Lipidoid Tail Structure Strongly Influences siRNA Delivery Activity

Isoprenoid CARTs: In Vitro and In Vivo mRNA Delivery by Charge-Altering Releasable Transporters Functionalized with Archaea-inspired Branched Lipids

The delivery of oligonucleotides across biological barriers is a challenge of unsurpassed significance at the interface of materials science and medicine, with emerging clinical utility in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccinations, immunotherapies, genome editing, and cell rejuvenation. Here, we address the role of readily available branched lipids in the design, synthesis, and evaluation of isoprenoid charge-altering releasable transporters (CARTs), a pH-responsive oligomeric nanoparticle delivery system for RNA. Systematic variation of the lipid block reveals an emergent relationship between the lipid block and the neutralization kinetics of the polycationic block. Unexpectedly, iA21A11, a CART with the smallest lipid side chain, isoamyl-, was identified as the lead isoprenoid CART for the in vitro transfection of immortalized lymphoblastic cell lines. When administered intramuscularly in a murine model, iA21A11-mRNA complexes induce higher protein expression levels than our previous lead CART, ONA. Isoprenoid CARTs represent a new delivery platform for RNA vaccines and other polyanion-based therapeutics.

Branched-Tail Lipid Nanoparticles for Intravenous mRNA Delivery to Lung Immune, Endothelial, and Alveolar Cells in Mice

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are proven safe and effective delivery systems on a global scale. However, their efficacy has been limited primarily to liver and immune cell targets. To extend the applicability of mRNA drugs, 580 ionizable lipidoids are synthesized and tested for delivery to extrahepatocellular targets. Of these, over 40 enabled protein expression in mice, with the majority transfecting the liver. Beyond the liver, several LNPs containing new, branched-tail ionizable lipidoids potently delivered mRNA to the lungs, with cell-level specificity depending on helper lipid chemistry. Incorporation of the neutral helper lipid 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE) at 16 mol% enabled highly specific delivery to natural killer and dendritic cells within the lung. Although inclusion of the cationic lipid 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP) improved lung tropism, it decreased cell specificity, resulting in equal transfection of endothelial and lymphoid cells. DOTAP formulations are also less favorable than DOPE formulations because they elevated liver enzyme and cytokine levels. Together, these data identify a new branched-tailed LNP with a unique ability to selectively transfect lung immune cell populations without the use of toxicity-prone cationic helper lipids. This novel vehicle may unlock RNA therapies for lung diseases associated with immune cell dysregulation, including cancer, viral infections, and autoimmune disorders.

Recent Advances in Engineering Carriers for siRNA Delivery

RNA interference (RNAi) technology has been a promising treatment strategy for combating intractable diseases. However, the applications of RNAi in clinical are hampered by extracellular and intracellular barriers. To overcome these barriers, various siRNA delivery systems have been developed in the past two decades. The first approved RNAi therapeutic, Patisiran (ONPATTRO) using lipids as the carrier, for the treatment of amyloidosis is one of the most important milestones. This has greatly encouraged researchers to work on creating new functional siRNA carriers. In this review, the recent advances in siRNA carriers consisting of lipids, polymers, and polymer-modified inorganic particles for cancer therapy are summarized. Representative examples are presented to show the structural design of the carriers in order to overcome the delivery hurdles associated with RNAi therapies. Finally, the existing challenges and future perspective for developing RNAi as a clinical modality will be discussed and proposed. It is believed that the addressed contributions in this review will promote the development of siRNA delivery systems for future clinical applications.

Which Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Designs Work? A Simple Kinetic Model Linking LNP Chemical Structure to In Vivo Delivery Performance

Although lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the predominant nanocarriers for short-interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery, most therapies use nearly identical formulations that have taken 30 years to design but lack the diverse property ranges necessary for versatile application. This dearth in variety and the extended timeline for implementation are attributed to a limited understanding of how LNP properties facilitate overcoming biological barriers. Herein, a simple kinetic model was developed by using major rate-limiting steps for siRNA delivery, and this model enabled the identification of a critical parameter to predict LNP efficacy without extensive experimental testing. A volume-averaged log D, the "solubility" of charged molecules as a function of pH weighted by component volume fractions, resulted in a good correlation between LNP composition and siRNA delivery. Both the effects of modifying the structures of ionizable lipids and LNP composition on gene silencing were easily captured in the model predictions. Thus, this approach provides a robust LNP structure-activity relationship to dramatically accelerate the realization of effective LNP formulations.

Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Enables mRNA Delivery for Cancer Therapy

Messenger RNA (mRNA) has received great attention in the prevention and treatment of various diseases due to the success of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines (Comirnaty and Spikevax). To meet the therapeutic purpose, it is required that mRNA must enter the target cells and express sufficient proteins. Therefore, the development of effective delivery systems is necessary and crucial. Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) represents a remarkable vehicle that has indeed accelerated mRNA applications in humans, as several mRNA-based therapies have already been approved or are in clinical trials. In this review, the focus is on mRNA-LNP-mediated anticancer therapy. It summarizes the main development strategies of mRNA-LNP formulations, discusses representative therapeutic approaches in cancer, and points out current challenges and possible future directions of this research field. It is hoped that these delivered messages can help further improve the application of mRNA-LNP technology in cancer therapy.

Cellular Trafficking of Nanotechnology-Mediated mRNA Delivery

Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapy has emerged as a powerful, safe, and rapidly scalable therapeutic approach that involves technologies for both mRNA itself and the delivery vehicle. Although there are some unique challenges for different applications of mRNA therapy, a common challenge for all mRNA therapeutics is the transport of mRNA into the target cell cytoplasm for sufficient protein expression. This review is focused on the behaviors at the cellular level of nanotechnology-mediated mRNA delivery systems, which have not been comprehensively reviewed yet. First, the four main therapeutic applications of mRNA are introduced, including immunotherapy, protein replacement therapy, genome editing, and cellular reprogramming. Second, common types of mRNA cargos and mRNA delivery systems are summarized. Third, strategies to enhance mRNA delivery efficiency during the cellular trafficking process are highlighted, including accumulation to the cell, internalization into the cell, endosomal escape, release of mRNA from the nanocarrier, and translation of mRNA into protein. Finally, the challenges and opportunities for the development of nanotechnology-mediated mRNA delivery systems are presented. This review can provide new insights into the future fabrication of mRNA nanocarriers with desirable cellular trafficking performance.

Factor XII Silencing Using siRNA Prevents Thrombus Formation in a Rat Model of Extracorporeal Life Support

Heparin anticoagulation increases the bleeding risk during extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study determined whether factor XII (FXII) silencing using short interfering RNA (siRNA) can provide ECLS circuit anticoagulation without bleeding. Adult male, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to four groups (n = 3 each) based on anticoagulant: (1) no anticoagulant, (2) heparin, (3) FXII siRNA, or (4) nontargeting siRNA. Heparin was administered intravenously before and during ECLS. FXII or nontargeting siRNA were administered intravenously 3 days before the initiation of ECLS via lipidoid nanoparticles. The rats were placed on pumped, arteriovenous ECLS for 8 hours or until the blood flow resistance reached three times its baseline resistance. Without anticoagulant, mock-oxygenator resistance tripled within 7 ± 2 minutes. The resistance in the FXII siRNA group did not increase for 8 hours. There were no significant differences in resistance or mock-oxygenator thrombus volume between the FXII siRNA and the heparin groups. However, the bleeding time in the FXII siRNA group (3.4 ± 0.6 minutes) was significantly shorter than that in the heparin group (5.5 ± 0.5 minutes, p < 0.05). FXII silencing using siRNA provided simpler anticoagulation of ECLS circuits with reduced bleeding time as compared to heparin. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A937.

Synthetic Microbial Surrogates Consisting of Lipid Nanoparticles Encapsulating DNA for the Validation of Surface Disinfection Procedures

Effective cleaning and disinfection procedures are an integral part of good manufacturing practice and in maintaining hygiene standards in health-care facilities. In this study, a method to validate such cleaning and disinfection procedures of surfaces was established employing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) encapsulating DNA. It was possible to determine and distinguish between the physical cleaning effect (dilution) and the chemical cleaning effect (disintegration) on the LNPs during the cleaning and disinfection procedure (wiping). After treatment with 70 v % ethanol as a disinfectant and SDS solution as a cleaning agent, LNPs showed log₁₀ reductions of 4.5 and 4.0, respectively. These values are similar to the log₁₀ reductions exhibited by common bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Serratia marcescens. Therefore, LNPs pose as useful tools for cleaning validation with advantages over the already existing tools and enable a separate detection of dilution and chemical disinfectant action.

