A very rare case of breast cancer in a female-to-male transsexual

[Transmasculine people: Gender affirming hormonal therapy, sexual and reproductive health prevention and care, a medical review and follow-up suggestions]

Transmasculine individuals have a poor access to health care, mostly regarding the sexual and reproductive health. Despite a lack of official guidelines, they need a gynecological follow-up, the aim of this review was to describe it. The present study involved an exhaustive search of MEDLINE, 68 articles were included to analyze the impact of hormonal therapy, prevention, and care regarding sexual and reproductive health of transmasculine individuals. Despite a lack of solid data, the global literature agrees that transmasculine individuals require sexual and reproductive health care. Care must be adapted to each pathway and may be impacted by gender-affirming care. The cancer risk does not seem to be increased in this population, particularly in relation to hormonal therapy. Prevention programs do not differ from those offered to cis women in the absence of gender-affirming surgeries. Transmasculine individuals require follow-up and care adapted to their needs and their pathways. Healthcare professionals must be trained to provide such care.

Systematic Review on Gender-Affirming Testosterone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Challenge for Physicians Treating Patients from Transgender and Gender-Diverse Populations

Conflicting evidence exists about the risk of breast cancer in transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients treated with testosterone. This review aimed to summarize current knowledge regarding the risk of breast cancer associated with gender-affirming testosterone treatment (GATT). A systematic literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist was conducted in January 2023 through Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. English-language, peer-reviewed articles evaluating breast cancer in TGD patients after GATT that met the inclusion criteria were included. This review included 22 articles, with 14 case reports, 4 case series, and 4 retrospective cohort studies. The review identified 26 TGD patients who developed breast cancer post-GATT therapy, with inconclusive evidence on the relationship between testosterone and the risk of breast cancer in TGD patients. This uncertainty in part arises from the mechanisms governing testosterone's effects within breast tissue, with contrasting theories proposing both proliferative and antiproliferative impacts. Considering this ambiguity, it is imperative for healthcare providers to engage in informed discussions with patients prior to initiating hormone therapy to discuss potential adverse effects, including the possibility of breast cancer development in TGD individuals. Patient education and shared decision-making are essential components of responsible care in this context.

Breast Cancer Screening Referral Patterns and Compliance in Transgender Male Patients

Purpose

Screening guidelines for breast cancer (BC) in transgender male (TM) patients are not well defined. This study describes referral patterns and compliance with referral for BC screening among TM patients receiving care at a tertiary care center.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of TM patients, 40-74 years of age, presenting for care between 2017 and 2020. The electronic medical record was queried for medical history and cancer screening data. Compliance with referral and screening was defined as occurring within 2 years of when screening would be expected.

Results

Of the 266 patients identified, 45 met inclusion criteria. One (2.2%) had a history of BC, 0 (0%) had hereditary BC risk, and 11 (24.4%) had a family history of BC. Of the patients, 18 (40%) were referred for BC screening, of whom 13 (72.2%) were compliant with screening. Ten (55.6%) were referred by a primary care provider, 2 (11.1%) were referred by a transgender medicine specialist, and 6 (33.3%) were referred by both. Of the cohort, 27 (60%) had undergone masculinizing mastectomy. Six (22.2%) of these patients were referred for screening, of whom 0 (0%) had pre-screening clinical findings indicating need for screening. Of the 18 (40%) patients who had not undergone masculinizing mastectomy, 12 (66.7%) were referred for BC screening.

Conclusions

There was heterogeneity in referral patterns for BC screening between TM patients who had undergone masculinizing mastectomy and those who had not. BC screening guidelines should be established for TM patients who have undergone masculinizing mastectomy.

Aspects to consider regarding breast cancer risk in trans men: A systematic review and risk management approach

BACKGROUND

The risk of breast cancer in trans men is currently a poorly understood subject and trans men likely carries a different level of risk from that of cis women.

AIM

This review aims to review several aspects that affects breast cancer risk in trans men and to apply the Swiss cheese model to highlight these risks. The study takes its cue from a systematic review of all described breast cancer cases in trans men following medical or surgical intervention because of gender dysphoria.

