Perceived physical fatigability improves after an exercise intervention among breast cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial

Role of Walking Energetics and Perceived Fatigability Differs by Gait Speed: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA)

BACKGROUND

Slower gait speed may be driven by greater energy deficits and fatigability among older adults. We examined associations of walking energetics and perceived physical fatigability with gait speed among slower and faster walkers. Additionally, we used statistical mediation to examine the role of fatigability in the associations of walking energetics and gait speed using the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA).

METHODS

Perceived physical fatigability was assessed using the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Physical score (range 0-50, higher = greater). A 3-phase cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill test collected peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak, mL/kg/min), energetic cost of walking (ECW, mL/kg/m), and cost-capacity ratio (VO2/VO2peak*100, %). Slower (<1.01 m/s) versus faster (≥1.01 m/s) walkers were classified using median 4-m gait speed. Linear regressions and statistical mediation analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Slower walkers had lower VO2peak, higher ECW at preferred walking speed (PWS), and greater PFS Physical score compared to faster walkers (all p < .05; N = 849). One standard deviation (1-SD) higher VO2peak was associated with 0.1 m/s faster gait speed, while 1-SD higher ECW PWS, cost-capacity ratio at PWS and slow walking speed (SWS), and PFS Physical score were associated with 0.02-0.23 m/s slower gait speed. PFS Physical score was a significant statistical mediator in the associations between VO2peak (15.2%), SWS cost-capacity ratio (15.9%), and ECW PWS (10.7%) with gait speed and was stronger among slower walkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Slower walkers may be more influenced by perceptions of fatigue in addition to walking energetics. Our work highlights the importance of targeting both energetics and perceived fatigability to prevent mobility decline.

Effects of Exercise on Cancer-Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue (CRF), specifically in breast cancer patients, with the ultimate goal of establishing an optimal exercise prescription for breast cancer patients. A comprehensive search was undertaken across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering data published up to 1 September 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), thereby quantifying the effectiveness of exercise in alleviating CRF in the breast cancer patient population. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Aerobic exercise (SMD, -0.17, p = 0.02), resistance exercise (SMD, -0.37, p = 0.0009), and combined exercise (SMD, -0.53, p < 0.0001) significantly improved CRF in breast cancer patients. In addition, exercise intervention conducted ≥3 times per week (SMD, -0.47, p = 0.0001) for >60 min per session (SMD, -0.63, p < 0.0001) and ≥180 min per week (SMD, -0.79, p < 0.0001) had greater effects on improving CRF in breast cancer patients, especially middle-aged patients (SMD, -0.42, p < 0.0001). Exercise is an effective approach to improving CRF in breast cancer patients. When devising an exercise program, the primary consideration should be the incorporation of combined exercise as the principal intervention. This entails ensuring that participants engage in the program at least three times weekly, with each session lasting for more than 60 min. The ultimate aim is to achieve a total weekly exercise duration of 180 min by progressively increasing the frequency of exercise sessions.

Measuring and Understanding the Health Impact of Greater Fatigability in Older Adults: A Call to Action and Opportunities

Different from fatigue, an instantaneous state of tiredness, weakness and lack of energy, fatigability is a trait that contextualizes whole-body fatigue to the level of activity (i.e., intensity and duration) with which the fatigue is associated. Fatigability can be perceived or performance-related. Measuring fatigability improves upon traditional fatigue measures by accounting for self-pacing as older adults likely slow down or limit their daily activity to maintain fatigue in a tolerable range. Anchoring fatigue to activities/tasks improves sensitivity and allows for meaningful comparisons across individuals/between studies, as well as evaluating change over time and treatment effects. Two well-validated approaches are utilized to measure perceived fatigability: 1) a 5-minute slow-paced (1.5 mph/0.67 m/s, 0% grade) treadmill walk immediately followed by Borg rating of perceived exertion; and 2) a self-administered 10-item questionnaire, Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale, with both physical and mental subscales. Many walking-based performance fatigability measures are based on certain lap time or distance, while the Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index uses raw accelerometry data to quantify percent of cadence decline over the entire long distance walking tasks. Perceived fatigability prevalence ranges from 20-90% in older adults varying by assessment tool, and is higher with advancing age and in women compared to men. Fatigability is associated with physical and cognitive function, fall risk, mobility decline, and mortality. Unfortunately, the available research lacks representativeness in terms of racial and ethnic diversity. The time is now to incorporate our established sensitive and validated fatigability measures into global research and clinical practice to better understand mechanistic underpinnings and reveal intervention effects to reduce the burden and lessen the consequences of greater fatigability worldwide.