Recent Advances in the Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of mRNA Vaccines

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have recently emerged as one of the most advanced technologies for the highly efficient in vivo delivery of exogenous mRNA, particularly for COVID-19 vaccine delivery. LNPs comprise four different lipids: ionizable lipids, helper or neutral lipids, cholesterol, and lipids attached to polyethylene glycol (PEG). In this review, we present recent the advances and insights for the design of LNPs, as well as their composition and properties, with a subsequent discussion on the development of COVID-19 vaccines. In particular, as ionizable lipids are the most critical drivers for complexing the mRNA and in vivo delivery, the role of ionizable lipids in mRNA vaccines is discussed in detail. Furthermore, the use of LNPs as effective delivery vehicles for vaccination, genome editing, and protein replacement therapy is explained. Finally, expert opinion on LNPs for mRNA vaccines is discussed, which may address future challenges in developing mRNA vaccines using highly efficient LNPs based on a novel set of ionizable lipids. Developing highly efficient mRNA delivery systems for vaccines with improved safety against some severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants remains difficult.

The replacement of helper lipids with charged alternatives in lipid nanoparticles facilities targeted mRNA delivery to the spleen and lungs

The broad clinical application of mRNA therapeutics has been hampered by a lack of delivery vehicles that induce protein expression in extrahepatic organs and tissues. Recently, it was shown that mRNA delivery to the spleen or lungs is possible upon the addition of a charged lipid to a standard four-component lipid nanoparticle formulation. This approach, while effective, further complicates an already complex drug formulation and has the potential to slow regulatory approval and adversely impact manufacturing processes. We were thus motivated to maintain a four-component nanoparticle system while achieving shifts in tropism. To that end, we replaced the standard helper lipid in lipidoid nanoparticles, DOPE, with one of eight alternatives. These lipids included the neutral lipids, DOPC, sphingomyelin, and ceramide; the anionic lipids, phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidic acid; and the cationic lipids, DOTAP and ethyl phosphatidylcholine. While neutral helper lipids maintained protein expression in the liver, anionic and cationic lipids shifted protein expression to the spleen and lungs, respectively. For example, replacing DOPE with DOTAP increased positive LNP surface charge at pH 7 by 5-fold and altered the ratio of liver to lung protein expression from 36:1 to 1:56. Similarly, replacing DOPE with PS reduced positive charge by half and altered the ratio of liver to spleen protein expression from 8:1 to 1:3. Effects were consistent across ionizable lipidoid chemistries. Regarding mechanism, nanoparticles formulated with neutral and anionic helper lipids best transfected epithelial and immune cells, respectively. Further, the lung-tropic effect of DOTAP was linked to reduced immune cell infiltration of the lungs compared to neutral or anionic lipids. Together, these data show that intravenous non-hepatocellular mRNA delivery is readily achievable while maintaining a four-component formulation with modified helper lipid chemistry.

An ionizable lipid toolbox for RNA delivery

Recent years have witnessed incredible growth in RNA therapeutics, which has benefited significantly from decades of research on lipid nanoparticles, specifically its key component—the ionizable lipid. This comment discusses the major ionizable lipid types, and provides perspectives for future development.

RNA therapeutics have benefited significantly from decades of research on lipid nanoparticles, specifically its key component—the ionizable lipid. This comment discusses the major ionizable lipid types, and provides perspectives for future development.

Lipids and Lipid Derivatives for RNA Delivery

RNA-based therapeutics have shown great promise in treating a broad spectrum of diseases through various mechanisms including knockdown of pathological genes, expression of therapeutic proteins, and programmed gene editing. Due to the inherent instability and negative-charges of RNA molecules, RNA-based therapeutics can make the most use of delivery systems to overcome biological barriers and to release the RNA payload into the cytosol. Among different types of delivery systems, lipid-based RNA delivery systems, particularly lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), have been extensively studied due to their unique properties, such as simple chemical synthesis of lipid components, scalable manufacturing processes of LNPs, and wide packaging capability. LNPs represent the most widely used delivery systems for RNA-based therapeutics, as evidenced by the clinical approvals of three LNP-RNA formulations, patisiran, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273. This review covers recent advances of lipids, lipid derivatives, and lipid-derived macromolecules used in RNA delivery over the past several decades. We focus mainly on their chemical structures, synthetic routes, characterization, formulation methods, and structure-activity relationships. We also briefly describe the current status of representative preclinical studies and clinical trials and highlight future opportunities and challenges.

Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations for Enhanced Co-delivery of siRNA and mRNA

Although mRNA and siRNA have significant therapeutic potential, their simultaneous delivery has not been previously explored. To facilitate the treatment of diseases associated with aberrant gene upregulation and downregulation, we sought to co-formulate siRNA and mRNA in a single lipidoid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation. We accommodated the distinct molecular characteristics of mRNA and siRNA in a formulation consisting of an ionizable and biodegradable amine-containing lipidoid, cholesterol, DSPC, DOPE, and PEG-lipid. Surprisingly, the co-formulation of siRNA and mRNA in the same LNP enhanced the efficacy of both drugs in vitro and in vivo. Compared to LNPs encapsulating siRNA only, co-formulated LNPs improved Factor VII gene silencing in mice from 44 to 87% at an siRNA dose of 0.03 mg/kg. Co-formulation also improved mRNA delivery, as a 0.5 mg/kg dose of mRNA co-formulated with siRNA induced three times the luciferase protein expression compared to when siRNA was not included. As not all gene therapy applications require both RNA drugs, we sought to extend the benefit of co-formulated LNPs to formulations encapsulating only a single type of RNA. We accomplished this by substituting the "helper" RNA with a negatively charged polymer, polystyrenesulfonate (PSS). LNPs containing PSS mediated the same level of protein silencing or expression as standard LNPs using 2-3-fold less RNA. For example, LNPs formulated with and without PSS induced 50% Factor VII silencing at siRNA doses of 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg, respectively. Together, these studies demonstrate potent co-delivery of siRNA and mRNA and show that inclusion of a negatively charged "helper polymer" enhances the efficacy of LNP delivery systems.

Lipid nanoparticle siRNA cocktails for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma is an aggressive and incurable subtype of non‐Hodgkin B cell lymphoma. Patients typically present with advanced disease, and most patients succumb within a decade of diagnosis. There is a clear and urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches that will affect mantle cell lymphoma through a unique mechanism compared to current therapies. This study examined the use of RNA interference (RNAi) therapy to attack mantle cell lymphoma at the mRNA level, silencing genes associated with cancer cell proliferation. We identified a lipid nanoparticle formulated with the lipidoid 306O₁₃ that delivered siRNA to JeKo‐1 and MAVER‐1 mantle cell lymphoma cell lines. Three therapeutic gene targets were examined for their effect on lymphoma growth. These included Cyclin D1, which is a cell cycle regulator, as well as Bcl‐2 and Mcl‐1, which prevent apoptosis. Gene knockdown with siRNA doses as low at 10 nM increased lymphoma cell apoptosis without carrier‐mediated toxicity. Silencing of Cyclin D1 induced apoptosis despite a twofold “compensation” upregulation of Cyclin D2. Upon simultaneous silencing of all three genes, nearly 75% of JeKo‐1 cells were apoptosing 3 days post‐transfection. Furthermore, cells proliferated at only 15% of their pretreatment rate. These data suggest that lipid nanoparticles‐formulated, multiplexed siRNA “cocktails” may serve as a beneficial addition to the treatment regimens for mantle cell lymphoma and other aggressive cancers.

Next-Generation Lipids in RNA Interference Therapeutics

RNA is emerging as a potential therapeutic modality for the treatment of incurable diseases. Despite intense research, the advent to clinical utility remains compromised by numerous biological barriers, hence, there is a need for sophisticated delivery vehicles. In this aspect, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most advanced platform among nonviral vectors for gene delivery. In this review, we critically review the literature and the reasons for ineffective delivery beyond the liver. We discuss the toxicity issues associated with permanently charged cationic lipids and then turn our attention to next-generation ionizable cationic lipids. These lipids exhibit reduced toxicity and immunogenicity and undergo ionization under the acidic environment of the endosome to release the encapsulated payload to their site of action in the cytosol. Finally, we summarize recent achievements in therapeutic nucleic acid delivery and report on the current status of clinical trials using LNP and the obstacles to clinical translation.