Effects of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support on Microvascular Endothelial Function

Effect of Aortic Valve Opening Pattern on Endothelial Function After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aortic valve opening patterns on endothelial functions in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. This study included 43 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation and 35 patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; control group). The CF-LVAD group was divided into three subgroups based on aortic valve opening patterns: open with each beat, intermittently opening, and not opening groups. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) were compared before and 3 months after CF-LVAD implantation. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and 6 minute walk test (6-MWT) scores were measured at baseline and follow-up in the CF-LVAD group. The mean FMD and PI of patients in the CF-LVAD group reduced 3 months after implantation. Patients with intermittently opening and not opening aortic valves had worse endothelial function at follow-up. Before and 3 months after implantation FMD% did not significantly differ in patients whose aortic valves were open with each beat (4.72 ± 1.06% vs. 4.67 ± 1.16%, p = 0.135). Pulsatility index changes paralleled FMD changes. Cardiopulmonary exercise test and 6-MWT scores improved after implantation but without significant differences between subgroups. Maintaining normal aortic valve function after CF-LVAD implantation may reduce endothelial dysfunction; however, larger studies are needed for long-term clinical effects.

Pressure sore incidence and treatment in left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-equipped patients: Insights from a prospective series

INTRODUCTION

A left ventricular assistance device (LVAD) is indicated in patients with end-stage heart failure. Due to the non-physiologic blood flow, a LVAD may favor pressure sores with a devastating risk of infection. This work shows the prevalence and treatment of pressure sores in LVAD patients, to optimize their management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated all LVAD implantations at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) from 2015 to 2019. We detected patients who developed a pressure sore and evaluated the timeline, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients benefited from LVAD, among whom 5 (12%) developed a stage III/IV pressure sore, within a mean time of 25 days. Due to their poor overall condition, 4/5 patients were treated surgically and 1/5 conservatively. Half of the patients treated with surgery had major complications requiring reoperation. After flap coverage, the mean time to healing for patients was 6 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The rapid development of deep pressure sores seen in 12% of patients may be a manifestation of the maladaptive blood flow induced by LVADs, combined with their bedridden condition. Initial signs of pressure sores should be considered seriously, as they are rapidly evolving and needing an aggressive surgical treatment whenever possible (80%). Complication rate was similar compared to standard pressure sore flap treatment. All patients benefiting from flap surgery achieved effective coverage after a mean follow-up of 24 months. No patient developed a LVAD infection.

CONCLUSION

Surgery must be considered early in this population to prevent potential device infection.

Physical Properties of Blood and their Relationship to Clinical Conditions

It has been long known that blood health heavily influences optimal physiological function. Abnormalities affecting the physical properties of blood have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various disorders, although the exact mechanistic links between hemorheology and clinical disease manifestations remain poorly understood. Often overlooked in current medical practice, perhaps due to the promises offered in the molecular and genetic era, the physical properties of blood which remain a valuable and definitive indicator of circulatory health and disease. Bridging this gap, the current manuscript provides an introduction to hemorheology. It reviews the properties that dictate bulk and microcirculatory flow by systematically dissecting the biomechanics that determine the non-Newtonian behavior of blood. Specifically, the impact of hematocrit, the mechanical properties and tendency of red blood cells to aggregate, and various plasma factors on blood viscosity will be examined. Subsequently, the manner in which the physical properties of blood influence hemodynamics in health and disease is discussed. Special attention is given to disorders such as sickle cell disease, emphasizing the clinical impact of severely abnormal blood rheology. This review expands into concepts that are highly topical; the relation between mechanical stress and intracellular homeostasis is examined through a contemporary cell-signaling lens. Indeed, accumulating evidence demonstrates that nitric oxide is not only transported by erythrocytes, but is locally produced by mechanically-sensitive enzymes, which appears to have intracellular and potentially extracellular effects. Finally, given the importance of shear forces in the developing field of mechanical circulatory support, we review the role of blood rheology in temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support devices, an increasingly utilized method of life support. This review thus provides a comprehensive overview for interested trainees, scientists, and clinicians.

Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices do not worsen endothelial function in subjects with chronic heart failure: a pilot study

AIMS

To evaluate endothelial function in subjects with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), comparing them with subjects with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on the list for heart transplant (HT) and with HT patients with a normal systolic cardiac function to identify any differences.

METHODS

We enrolled 28 subjects with LVAD, 55 subjects with HT, and 42 subjects with heart failure on the transplant list. The subjects underwent a general physical examination, assessment of laboratory blood parameters, and assessment of endothelial function through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of brachial artery.

