The effect of orlistat on weight reduction in obese and overweight Korean patients

Orlistat for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: an eight-week multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Weight gain and metabolic disorders are commonly induced by antipsychotics. Orlistat is a lipase inhibitor used for weight control. The effect of orlistat on weight gain and metabolic disturbances in people (especially women) treated with antipsychotics has not been sufficiently studied. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of orlistat in mitigating antipsychotic-induced weight gain and abnormal glycolipid metabolism.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder with a weight gain ≥ 7% after taking antipsychotics were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups: one received eight weeks of orlistat (360 mg/day) and the other received a placebo. Anthropometric and fasting serum biochemical parameters were measured at baseline, week 4 and week 8.

RESULTS

Sixty individuals (orlistat:placebo = 32:28) participated in the study. After controlling for the study center, the eight-week changes in body mass index (BMI), cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-CH) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CH) were significantly different between the groups. According to the mixed linear models, CHOL and LDL-CH were significantly lower in the orlistat group than in the control group at week 8. The week 0-to-8 slopes of BMI, CHOL and LDL-CH were also significantly lower in the orlistat group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that orlistat is an effective intervention for attenuating weight gain and serum lipid disturbances in antipsychotic-treated patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03451734.

Effectiveness and safety of drugs for obesity

Recent publicity around the use of new antiobesity medications (AOMs) has focused the attention of patients and healthcare providers on the role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of obesity. Newer drug treatments have shown greater efficacy and safety compared with older drug treatments, yet access to these drug treatments is limited by providers' discomfort in prescribing, bias, and stigma around obesity, as well as by the lack of insurance coverage. Now more than ever, healthcare providers must be able to discuss the risks and benefits of the full range of antiobesity medications available to patients, and to incorporate both guideline based advice and emerging real world clinical evidence into daily clinical practice. The tremendous variability in response to antiobesity medications means that clinicians need to use a flexible approach that takes advantage of specific features of the antiobesity medication selected to provide the best option for individual patients. Future research is needed on how best to use available drug treatments in real world practice settings, the potential role of combination therapies, and the cost effectiveness of antiobesity medications. Several new drug treatments are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, suggesting that the future for pharmacotherapy of obesity is bright.

Effect of Teneligliptin 20 mg Twice Daily on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Levels and Its Influence on Non-Glycemic Components in Non-Diabetic Obese Individuals

Background and Aims: Teneligliptin is an oral antidiabetic agent, it can persevere glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) by inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase enzyme. In addition, it has rare incidence of hypoglycemia. Hence, this study aimed to test the effect of teneligliptin 20 mg twice daily along with low carbohydrate diet and physical exercise on change of body weight and insulin resistance in nondiabetic obese subjects. Materials and Methods: It is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study carried out at outpatient department of an endocrinology hospital over the period of 48 weeks. Teneligliptin 20 mg twice daily 30 min before food (low carbohydrate diet [LCD]) with regular physical exercise, and control group was kept with placebo twice daily 30 min before food LCD with regular physical exercise. This study was registered in clinical trial registry of India [CTRI/2020/02/023329]. Results: A total of 150 nondiabetic obese subjects were randomized into test (n = 75) and control groups (n = 75). At the end of 48 weeks there was significant improvement in GLP-1, simplified nutrition assessment questionnaire (SNAQ) score, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides (TG), and body weight. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval of GLP-1 (pg/mL) was 76.42 (44.42-148.41) (P = 0.37); SNAQ score, -1.64 (-2.48 to -0.81) (P = 0.000); HOMA-IR, -0.9 (-0.59 to -0.38) (P = 0.000); TG (mg/dL) -29.37 (-44.46 to -14.07) (P = 0.000); reduction of body weight (kilograms) -3.09 (-6.11 to -0.07) (P = 0.043). Conclusion: Findings of this study reveals that teneligliptin-treated group showed significant improvement in GLP-1 levels, reduced insulin resistance, body weight, TG, appetite, and metabolic syndrome. Teneligliptin is well tolerated, except in upper respiratory tract infections. CTR number: CTRI/2020/02/023329.

