduced plan, which reduced the energy layer switching time and spot traveling time. We used the standard, reduced, and LMA-reduced plans to validate the proposed method and tested it on prostate and nasopharyngeal cases. Then, we compared and evaluated the plan quality, treatment time, and plan robustness against delivery uncertainty. RESULTS Compared with the standard plans, the number of spots in the LMA-reduced plans was on average reduced by 13 400 (95.6%) for prostate cases and by 48 300 (80.7%) for nasopharyngeal cases and the number of energy layers was on average reduced by 49 (61.3%) for prostate cases and by 97 (50.5%) for nasopharyngeal cases. And, the delivery time of the LMA-reduced plans was shortened from 34.5 to 8.6 s for prostate cases and from 163.8 to 53.6 s for nasopharyngeal cases. The LMA-reduced plans had comparable robustness to the spot monitor unit (MU) error compared with the standard plans, but the LMA-reduced plans became more sensitive to spot position uncertainty. CONCLUSION The delivery efficiency can be significantly improved using the LMA beamline and spots and energy layers reduction strategies. The method is promising to improve the efficiency of motion mitigation strategies for treating moving tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiyong Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yicheng Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peilun Li
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Runxiao Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bortfeld T, Yan S. Our journeys through the fascinating world of proton radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50 Suppl 1:27-34. [PMID: 36502491 PMCID: PMC10257772 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to share the excitement of the science of proton therapy, told by two physicists, who started their career in this area at different times. The authors' journey spans the evolution of proton therapy over the past 30 years, taking the reader from the time when it was an extremely exotic treatment modality until its more common use today. Over this time period, the authors' research and development aimed at an improved understanding of the physical benefits of intensity-modulated proton therapy and arc therapy, treatment planning and optimization to take proton-specific uncertainties into account, and imaging to measure the proton range in the patient. The final section focuses on emerging themes to democratize proton therapy by substantially reducing its size and price, for much greater affordability and global availability of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bortfeld
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susu Yan
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sommat K, Tong AKT, Ong ALK, Hu J, Sin SY, Lam WWC, Xie W, Khor YM, Lim C, Lim TW, Selvarajan S, Wang F, Tan TWK, Wee JTS, Soong YL, Fong KW, Hennedige T, Hua TC. 18F-FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with multifield optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37157884 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiotherapy planning feasibility of dose escalation with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to hypoxic tumor regions identified on 18F-Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine patients with stages T3-4N0-3M0 NPC underwent 18F-FMISO PET-CT before and during week 3 of radiotherapy. The hypoxic volume (GTVhypo) is automatically generated by applying a subthresholding algorithm within the gross tumor volume (GTV) with a tumor to muscle standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio of 1.3 on the 18F-FMISO PET-CT scan. Two proton plans were generated for each patient, a standard plan to 70 Gy and dose escalation plan with upfront boost followed by standard 70GyE plan. The stereotactic boost was planned with single-field uniform dose optimization using two fields to deliver 10 GyE in two fractions to GTVhypo. The standard plan was generated with IMPT with robust optimization to deliver 70GyE, 60GyE in 33 fractions using simultaneous integrated boost technique. A plan sum was generated for assessment. RESULTS Eight of nine patients showed tumor hypoxia on the baseline 18F-FMISO PET-CT scan. The mean hypoxic tumor volume was 3.9 cm3 (range .9-11.9cm3 ). The average SUVmax of the hypoxic volume was 2.2 (range 1.44-2.98). All the dose-volume parameters met the planning objectives for target coverage. Dose escalation was not feasible in three of eight patients as the D0.03cc of temporal lobe was greater than 75GyE. CONCLUSIONS The utility of boost to the hypoxic volume before standard course of radiotherapy with IMPT is dosimetrically feasible in selected patients. Clinical trials are warranted to determine the clinical outcomes of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiattisa Sommat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aaron Kian Ti Tong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ashley Li Kuan Ong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jing Hu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sze Yarn Sin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Winnie Wing Chuen Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wanying Xie
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yiu Ming Khor
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cindy Lim
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tze Wei Lim
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fuqiang Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Terence Wee Kiat Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joseph Tien Seng Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kam Weng Fong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tiffany Hennedige
- Division of Oncologic Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Thng Choon Hua
- Division of Oncologic Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kasamatsu K, Matsuura T, Yasuda K, Miyazaki K, Takao S, Tamura M, Otsuka M, Uchinami Y, Aoyama H. Hyperfractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for pharyngeal cancer with variable relative biological effectiveness: A simulation study. Med Phys 2022; 49:7815-7825. [PMID: 36300598 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton is considered to be dependent on biological parameters and fractional dose. While hyperfractionated photon therapy was effective in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancers, its effect in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) under the variable RBE has not been investigated in detail. PURPOSE To study the effect of variable RBE on hyperfractionated IMPT for the treatment of pharyngeal cancer. We investigated the biologically effective dose (BED) to determine the theoretical effective hyperfractionated schedule. METHODS The treatment plans of three pharyngeal cancer patients were used to define the ΔBED for the clinical target volume (CTV) and soft tissue (acute and late reaction) as the difference between the BED for the altered schedule with variable RBE and conventional schedule with constant RBE. The ΔBED with several combinations of parameters (treatment days, number of fractions, and prescribed dose) was comprehensively calculated. Of the candidate schedules, the one that commonly gave a higher ΔBED for CTV was selected as the resultant schedule. The BED volume histogram was used to compare the influence of variable RBE and fractionation. RESULTS In the conventional schedule, compared with the constant RBE, the variable RBE resulted in a mean 2.6 and 2.7 Gy reduction of BEDmean for the CTV and soft tissue (acute reaction) of the three plans, respectively. Moreover, the BEDmean for soft tissue (late reaction) increased by 7.4 Gy, indicating a potential risk of increased RBE. Comprehensive calculation of the ΔBED resulted in the hyperfractionated schedule of 80.52 Gy (RBE = 1.1)/66 fractions in 6.5 weeks. When variable RBE was used, compared with the conventional schedule, the hyperfractionated schedule increased the BEDmean for CTV by 7.6 Gy; however, this was associated with a 7.8 Gy increase for soft tissue (acute reaction). The BEDmean for soft tissue (late reaction) decreased by 2.4 Gy. CONCLUSION The results indicated a potential effect of the variable RBE on IMPT for pharyngeal cancer but with the possibility that hyperfractionation could outweigh this effect. Although biological uncertainties require conservative use of the resultant schedule, hyperfractionation is expected to be an effective strategy in IMPT for pharyngeal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koki Kasamatsu
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Miyazaki
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Research and Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaya Tamura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Manami Otsuka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Y, Alshaikhi J, Amos RA, Tan W, Anaya VM, Pang Y, Royle G, Bär E. Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients. Med Phys 2022; 49:7683-7693. [PMID: 36083223 PMCID: PMC10092578 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To incorporate small non-rigid variations of head and neck patients into the robust evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the selection of robust treatment plans. METHODS A cohort of 20 nasopharynx cancer patients with weekly kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and 15 oropharynx cancer patients with weekly cone-beam CT (CBCT) were retrospectively included. Anatomical variations between week 0/week 1 of treatment were acquired using deformable image registration (DIR) for all 35 patients and then applied to the planning CT of four patients who have kVCT scanned each week to simulate potential small non-rigid variations (sNRVs). The robust evaluations were conducted on IMPT plans with: (1) different number of beam fields from 3-field to 5-field; (2) different beam angles. The robust evaluation before treatment, including the sNRVs and setup uncertainty, referred to as sNRV+R evaluation was compared with the conventional evaluation (without sNRVs) in terms of robustness consistency with the gold standard evaluation based on weekly CT. RESULTS Among four patients (490 scenarios), we observed a maximum difference in the sNRV+R evaluation to the nominal dose of: 9.37% dose degradation on D95 of clinical target volumes (CTVs), increase in mean dose (D mean $_{\text{mean}}$ ) of parotid 11.87 Gy, increase in max dose (D max $_{\text{max}}$ ) of brainstem 20.82 Gy. In contrast, in conventional evaluation, we observed a maximum difference to the nominal dose of: 7.58% dose degradation on D95 of the CTVs, increase in parotid D mean $_{\text{mean}}$ by 4.88 Gy, increase in brainstem D max $_{\text{max}}$ by 13.5 Gy. In the measurement of the robustness ranking consistency with the gold standard evaluation, the sNRV+R evaluation was better or equal to the conventional evaluation in 77% of cases, particularly, better on spinal cord, parotid glands, and low-risk CTV. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the additional dose discrepancy that sNRVs can make. The inclusion of sNRVs can be beneficial to robust evaluation, providing information on clinical uncertainties additional to the conventional rigid isocenter shift.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Jailan Alshaikhi
- Saudi Proton Therapy Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Richard A Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Wenyong Tan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Virginia Marin Anaya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, London, UK