RESULTS

The three groups were homogeneous as regards age, gender, smoke abuse, C-reactive protein (CRP) and FMD parameters (P = ns). In LVAD group percentage of FMD change showed an inverse correlation with CRP (rho: -0.5, P: 0.003), a well-known marker of inflammation and tissue damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous flow related to LVAD seems to not worsen endothelial function. Endothelial function was not affected by cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, obesity, and tobacco habit), by the functional status expressed by New York Heart Association class, by the left ventricular systolic function and by the presence or absence of ischaemic heart disease in all the populations analysed. CRP was the only factor able to influence percentage of FMD change in patient with LVAD, reinforcing the hypothesis that inflammation is the main determinant of endothelial function.

The Effect of Artificial Pulsatility on the Peripheral Vasculature in Patients with A Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

Implantation of left ventricular assist systems (LVASs) has become the standard of care for advanced heart failure (HF). The absence of pulsatility in previous devices contributes to vascular and endothelial dysfunction, related to atherosclerotic or vascular complications. We hypothesized that the artificial pulsatility provided by the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAS would exert a favorable effect on the vasculature.

METHODS

In 32 patients implanted with HM3 (5 females; mean age 55±13.6 years), the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and peripheral augmentation index (AI), markers of endothelial function and arterial stiffness, were measured with an Endo-PAT2000 prior to and in the 3^rd and 6^th months after implantation. RHI and AI data from 30 HeartMate II (HM II) recipients in the 3^rd and 6^th months after implantation, from 15 advanced HF patients without LVASs, and from 13 healthy volunteers were also analyzed.

RESULTS

In HM3 recipients, the mean RHI significantly decreased at 3^rd and 6^th months after implantation. The RHI was substantially lower at baseline than that of healthy or HF reference group. Increasing AI values, indicating worsening arterial stiffness, were also observed. Similar trends were observed in HM II recipients between the 3^rd and 6^th months, but with higher absolute values of RHI and AI.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected impaired vascular function in HM3 patients and provided additional evidence on the negative effect of low pulsatility on vascular function after LVAS implantation. The results suggest that the artificial pulsatility of the HM3 does not avert the progression of endothelial dysfunction.

Approaches to improving exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular assist devices: an area requiring further investigation

Introduction: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has become a well-established treatment option for patients with end stage heart failure (HF) who are refractory to medical therapy. While LVADs implantation does effectively improve hemodynamic performance many patients still possess peripheral pathological adaptations often present in end-stage HF. Therefore, increased attention has been placed on investigating the effects of exercise training for patients with LVADs to improve clinical outcomes. However, the available evidence on exercise training for patients with LVADs is limited. Areas covered: The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize: 1) The evolution of LVAD technology and usage; 2) The physiological responses to exercise in patients with LVADs; 3) The available evidence regarding exercise training; 4) Potential strategies to implement exercise training programs for this patient population. Expert opinion: The available evidence for exercise training to improve physical function and clinical outcomes for patients with LVADs is promising but limited. Future research is needed to further elucidate the ideal exercise training parameters, method of delivery for exercise training, and unique barriers and facilitators to exercise training for patients receiving LVAD implantation.

Exercise physiology in chronic mechanical circulatory support patients: vascular function and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The majority of patients currently implanted with left ventricular assist devices have the expectation of support for more than 2 years. As a result, survival alone is no longer a sufficient distinctive for this technology, and there have been many studies within the last few years examining functional capacity and exercise outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite strong evidence for functional class improvements and increases in simple measures of walking distance, there remains incomplete normalization of exercise capacity, even in the presence of markedly improved resting hemodynamics. Reasons for this remain unclear. Despite current pumps being run at a fixed speed, it is widely recognized that pump outputs significantly increase with exercise. The mechanism of this increase involves the interaction between preload, afterload, and the intrinsic pump function curves. The role of the residual heart function is also important in determining total cardiac output, as well as whether the aortic valve opens with exercise. Interactions with the vasculature, with skeletal muscle blood flow and the state of the autonomic nervous system are also likely to be important contributors to exercise performance.

SUMMARY

Further studies examining optimization of pump function with active pump speed modulation and options for optimization of the overall patient condition are likely to be needed to allow left ventricular assist devices to be used with the hope of full functional physiological recovery.

The response of the microcirculation to mechanical support of the heart in critical illness

Critical illness associated with cardiac pump failure results in reduced tissue perfusion in all organs and occurs in various conditions such as sepsis, cardiogenic shock, and heart failure. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices can be used to maintain organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock and decompensated chronic heart failure. However, correction of global hemodynamic parameters by MCS does not always cause a parallel improvement in microcirculatory perfusion and oxygenation of the organ systems, a condition referred to as a loss of hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation (MC). In this paper, we review the literature describing hemodynamic coherence or loss occurring during MCS of the heart. By using Embase, Medline Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, we analyzed the literature on the response of MC and macrocirculation to MCS of the heart in critical illness. The characteristics of patients, MCS devices, and micro- and macrocirculatory parameters were very heterogenic. Short-term MCS studies (78%) described the effects of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) on the MC and macrocirculation. Improvement in MC, observed by handheld microscopy (orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS), sidestream dark-field (SDF), and Cytocam IDF imaging) in line with restored macrocirculation was found in 44% and 40% of the studies of short- and long-term MCS, respectively. In only 6 of 14 studies, hemodynamic coherence was described. It is concluded that more studies using direct visualization of the MC in short- and long-term MCS by handheld microscopy are needed, preferably randomized controlled studies, to identify the presence and clinical significance of hemodynamic coherence. It is anticipated that these further studies can enable to better identify patients who will benefit from treatment by mechanical heart support to ensure adequate organ perfusion.