METHODS

PubMed was systematically searched on the 14th of March 2023 to find all published cases of breast cancer following chest contouring surgery in trans men. Included articles had to involve trans men, the diagnosis of breast cancer had to be preceded by either a medical or surgical intervention related to gender dysphoria, and cases needed to involve invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Articles were excluded if gender identity in the case subject was unclear and/or a full English version of the report was unavailable. Quality and risk of bias was evaluated using the GRADE protocol. A literature review of specific risk altering aspects in this population followed. The Swiss cheese model was employed to present a risk analysis and to propose ways of managing this risk.

RESULTS

28 cases of breast cancer in trans men have been published. The Swiss cheese model identified several weaknesses associated with methods of preventing breast cancer in trans men.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study may highlight the difficulties with managing risk factors concerning breast cancer in trans men to clinicians not encountering this patient group frequently.

CONCLUSION

This review finds that evidence for most aspects concerning breast cancer in trans men are inadequate, which supports the establishment of a risk-management approach to breast cancer in trans men.

Complexities in Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer in Female-to-Male Transgender Patients

Introduction

Managing breast cancer in female-to-male (FtM) transgender patients is complicated and challenging. Androgens play a crucial role in the development of secondary sexual identity in FtM transgender patients, but their effectiveness in breast cancer remains unclear. Furthermore, the considerations for adjuvant endocrine therapy in this population are highly intricate and warrant thorough discussion.

Case Presentation

We describe the case of a 44-year-old FtM transgender diagnosed with breast cancer 3 years after initiating androgen receptor agonist therapy as part of his gender identity transition. After mastectomy, adjuvant endocrine therapy was initiated, consisting of a combination of an aromatase inhibitor and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, along with a cross-sex hormone.

Conclusion

Estradiol levels were significantly reduced, and male-typical levels of sex hormones were attained.

Cancer screening and management in the transgender population: Review of literature and special considerations for gender affirmation surgery

BACKGROUND

Literature focused on cancer screening and management is lacking in the transgender population.

AIM

To action to increase contributions to the scientific literature that drives the creation of cancer screening and management protocols for transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed on January 5th, 2022, with the following terms: "TGNC", OR "transgender", OR "gender non-conforming", OR "gender nonbinary" AND "cancer screening", AND "breast cancer", AND "cervical cancer", AND "uterine cancer", AND "ovarian cancer", AND "prostate cancer", AND "testicular cancer", AND "surveillance", AND "follow-up", AND "management". 70 unique publications were used. The findings are discussed under "Screening" and "Management" categories.

RESULTS

Screening: Current cancer screening recommendations default to cis-gender protocols. However, long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy and loss to follow-up from the gender-specific specialties contribute to a higher risk for cancer development and possible delayed detection. The only known screening guidelines made specifically for this population are from the American College of Radiology for breast cancer. Management: Prior to undergoing Gender Affirmation Surgery (GAS), discussion should address cancer screening and management in the organs remaining in situ. Cancer treatment in this population requires consideration for chemotherapy, radiation, surgery and/or reconstruction. Modification of hormone therapy is decided on a case-by-case basis. The use of prophylactic vs aesthetic techniques in surgery is still debated.

CONCLUSION

When assessing transgender individuals for GAS, a discussion on the future oncologic risk of the sex-specific organs remaining in situ is essential. Cancer management in this population requires a multidisciplinary approach while the care should be highly individualized with considerations to social, medical, surgical and gender affirming surgery related specifications. Special considerations have to be made during planning for GAS as surgery will alter the anatomy and may render the organ difficult to sample for screening purposes. A discussion with the patient regarding the oncologic risk of remaining organs is imperative prior to GAS. Other special considerations to screening such as the conscious or unconscious will to unassociated with their remaining organs is also a key point to address. We currently lack high quality studies pertinent to the cancer topic in the gender affirmation literature. Further research is required to ensure more comprehensive and individualized care for this population.

Risk and incidence of breast cancer in transgender individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The risk of developing breast cancer in transgender individuals [male-to-female (MtF) or female-to-male (FtM)] is still inadequately quantified. We aimed to evaluate the impact of breast cancer in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search and review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines through the PUBMED and SCOPUS databases. We identified six cohort studies (for both populations) plus 35 case reports. Incidence and breast cancer risk quantification were the main outcomes considered.