| | - Yaru Pang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shan J, Feng H, Morales DH, Patel SH, Wong WW, Fatyga M, Bues M, Schild SE, Foote RL, Liu W. Virtual particle Monte Carlo: A new concept to avoid simulating secondary particles in proton therapy dose calculation. Med Phys 2022; 49:6666-6683. [PMID: 35960865 PMCID: PMC9588716 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In proton therapy dose calculation, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are superior in accuracy but more time consuming, compared to analytical calculations. Graphic processing units (GPUs) are effective in accelerating MC simulations but may suffer thread divergence and racing condition in GPU threads that degrades the computing performance due to the generation of secondary particles during nuclear reactions. PURPOSE A novel concept of virtual particle (VP) MC (VPMC) is proposed to avoid simulating secondary particles in GPU-accelerated proton MC dose calculation and take full advantage of the computing power of GPU. METHODS Neutrons and gamma rays were ignored as escaping from the human body; doses of electrons, heavy ions, and nuclear fragments were locally deposited; the tracks of deuterons were converted into tracks of protons. These particles, together with primary and secondary protons, are considered to be the realistic particles. Histories of primary and secondary protons were replaced by histories of multiple VPs. Each VP corresponded to one proton (either primary or secondary). A continuous-slowing-down-approximation model, an ionization model, and a large angle scattering event model corresponding to nuclear interactions were developed for VPs by generating probability distribution functions (PDFs) based on simulation results of realistic particles using MCsquare. For efficient calculations, these PDFs were stored in the Compute Unified Device Architecture textures. VPMC was benchmarked with TOPAS and MCsquare in phantoms and with MCsquare in 13 representative patient geometries. Comparisons between the VPMC calculated dose and dose measured in water during patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) of the selected 13 patients were also carried out. Gamma analysis was used to compare the doses derived from different methods and calculation efficiencies were also compared. RESULTS Integrated depth dose and lateral dose profiles in both homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms all matched well among VPMC, TOPAS, and MCsquare calculations. The 3D-3D gamma passing rates with a criterion of 2%/2 mm and a threshold of 10% was 98.49% between MCsquare and TOPAS and 98.31% between VPMC and TOPAS in homogeneous phantoms, and 99.18% between MCsquare and TOPAS and 98.49% between VPMC and TOPAS in inhomogeneous phantoms, respectively. In patient geometries, the 3D-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm/10% between dose distributions from VPMC and MCsquare were 98.56 ± 1.09% in patient geometries. The 2D-3D gamma analysis with 3%/2 mm/10% between the VPMC calculated dose distributions and the 2D measured planar dose distributions during PSQA was 98.91 ± 0.88%. VPMC calculation was highly efficient and took 2.84 ± 2.44 s to finish for the selected 13 patients running on four NVIDIA Ampere GPUs in patient geometries. CONCLUSION VPMC was found to achieve high accuracy and efficiency in proton therapy dose calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | | | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Faught AM, Wilson LJ, Gargone M, Pirlepesov F, Moskvin VP, Hua C. Treatment-planning approaches to intensity modulated proton therapy and the impact on dose-weighted linear energy transfer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13782. [PMID: 36161765 PMCID: PMC9859995 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We quantified the effect of various forward-based treatment-planning strategies in proton therapy on dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd). By maintaining the dosimetric quality at a clinically acceptable level, we aimed to evaluate the differences in LETd among various treatment-planning approaches and their practicality in minimizing biologic uncertainties associated with LETd. METHOD Eight treatment-planning strategies that are achievable in commercial treatment-planning systems were applied on a cylindrical water phantom and four pediatric brain tumor cases. Each planning strategy was compared to either an opposed lateral plan (phantom study) or original clinical plan (patient study). Deviations in mean and maximum LETd from clinically acceptable dose distributions were compared. RESULTS In the phantom study, using a range shifter and altering the robust scenarios during optimization had the largest effect on the mean clinical target volume LETd, which was reduced from 4.5 to 3.9 keV/μm in both cases. Variations in the intersection angle between beams had the largest effect on LETd in a ring defined 3 to 5 mm outside the target. When beam intersection angles were reduced from opposed laterals (180°) to 120°, 90°, and 60°, corresponding maximum LETd increased from 7.9 to 8.9, 10.9, and 12.2 keV/μm, respectively. A clear trend in mean and maximum LETd variations in the clinical cases could not be established, though spatial distribution of LETd suggested a strong dependence on patient anatomy and treatment geometry. CONCLUSION Changes in LETd from treatment-plan setup follow intuitive trends in a controlled phantom experiment. Anatomical and other patient-specific considerations, however, can preclude generalizable strategies in clinical cases. For pediatric cranial radiation therapy, we recommend using opposed lateral treatment fields to treat midline targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M. Faught
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Lydia J. Wilson
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Melissa Gargone
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Fakhriddin Pirlepesov
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Vadim P. Moskvin
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Chia‐Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fang KC, Huang TL, Liao KC, Lee TF, Hsieh YW, Tsai WL, Fang FM. Dosimetric Parameters Related to Acute Radiation Dermatitis of Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated by Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy. J Pers Med 2022; 12. [PMID: 35887590 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Growing patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). However, a high probability of severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) was observed. The objective of the study is to investigate the dosimetric parameters related to ARD for NPC patients treated with IMPT. Methods: Sixty-two patients with newly diagnosed NPC were analyzed. The ARD was recorded based on the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Logistic regression model was performed to identify the clinical and dosimetric parameters related to ARD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results: The maximum ARD grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 27 (43.5%), 26 (42.0%), and 9 (14.5%) of the patients, respectively. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) in average volume to skin 5 mm with the respective doses were observed in the range 54−62 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) for grade 2 and 3 versus grade 1 ARD. Smoking habit and N2-N3 status were identified as significant predictors to develop grade 2 and 3 ARD in clinical model, and V58CGE to skin 5 mm as an independent predictor in dosimetric model. After adding the variable of V58CGE to the metric incorporating two parameters of smoking habit and N status, the AUC value of the metric increases from 0.78 (0.66−0.90) to 0.82 (0.72−0.93). The most appropriate cut-off value of V58CGE to skin 5 mm as determined by ROC curve was 5.0 cm3, with a predicted probability of 54% to develop grade 2 and 3 ARD. Conclusion: The dosimetric parameter of V58CGE to skin 5 mm < 5.0 cm3 could be used as a constraint in treatment planning for NPC patients treated by IMPT.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kobeissi JM, Hilal L, Simone CB 2nd, Lin H, Crane CH, Hajj C. Proton Therapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2900. [PMID: 35740567 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy is among the locoregional therapy modalities used to treat unresectable or medically inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton radiation therapy plays a major role in the treatment of HCC, especially when liver toxicity is a concern. The aim of this review is to provide a concise and comprehensive summary on the use of proton therapy in the management of HCC. Abstract Proton radiation therapy plays a central role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the near-zero exit dose and improved sparing of normal liver parenchyma, protons are being used even in challenging scenarios, including larger or multifocal liver tumors, and those associated with vascular tumor thrombus. There is a mounting level of evidence that suggests that protons are superior to photons in terms of survival and toxicity outcomes, specifically the progression to liver failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing protons to photons is currently underway to verify this hypothesis.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hytönen R, Vanderstraeten R, Dahele M, Verbakel WFAR. Influence of Beam Angle on Normal Tissue Complication Probability of Knowledge-Based Head and Neck Cancer Proton Planning. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122849. [PMID: 35740515 PMCID: PMC9221467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge-based planning solutions have brought significant improvements in treatment planning. However, the performance of a proton-specific knowledge-based planning model in creating knowledge-based plans (KBPs) with beam angles differing from those used to train the model remains unexplored. We used a previously validated RapidPlanPT model and scripting to create nine KBPs, one with default and eight with altered beam angles, for 10 recent oropharynx cancer patients. The altered-angle plans were compared against the default-angle ones in terms of grade 2 dysphagia and xerostomia normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), mean doses of several organs at risk, and dose homogeneity index (HI). As KBP could be suboptimal, a proof of principle automatic iterative optimizer (AIO) was added with the aim of reducing the plan NTCP. There were no statistically significant differences in NTCP or HI between default- and altered-angle KBPs, and the altered-angle plans showed a <1% reduction in NTCP. AIO was able to reduce the sum of grade 2 NTCPs in 66/90 cases with mean a reduction of 3.5 ± 1.8%. While the altered-angle plans saw greater benefit from AIO, both default- and altered-angle plans could be improved, indicating that the KBP model alone was not completely optimal to achieve the lowest NTCP. Overall, the data showed that the model was robust to the various beam arrangements within the range described in this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Hytönen
- Varian Medical Systems Finland, 00270 Helsinki, Finland
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Max Dahele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (W.F.A.R.V.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilko F. A. R. Verbakel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (W.F.A.R.V.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sheikh K, Liu D, Li H, Acharya S, Ladra MM, Hrinivich WT. Dosimetric evaluation of cone-beam CT-based synthetic CTs in pediatric patients undergoing intensity-modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13604. [PMID: 35413144 PMCID: PMC9194971 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate dosimetric changes detected using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) derived from online cone-beam CTs (CBCT) in pediatric patients treated using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). METHODS Ten pediatric patients undergoing IMPT and aligned daily using proton gantry-mounted CBCT were identified for retrospective analysis with treated anatomical sites fully encompassed in the CBCT field of view. Dates were identified when the patient received both a CBCT and a quality assurance CT (qCT) for routine dosimetric evaluation. sCTs were generated based on a deformable registration between the initial plan CT (pCT) and CBCT. The clinical IMPT plans were re-computed on the same day qCT and sCT, and dosimetric changes due to tissue change or response from the initial plan were computed using each image. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between dosimetric changes detected using the qCT and the sCT. Gamma analysis was also used to compare the dose distributions computed on the qCT and sCT. RESULTS The correlation coefficients (p-values) between qCTs and sCTs for changes detected in target coverage, overall maximum dose, and organ at risk dose were 0.97 (< .001), 0.84 (.002) and 0.91 (< .001), respectively. Mean ± SD gamma pass rates of the sCT-based dose compared to the qCT-based dose at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria were 96.5%±4.5%, 93.2%±6.3%, and 91.3%±7.8%, respectively. Pass rates tended to be lower for targets near lung. CONCLUSION While insufficient for re-planning, sCTs provide approximate dosimetry without administering additional imaging dose in pediatric patients undergoing IMPT. Dosimetric changes detected using sCTs are correlated with changes detected using clinically-standard qCTs; however, residual differences in dosimetry remain a limitation. Further improvements in sCT image quality may both improve online dosimetric evaluation and reduce imaging dose for pediatric patients by reducing the need for routine qCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadija Sheikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dezhi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sahaja Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew M Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - William T Hrinivich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu C, Bradley JA, Zheng D, Vega RBM, Beltran CJ, Mendenhall N, Liang X. RBE-weighted dose and its impact on the risk of acute coronary event for breast cancer patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13527. [PMID: 35060317 PMCID: PMC8992952 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose to the heart and to estimate RBE uncertainties when assuming a constant RBE of 1.1, for breast cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Further, to study the impact of RBE uncertainties on the risk of an acute coronary event (ACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 20 patients who received IMPT to either the left breast (n = 10) or left chest wall (n = 10) and regional lymph nodes. The Monte Carlo simulation engine, MCsquare, was used to simulate the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) map. The RBE-weighted dose to the heart and its substructures was calculated using three different RBE models. The risk of ACE was estimated per its linear relationship with mean heart dose (MHD) as established by Darby et al. RESULTS The median MHD increased from 1.33 GyRBE assuming an RBE of 1.1 to 1.64, 1.87, and 1.99 GyRBE when using the RBE-weighted dose models. The median values (and ranges) of the excess absolute risk of ACE were 0.4% (0.1%-0.8%) when assuming an RBE of 1.1, and 0.6% (0.2%-1.0%), 0.6% (0.2%-1.1%), and 0.7% (0.2%-1.1%) with the RBE-weighted models. For our patient cohort, the maximum excess absolute risk of ACE increased by 0.3% with the RBE-weighted doses compared to the constant RBE of 1.1, reaching an excess absolute ACE risk of 1.1%. The interpatient LETd variation was small for the relevant high-dose regions of the heart. CONCLUSION All three RBE models predicted a higher biological dose compared to the clinical standard dose assuming a constant RBE of 1.1. An underestimation of the biological dose results in underestimation of the ACE risk. Analyzing the voxel-by-voxel biological dose and the LET map alongside clinical outcomes is warranted in the development of a more accurate normal-tissue complication probability model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Liu
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy InstituteJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Mayo ClinicDepartment of Radiation OncologyJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Mayo ClinicDepartment of Radiation OncologyJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tamura H, Kobashi K, Nishioka K, Yoshimura T, Hashimoto T, Shimizu S, Ito YM, Maeda Y, Sasaki M, Yamamoto K, Tamamura H, Aoyama H, Shirato H. Dosimetric advantages of daily adaptive strategy in IMPT for high-risk prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13531. [PMID: 35045211 PMCID: PMC8992948 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the dosimetric advantages of daily adaptive radiotherapy (DART) in intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for high‐risk prostate cancer by comparing estimated doses of the conventional non‐adaptive radiotherapy (NART) that irradiates according to an original treatment plan through the entire treatment and the DART that uses an adaptive treatment plan generated by using daily CT images acquired before each treatment. Methods Twenty‐three patients with prostate cancer were included. A treatment plan with 63 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 21 fractions was generated using treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images assuming that all patients had high‐risk prostate cancer for which the clinical target volume (CTV) needs to include prostate and the seminal vesicle (SV) in our treatment protocol. Twenty‐one adaptive treatment plans for each patient (total 483 data sets) were generated using daily CT images, and dose distributions were calculated. Using a 3 mm set‐up uncertainty in the robust optimization, the doses to the CTV, prostate, SV, rectum, and bladder were compared. Results Estimated accumulated doses of NART and DART in the 23 patients were 60.81 ± 3.47 Gy (RBE) and 63.24 ± 1.04 Gy (RBE) for CTV D99 (p < 0.01), 62.99 ± 1.28 Gy (RBE) and 63.43 ± 1.33 Gy (RBE) for the prostate D99 (p = 0.2529), and 59.07 ± 5.19 Gy (RBE) and 63.17 ± 1.04 Gy (RBE) for SV D99 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between NART and DART in the estimated accumulated dose for the rectum and bladder. Conclusion Compared with the NART, DART was shown to be a useful approach that can maintain the dose coverage to the target without increasing the dose to the organs at risk (OAR) using the 3 mm set‐up uncertainty in the robust optimization in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Tamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiological Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi M Ito
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Maeda
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | | | | | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Feng H, Shan J, Anderson JD, Wong WW, Schild SE, Foote RL, Patrick CL, Tinnon KB, Fatyga M, Bues M, Patel SH, Liu W. Per-voxel constraints to minimize hot spots in linear energy transfer-guided robust optimization for base of skull head and neck cancer patients in IMPT. Med Phys 2021; 49:632-647. [PMID: 34843119 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to the employment of quadratic programming using soft constraints to implement dose volume constraints and the "trial-and-error" procedure needed to achieve a clinically acceptable plan, conventional dose volume constraints (upper limit) are not adequately effective in controlling small and isolated hot spots in the dose/linear energy transfer (LET) distribution. Such hot spots can lead to adverse events. In order to mitigate the risk of brain necrosis, one of the most clinically significant adverse events in patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for base of skull (BOS) cancer, we propose per-voxel constraints to minimize hot spots in LET-guided robust optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten BOS cancer patients treated with IMPT were carefully selected by meeting one of the following conditions: (1) diagnosis of brain necrosis during follow-up; and (2) considered high risk for brain necrosis by not meeting dose constraints to the brain. An optimizing structure (BrainOPT) and an evaluating structure (BrainROI) that both contained the aforementioned hot dose regions in the brain were generated for optimization and evaluation, respectively. Two plans were generated for every patient: one using conventional dose-only robust optimization, the other using LET-guided robust optimization. The impact of LET was integrated into the optimization via a term of extra biological dose (xBD). A novel optimization tool of per-voxel constraints to control small and isolated hot spots in either the dose, LET, or combined (dose/LET) distribution was developed and used to minimize dose/LET hot spots of the selected structures. Indices from dose-volume histogram (DVH) and xBD dose-volume histogram (xBDVH) were used in the plan evaluation. A newly developed tool of the dose-LET-volume histogram (DLVH) was also adopted to illustrate the underlying mechanism. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison of the DVH and xBDVH indices between the conventional dose-only and the LET-guided robustly optimized plans. RESULTS Per-voxel constraints effectively and efficiently minimized dose hot spots in both dose-only and LET-guided robust optimization and LET hot spots in LET-guided robust optimization. Compared to the conventional dose-only robust optimization, the LET-guided robust optimization could generate plans with statistically lower xBD hot spots in BrainROI (VxBD,50 Gy[RBE], p = 0.009; VxBD,60 Gy[RBE], p = 0.025; xBD1cc, p = 0.017; xBD2cc, p = 0.022) with comparable dose coverage, dose hot spots in the target, and dose hot spots in BrainROI. DLVH analysis indicated that LET-guided robust optimization could either reduce LET at the same dose level or redistribute high LET from high dose regions to low dose regions. CONCLUSION Per-voxel constraint is a powerful tool to minimize dose/LET hot spots in IMPT. The LET-guided robustly optimized plans outperformed the conventional dose-only robustly optimized plans in terms of xBD hot spots control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Justin D Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Kathryn B Tinnon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bridhikitti J, Viehman JK, Harmsen WS, Amundson AC, Shiraishi S, Mundy DW, Rwigema JCM, McGee LA, Patel SH, Routman DM, Lester SC, Neben-Wittich MA, Garces YI, Ma DJ, Foote RL. Oncologic Outcomes for Head and Neck Skin Malignancies Treated with Protons. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:294-303. [PMID: 34285955 PMCID: PMC8270091 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00045.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment for patients with inoperable skin malignancies of the head and neck region (H&N), and as adjuvant treatment post surgery in patients at high risk for local or regional recurrence. This study reports clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for these malignancies. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases involving 47 patients with H&N malignancies of the skin (squamous cell, basal cell, melanoma, Merkel cell, angiosarcoma, other) who underwent IMPT for curative intent between July 2016 and July 2019. Overall survival was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and oncologic outcomes were reported as cumulative incidence with death as a competing risk. Results The 2-year estimated local recurrence rate, regional recurrence rate, local regional recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1%-30.3%), 4.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-17.4%), 15.5% (95% CI, 7%-34.3%), 23.4% (95% CI, 5.8%-95.5%), and 87.2% (95% CI, 75.7%-100%), respectively. No patient was reported to have a grade 3 or higher adverse event during the last week of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up visit. Conclusion IMPT is safe and effective in the treatment of skin malignancies of the H&N.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason K Viehman
- Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - W Scott Harmsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam C Amundson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel W Mundy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Yolanda I Garces