Self-managed physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer survivors (BCS) experience many issues of rehabilitative concern due to the treatments they have undergone. Given the chronicity of these outcomes, the increasing number of survivors, and the positive results obtained by supervised exercise, professionals should consider offering self-managed physical activity (PA) programs to this population. Our aim was to map the currently available evidence about self-care rehabilitation for BCS.

METHODS

Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for primary literature. Scoping review methodological frameworks were used to tackle the heterogeneity of the topic. Studies investigating self-managed PA interventions prescribed to adult BCS were included.

RESULTS

One hundred-eight studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 6 to 692 patients. Information was systematically collected in tables displaying study design, type of PA, duration and recommended frequency, professional leading the study, type of supervision, initial training, strategies used to help patients integrate self-care into their daily lives, and self-managed PA efficacy. Tables were produced for every oncological side effect that BCS might experience: lymphedema, arthralgia, cancer-related fatigue, a decline in physical parameters, treatment-related cardiotoxicity, peripheral neurotoxicity, and a possible decline in the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-managed PA has the potential to improve BCS oncological issues. Professionals can adopt many strategies to support patients and empower them with long-lasting self-care competencies. This scoping review provided a comprehensive and easy-to-consult overview of self-managed PA interventions for BCS. We also provided recommendations for future primary studies and secondary synthesis.

Changes in Objectively Measured Physical Activity Are Associated With Perceived Physical and Mental Fatigability in Older Men

BACKGROUND

Lower physical activity (PA) is associated with greater perceived fatigability, a person-centered outcome. The association between change in PA and fatigability with advanced age has yet to be established.

METHODS

Community-dwelling older men (N = 1 113, age = 84.1 ± 3.9 years at Year 14) had free-living PA assessed using SenseWear Armband prospectively at Year 7 (2007-2009) and Year 14 (2014-2016) of Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study, a longitudinal cohort established in 2000 (baseline). We categorized percent changes in PA into groups (large decline → large increase) for 4 metrics: step count, light intensity PA (LIPA, metabolic equivalents [METs] >1.5 to <3.0), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA, METs ≥ 3.0), and sedentary behavior (SB, METs ≤ 1.5, excluding sleep). Perceived physical and mental fatigability were measured (Year 14) with the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS, higher score = greater fatigability; range = 0-50). Associations between each metric of percent changes in PA and fatigability were examined using linear regression, adjusted for demographics, change in health conditions, and Year 7 step count or total PA (METs > 1.5).

RESULTS

Men declined 2 336 ± 2 546 (34%) steps/d, 24 ± 31 (25%) LIPA min/d, 33 ± 58 (19%) MVPA min/d, and increased 40 ± 107 (6%) SB min/d over 7.2 ± 0.7 years. Compared to large decline (% change less than -50%), those that maintained or increased step count had 3-8 points lower PFS Physical scores; those who maintained or increased LIPA and MVPA had 2-3 and 2-4 points lower PFS Physical scores, respectively (all p ≤ .01). Associations were similar, but smaller, for PFS Mental scores.

CONCLUSION

Older men who maintained or increased PA had lower fatigability, independent of initial PA. Our findings inform the types and doses of PA that should be targeted to reduce fatigability in older adults.

