Use of the modified meek technique for the coverage of extensive burn wounds

INTRODUCTION

Autologous split thickness skin grafting using meshing technique remains the preferred option for the management of deep dermal and full thickness burns. The limited donor site availability seen in patients with extensive burns, however, restricts use of the mesh grafting technique for skin expansion. Meek micrografting was developed to allow for greater expansion, and, therefore, more reliable treatment of extensive burns. This study aimed to present our outcomes using the Meek micrografting technique and identify risk factors for graft failure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients admitted to our large academic hospital who were treated with the Meek micrografting technique from 2013 to 2022 was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics and outcomes were reported. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors that influence graft take and reoperation rate.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients with a mean age of 45.7 ± 19.9 years and mean burn size of 60.0 ± 17.8%TBSA, with 45.3 ± 14.9% TBSA being third degree burns, received Meek transplantation. The mean graft take after removal of the pre-folded polyamide gauze at the tenth post-operative day was 75.8 ± 14.7%. Pre-treatment with use of an allograft, longer waiting time between admission and Meek grafting and transplantation over a dermal matrix were identified as positive predictors for graft take, while age was established as a negative predictor.

CONCLUSION

By examining the outcomes of the Meek micrografting technique in extensive burn wounds we identified that preconditioning of the wound bed, through allograft or negative pressure wound therapy application, positively correlates with improved outcomes, including higher graft take. At the same time, older age was seen to negatively correlate with graft take. Overall, Meek transplantation displays a favorable safety profile with promising outcomes. Future prospective studies and clinical trials can optimize the procedure and help establish it as the golden standard for extensive and complex burns.

Routine histopathological examination after female-to-male gender-confirming mastectomy

Background

The number of transmen seeking gender-confirming surgery has risen steadily throughout the last decade. Pathologists are increasingly confronted with transmale mastectomy specimens. It is not clear whether routine histopathological examination is useful. This study explored the possible benefit of routine investigation through detailed description of lesions encountered in mastectomy specimens after female-to-male gender-confirming surgery.

Methods

Breast tissue from a cohort of transmen was reviewed. The presence of benign and malignant breast lesions was recorded. The number of terminal duct–lobule units (TDLUs) per ten low-power fields (LPFs) was quantified. Information on hormone therapy and morphometry was retrieved for selected patients.

Results

The cohort included 344 subjects with a mean age of 25·8 (range 16–61) years at the time of surgery; the age at surgery decreased significantly over time. Older individuals presented with a significantly higher number of breast lesions. The number of TDLUs per LPF was lower in heavier breasts, but did not correlate with age. Breast lesions, either benign or malignant, were present in 166 individuals (48·3 per cent). Invasive breast cancer was found in two (0·6 per cent); one tumour was an unexpected finding. The number of breast lesions encountered on histopathological examination increased significantly when more tissue blocks were taken.

Conclusion

The discovery of an unexpected breast cancer in a 31-year-old transman emphasizes the importance of thorough routine histopathological examination of mastectomy specimens. The number of tissue blocks taken should be based on age and breast weight.