RESULTS

FtM individuals had a higher risk of developing breast cancer in comparison to cisgender men [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 63.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 32.2-124.9] but a lower risk than cisgender women (SIR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.07-2.41). Similarly, MtF individuals were at higher risk of developing breast cancer in comparison to cisgender men (SIR = 22.5; 95% CI, 5.54-91.8) and at lower risk than cisgender women (SIR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.42).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic study and meta-analysis, we identified that FtM and MtF individuals are at substantially higher risk of developing breast cancer in comparison to cisgender men, though at lower risk than cisgender women. These individuals, in the absence of defined guidelines for breast cancer prevention, should periodically undergo breast or chest examinations.

Gender-affirming hormonal therapy for transgender and gender-diverse people-A narrative review

As the number of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people accessing gender-affirming care increases, the need for healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) also increases. This chapter provides an overview of the HCPs interested in getting involved in providing GAHT.

The Impact of Exogenous Testosterone on Breast Cancer Risk in Transmasculine Individuals

BACKGROUND

Exogenous testosterone is vital to gender-affirming therapy for transmasculine individuals. Testosterone may be implicated in breast cancer (BCa) because it can activate androgen and estrogen receptors. To further explore this risk, we performed a systematic review to investigate the impact of exogenous testosterone on BCa risk in transmasculine individuals.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/Embase for clinical and preclinical studies assessing BCa and testosterone therapy and screened 6125 articles independently. We ascertained level of evidence using a modified tool from Cook et al (Chest. 1992;102:305S-311S) and risk of bias using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies were included. Epidemiological data suggested that BCa incidence was higher in transmasculine individuals compared with cisgender men but lower compared with cisgender women. Histological studies of transmasculine breast tissue samples also demonstrated a low incidence of precancerous lesions. Interestingly, cases demonstrated that BCa occurred at a younger average age in transmasculine individuals and was predominantly hormone receptor positive. The mechanism for BCa in transmasculine individuals may be related to androgen receptor stimulation or conversion to estradiol. Serum studies reported varied estradiol levels associated with exogenous testosterone. Animal and in vitro studies demonstrated that testosterone was growth inhibitory but may induce proliferation at higher doses or with low estradiol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic surgeons play a critical role in providing gender-affirming care for transmasculine patients. The limited studies available suggest that this patient population has decreased risk for BCa when compared with cisgender women; however, any BCa that does occur may have different clinical presentations and underlying mechanisms compared with cisgender women and men. Overall, the limitations for clinical studies and discrepancies among preclinical studies warrant further investigation.

Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast in a Transgender Man: A Case Report

There is limited literature about breast cancer in the transgender population. Very little is known about how gender-affirming hormone therapy affects their breast cancer risk. On the other end, for those diagnosed with breast cancer, there are no clinical guidelines to manage their breast cancer, specifically, how to manage their gender-affirming hormone therapy during breast cancer treatment. Here, we report a 52-year-old transman diagnosed with a grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma (ER+/PR+/HER2-), and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of intermediate grade. We discussed his risk factors as well as treatment options.

Reproductive Organ Pathology of Individuals Undergoing Gender-Affirming Surgery

As gender-affirming surgeries become more routine, it is increasingly important for pathologists to recognize the expected histologic changes seen in various tissues secondary to gender-affirming hormone therapy. For example, exogenous testosterone-related squamous atrophy or transitional cell metaplasia of the cervix may be confused for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. In addition to distinguishing between benign and dysplastic/malignant features, pathologists should be mindful of the phrasing of their reports and aim to use objective, nongendered language.

The Incidence of Breast Cancer After Gender-Affirming Mastectomy in Transmen

BACKGROUND

The incidence of breast cancer in transmale patients and their continued risk after gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) has not been well established. Plastic surgeons who offer GAM are often one of the few medical professionals sought out by this population, placing them in a unique position to not only deliver surgical care but also improve access to preventative cancer care.

METHODS

We reviewed the senior author's experience with GAMs over the past 5 years for any incidence of breast cancer noted after or at time of surgery. We subsequently performed a thorough review of the literature for cases of breast cancer in transmen, to provide a comprehensive overview of screening, therapy, and postoperative surveillance practices.