Self-managed physical activity in cancer survivors for the management of cancer-related fatigue: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a disabling chronic condition that cancer survivors could experience during and after recovery and that might benefit from self-managed physical activity (PA) programs. This scoping review aimed to map self-managed PA interventions found in literature for the management of CRF.

METHODS

Given the heterogeneity of the topic, scoping review methodological frameworks were used. Pubmed, Cinahl and Cochrane databases were searched for primary literature. Inclusion criteria: self-managed PA meant as any exercise program prescribed by a professional either with or without initial supervision and training which then continued independently for a given time frame; patient-reported fatigue assessment included in the outcome measures. Articles dealing with entirely supervised interventions, dietary or psychological-only therapies, and with palliative care were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 543 experimental or observational studies screened, 63 were included. Of these forty-three studies were randomized controlled trials. Data were summarized in tables describing self-managed interventions according to: type of self-managed activity, frequency and duration, strategies to promote adherence, professionals supervising the treatment, outcome measures, and efficacy. A narrative synthesis was also added to further explain findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We collected the available evidence on PA when this was self-managed by patients after prescription by a healthcare provider. Clinicians and researchers should consider incorporating self-care programs in CRF patients' recovery journey gradually, identifying the best strategies to integrate them into daily life. Researchers should specify the characteristics of PA programs when designing new studies. This review highlighted the areas to be investigated for future studies pertaining to self-managed PA.

Effectiveness of different types, delivery modes and extensiveness of exercise in patients with breast cancer receiving systemic treatment - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Effects of exercise in patients with breast cancer have been thoroughly investigated. The aim was to explore differences in effects regarding type, delivery mode and extensiveness (e.g. intensity; volume) of the interventions.

METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials including patients with breast cancer receiving systemic treatment, exercise-based interventions, and measures on patient reported- and objectively measured outcomes.

RESULTS

Exercise showed significant and moderate effects on the primary outcomes quality of life and physical function, Standardised Mean Difference: 0.52 (95 % CI 0.38-0.65) and 0.52 (95 % CI 0.38-0.66), respectively. Type of exercise had little influence on the effects, however combined aerobic- and resistance exercise seemed superior for increasing physical function, compared to aerobic or resistance exercise. Supervised interventions were superior to partly and unsupervised. Extensiveness of the intervention only influenced physical function.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised interventions, more than type or extensiveness of interventions, seem to increase effects.

Perceived Physical Fatigability Predicts All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Perceived physical fatigability is highly prevalent in older adults and associated with mobility decline and other health consequences. We examined the prognostic value of perceived physical fatigability as an independent predictor of risk of death among older adults.

METHODS

Participants (N = 2,906), mean age 73.5 [SD, 10.4] years, 54.2% women, 99.7% white enrolled in the Long Life Family Study were assessed at Visit 2 (2014-2017) with 2.7 [SD, 1.0] years follow-up. The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS), a 10-item, self-administered validated questionnaire (score range 0-50, higher=greater fatigability) measured perceived physical fatigability at Visit 2. Deaths post-Visit 2 through December 31, 2019 were identified by: family members notifying field centers, reporting during another family member's annual phone follow-up, an obituary, or Civil Registration System (Denmark). We censored all other participants at their last contact. Cox proportional hazard models predicted mortality by fatigability severity, adjusted for family relatedness and other covariates.

RESULTS

Age-adjusted PFS Physical scores were higher for those who died (19.1 [SE, 0.8]) compared to alive (12.2, [SE, 0.4]) overall, as well as across age strata (P<.001), except for those 60-69 years (P=.79). Participants with the most severe fatigability (PFS Physical scores ≥25) were over twice as likely to die (HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.65 to 3.28]) compared to those with less severe fatigability (PFS Physical scores <25) after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

This work underscores the utility of the PFS as a novel patient-reported prognostic indicator of phenotypic aging that captures both overt and underlying disease burden that predicts death.