New therapy, new challenges: The effects of long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device on inflammation

Surgically implanted continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are currently used in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). However, CF-LVAD therapy introduces a new set of complications and adverse events in these patients. Major adverse events with the CF-LVAD include right heart failure, vascular dysfunction, stroke, hepatic failure, and multi-organ failure, complications that may have inflammation as a common etiology. Our aim was to review the current evidence showing a relationship between these adverse events and elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers in CF-LVAD recipients.

Further Peripheral Vascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Role of Pulsatility

OBJECTIVES

Using flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia (RH), this study aimed to provide greater insight into left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-induced changes in peripheral vascular function.

BACKGROUND

Peripheral endothelial function is recognized to be impaired in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the peripheral vascular effects of continuous-flow LVAD implantation, now used as either a bridge to transplantation or as a destination therapy, remain unclear.

METHODS

Sixty-eight subjects (13 New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II HFrEF patients, 19 NYHA functional class III/IV HFrEF patients, 20 NYHA functional class III/IV HFrEF patients post-LVAD implantation, and 16 healthy age-matched control subjects) underwent FMD and RH testing in the brachial artery with blood flow velocity, artery diameters, and pulsatility index (PI) assessed by ultrasound Doppler.

RESULTS

PI was significantly lower in the LVAD group (2.0 ± 0.4) compared with both the HFrEF II (8.6 ± 0.8) and HFrEF III/IV (8.1 ± 0.9) patients, who, in turn, had significantly lower PI than the control subjects (12.8 ± 0.9). Likewise, LVAD %FMD/shear rate (0.09 ± 0.01 %Δ/s(-1)) was significantly reduced compared with all other groups (control subjects, 0.24 ± 0.03; HFrEF II, 0.17 ± 0.02; and HFrEF III/IV, 0.13 ± 0.02 %Δ/s(-1)), and %FMD/shear rate significantly correlated with PI (r = 0.45). RH was unremarkable across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although central hemodynamics are improved in patients with HFrEF by a continuous-flow LVAD, peripheral vascular function is further compromised, which is likely due, at least in part, to the reduction in pulsatility that is a characteristic of such a mechanical assist device.

Attenuation in peripheral endothelial function after continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy is associated with cardiovascular adverse events

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure (HF) have abnormal endothelial function. Although use of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) results in significant hemodynamic improvement, the effects on systemic endothelial function are unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighteen HF patients with CF-LVAD implantation were included in this prospective observational study. We measured reactive hyperemia index (RHI) before and after CF-LVAD implantation to evaluate sequential changes in endothelial function. Patients were followed clinically for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of death, thrombosis, bleeding, HF, renal failure, and arrhythmia. Preoperative RHI was 1.77±0.39. Early in the postoperative period (7-14 days after operation) RHI significantly decreased to 1.19±0.31 (P<0.001, compared with preoperative RHI). At first and second follow-up (4-6 weeks and 3-7 months after operation) RHI remained lower at 1.48±0.50 (P=0.030) and 1.26±0.37 (P=0.002), respectively, compared with preoperative RHI. The decrease in early postoperative RHI relative to preoperative RHI was significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular events after CF-LVAD (age-adjusted risk ratio for 0.25 decrease in RHI, 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.62, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral endothelial function had a significant and persistent decline up to 5 months following implantation of CF-LVAD, and this decline was associated with adverse cardiovascular events. These findings may provide insight into some of the vascular complications following CF-LVAD in HF patients.

Sexual function in patients supported with left ventricular assist device and with heart transplant

AIMS

Sexual dysfunction is common among patients with heart failure (HF) and considered an important hamper to quality of life. While implantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may prolong and improve life in advanced HF, limited data are available on its impact on sexual function. The aim of this study is to evaluate sexual function in LVAD patients and compare this with patients after heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sexual activity and satisfaction of stable patients with durable LVAD or after HTx were evaluated using a validated questionnaire and visual analogue scale from 0 to 10. Data were collected from 31 patients (mean age 59 ± 12 years, 87% male), 17 after HTx and 14 with LVAD. Pleasure or satisfaction with sex was significantly higher in HTx patients (P = 0.0005). In total, 29% LVAD patients and 71% HTx patients reported content with sexual activity. Recalled satisfaction with sex life pre-operation was comparable between the groups. During support, satisfaction with sex life using visual analogue scale was 7.6 ± 3.1 for HTx versus 3.9 ± 4.0 for LVAD patients (P = 0.017). In total, 11 LVAD patients (79%) reported specific problems in sexual function including erectile dysfunction or vaginal dryness (8, 57%); problems with the LVAD, cable, or batteries (5, 36%); problems with orgasm (4,29%); and other problems such as fear of injury, feeling depressed, partner issues, self-image, and pain (1, 7% each).