RESULTS

We identified 2 cases of breast cancer (ages 49 and 54 years) found on routine examination of pathology specimens after GAM at our institution. Both patients had been taking hormone therapy for the past 1 year. Pathology specimen revealed low-grade estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ in 1 patient, and estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma in the other. Both patients were referred to oncology for appropriate treatment, and both elected to continue their exogenous hormone therapy for personal reasons.Review of the literature demonstrated 36 other cases of documented breast cancer in transmen. Sixty-seven percent (24) were found after GAM, and of those, 50% were incidentally found on pathology specimen. At least 50% were found to be either estrogen-, progesterone-, or androgen receptor-positive cancers. At least 17% of cases documented continued use of masculinizing hormone therapy after cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most documented cases of breast cancer in transmen were diagnosed after gender-affirming surgery, which would suggest residual breast tissue does pose some risk for breast cancer. In addition, those diagnosed with cancer may elect to continue exogenous testosterone therapy despite potential added risks with hormone-receptor positivity. These cases highlight the need for agreement in current screening practices, surgical recommendations, and continuation of masculinizing hormone therapy.Plastic surgeons have the unique opportunity to educate these patients on appropriate breast cancer-related surveillance both before and after chest surgery.

Pathological Evaluation of Breast Specimens in Transgender Chest Masculinization: Incidental Findings and Effect of Prior Chest Binding and Androgen Therapy in 74 Consecutive Patients

Background: The rate of masculinizing chest surgery for gender affirmation continues to increase. With a paucity of literature on pathological evaluation of breast specimens in this patient population, there is a need for these data and for protocols on the handling of these specimens. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed between 2015 and 2020 on all patients who underwent chest masculinization surgery for gender dysphoria by the senior author (J.D.K.). Inclusion criteria were any patient with sex assigned female at birth who underwent removal of breast and/or nipple areolar complex tissue for gender affirmation. Patient demographics were recorded. Bilateral breast tissue was sent for routine pathology in all cases and findings were recorded. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Seventy-four consecutive patients and 148 breast specimen reports were identified from a database and included in the study. The mean age was 26 years (15-49). Thirty-nine patients had a known history of chest wall binding and 60 patients had undergone preoperative androgen therapy. There was no invasive or in situ carcinoma found in any breast tissue specimens. Thirty-four patients had a benign lesion in one or both breast specimens. Atypical lobular hyperplasia was found in one patient's specimen. A history of chest wall binding was not correlated with any benign lesions (p=0.79) or stromal fibrosis (p=0.94). A history of testosterone use was not correlated with any benign lesions (p=0.35) or stromal fibrosis (p=0.20). Conclusions: The prevalence (1.4%) of significant breast pathology and of benign findings (46%) in our study closely correlates with the rates in the literature. We found no correlation between significant breast pathology or benign lesions and a history of chest wall binding or preoperative androgen therapy. We recommend all breast specimens removed during chest masculinization surgery be sent for pathological evaluation.

A Dual-Surgeon Approach to Breast Cancer Surgery in a Transmale

ABSTRACT

With increasing numbers of gender-affirming chest surgery, new questions regarding breast cancer management and surgical practice arise. Guided by our case report, we present a comprehensive review of breast cancer surgery in a transman to educate both plastic and breast surgeons on various factors to consider when caring for these patients.Our case involves a 31-year-old transmale patient who presented for plastic surgery consultation for gender-affirming mastectomy but was subsequently found to have a right breast mass. This is the first case in the literature of a transmale on hormone therapy with breast cancer interested in gender-affirming surgery, thus requiring a dual-surgeon approach for oncologic and gender-affirming mastectomy. With a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach involving breast surgery, plastic surgery, medical oncology, and radiology, we devised a surgical plan to safely remove his breast tissue with consideration for his gender-affirming goals. He underwent a right skin-sparing mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy and left prophylactic skin-sparing mastectomy through skin markings by the plastic surgeon, with bilateral free nipple grafts. Final pathology confirmed estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma with clear margins and negative sentinel node. The patient did not require adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation but was started on adjuvant hormone therapy targeting his hormone receptor positive cancer. He elected to stay on low-dose masculinizing hormone therapy with continued surveillance examinations.We follow our case with a review of the current literature involving breast cancer in transmales to explore current screening practices, surgical recommendations, adjuvant therapies, continuation of masculinizing hormone therapy, and postoperative surveillance guidelines in the hopes of informing plastic surgeons in having these discussions with their transmale patients and thus improving informed cancer care for this population.