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bahig H, Gunn BG, Garden AS, Ye R, Hutcheson K, Rosenthal DI, Phan J, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Reddy JP, Ng SP, Gross ND, Sturgis EM, Ferrarotto R, Gillison M, Frank SJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:213-222. [PMID: 34285948 PMCID: PMC8270092 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00081.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-HN) tool, in patients with oropharynx cancer (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the context of first-course irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced OPC treated with radical IMPT between 2011 and 2018 were included in a prospective registry. FACT-HN scores were measured serially during and 24 months following IMPT. PRO changes in the FACT-HN scores over time were assessed with mixed-model analysis. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (range, 41-84), and 91% had human papillomavirus-associated disease. In total, 28% received induction chemotherapy and 68% had concurrent chemotherapy. Compliance to FACT-HN questionnaire completion was 59%, 48%, and 42% at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. The mean FACT-General (G), FACT-Total, and FACT-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score changes were statistically and clinically significant relative to baseline from week 3 of treatment up to week 2 after treatment. Nadir was reached at week 6 of treatment for all scores, with maximum scores dropping by 15%, 20%, and 39% compared to baseline for FACT-G, FACT-Total, and FACT-TOI, respectively. Subdomain scores of physical well-being, functional well-being, and head and neck additional concerns decreased from baseline during treatment and returned to baseline at week 4 after treatment. CONCLUSIONS IMPT was associated with a favorable PRO trajectory, characterized by an acute decline followed by rapid recovery to baseline. This study establishes the expected acute, subacute, and chronic trajectory of PROs for patients undergoing IMPT for OPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Brandon G. Gunn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kate Hutcheson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jack Phan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Jay Paul Reddy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
,Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil D. Gross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Maura Gillison
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yu NY, Khurana A, Ma DJ, Neben-Wittich MA, Golafshar MA, McGee LA, Rwigema JCM, Foote RL, Patel SH. Initial Experience with Proton Beam Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:311-318. [PMID: 34285957 PMCID: PMC8270099 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-d-20-00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose External beam radiotherapy is used in a subset of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Recurrent, radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory DTC carries a poor prognosis. We report our initial experience of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC. Patients and Methods Fourteen patients with recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC were consecutively treated with IMPT from November 2016 to March 2020 at our multisite institution. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were recorded. Overall survival and local-regional recurrence-free survival were recorded and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late treatment-related toxicities were recorded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Head and Neck Module at baseline and after IMPT. Eleven patients were included in the final analysis. Results Median follow-up was 8 months (range, 3-40) for all patients. Median age at treatment with IMPT was 64 years (range, 40-77), and the majority were men (64%). Recurrent histologies included papillary (55%), Hurthle cell (36%), and poorly differentiated (9%) carcinoma; 1 patient had tall cell variant. Concurrent chemotherapy was not administered for any patient in this cohort. At 8 months, all patients were alive without local-regional failure. Acute grade 3 toxicities were limited to 1 patient with dysphagia, requiring feeding tube placement. Two patients experienced late grade 3 esophageal stenosis requiring dilation. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. There were no differences in pretreatment versus posttreatment patient-reported outcomes in terms of dysphagia or hoarseness. Conclusion In our early experience, IMPT provided promising local-regional control for recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC. Further study is warranted to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of IMPT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Aditya Khurana
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Deng W, Yang Y, Liu C, Bues M, Mohan R, Wong WW, Foote RH, Patel SH, Liu W. A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:36-49. [PMID: 34285934 PMCID: PMC8270082 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00049.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review article, we review the 3 important aspects of linear-energy-transfer (LET) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer management. Accurate LET calculation methods are essential for LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization, which can be calculated either by analytical methods or by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Recently, some new 3D analytical approaches to calculate LET accurately and efficiently have been proposed. On the other hand, several fast MC codes have also been developed to speed up the MC simulation by simplifying nonessential physics models and/or using the graphics processor unit (GPU)–acceleration approach. Some concepts related to LET are also briefly summarized including (1) dose-weighted versus fluence-weighted LET; (2) restricted versus unrestricted LET; and (3) microdosimetry versus macrodosimetry. LET-guided plan evaluation has been clinically done in some proton centers. Recently, more and more studies using patient outcomes as the biological endpoint have shown a positive correlation between high LET and adverse events sites, indicating the importance of LET-guided plan evaluation in proton clinics. Various LET-guided plan optimization methods have been proposed to generate proton plans to achieve biologically optimized IMPT plans. Different optimization frameworks were used, including 2-step optimization, 1-step optimization, and worst-case robust optimization. They either indirectly or directly optimize the LET distribution in patients while trying to maintain the same dose distribution and plan robustness. It is important to consider the impact of uncertainties in LET-guided optimization (ie, LET-guided robust optimization) in IMPT, since IMPT is sensitive to uncertainties including both the dose and LET distributions. We believe that the advancement of the LET-guided plan evaluation and optimization will help us exploit the unique biological characteristics of proton beams to improve the therapeutic ratio of IMPT to treat H&N and other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yunze Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Chenbin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Robert H Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Feng H, Shan J, Ashman JB, Rule WG, Bhangoo RS, Yu NY, Chiang J, Fatyga M, Wong WW, Schild SE, Sio TT, Liu W. Technical Note: 4D robust optimization in small spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for distal esophageal carcinoma. Med Phys 2021; 48:4636-4647. [PMID: 34058026 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the dosimetric performances of small-spot three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) plans in the presence of uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously for distal esophageal carcinoma. METHOD AND MATERIALS Thirteen (13) patients were selected and re-planned with small-spot ( σ ~ 2-6 mm) 3D and 4D robust optimization in IMPT, respectively. The internal clinical target volumes (CTVhigh3d , CTVlow3d ) were used in 3D robust optimization. Different CTVs (CTVhigh4d , CTVlow4d ) were generated by subtracting an inner margin of the motion amplitudes in three cardinal directions from the internal CTVs and used in 4D robust optimization. All patients were prescribed the same dose to CTVs (50 Gy[RBE] for CTVhigh3d /CTVhigh4d and 45 Gy[RBE] for CTVlow3d /CTVlow4d ). Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated to assess plan quality. Comprehensive plan robustness evaluations that consisted of 300 perturbed scenarios (10 different motion patterns to consider irregular motion (sampled from a Gaussian distribution) and 30 different uncertainties scenarios (sampled from a 4D uniform distribution) combined), were performed to quantify robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Compared to 3D robustly optimized plans, 4D robustly optimized plans had statistically improved target coverage and better sparing of lungs and heart (heart Dmean , P = 0.001; heart V30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) in the nominal scenario. 4D robustly optimized plans had better robustness in target dose coverage (CTVhigh4d V100% , P = 0.002) and the protection of lungs and heart (heart Dmean , P = 0.001; heart V30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) when uncertainties and interplay effect were considered simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS Even with small spots in IMPT, 4D robust optimization outperformed 3D robust optimization in terms of normal tissue protection and robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Our findings support the use of 4D robust optimization to treat distal esophageal carcinoma with small spots in IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jennifer Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ren XY, He PK, Gao XS, Zhao ZL, Zhao B, Bai Y, Liu SW, Li K, Qin SB, Ma MW, Zhou J, Rong Y. Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation using intensity-modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:79-88. [PMID: 33817981 PMCID: PMC8130224 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate dosimetric properties of intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for simulated treatment planning in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) targeting left atrial‐pulmonary vein junction (LA‐PVJ), in comparison with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (TOMO). Methods Ten thoracic 4D‐CT scans with respiratory motion and one with cardiac motion were used for the study. Ten respiratory 4D‐CTs were planned with VMAT, TOMO, and IMPT for simulated AF. Targets at the LA‐PVJ were defined as wide‐area circumferential ablation line. A single fraction of 25 Gy was prescribed to all plans. The interplay effects from cardiac motion were evaluated based on the cardiac 4D‐CT scan. Dose‐volume histograms (DVHs) of the ITV and normal tissues were compared. Statistical analysis was evaluated via one‐way Repeated‐Measures ANOVA and Friedman’s test with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. Results The median volume of ITV was 8.72cc. All plans had adequate target coverage (V23.75Gy ≥ 99%). Compared with VMAT and TOMO, IMPT resulted in significantly lower dose of most normal tissues. For VMAT, TOMO, and IMPT plans, Dmean of the whole heart was 5.52 ± 0.90 Gy, 5.89 ± 0.78 Gy, and 3.01 ± 0.57 Gy (P < 0.001), mean dose of pericardium was 4.74 ± 0.76 Gy, 4.98 ± 0.62 Gy, and 2.59 ± 0.44 Gy (P < 0.001), and D0.03cc of left circumflex artery (LCX) was 13.96 ± 5.45 Gy, 14.34 ± 5.91 Gy, and 8.43 ± 7.24 Gy (P < 0.001), respectively. However, no significant advantage for one technique over the others was observed when examining the D0.03cc of esophagus and main bronchi. Conclusions IMPT targeting LA‐PVJ for patients with AF has high potential to reduce dose to surrounding tissues compared to VMAT or TOMO. Motion mitigation techniques are critical for a particle‐therapy approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Ying Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng-Kang He
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Lei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yizhou International Proton Therapy Medical Center, Hebei, China
| | - Bo Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Si-Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kang Li
