Biosimilars: Challenges and path forward

Charge variants of proposed biosimilar to Omalizumab: Isolation, purification and analysis by HPLC methods

Omalizumab (Xolair) is a humanized monoclonal antibody derived by recombinant DNA technology. It binds specifically to immunoglobulin E (IgE) which plays a major role in allergic reaction by releasing histamine and other inflammatory factors from mast cells. Omalizumab binds circulatory IgE with high affinity and prevents from its binding to mast cell receptor. Charge variants are one of the critical quality attributes (CQAs) in biological drug development and sources of heterogeneity which needs to be considered in biosimilarity assessment. In this study, biosimilar product of Xolair was expressed in mammalian cell culture process in laboratory to isolate charge variants (acidic, main peak and basic). Different charge variants were isolated from intermediate purified biosimilar product of Xolair. Isolated charge variants were purified with preparative cation exchange chromatography technique and characterized with different analytical tools includes size exclusion chromatography (SEC-HPLC) and cation exchange chromatography (CEX-HPLC). Purity of acidic, main peak and basic variants was 99.58%, 99.98% and 98.64% respectively as per SEC-HPLC and according to CEX-HPLC purity was 94.25%, 95.58% and 91.33% respectively. The study data indicates that isolated charge variants were purified with desired purity and can be further used for process characterization, in vitro potency and in vivo kinetics studies.

Similar or the Same? Why Biosimilars are not the Solution

Advancements in the field of biotechnology have accelerated the development of drugs that are manufactured from cultures of living cells, commonly referred to as "biologics." Due to the complexity of the production process, generic biologics are unlikely to be chemically identical to the reference product, and accordingly are referred to as "biosimilars." Encouraging the development of biosimilars has been presented as the key solution to decrease prices and increase access to biologics, but the development and use of biosimilars continues to raise problems, none of which can easily be addressed. Developing a biosimilar requires considerable time and financial resources, and legitimate safety concerns necessitate elaborate clinical testing of biosimilars. As a consequence, the introduction of biosimilars onto the market has not resulted in significant price reductions, and concerns regarding the substitution and interchangeability of original biologics with biosimilars persist. This article will explain how the biologics production process distorts the trade-offs that traditionally guided both patent protection and regulatory exclusivities: disclosure as a key condition for benefiting from the corresponding monopoly position. Hence, we propose establishing a mechanism of mandatory deposit of the original biologic's cell line at the stage of the regulatory approval as the most effective remedy.

The state-of-play and future of antibody therapeutics

It has been over four decades since the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) using a hybridoma cell line was first reported. Since then more than thirty therapeutic antibodies have been marketed, mostly as oncology, autoimmune and inflammatory therapeutics. While antibodies are very efficient, their cost-effectiveness has always been discussed owing to their high costs, accumulating to more than one billion dollars from preclinical development through to market approval. Because of this, therapeutic antibodies are inaccessible to some patients in both developed and developing countries. The growing interest in biosimilar antibodies as affordable versions of therapeutic antibodies may provide alternative treatment options as well potentially decreasing costs. As certain markets begin to capitalize on this opportunity, regulatory authorities continue to refine the requirements for demonstrating quality, efficacy and safety of biosimilar compared to originator products. In addition to biosimilars, innovations in antibody engineering are providing the opportunity to design biobetter antibodies with improved properties to maximize efficacy. Enhancing effector function, antibody drug conjugates (ADC) or targeting multiple disease pathways via multi-specific antibodies are being explored. The manufacturing process of antibodies is also moving forward with advancements relating to host cell production and purification processes. Studies into the physical and chemical degradation pathways of antibodies are contributing to the design of more stable proteins guided by computational tools. Moreover, the delivery and pharmacokinetics of antibody-based therapeutics are improving as optimized formulations are pursued through the implementation of recent innovations in the field.

Monoclonal Antibody and Fusion Protein Biosimilars Across Therapeutic Areas: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence

BACKGROUND

Despite regulatory efforts to formalize guidance policies on biosimilars, there remains a need to educate healthcare stakeholders on the acknowledged definition of biosimilarity and the data that underpin it.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to systematically collate published data for monoclonal antibodies and fusion protein biosimilars indicated for cancer, chronic inflammatory diseases, and other indications, and to explore differences in the type and weight (quantity and quality) of available evidence.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and ISI Web of Science were searched to September 2015. Conference proceedings (n = 17) were searched 2012 to July 2015. Included studies were categorized by originator, study type, and indication. To assess data strength and validity, risk of bias assessments were undertaken.

RESULTS

Across therapeutic areas, 43 named (marketed or proposed) biosimilars were identified for adalimumab, abciximab, bevacizumab, etanercept, infliximab, omalizumab, ranibizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab originators. Infliximab CT-P13, SB2, and etanercept SB4 biosimilars have the greatest amount of published evidence of similarity with their originators, based on results of clinical studies involving larger numbers of patients or healthy subjects (N = 1405, 743, and 734, respectively). Published data were also retrieved for marketed intended copies of etanercept and rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

This unbiased synthesis of the literature exposed significant differences in the extent of published evidence between molecules at preclinical, clinical, and post-marketing stages of development, providing clinicians and payers with a consolidated view of the available data and remaining gaps.

Editorial: Bioprocess beyond the large scale production

Advances in bioprocess engineering continue to step forward in its own field of large scale production in mid- and down-stream processes of biotechnology. Some of the recent researches are shown in this AFOB (Asian Federation of Biotechnology) Special issue of Advances in Bioprocess Engineering.