A Review of Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Adolescents and Young Adults

Simple Summary

Cancer diagnosed in patients between the ages of 15 and 39 deserves special consideration. Diagnoses within this cohort of adolescents and young adults include childhood cancers which present at an older age than expected, or an early presentation of cancers that are typically observed in older adults, such as breast cancer. Cancers within this age group are associated with worse disease-free and overall survival rates, and the incidence of these cases are rising. Knowing an individual’s susceptibility to disease can change their clinical management and allow for the risk-testing of relatives. This review discusses the risk factors that contribute to breast cancer in this unique cohort of patients, including inherited genetic risk factors, as well as environmental and lifestyle factors. We also describe risk models that allow clinicians to quantify a patient’s lifetime risk of developing disease.

Abstract

Cancer in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) deserves special consideration for several reasons. AYA cancers encompass paediatric malignancies that present at an older age than expected, or early-onset of cancers that are typically observed in adults. However, disease diagnosed in the AYA population is distinct to those same cancers which are diagnosed in a paediatric or older adult setting. Worse disease-free and overall survival outcomes are observed in the AYA setting, and the incidence of AYA cancers is increasing. Knowledge of an individual’s underlying cancer predisposition can influence their clinical care and may facilitate early tumour surveillance strategies and cascade testing of at-risk relatives. This information can further influence reproductive decision making. In this review we discuss the risk factors contributing to AYA breast cancer, such as heritable predisposition, environmental, and lifestyle factors. We also describe a number of risk models which incorporate genetic factors that aid clinicians in quantifying an individual’s lifetime risk of disease.

Histologic Findings in Surgical Pathology Specimens From Individuals Taking Masculinizing Hormone Therapy for the Purpose of Gender Transition: A Systematic Scoping Review

CONTEXT.—

Transgender men and transmasculine persons experience a discordance between the female sex they were assigned at birth and their gender. They may choose to take hormone therapy and/or undergo surgery to masculinize the body. Understanding the common (and less common) histologic changes present in patients taking masculinizing hormones will empower pathologists to better serve this unique patient population.

OBJECTIVE.—

To summarize histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from persons taking masculinizing hormones as a part of gender transition.

DATA SOURCES.—

A systematic review of the OVID Medline and PubMed databases was performed to identify all studies describing histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from transgender men from January 1946 to January 2021.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Publication in this area has markedly increased in the last 2 decades. However, most of the studies identified were descriptive and case reports describing changes seen in specimens removed as a part of masculinizing surgical procedures. Benign histologic findings include stromal hyalinization and epithelial atrophy in the breast, polycystic ovarian syndrome-like changes in the ovary, and transitional cell metaplasia in the cervix. The most commonly reported neoplastic finding was adenocarcinoma of the breast, with rare cases of ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vaginal, pituitary, pancreatic, and cardiovascular neoplasia also reported. Ongoing research in this area is needed to better characterize the histologic findings in persons taking masculinizing hormones to provide a deeper understanding of the effect of these treatments on different tissues and facilitate better patient management.

Oncologic Considerations for Safe Gender-Affirming Mastectomy: Preoperative Imaging, Pathologic Evaluation, Counseling, and Long-Term Screening

SUMMARY

There remain significant gaps in the evidence-based care of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy with regard to implications for breast cancer development and screening. The current clinical evidence does not demonstrate an increased risk of breast cancer secondary to testosterone therapy in transgender patients. Gender-affirmation mastectomy techniques vary significantly with regard to the amount of residual breast tissue left behind, which has unknown implications for the incidence of postoperative breast cancer and need for screening. Subcutaneous mastectomy should aim to remove all gross breast parenchyma, although this is limited in certain techniques. Tissue specimens should also be routinely sent for pathologic analysis. Several cases of incidental breast cancer after subcutaneous mastectomy have been described. There is little evidence on the need for or types of postoperative cancer screening. Chest awareness is an important concept for patients that have undergone subcutaneous mastectomies, as clinical examination remains the most common reported method of postmastectomy malignancy detection. In patients with greater known retained breast tissue, such as those with circumareolar or pedicled techniques, consideration may be given to alternative imaging modalities, although the efficacy and cost-utility of these techniques must still be proven. Preoperative patient counseling on the risk of breast cancer after gender-affirming mastectomy in addition to the unknown implications of residual breast tissue and long-term androgen exposure is critical. Patient awareness and education play an important role in shared decision-making, as further research is needed to define standards of medical and oncologic care in this population.