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu C, Zheng D, Bradley JA, Mailhot Vega RB, Zhang Y, Indelicato DJ, Mendenhall N, Liang X. Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:252-259. [PMID: 33063569 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1834141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the LETd-weighted biological dose to OARs in proton therapy for breast cancer and to study the relationship of the LETd-weighted biological dose relative to the standard dose (RBE = 1.1) and thereby to provide estimations of the biological dose uncertainties with the standard dose calculations (RBE = 1.1) commonly used in clinical practice. METHOD This study included 20 patients who received IMPT treatment to the whole breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The LETd distributions were calculated along with the physical dose using an open-source Monte Carlo simulation package, MCsquare. Using the McMahon linear model, the LETd-weighted biological dose was computed from the physical dose and LETd. OAR doses were compared between the Dose (RBE = 1.1) and the LETd-weighted biological dose, on brachial plexus, rib, heart, esophagus, and Ipsilateral lung. RESULTS On average, the LETd-weighted biological dose compared to the Dose (RBE = 1.1) was higher by 8% for the brachial plexus D0.1 cc, 13% for the ribs D0.5 cc, 24% for mean heart dose, and 10% for the esophagus D0.1 cc, respectively. The LETd-weighted doses to the Ipsilateral lung V5, V10, and V20 were comparable to the Dose (RBE = 1.1). No statistically significant difference in biological dose enhancement to OARs was observed between the intact breast group and the CW group, with the exception of the ribs: the CW group experienced slightly greater biological dose enhancement (13% vs. 12%, p = 0.04) to the ribs than the intact breast group. CONCLUSION Enhanced biological dose was observed compared to standard dose with assumed RBE of 1.1 for the heart, ribs, esophagus, and brachial plexus in breast/CW and regional nodal IMPT plans. Variable RBE models should be considered in the evaluation of the IMPT breast plans, especially for OARs located near the end of range of a proton beam. Clinical outcome studies are needed to validate model predictions for clinical toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cozzi L, Comito T, Loi M, Fogliata A, Franzese C, Franceschini D, Clerici E, Reggiori G, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. The Potential Role of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hepatic Carcinoma in Mitigating the Risk of Dose De-Escalation. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820980412. [PMID: 33287650 PMCID: PMC7727039 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820980412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a risk-adapted dose prescription regimen. METHODS A cohort of 30 patients was retrospectively selected as "at-risk" of dose de-escalation due to the proximity of the target volumes to dose-limiting healthy structures. IMPT plans were compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) RapidArc (RA) plans. The maximum dose prescription foreseen was 75 Gy in 3 fractions. The dosimetric analysis was performed on several quantitative metrics on the target volumes and organs at risk to identify the relative improvement of IMPT over VMAT and to determine if IMPT could mitigate the need of dose reduction and quantify the consequent potential patient accrual rate for protons. RESULTS IMPT and VMAT plans resulted in equivalent target dose distributions: both could ensure the required coverage for CTV and PTV. Systematic and significant improvements were observed with IMPT for all organs at risk and metrics. An average gain of 9.0 ± 11.6, 8.5 ± 7.7, 5.9 ± 7.1, 4.2 ± 6.4, 8.9 ± 7.1, 6.7 ± 7.5 Gy was found in the near-to-maximum doses for the ribs, chest wall, heart, duodenum, stomach and bowel bag respectively. Twenty patients violated one or more binding constraints with RA, while only 2 with IMPT. For all these patients, some dose de-intensification would have been required to respect the constraints. For photons, the maximum allowed dose ranged from 15.0 to 20.63 Gy per fraction while for the 2 proton cases it would have been 18.75 or 20.63 Gy. CONCLUSION The results of this in-silico planning study suggests that IMPT might result in advantages compared to photon-based VMAT for HCC patients to be treated with ablative SBRT. In particular, the dosimetric characteristics of protons may avoid the need for dose de-escalation in a risk-adapted prescription regimen for those patients with lesions located in proximity of dose-limiting healthy structures. Depending on the selection thresholds, the number of patients eligible for treatment at the full dose can be significantly increased with protons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCSS, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Feng H, Sio TT, Rule WG, Bhangoo RS, Lara P, Patrick CL, Korte S, Fatyga M, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ashman JB, Liu W. Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:141-152. [PMID: 33058523 PMCID: PMC7700921 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the dosimetric performances of intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans generated with two different beam angle configurations (the Right–Left oblique posterior beams and the Superior–Inferior oblique posterior beams) for the treatment of distal esophageal carcinoma in the presence of uncertainties and interplay effect. Methods and Materials Twenty patients’ IMPT plans were retrospectively selected, with 10 patients treated with the R‐L oblique posterior beams (Group R‐L) and the other 10 patients treated with the S‐I oblique posterior beams (Group S‐I). Patients in both groups were matched by their clinical target volumes (CTVs—high and low dose levels) and respiratory motion amplitudes. Dose‐volume‐histogram (DVH) indices were used to assess plan quality. DVH bandwidth was calculated to evaluate plan robustness. Interplay effect was quantified using four‐dimensional (4D) dynamic dose calculation with random respiratory starting phase of each fraction. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for heart, liver, and lung was calculated, respectively, to estimate the clinical outcomes. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used for statistical comparison between the two groups. Results Compared with plans in Group R‐L, plans in Group S‐I resulted in significantly lower liver Dmean and lung V30Gy[RBE] with slightly higher but clinically acceptable spinal cord Dmax. Similar plan robustness was observed between the two groups. When interplay effect was considered, plans in Group S‐I performed statistically better for heart Dmean and V30Gy[RBE], lung Dmean and V5Gy[RBE], and liver Dmean, with slightly increased but clinically acceptable spinal cord Dmax. NTCP for liver was significantly better in Group S‐I. Conclusions IMPT plans in Group S‐I have better sparing of liver, heart, and lungs at the slight cost of spinal cord maximum dose protection, and are more interplay‐effect resilient compared to IMPT plans in Group R‐L. Our study supports the routine use of the S‐I oblique posterior beams for the treatments of distal esophageal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pedro Lara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Shawn Korte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brodbek L, Kretschmer J, Willborn K, Meijers A, Both S, Langendijk JA, Knopf AC, Looe HK, Poppe B. Analysis of the applicability of two-dimensional detector arrays in terms of sampling rate and detector size to verify scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy plans. Med Phys 2020; 47:4589-4601. [PMID: 32574383 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The introduction of advanced treatment techniques in proton therapy, such as intensity-modulated proton therapy, leads to an increased need for patient-specific quality assurance, especially an accurate treatment plan verification becomes inevitable. In this study, signal theoretical analysis of dose distributions in scanned proton therapy is performed to investigate the feasibility and limits of two-dimensional (2D) detector arrays for treatment plan verification. METHODS 2D detector arrays are characterized by two main aspects: the distance between the single detectors on the array or the sampling frequency; and the lateral response functions of a single detector. The analysis is based on single spots, reference fields and on measured and calculated dose distributions of typical intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans with and without range shifter. Measurements were performed with Gafchromic EBT3 films (Ashland Speciality Ingredients G.P., Bridgewater, NJ, USA), the MatriXX PT detector array (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) and the OCTAVIUS detector array 1500XDR (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) at an IBA Proteus PLUS proton therapy system (Ion Beam Applications, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Dose calculations were performed with the treatment planning system RayStation 6 or 8 (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden). RESULTS The Fourier analysis of the data of the treatment planning system and film measurements show maximum frequencies of 0.06/mm for the plan with range shifter and 0.083/mm for the plan without range shifter. According to the Nyquist theorem, this corresponds to minimum required sampling distances of 8.3 and 6 mm, respectively. By comparison, the sampling distances of the arrays of 7.6 mm (MatriXX PT) and 7.1 mm (OD1500XDR) are sufficient to reconstruct the dose distributions adequately from measurements if range shifters are used, whereas some fields of the plans without range shifter violated the Nyquist requirement. The lateral dose response functions of the single detectors within the arrays have clearly higher frequencies than the treatment plans and thus the volume effect only slightly influences the measurements. Consequently, the array measurements show high gamma passing rates with at least 96 % and a good agreement between the investigated line profiles. CONCLUSION The results indicate that the detector dimensions and sampling distances of the arrays are in most studied cases adequate not to substantially influence the measurement process when they are used for analyzing typical intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans. Nevertheless, clinical conditions have been identified, for instance treatment plans without range shifter, under which the Nyquist theorem is violated such that a full representation of the dose distributions with the measurements is not feasible. In these cases, analysis of measurements is limited to pointwise comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Brodbek
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jana Kretschmer
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Kay Willborn
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antje-Christin Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Rose F, Cozzi L, Meattini I, Fogliata A, Franceschini D, Franzese C, Tomatis S, Becherini C, Livi L, Scorsetti M. The Potential Role of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy in the Regional Nodal Irradiation of Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 32:26-34. [PMID: 31377082 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for regional nodal irradiation in patients with breast carcinoma in comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort of 20 patients (10 in the breast-conserving surgery group and 10 post-mastectomy patients with tissue expander implants) was investigated. Proton plans were also computed using robust optimisation methods. Plan quality was assessed by means of dose-volume histograms and scored with conventional metrics. Estimates of the risk of secondary cancer induction (excess absolute risk, EAR) were carried out, taking into account fractionation, repopulation and repair. RESULTS Concerning target coverage, the data proved a substantial equivalence of VMAT and IMPT: for example, coverage for the 50 Gy target, expressed in terms of V98%, was 47.8 ± 0.4, 47.6 ± 0.4, 47.3 ± 0.8, consistent with the objective of 47.5 Gy, for post-mastectomy patients for the three groups of patients. Also, the conformality of the dose distributions was similar for the two techniques, about 1.1, without statistically significant differences. Organ at risk planning aims were achieved for all structures for both techniques. The mean dose to the ipsilateral lung was 10.8 ± 1.1, 6.2 ± 0.8, 7.2 ± 1.0; for the contralateral lung was 3.2 ± 0.7, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.4 ± 0.2; for the contralateral breast was: 3.1 ± 0.7, 0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.3 ± 0.3, whereas it was 3.9 ± 0.9, 0.4 ± 0.3 and 0.5 ± 0.5, respectively, for the heart for VMAT, IMPT and robust IMPT plans over the whole group of patients. Robust optimisation affected the near-to-maximum dose values for contralateral lung and breast, the mean dose for the heart and ipsilateral lung, with a deterioration ranging from 20 to 40% of the nominal value of IMPT plans (e.g. from 8.1 ± 6.4 to 11.4 ± 8.8 for the heart compared with 16.2 ± 5.2 for the VMAT plans). The numerical values of EAR per 10 000 patient-years were about one order of magnitude higher for VMAT than for IMPT for contralateral structures: 11.66 ± 2.01, 0.89 ± 0.80, 0.98 ± 0.77 for the contralateral breast and the three groups of plans, respectively; 14.31 ± 2.75, 1.42 ± 0.80, 1.78 ± 0.87 for the contralateral lung; and 34.86 ± 2.64, 18.85 ± 2.15, 20.98 ± 2.35 for the ipsilateral lung. CONCLUSION IMPT with or without robust optimisation seems to be a potentially promising approach for the radiation treatment of breast cancer when nodal volumes should be irradiated. This was measured in terms of dosimetric advantage and predicted clinical benefit. In fact, the significant reduction in estimated EAR could add further clinical value to the dosimetric sparing of the organs at risk achievable with IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - L Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