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction occurs in patients with LVAD support and may be more prominent than after HTx. Problems limiting sexual function related to physiological, psychological, and equipment merit consideration during follow-up.

Systolic blood pressure on discharge after left ventricular assist device insertion is associated with subsequent stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a significant complication in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) and hypertension is a significant risk factor for stroke, but the association between blood pressure and stroke in LVAD patients is not well characterized.

METHODS

We identified 275 consecutive patients who survived implant hospitalization between January 2005 and April 2013. Patients were grouped according to systolic blood pressure (SBP) as above a median and below a median of 100 mm Hg by their averaged systolic blood pressure during the 48 hours before discharge from implantation hospitalization. The groups were compared for the primary outcome of time to stroke.

RESULTS

The above-median SBP group had mean SBP of 110 mm Hg and the below-median SBP group had mean SBP of 95 mm Hg. There were no significant between-group differences in body mass index, smoking, vascular disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, or prior stroke. During a mean follow-up of 16 months, stroke occurred in 16% of the above-median SBP group vs in 7% of the below-median SBP group (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-5.11), with a similar proportion of hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes in each group. In Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, diabetes, or prior stroke, the hazard ratio remained statistically significant. SBP as a continuous variable predictor of stroke had an area under the curve of 0.64 in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, CF-LVAD cohort, elevated SBP was independently associated with a greater risk of subsequent stroke. These results identify management of hypertension as a potential modifiable risk factor for reducing the incidence of stroke in patients supported by CF-LVAD.

Left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation

Heart failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting over five million patients in the United States. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have become the standard of care for patients with end stage heart failure. This review highlights the current state of LVAD as a bridge to transplant (BTT) in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS).

Identification of differentially expressed transcripts and pathways in blood one week and six months following implant of left ventricular assist devices

Introduction

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. The short- and long-term impact of these devices on peripheral blood gene expression has not been characterized, and may provide insight into the molecular pathways mediated in response to left ventricular remodeling and an improvement in overall systemic circulation. We performed RNA sequencing to identify genes and pathways influenced by these devices.

Methods

RNA was extracted from blood of 9 heart failure patients (8 male) prior to LVAD implantation, and at 7 and 180 days postoperatively. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 and sequences mapped to the human Ensembl GRCh37.67 genome assembly.

Results

A specific set of genes involved in regulating cellular immune response, antigen presentation, and T cell activation and survival were down-regulated 7 days after LVAD placement. 6 months following LVAD placement, the expression levels of these genes were significantly increased; yet importantly, remained significantly lower than age and sex-matched samples from healthy controls.

Conclusions

In summary, this genomic analysis identified a significant decrease in the expression of genes that promote a healthy immune response in patients with heart failure that was partially restored 6 months following LVAD implant.

Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

OBJECTIVES

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have become the standard of care for patients with heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplant. However, data on long-term post-transplant survival for these patients are limited. We evaluated the effect of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on postcardiac transplant survival in the current era.

METHODS

All patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant at a single center from June 2005 to September 2011 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 167 patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant, 77 (46%) underwent cardiac transplantation, 27 died before transplantation (16%), and 63 (38%) remain listed for transplantation and continued with left ventricular assist device support. The mean age of the transplanted patients was 54.5 ± 11.9 years, 57% had an ischemic etiology, and 20% were women. The overall mean duration of left ventricular assist device support before transplantation was 310 ± 227 days (range, 67-1230 days). The mean duration of left ventricular assist device support did not change in patients who had received a left ventricular assist device in the early period of the study (2005-2008, n = 62) compared with those who had received a left ventricular assist device later (2009-2011, n = 78, 373 vs 392 days, P = NS). In addition, no difference was seen in survival between those patients supported with a left ventricular assist device for fewer than 180 days or longer than 180 days before transplantation (P = NS). The actuarial survival after transplantation at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 98.7%, 93.0%, 91.1%, and 88.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term post-transplant survival for patients bridged with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in the current era has been excellent. Furthermore, the duration of left ventricular assist device support did not affect post-transplant survival. The hemodynamic benefits of ventricular unloading with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices, in addition to their durability and reduced patient morbidity, have contributed to improved post-transplant survival.