Breast Cancer Risk and Screening in Transgender Persons: A Call for Inclusive Care

The Society of Surgical Oncology is committed to reducing health disparities adversely affecting sexual and gender minorities. Transgender persons represent a socially disadvantaged group who frequently experience discrimination and receive disparate care, resulting in suboptimal cancer outcomes. The rate of breast cancer development in transgender individuals differs from rates observed in their cisgender counterparts, however there is little evidence to quantify these differences and guide evidence-based screening and prevention. There is no consensus for breast cancer screening guidelines in transgender patients. In this review, we discuss barriers to equitable breast cancer care, risk factors for breast cancer development, and existing data to support breast cancer screening in transgender men and women.

Testosterone therapy and breast histopathological features in transgender individuals

Testosterone therapy (TT) is administered to enhance masculinization in transgender individuals. The long-term effect of exogenous testosterone on breast tissues remains unclear. Our study evaluated the modulation of breast morphology by TT in transgender individuals with special attention to duration of TT. We reviewed 447 breast surgical specimens from gender affirming chest-contouring surgery, and compared histopathological findings including degree of lobular atrophy, and atypical and non-atypical proliferations between subjects who did (n = 367) and did not (n = 79) receive TT. TT for one patient was unknown. TT for >12 months was associated with seven histopathological features. Longer duration of TT was significantly associated with higher degrees of lobular atrophy (p < 0.001). This relationship remained significant after accounting for age at surgery, ethnicity, body mass index, and presurgical oophorectomy (adjusted p < 0.001). Four types of lesions were more likely to be absent in breast tissues exposed to longer durations of TT: cysts (median = 16.2 months; p < 0.01; adjusted p = 0.01), fibroadenoma (median = 14.8 months; p = 0.02; adjusted p = 0.07), pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (median = 17.0 months; p < 0.001; adjusted p < 0.001), and papillomas (median = 14.7 months; p = 0.04; adjusted p = 0.20). Columnar cell change and mild inflammation were also less likely to occur in subjects receiving TT (p < 0.05), but were not linked to the duration of TT. Atypia and ductal carcinoma in situ were detected in 11 subjects (2.5%) all of whom received TT ranging from 10.1 to 64.1 months. The incidental findings of high-risk lesions and carcinoma as well as the risk of cancer in residual breast tissue after chest-contouring surgery warrant the consideration of culturally sensitive routine breast cancer screening protocols for transgender men and masculine-centered gender nonconforming individuals. Long-term follow-up studies and molecular investigations are needed to understand the breast cancer risk of transgender individuals who receive TT.

Testosterone therapy and risk of breast cancer development: a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to conduct a systematic review of the literature, document all reported cases of breast cancer development in cis men and female-to-male (FtM) transgender men undergoing testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), and determine if testosterone poses a substantial risk of breast cancer development and recurrence.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search through December 2019 was performed. Out of 1890, 15 studies were eligible for inclusion in the final analyses. In total, 22 patients have developed breast cancer while on testosterone treatment. Four cases were cis men, whereas 18 cases were FtM. Age ranged from 18 to 61 years. Testosterone treatment duration ranged from 5 weeks up to 25 years.

SUMMARY

There is a relatively higher incidence of BCa in FtM on CSH therapy compared with cis men on TRT. Because of the small sample size of reported cases, we cannot delineate the exact relationship between testosterone therapy and BCa development. Additionally, we have limited data to suggest that TRT should or should not be contraindicated in cis men and FtM with a prior history of breast cancer.