| | - I Meattini
- Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Az. Osp. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - A Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - D Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - C Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - S Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - C Becherini
- Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Az. Osp. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - L Livi
- Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Az. Osp. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Buchberger D, Kreinbrink P, Kharofa J. Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer in Pelvic Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Series. Int J Part Ther 2019; 6:28-34. [PMID: 31773046 PMCID: PMC6871631 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00067.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of anal cancer in patients with kidney transplants has increased. The definitive treatment for anal cancer is chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. In kidney transplant recipients, sparing the pelvic kidney in the process of delivering radiation to the anus can be challenging. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has been proposed as an alternative to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of anal cancer in this population, given its increased ability to spare organs-at-risk. CASE SERIES We present 4 cases of patients with transplanted pelvic kidneys who subsequently developed anal cancer and were treated with IMPT from 2017 to 2019. CONCLUSION Use of IMPT appears to be an acceptable option for the treatment of anal cancer in patients with a pelvic kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Buchberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Paul Kreinbrink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu C, Bhangoo RS, Sio TT, Yu NY, Shan J, Chiang JS, Ding JX, Rule WG, Korte S, Lara P, Ding X, Bues M, Hu Y, DeWees T, Ashman JB, Liu W. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:15-27. [PMID: 31112371 PMCID: PMC6612702 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal carcinoma is the eighth most common cancer in the world. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is widely used to treat distal esophageal carcinoma due to high conformality to the target and good sparing of organs at risk (OAR). It is not clear if small-spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) demonstrates a dosimetric advantage over VMAT. In this study, we compared dosimetric performance of VMAT and small-spot IMPT for distal esophageal carcinoma in terms of plan quality, plan robustness, and interplay effects. METHODS 35 distal esophageal carcinoma patients were retrospectively reviewed; 19 patients received small-spot IMPT and the remaining 16 of them received VMAT. Both plans were generated by delivering prescription doses to clinical target volumes (CTVs) on phase-averaged 4D-CT's. The dose-volume-histogram (DVH) band method was used to quantify plan robustness. Software was developed to evaluate interplay effects with randomized starting phases for each field per fraction. DVH indices were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For fair comparison, all the treatment plans were normalized to have the same CTVhigh D95% in the nominal scenario relative to the prescription dose. RESULTS In the nominal scenario, small-spot IMPT delivered statistically significantly lower liver Dmean and V30Gy[RBE] , lung Dmean , heart Dmean compared with VMAT. CTVhigh dose homogeneity and protection of other OARs were comparable between the two treatments. In terms of plan robustness, the IMPT and VMAT plans were comparable for kidney V18Gy[RBE] , liver V30Gy[RBE] , stomach V45Gy[RBE] , lung Dmean , V5Gy[RBE] , and V20Gy[RBE] , cord Dmax and D 0.03 c m 3 , liver Dmean , heart V20Gy[RBE] , and V30Gy[RBE] , but IMPT was significantly worse for CTVhigh D95% , D 2 c m 3 , and D5% -D95% , CTVlow D95% , heart Dmean , and V40Gy[RBE] , requiring careful and experienced adjustments during the planning process and robustness considerations. The small-spot IMPT plans still met the standard clinical requirements after interplay effects were considered. CONCLUSIONS Small-spot IMPT decreases doses to heart, liver, and total lung compared to VMAT as well as achieves clinically acceptable plan robustness. Our study supports the use of small-spot IMPT for the treatment of distal esophageal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenbin Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | | | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | | | - Julia X. Ding
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - William G. Rule
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Shawn Korte
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Pedro Lara
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Xiaoning Ding
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Yanle Hu
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Todd DeWees
- Division of BiostatisticsMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | | | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu C, Sio TT, Deng W, Shan J, Daniels TB, Rule WG, Lara PR, Korte SM, Shen J, Ding X, Schild SE, Bues M, Liu W. Small-spot intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapies for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A dosimetric comparative study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:140-148. [PMID: 30328674 PMCID: PMC6236833 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare dosimetric performance of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and small‐spot intensity‐modulated proton therapy for stage III non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and Materials A total of 24 NSCLC patients were retrospectively reviewed; 12 patients received intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and the remaining 12 received VMAT. Both plans were generated by delivering prescription doses to clinical target volumes (CTV) on averaged 4D‐CTs. The dose‐volume‐histograms (DVH) band method was used to quantify plan robustness. Software was developed to evaluate interplay effects with randomized starting phases of each field per fraction. DVH indices were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results Compared with VMAT, IMPT delivered significantly lower cord Dmax, heart Dmean, and lung V5 Gy[RBE] with comparable CTV dose homogeneity, and protection of other OARs. In terms of plan robustness, the IMPT plans were statistically better than VMAT plans in heart Dmean, but were statistically worse in CTV dose coverage, cord Dmax, lung Dmean, and V5 Gy[RBE]. Other DVH indices were comparable. The IMPT plans still met the standard clinical requirements with interplay effects considered. Conclusions Small‐spot IMPT improves cord, heart, and lung sparing compared to VMAT and achieves clinically acceptable plan robustness at least for the patients included in this study with motion amplitude less than 11 mm. Our study supports the usage of IMPT to treat some lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenbin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pedro R Lara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Shawn M Korte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Xiaoning Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jensen MF, Hoffmann L, Petersen JBB, Møller DS, Alber M. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients. Med Phys 2018; 45:4355-4363. [PMID: 30129041 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE When treating lung cancer patients with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), target coverage can only be guaranteed when utilizing motion mitigation. The three motion mitigation techniques, gating, breath-hold, and dose repainting, all benefit from a more rapid application of the treatment plan. A lower limit for the ungated treatment time is defined by the number of energy layers in the IMPT plan. By limiting this number during treatment planning, IMPT could become more viable for lung cancer patients. We investigate to what extend the number of layers can be reduced in single-field optimization (SFO) and multifield optimization (MFO) plans and which implications it has on the plan quality and robustness. METHODS We have implemented three distinct layer-reducing strategies in the treatment planning system Hyperion; constant energy steps, exponential energy steps, and an adaptive strategy, where the spot weights are exposed to a group sparsity penalty in combination with layer exclusion during optimization. Four levels of increasing layer removal are planned for each strategy. SFO and MFO plans with three treatment fields are created for eleven locally advanced NSCLC patients on the midventilation 4DCT phase to simulate a breath-hold. A minimum dose to the target is ensured for each degree of layer reduction, reflecting the plan quality in the homogeneity index (HI). Plan quality was also assessed by a robustness evaluation, where the patient setup was shifted 2 mm or 4 mm in six directions. RESULTS The three strategies result in very similar target coverages and robustness levels as a function of removed layers. The HI increases unacceptably for all the SFO plans after 50% layer removal as compared to the reference plan, while all the MFO plans are clinically acceptable with up to a highest removed percentage of 75%. The robustness level is constant as a function of removed layers. The SFO plans are significantly more robust than the MFO plans with all P-values below 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank). The overall mean D98% CTV dose difference is at 2-mm setup error amplitude: 0.7 Gy (SFO) and 1.9 Gy (MFO), and at 4 mm: 3.2 Gy (SFO) and 5.4 Gy (MFO), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The number of layers in MFO plans can be reduced substantially more than in SFO plans without compromising plan quality. Furthermore, as the robustness is independent of the number of layers, it follows that if the level of robustness is acceptable or enforced via robust optimization, MFO plans could be candidates for treatment time reductions via energy layer reductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fuglsang Jensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - L Hoffmann
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - J B B Petersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - D S Møller