Effectiveness, persistence of use, and safety of orlistat and liraglutide in a group of patients with obesity

BACKGROUND

To determine the effectiveness, persistence of use, adverse reactions, interactions of orlistat and liraglutide taken for weight loss by a group of obese patients in Colombia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study of a cohort of patients with obesity treated with orlistat or liraglutide. Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables were identified. The effectiveness for weight loss at 12-16 and 52 weeks, persistence of use, and safety were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were followed up. At 12-16 weeks after starting orlistat and liraglutide, weight losses of -1.2kg (p=0.002) and -4.1kg (p<0.001) were observed, respectively, and at 52 weeks, reductions of -1.6kg (p=0.208) and -7.8kg (p<0.001) were observed. A total of 8.8% and 31.3% of patients treated with orlistat and liraglutide, respectively, persisted with treatment 1 year after initiation. A total of 17.3% had adverse drug reactions. Older adults with grade II or III obesity who performed physical activity and those treated with liraglutide were more likely to have lost at least 5% of their body weight at 12-16 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Orlistat and liraglutide users presented weight loss at 12-16 weeks. However, this effect was greater and sustained with liraglutide, especially when combined with physical activity.

Clinical outcomes associated with anti-obesity medications in real-world practice: A systematic literature review

Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are efficacious and well tolerated in randomized controlled trials, but findings may not be generalizable to routine clinical practice. This systematic literature review aimed to identify real-world (RW) evidence for AOMs to treat adults ( ≥ 18 years) with obesity or overweight (BMI  ≥  27 kg/m² ). Searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of relevant FDA-approved AOMs yielded 41 publications. Weight loss (WL) was consistently observed, with 14% to 58.6% of patients achieving ≥ 5% WL on orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, phentermine, or liraglutide in studies of 3-6 months' duration where this was measured. When cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed, AOMs reduced or had no impact on blood pressure, lipids, or glycemia. RW data on the impact of AOMs on existing obesity-related comorbidities and mortality were generally lacking. AOMs were associated with various adverse events, but these were of mild to moderate severity and no unexpected safety signals were reported. A pattern of poor adherence and persistence with AOMs was observed across studies. Overall, the review confirmed the effectiveness of AOMs in RW settings but demonstrated large gaps in the evidence base.

Effectiveness and tolerability of orlistat and liraglutide in patients with obesity in a real-world setting: The XENSOR Study

AIMS

To evaluate in a real-world setting the effectiveness of two drugs, orlistat and liraglutide, in patients with overweight or obesity and insufficient weight loss (WL) after a lifestyle modification programme.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes of orlistat 120 mg three times a day and liraglutide (up to 3 mg daily) in adult patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² or ≥27 kg/m² with at least a weight-related comorbidity who had failed to lose at least 5% of their weight after 6 months of lifestyle modification. The co-primary end-points, assessed at 3-6 months and at the end of the follow-up, were weight change from baseline, proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of their baseline weight and adjusted differences in WL between both drugs.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients, 400 in the group of orlistat (age 47.0, weight 107.8 kg) and 100 in the group of liraglutide (age 51.9 years, weight 105.1 kg), were included. Treatment with both drugs significantly reduced weight, fasting plasma glucose, systolic BP, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and alanine transaminase over a median follow-up period of 7 months. WL with liraglutide (-7.7 kg) was significantly greater than that observed with orlistat (-3.3 kg), and more individuals lost at least 5% of their baseline weight with liraglutide (64.7%) than with orlistat (27.4%). Rates of prediabetes significantly decreased with liraglutide in comparison to orlistat.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, liraglutide showed a greater effectiveness in WL compared with orlistat and improved several obesity-associated metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors.

Chinese herbal medicine for obesity: a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, prospective trial

Obesity is a serious medical problem worldwide. As a holistic therapy, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may have a potential in obesity management. In this controlled trial, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of xin-ju-xiao-gao-fang (XJXGF), a TCM herbal formulation, in 140 obese subjects over a 24-week period. The XJXGF formula mainly consists of rhubarb, coptis, semen cassia, and citrus aurantium. Subjects with body mass index (BMI) 28-40 kg/m(2) were recruited at 5 centers in China. We assessed the changes in subjects' body weight, its related parameters, and the reduction of insulin resistance (IR) after administration of XJXGF formula or low-dose XJXGF (10% of the XJXGF formula, as control). After 24-week treatment, among participants in the XJXGF formula group and low-dose XJXGF group, the mean ± SE changes in the body weight were -3.58 ± 0.48 and -1.91 ± 0.38 kg, respectively (p < 0.01). The changes in the IR-index of two groups were -2.65 ± 1.04 and -1.58 ± 1.3, respectively (p < 0 .05). There were no serious adverse events reported during the 24-week trial. Participants reported 7 minor adverse events, 4 in the XJXGF formula group and 3 in the low-dose XJXGF group (p = 0.578). Future studies are needed to investigate the clinical utility of this TCM formulation in the treatment of obese subjects.