Breast malignancy in female-to-male transsexuals: systematic review, case report, and recommendations for screening

BACKGROUND

Female-to-male (FtM) transsexuals may use testosterone therapy for masculinization, which potentially influences the risk of breast cancer development. Guided by our case report, we aimed to investigate the evidence regarding the risk of testosterone therapy on breast malignancy in female-to-male transsexuals and evaluate breast cancer screening in this subgroup.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA checklist in June 2020 in PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/EMBASE. Reference lists of included articles were screened to find additional articles that met the inclusion criteria. All cohort studies and case reports evaluating breast cancer in FtM transsexuals after testosterone therapy were included.

RESULTS

We found 23 cases of FtM transsexuals who developed breast cancer after testosterone therapy, including our own case. Moreover, we evaluated ten retrospective cohort studies investigating breast malignancy in the transsexual population. The cohort studies showed no elevated risk in FtM transsexuals compared to natal women. Including our own case, nine cases were described in which breast malignancy was incidentally found during routine histological examination after mastectomy. High-level evidence for a correlation between testosterone therapy and breast malignancy is missing.

CONCLUSION

Few cases are described of FtM transsexuals with breast malignancy. However, cases such as these make physicians aware of the possibility of breast cancer in FtM transsexuals. Radiological screening of FtM transsexuals for breast cancer prior to mastectomy and histological screening of the mammalian tissue after mastectomy should be considered; physicians should decide together with every individual FtM transsexual if screening is necessary.

Transmasculine Hormone Therapy

Prescribing gender-affirming hormonal therapy in transgender men (TM) not only induces desirable physical effects but also benefits mental health. In TM, testosterone therapy is aimed at achieving cisgender male serum testosterone to induce virilization. Testosterone therapy is safe on the short term and middle term if adequate endocrinological follow-up is provided. Transgender medicine is not a strong part of the medical curriculum, although a large number of transgender persons will search for some kind of gender-affirming care. Because hormonal therapy has beneficial effects, all endocrinologists or hormone-prescribing physicians should be able to provide gender-affirming hormonal care.

Histopathologic findings in breast surgical specimens from patients undergoing female-to-male gender reassignment surgery

Breast reduction surgery or mastectomy following administration of androgen therapy is part of the female-to-male gender reassignment process. Details regarding the histopathologic findings in breast tissue from patients undergoing female-to-male gender reassignment surgery are limited. We reviewed hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of breast tissue from 148 patients who underwent breast reduction surgery or mastectomy as part of the female-to-male gender reassignment process at our institution between January 2014 and May 2017. The spectrum of histologic features in each case was catalogued. The median patient age was 27 years (range 18-60 years). Lobular atrophy was seen to some degree in 73% of cases and was prominent in 42%. A predominantly fibrotic stroma was seen in 45% of cases and areas resembling the fibrous stage of gynecomastia were seen in 41%. Other features included variably ectatic ducts in 96% of cases, cysts in 42%, apocrine metaplasia in 32%, fibroadenomatous change in 27%, usual ductal hyperplasia in 26%, and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia in 19%. Five cases (3%) demonstrated atypical hyperplasia (atypical ductal hyperplasia in 2; atypical lobular hyperplasia in 2; both atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical lobular hyperplasia in 1). One case demonstrated high grade ductal carcinoma in situ. No invasive carcinomas were identified. In conclusion, the majority of breast specimens from patients undergoing female-to-male gender reassignment demonstrate at least some degree of lobular atrophy as well as ectatic ducts, fibrous stroma, and areas resembling the fibrous stage of gynecomastia. Only rare cases showed atypical lesions; the clinical significance of these lesions in this setting is uncertain.

Breast Cancer Development in a Transgender Male Receiving Testosterone Therapy

Context

To describe a case of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in a transgender male receiving testosterone therapy for gender-affirming treatment.

Case Description

A 28-year-old transgender male receiving intramuscular testosterone was found to have a breast mass on ultrasound after self-exam revealed a palpable breast lump. Ultrasound-guided breast biopsy revealed estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) positive, invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. He underwent neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy along with bilateral mastectomy. At patient request, his testosterone injections were permanently discontinued.

Conclusion

Fewer than 20 cases of breast cancer in transgender male patients have been reported in medical literature. While studies have shown increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with higher testosterone levels, data regarding premenopausal women is conflicting and little is known about breast cancer risk in transgender individuals receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), with inconclusive results regarding correlation between testosterone therapy and breast cancer. More research is required to evaluate whether a possible increased risk of breast cancer exists for transgender men receiving gender-affirming therapy.