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - M Alber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yao W, Krasin MJ, Farr JB, Merchant TE. Feasibility study of range-based registration using daily cone beam CT for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:1191-1203. [PMID: 29360157 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton dose coverage is sensitive to proton beam range. The current practice of CT number-based registration for patient positioning focuses on matching the target and is not sufficient for proton therapy because the proton range depends on the medium traversed by the beam. Patient body deformations and anatomical changes result in range deviation in the target. We propose proton range-based registration to minimize the range deviation. METHODS The range was calculated from cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT) of the patient on couch, and the range deviation was the difference of the calculated range from that on the initial (day 1) CBCT. In the investigated prostate cases in which the main cause of range deviation was the rotation of femur bones, and in the investigated abdomen cases in which the main cause of range deviation was body growth and anatomic change, our range-based registration was used to obtain the optimal beam angle by minimizing the range deviation. The new angle was limited to be ±5° from that planned to prevent potentially increased dose to the organs at risk. To demonstrate the benefit of range-based registration, we investigated the range at the voxels on the surface of the target volume. The calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was investigated by using solid water phantoms with different thicknesses. Range-based registration using both CBCTs and CTs was performed in cases of two patients with pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma and one patient with upper abdominal tumor. The range was represented by the water-equivalent thickness to shorten the computation for online application purposes. RESULTS In the phantom study, the calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was within 2 mm for a 1-cm thickness change (the mean range deviation was 0.8 mm). In the CT study of the prostate cases, the range deviation (mean ± root-mean-square deviation) on the contour in each slice was efficiently reduced from 3.6 ± 2.8 mm to 2.1 ± 1.4 mm, with most slices being within 3 mm; in the CT study of the abdomen cases, the range deviation of the whole set was reduced from 4.4 ± 1.9 mm to 3.5 ± 2.1 mm. Both the mean and root-mean-square deviation of the range deviation on each treatment day were decreased. The dose coverage on the target was improved and the dose on the OARs was only slightly changed. CONCLUSION Range-based registration can efficiently mitigate range deviation due to patient positioning and anatomical changes. It can shorten patient positioning time and reduce the patient's dose from CBCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiguang Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Matthew J Krasin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Jonathan B Farr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wu RY, Liu AY, Sio TT, Blanchard P, Wages C, Amin MV, Gunn GB, Titt U, Ye R, Suzuki K, Gillin MT, Zhu XR, Mohan R, Frank SJ. Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Adaptive Planning for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2017; 4:26-34. [PMID: 31773006 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-00010.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The authors aimed to illustrate the potential dose differences to clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs-at-risk (OARs) volumes after proton adaptive treatment planning was used. Patients and Methods The records of 10 patients with oropharyngeal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Each patient's treatment plan was generated by using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Verification computed tomography (CT) scan was performed during the fourth week of treatment. Deformable image registrations were performed between the 2 CT image sets, and the CTVs and major OARs were transferred to the verification CT images to generate the adaptive plan. We compared the accumulated doses to CTVs and OARs between the original and adaptive plans, as well as between the adaptive and verification plans to simulate doses that would have been delivered if the adaptive plans were not used. Results Body contours were different on planning and week-4 verification CTs. Mean volumes of all CTVs were reduced by 4% to 8% (P ≤ .04), and the volumes of left and right parotid glands also decreased (by 11% to 12%, P ≤ .004). Brainstem and oral cavity volumes did not significantly differ (all P ≥ .14). All mean doses to the CTV were decreased for up to 7% (P ≤ .04), whereas mean doses to the right parotid and oral cavity increased from a range of 5% to 8% (P ≤ .03), respectively. Conclusion Verification and adaptive planning should be recommended during the course of proton therapy for patients with head and neck cancer to ensure adequate dose deliveries to the planned CTVs, while safe doses to OARs can be respected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Y Wu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Y Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Cody Wages
- Department of Dosimetry Service, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mayankkumar V Amin
- Department of Dosimetry Service, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uwe Titt
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kazumichi Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Gillin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaorong R Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Meier T, Mascia A, Wolf E, Kharofa J. Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy in Anal Cancer Patients and the Ability to Spare Bone Marrow. Int J Part Ther 2017; 4:11-17. [PMID: 31773004 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been used to spare organs at risk (OARs) in the definitive treatment of anal cancer. However, treatment continues to result in significant hematologic toxicity. In a cooperative trial assessing IMRT (RTOG 0529), the rate of grade 2+ and grade 3+ hematologic toxicity was 73% and 58%, respectively. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to decrease the integral bone marrow dose and dose to other OARs compared with photon therapy. Patients and Methods Computed tomography datasets of 9 patients with anal cancer previously treated with IMRT, volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), or tomotherapy at our institution were used for comparison. Both VMAT and IMPT plans were created for each patient. The IMPT plans were created using a multi-field optimized, split-target technique. The dose to OARs, including bone marrow, bladder, small bowel, large bowel, femoral heads, and genitalia, were compared using a paired t test. Results The mean bone marrow dose was 17.42 Gy with IMPT plans and 30.76 Gy with VMAT plans (P < .0001). The absolute volume of bone marrow spared 10 and 20 Gy was significantly less with the proton plans. IMPT also showed significant sparing of other OARs, including the small and large bowel, femoral heads, and genitalia. The mean planning target volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V95) was similar with IMPT and VMAT plans, 99% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion IMPT can decrease the mean bone marrow dose compared with VMAT plans by minimizing the low dose spill associated with standard photon treatment. Prospective studies assessing proton therapy for anal cancer are ongoing to evaluate the potential for improvement in hematologic toxicity and the acute tolerance of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Meier
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Mascia
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Eric Wolf
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Kharofa
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhang P, Fan N, Shan J, Schild SE, Bues M, Liu W. Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:29-35. [PMID: 28681976 PMCID: PMC5599351 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 02/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In treatment planning for intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT), we aim to deliver the prescribed dose to the target yet minimize the dose to adjacent healthy tissue. Mixed‐integer programming (MIP) has been applied in radiation therapy to generate treatment plans. However, MIP has not been used effectively for IMPT treatment planning with dose‐volume constraints. In this study, we incorporated dose‐volume constraints in an MIP model to generate treatment plans for IMPT. Methods We created a new MIP model for IMPT with dose volume constraints. Two groups of IMPT treatment plans were generated for each of three patients by using MIP models for a total of six plans: one plan was derived with the Limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L‐BFGS) method while the other plan was derived with our MIP model with dose‐volume constraints. We then compared these two plans by dose‐volume histogram (DVH) indices to evaluate the performance of the new MIP model with dose‐volume constraints. In addition, we developed a model to more efficiently find the best balance between tumor coverage and normal tissue protection. Results The MIP model with dose‐volume constraints generates IMPT treatment plans with comparable target dose coverage, target dose homogeneity, and the maximum dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to treatment plans from the conventional quadratic programming method without any tedious trial‐and‐error process. Some notable reduction in the mean doses of OARs is observed. Conclusions The treatment plans from our MIP model with dose‐volume constraints can meet all dose‐volume constraints for OARs and targets without any tedious trial‐and‐error process. This model has the potential to automatically generate IMPT plans with consistent plan quality among different treatment planners and across institutions and better protection for important parallel OARs in an effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Neng Fan
- Department of Systems & Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rwigema JCM, Verma V, Lin L, Berman AT, Levin WP, Evans TL, Aggarwal C, Rengan R, Langer C, Cohen RB, Simone CB. Prospective study of proton-beam radiation therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2017; 123:4244-4251. [PMID: 28678434 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing data supporting the use of proton-beam therapy (PBT) for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) are limited to a single 6-patient case series. This is the first prospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LS-SCLC. METHODS This study prospectively analyzed patients with primary, nonrecurrent LS-SCLC definitively treated with PBT and concurrent chemotherapy from 2011 to 2016. Clinical backup intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient and were compared with PBT plans. Outcome measures included local control (LC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates and toxicities. RESULTS Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median dose was 63.9 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 45-66.6 cobalt gray equivalents) in 33 to 37 fractions delivered daily (n = 18 [60.0%]) or twice daily (n = 12 [40.0%]). The concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/etoposide (n = 21 [70.0%]) or carboplatin/etoposide (n = 9 [30.0%]). In comparison with the backup IMRT plans, PBT allowed statistically significant reductions in the cord, heart, and lung mean doses and the volume receiving at least 5 Gy but not in the esophagus mean dose or the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the 1-/2-year LC and RFS rates were 85%/69% and 63%/42%, respectively. The median OS was 28.2 months, and the 1-/2-year OS rates were 72%/58%. There was 1 case each (3.3%) of grade 3 or higher esophagitis, pneumonitis, anorexia, and pericardial effusion. Grade 2 pneumonitis and esophagitis were seen in 10.0% and 43.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the first prospective registry study and largest analysis to date of PBT for LS-SCLC, PBT was found to be safe with a limited incidence of high-grade toxicities. Cancer 2017;123:4244-4251. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Claude M Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tracey L Evans
