Medical Student's Perspective Regarding Undergraduate Surgical Education with Special Reference to Pandemic

In-Person Versus Online Training in Simulations of Helping Babies Breathe: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Birth asphyxia is a leading cause of neonatal deaths, but simple interventions may prevent it. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) course has significantly reduced neonatal mortality rates in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) by training healthcare providers (i.e. midwives and nurses) on the essential skills of bag-and-mask ventilation and postnatal care. Although several studies have supported the efficacy of virtual learning in other medical education programs, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding a virtual approach to HBB. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of online versus in-person learning of the HBB course among medical and nursing students.

METHODS

The study is a two-arm parallel randomized non-inferiority controlled trial, that includes medical and nursing students. Participants were randomly assigned to either online or in-person debriefing during the hands-on simulations of HBB. They attended a pre-recorded lecture before being assigned to one of three instructors for the simulation lab. Participants completed a seven-point anonymous Likert-based questionnaire and a standardized Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Student Version (DASH-SV) Short Form. The primary outcome was the Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) grade. The trial is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05257499.

RESULTS

47 participants completed the study, with similar baseline characteristics in each arm (gender, age, and class). The participants in both arms reported high levels of satisfaction and confidence, with no significant difference between the two arms. The DASH score over 7 was also similar in the online arm (6.27±0.26) compared to the in-person arm (6.55±0.13) (p=0.07). The mean OSCE score in the online arm (45.8±5.2) was comparable to the mean OSCE score in the in-person arm (41.3±5.0) (p=0.22). Both online and in-person participants failed the OSCE.

CONCLUSION

The survey responses conveyed that online simulation training is comparable to in-person simulation for the HBB course. Both online and in-person participants failed the OSCE most likely because they needed more training on HBB. This could be due to the fact that the material is too new to the students who needed more practice to pass the OSCE. Further research is needed to confirm these results and explore the long-term impact of online neonatal resuscitation training.

A novel video compendium of real surgical patient interactions for medical students

Objective

To develop a novel video compendium of real surgical patient interactions as a tool for medical student education and to evaluate our institutional experience of its usefulness.

Design

Prospective development of a video compendium of real surgical patient interactions.

Setting

Single university affiliated hospital in Cork, Ireland.

Participants

Patients with illnesses relevant to the surgery curriculum and students from an Irish medical school.

Results

Videos were recorded of the clinical interaction between a consultant surgeon and patients, capturing focused history taking and/or clinical examination, with an associated set of explanatory notes. Fifty videos were developed with a tiered release to the clinical year medical students, via their virtual learning/education platform. Three hundred and eleven students responded to the questionnaire across 3-student year groups (311/585-53 %). Fifty-two percent of students did not have their clinical rotations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. >90 % of students agreed that the videos helped history taking and clinical examination technique. >80 % of students agreed that the accompanying text slides reinforced key points and helped with understanding difficult topics. Eighty-five percent of students reported that the videos increased exposure to surgical patients and pathology. Eighty-five percent of students rated their experience as at least 4 out of 5.

Conclusions

This online educational compendium bridged a gap for students with limited clinical exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic, and has become an important resource for all clinical students. Our novel engagement with real patients sets this compendium apart from resources which use actors.

A Systematic Review of the Medical Student Feedback on Undergraduate Surgical Education During the Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged and changed significant aspects of day-to-day life. With regard to medical education, the challenges have been substantial, and the changes have been innovative. This systematic review focuses specifically on medical student feedback on undergraduate surgical education during the pandemic. It explores the various types of technology used to facilitate online learning and aims to comprehensively review the advantages and disadvantages. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to, and electronic databases PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were used to identify relevant studies. The search yielded 102 papers once duplicates and non-English articles were removed. Of these, 19 articles were included in the review. These publications were appraised, which was the source of the narrative syntheses of this systematic review, and due to the heterogeneous data, a meta-analysis could not be successfully implemented. The integration of real-time image capture devices used to display stakeholders or objects such as models of wounds has resulted in the improvement of virtual learning to an almost in-person experience. Adding to this, the use of communication and participation platforms facilitates active discussion when used appropriately. However, there are still some barriers that may be removed with time as the technology continually improves, and these are not exclusive to connectivity issues and restriction of the senses to only two-dimensional sight and hearing. Despite this, the student feedback was largely positive, and the integration of more innovative methods of delivering teaching will have a positive impact on education as long as it is used as an adjunct and not as a replacement for face-to-face teaching.

Perceptions of medical students towards and effectiveness of online surgical curriculum: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Online education has been used as an adjunct modality for teaching and it attracts attention in recent years as many medical students can not accomplish their clerkship in the hospital due to COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to collect the articles related to online surgical education for medical students, and to analyze the effectiveness of online education and the perceptions of the medical students.

METHOD

We performed a systemic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC and Cochrane library. Keywords used for searching included "medical student", "online education", "online teaching", "online learning", "distance learning", "electronic learning", "virtual learning" and "surgical". Medical education research study quality instrument (MERSQI) was used for the evaluation of the quality of the searched articles.

RESULTS

From 1240 studies retrieved from the databases, 13 articles were included in this study after screening. The publication year was from 2007 to 2021. The mean MERSQI score of the 13 searched articles was 12.5 +/- 1.7 (range 10.0-14.5). There were totally 2023 medical students who attended online surgical curriculum. By online course, improvement of understanding and knowledge on the studied topics could be reached. The confidence in patient encounters could be improved by online curriculum with sharing experiences, discussing, and role playing. However, students felt concentration was poor during online course. Medical students studying through video platform could get better test scores than those studying with textbooks. Regarding basic surgical skills, online teaching of suturing and knot-tying could be possible and was appreciated by the students who could practice away from the hospital and get feedbacks by instructors through online environment. The scores for the clinical competence assessment for incision, suturing and knot-tying were found to be no significant difference between the online teaching group and face-to-face teaching group.

CONCLUSION

Online surgical curriculum for medical students is not easy but inevitable in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Although online course is not the same as physical course, there are some efforts which could be tried to increase the effectiveness. Basic surgical skills could also be taught effectively through online platform. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic is over in the future, online curriculum could still be a helpful adjunct for surgical education.