Long-term hormonal therapy resulting in breast cancer in female-to-male transsexual: Case report

RATIONALE

Testosterone is important for the development of secondary sexual characteristics in female-to-male transsexuals. On the contrary, it can increase the risk of breast cancer.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present a rare case of breast cancer in female-to-male transsexual patient after long-term hormonal therapy.

DIAGNOSIS

Breast cancer in female-to-male transsexual patient.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent mastectomy and chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

The patient had local recurrence of the disease and he underwent re-excision, radiotherapy and the tamoxifen treatment. After this treatment, the patient is in the remission from the disease.

LESSONS

Breast cancer in transsexuals appears to be rare. However, there is a potential risk that testosterone exposure can increase the risk of developing breast cancer by the stimulation of breast tissue. There is limited published literature on the risk of breast cancer in transsexual patients.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy and the risk of sex hormone-dependent tumours in transgender individuals-A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cancers are a leading cause of death worldwide, and transgender individuals are no exception. The effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on sex hormone-dependent tumours are unclear. Therefore, this review seeks to determine whether tumour risk in transgender individuals differs from the general population, to guide clinical screening recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies examining tumour incidence, prevalence or cancer-related mortality in transgender individuals. All English peer-reviewed publications were included if histological type and temporal relation to GAHT were reported. Case reports were included if there were ≥2 cases of the same histological type.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 307 studies. Excluding those that did not meet inclusion criteria, 43 studies (7 cohort studies, 2 cross-sectional studies and 34 case reports) were reviewed. Retrospective cohort studies suggest no increase in risk of tumour development in transgender individuals receiving GAHT compared to the general population. Notably, the mean ages of cohorts were young and were treated with GAHT for insufficient durations to assess tumour risk. Case reports raise potential associations between high-dose oestradiol and anti-androgen therapy with prolactinoma and meningioma, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the risk of GAHT and hormone-dependent tumour development. Until further evidence is available, tumour screening should be based on guidelines for the general population and the presence of organs in transgender individuals rather than gender identity or hormonal therapy status.

Routine histopathological examination after female-to-male gender-confirming mastectomy

Background

The number of transmen seeking gender-confirming surgery has risen steadily throughout the last decade. Pathologists are increasingly confronted with transmale mastectomy specimens. It is not clear whether routine histopathological examination is useful. This study explored the possible benefit of routine investigation through detailed description of lesions encountered in mastectomy specimens after female-to-male gender-confirming surgery.

Methods

Breast tissue from a cohort of transmen was reviewed. The presence of benign and malignant breast lesions was recorded. The number of terminal duct–lobule units (TDLUs) per ten low-power fields (LPFs) was quantified. Information on hormone therapy and morphometry was retrieved for selected patients.

Results

The cohort included 344 subjects with a mean age of 25·8 (range 16–61) years at the time of surgery; the age at surgery decreased significantly over time. Older individuals presented with a significantly higher number of breast lesions. The number of TDLUs per LPF was lower in heavier breasts, but did not correlate with age. Breast lesions, either benign or malignant, were present in 166 individuals (48·3 per cent). Invasive breast cancer was found in two (0·6 per cent); one tumour was an unexpected finding. The number of breast lesions encountered on histopathological examination increased significantly when more tissue blocks were taken.

Conclusion

The discovery of an unexpected breast cancer in a 31-year-old transman emphasizes the importance of thorough routine histopathological examination of mastectomy specimens. The number of tissue blocks taken should be based on age and breast weight.

Breast Imaging of Transgender Individuals: A Review

PURPOSE

This review will inform radiologists about the evidence base regarding radiographic imaging for transgender individuals and considerations for providing culturally sensitive care for this population.

FINDINGS

Transgender individuals are increasingly referred for both screening and diagnostic breast imaging. It is important that the clinic environment is welcoming, the medical staff utilize accepted terminology and patients are able to designate their gender and personal history to ensure appropriate care. Hormone and surgical treatments used for transition by many transgender women and men may change the approach to imaging.

SUMMARY

Although not yet evidence-based, screening mammography is currently suggested for transgender women with risk factors, including those receiving hormone treatment over 5 years. The risk for breast cancer in transgender individuals is still being defined.