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Corey Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mondlane G, Gubanski M, Lind PA, Henry T, Ureba A, Siegbahn A. Dosimetric Comparison of Plans for Photon- or Proton-Beam Based Radiosurgery of Liver Metastases. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:277-284. [PMID: 31772978 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-16-00010.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiosurgery treatment of liver metastases with photon beams has been an established method for more than a decade. One method commonly used is the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) technique. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential sparing of the organs at risk (OARs) that the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), instead of SBRT, could enable. Patients and Methods A comparative treatment-planning study of photon-beam and proton-beam based liver-cancer radiosurgery was performed. Ten patients diagnosed with liver metastasis and previously treated with SBRT at the Karolinska University Hospital were included in the study. New IMPT plans were prepared for all patients, while the original plans were set as reference plans. The IMPT planning was performed with the objective of achieving the same target dose coverage as with the SBRT plans. Pairwise dosimetric comparisons of the treatment plans were then performed for the OARs. A 2-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance level of 5% was carried out. Results Improved sparing of the OARs was made possible with the IMPT plans. There was a significant decrease of the mean doses delivered to the following risk organs: the nontargeted part of the liver (P = .002), the esophagus (P = .002), the right kidney (P = .008), the spinal cord (P = .004), and the lungs (P = .002). The volume of the liver receiving less than 15 Gy was significantly increased with the IMPT plans (P = .004). Conclusion The IMPT-based radiosurgery plans provided similar target coverage and significant dose reductions for the OARs compared with the photon-beam based SBRT plans. Further studies including detailed information about varying tissue heterogeneities in the beam path, due to organ motion, are required to evaluate more accurately whether IMPT is preferable for the radiosurgical treatment of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gracinda Mondlane
- Department of Physics - Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Physics, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Michael Gubanski
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pehr A Lind
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Thomas Henry
- Department of Physics - Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ana Ureba
- Department of Physics - Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Albert Siegbahn
- Department of Physics - Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jiang S, Wang J, Li H, Liao L, Li Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Zhu RX, Sahoo N, Gillin MT, Hojo Y, Sun J, Chang JY, Liao Z, Grosshans D, Frank SJ, Zhang X. Novel Hybrid Scattering- and Scanning-Beam Proton Therapy Approach. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:37-50. [PMID: 31772974 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00014.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether a hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and passive scattered proton therapy (PSPT) technique, termed HimpsPT, could be adopted as an alternative delivery method for patients demanding scanning beam proton therapy. Patients and Methods We identified 3 representative clinical cases-an oropharyngeal cancer, skull base chordoma, and stage III non-small-cell lung cancer-that had been treated with IMPT at our center. We retrospectively redesigned these cases using HimpsPT. The PSPT plans for all three cases were designed with the same prescriptions as those used in the IMPT plans. In this way, the whole treatment was delivered using alternating or sequential PSPT and IMPT. Results All HimpsPT plans met the clinical dose criteria and were of similar quality as the IMPT plans. In the skull base case, the mixed plan was more effective at sparing the brain stem because the sharp penumbra of the aperture in the PSPT plans was not present in the IMPT plans. The HimpsPT plans were more robust than the clinical IMPT plans generated without robust optimization. Conclusion The HimpsPT delivery technique can achieve a treatment-plan quality similar to that of IMPT, even in the most challenging clinical cases. In addition, at centers equipped with both scattering and scanning beam capabilities, the HimpsPT technique may allow more patients to benefit from scanning beam technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengpeng Jiang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingqian Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Li Liao
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yupeng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Applied Research, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Xiaochun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yining Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ronald X Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Gillin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshifumi Hojo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jian Sun
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Holliday E, Bhattasali O, Kies MS, Hanna E, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Gunn GB, Phan J, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Frank SJ. Postoperative Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Int J Part Ther 2016; 2:533-543. [PMID: 31772965 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00032.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Postoperative radiation therapy can improve control for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck; however, delivering adequate dose to the tumor bed must be balanced with limiting dose to nearby critical organs. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may help improve the therapeutic ratio, though concerns exist regarding tissue heterogeneity and other sources of uncertainty in several head and neck subsites. We report control and toxicity outcomes for patients with ACC of the head and neck treated at a single institution with postoperative IMPT and robust planning and analysis. Patients and Methods Sixteen patients with head and neck ACC treated with postoperative IMPT were identified. Intensity-modulated proton therapy was delivered by using multifield optimization. Robust planning and analysis were performed. The median dose was 60 (range, 60 to 70) Gy (RBE) (Gy [relative biological effectiveness]). Adjuvant IMPT was given with (N = 12) or without (N = 4) platinum-based chemotherapy. Tumor control outcomes were recorded from the medical record, and acute and chronic toxicities were graded weekly during treatment and upon follow-up per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (CTCAE v4). Results Median follow-up is 24.9 (range, 9.2 to 40.2) months. One patient developed local and distant recurrence and subsequently died. The remaining 15 patients are alive without evidence of disease. Four patients experienced acute grade 3 toxicities: dermatitis (N = 3) and oral mucositis (N = 1). One patient developed a chronic grade 4 optic nerve disorder. There were no grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a feasible option for patients with ACC of the head and neck in the postoperative setting. Robust treatment planning and plan analysis can be performed such that uncertainties and tissue heterogeneities do not appear to limit safe and effective IMPT delivery. Safety and efficacy appear comparable to those of other types of radiation therapy, but further follow-up of clinical outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Onita Bhattasali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Merrill S Kies
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - X Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Morel P, Wu X, Blin G, Vialette S, Flynn R, Hyer D, Wang D. Spot Weight Adaptation for Moving Target in Spot Scanning Proton Therapy. Front Oncol 2015; 5:119. [PMID: 26075184 PMCID: PMC4447005 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study describes a real-time spot weight adaptation method in spot-scanning proton therapy for moving target or moving patient, so that the resultant dose distribution closely matches the planned dose distribution. Materials and methods The method proposed in this study adapts the weight (MU) of the delivering pencil beam to that of the target spot; it will actually hit during patient/target motion. The target spot that a certain delivering pencil beam may hit relies on patient monitoring and/or motion modeling using four-dimensional (4D) CT. After the adapted delivery, the required total weight [Monitor Unit (MU)] for this target spot is then subtracted from the planned value. With continuous patient motion and continuous spot scanning, the planned doses to all target spots will eventually be all fulfilled. In a proof-of-principle test, a lung case was presented with realistic temporal and motion parameters; the resultant dose distribution using spot weight adaptation was compared to that without using this method. The impact of the real-time patient/target position tracking or prediction was also investigated. Results For moderate motion (i.e., mean amplitude 0.5 cm), D95% to the planning target volume (PTV) was only 81.5% of the prescription (RX) dose; with spot weight adaptation PTV D95% achieves 97.7% RX. For large motion amplitude (i.e., 1.5 cm), without spot weight adaptation PTV D95% is only 42.9% of RX; with spot weight adaptation, PTV D95% achieves 97.7% RX. Larger errors in patient/target position tracking or prediction led to worse final target coverage; an error of 3 mm or smaller in patient/target position tracking is preferred. Conclusion The proposed spot weight adaptation method was able to deliver the planned dose distribution and maintain target coverage when patient motion was involved. The successful implementation of this method would rely on accurate monitoring or prediction of patient/target motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Morel
- Laboratoire Informatique Gaspard Monge (LIGM), UMR CNRS 8049, Université Paris-Est , Paris , France
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA , USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Guillaume Blin
- Laboratoire Informatique Gaspard Monge (LIGM), UMR CNRS 8049, Université Paris-Est , Paris , France ; UMR 5800, Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (LaBRI), Université de Bordeaux , Talence , France
| | - Stéphane Vialette
- Laboratoire Informatique Gaspard Monge (LIGM), UMR CNRS 8049, Université Paris-Est , Paris , France
| | - Ryan Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Daniel Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Dongxu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yeung D, McKenzie C, Indelicato DJ. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61:89-94. [PMID: 24000229 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization techniques and pencil-beam scanning (PBS) nozzle designs on pediatric craniopharyngiomas. PROCEDURE We compared a double-scatter (DS) plan with IMPT plans using single-field uniform dose (SFUD) optimization or multi-field optimization (MFO) and different PBS nozzles. The clinical impacts of SFUD versus MFO, range shifters, and two different PBS nozzles were compared. For target coverage assessment, the conformity index and inhomogeneity coefficient were evaluated. RESULTS Although both proton therapy techniques achieved adequate target coverage, IMPT achieved a better conformity index of 0.78 versus 0.60 for DS. For the inhomogeneity coefficient, IMPT with MFO performed better than using SFUD or DS. MFO with the dedicated nozzle (MFO-DN) achieved the best result of 0.023, as compared to values of 0.03 or higher for the other plans. IMPT achieved lower doses to the normal tissues, as compared to DS; MFO-DN had the best results. The DN provided the best beam-spot characteristics and the sharpest lateral penumbra. MFO reduced the need for range shifters. CONCLUSIONS As compared to DS proton therapy for pediatric craniopharyngiomas, IMPT achieved significantly better target coverage and dose sparing of normal tissue. Nozzle designs that provided small beam spots and sharp lateral penumbra allowed for better target coverage and reduced dose to normal tissue. In the case of shallow targets, MFO, in contrast to SFUD, required minimal use of range shifters, which preserved the penumbra and the dosimetric advantage. MFO-DN proved to be the optimal technique for IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Yeung
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | |
Collapse
|