Role of Brain Biomarker in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Hypertensive Cerebrovascular Ischemic Stroke

Multifunctional roles of γ-enolase in the central nervous system: more than a neuronal marker

Enolase, a multifunctional protein with diverse isoforms, has generally been recognized for its primary roles in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis. The shift in isoform expression from α-enolase to neuron-specific γ-enolase extends beyond its enzymatic role. Enolase is essential for neuronal survival, differentiation, and the maturation of neurons and glial cells in the central nervous system. Neuron-specific γ-enolase is a critical biomarker for neurodegenerative pathologies and neurological conditions, not only indicating disease but also participating in nerve cell formation and neuroprotection and exhibiting neurotrophic-like properties. These properties are precisely regulated by cysteine peptidase cathepsin X and scaffold protein γ1-syntrophin. Our findings suggest that γ-enolase, specifically its C-terminal part, may offer neuroprotective benefits against neurotoxicity seen in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, although the therapeutic potential of γ-enolase seems promising, the effectiveness of enolase inhibitors is under debate. This paper reviews the research on the roles of γ-enolase in the central nervous system, especially in pathophysiological events and the regulation of neurodegenerative diseases.

Neuron-Specific Enolase-What Are We Measuring?

Since the discovery of the neuron-specific protein by Moore and McGregor in 1965, tens of thousands of studies have investigated the basic and applied significance of neuron-specific enolase (NSE). This promising biomarker, according to many researchers, has not found widespread use in clinical practice, particularly in acute cerebrovascular accidents. Moreover, the several studies refuting the usefulness of serum NSE measurement in critically ill patients leads us to consider the reasons for such contradictory conclusions. In this article, we have analyzed the main directions in the study of NSE and expressed our perspective on the reasons for the contradictory results and the difficulties in implementing the results of these studies in clinical practice. In our opinion, the method of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used in the majority of the studies is inappropriate for the evaluation of NSE as a marker of central nervous system damage, because it does not allow for the differentiation of heterodimers of enolases and the assessment of the enzymatic activity of this group of enzymatic proteins. Therefore, the methodological approach for the evaluation of NSE (γγ-enolase) as a biomarker needs to be elaborated and improved. Furthermore, the specificity of the applied research methods and the appropriateness of the continued use of the term "neuron-specific enolase" must be addressed.

[Serum brain damage biomarkers as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in ischemic stroke]

OBJECTIVE

To study serum quantities of neuron specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and NR2-antibodies (NR2-ab) in various cerebrovascular pathology and assess their value as a panel used as a diagnostic and predictive tool for stroke.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

NSE, GFAP and NR2-ab serum levels were measured twice for 84 patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and 8 patients with hemorrhagic stroke (HI), once for 8 patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), 26 patients with chronic brain ischemia (CBI), 27 healthy volunteers (HV).

RESULTS

NSE and GFAP levels were significantly higher in IS than in CBI and HV patients, and NR2-ab levels in IS were higher than in TIA and lower than in HV. In patients with more pronounced neurological deficiency and less favorable functional outcome by day 10-14 of IS, the levels of NSE, GFAP and NR2-ab were higher. Sensitivity and specificity of biomarker panel was higher than with their separate application.

CONCLUSION

The NSE, GFAP and NR2-ab biomarkers have a diagnostic and predictive value for IS.

Biomarkers for Transient Ischemic Attack: A Brief Perspective of Current Reports and Future Horizons

Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of long-term disability in the world and the third-leading cause of death in the United States. The early diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) is of great importance for reducing the mortality and morbidity of cerebrovascular diseases. Patients with TIA have a high risk of early subsequent ischemic stroke and the development of permanent nervous system lesions. The diagnosis of TIA remains a clinical diagnosis that highly relies on the patient's medical history assessment. There is a growing list of biomarkers associated with different components of the ischemic cascade in the brain. In this review, we take a closer look at the biomarkers of TIA and their validity with a focus on the more clinically important ones using recent evidence of their reliability for practical usage.

[Assessment of the levels of neuron-specific enolase and BDNF at the stages of rehabilitation in the acute and early recovery periods of ischemic stroke]

BACKGROUND

The issue of the diagnostic significance and clinical value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) in the acute period of stroke remains controversial. Therefore, it is advisable to study the correlation of biomarkers with the clinical characteristics of stroke in the time period of early recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To monitor NSE and BDNF levels in peripheral blood, to analyze the clinical and laboratory correlations in patients with ischemic stroke at the stages of medical rehabilitation in the early recovery period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery were examined. The observation period is 90 days. Observation Points are Day 1; Day 14; Day 45; Day 90. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Fugle-Meyer Scale (FMA), the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were administered. NSE was determined in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, BDNF was analyzed on a multiplex analyzer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

NSE_Day1 in patients was significantly higher than in the comparison group (p_{Day1-comparison group}<0.001) with a trend to a maximum decrease on the 90th day of stroke (p_Day1-90<0.001). BDNF_Day1 turned out to be lower than in the comparison group (p_{Day1-comparison group}=0.006) and significantly increased by the 14th day of the stroke (p_Day1-14<0.001; p_{Day14-comparison group}=0.637). A negative correlation was found between a decrease in NSE_Day14 and an increase in BDNF_Day14 (r= -0.349; p=0.05). A positive correlation was found between an increase in BDNF_Day14 and a decrease in mRS scores _Day90 (r=0.499, p=0.035). Outcomes in patients in group 1 (after stages I and II of rehabilitation) on the assessment scales were significantly better than in patients discharged after stage I for outpatient monitoring - group 2 (p<0.05). In group 1, BDNF_Day90 did not differ from BDNF_Day14 (p_{Day14-90-Group1}=0.17), and in group 2 it was significantly lower by the end of the early recovery period (p_{Day14-90-Group2}=0.002).

[The possibility of using neuron-specific enolase as a biomarker in the acute period of stroke]

The article presents a review of the literature on neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as a biomarker of stroke. It is shown that NSE does not allow differentiation of the ischemic and hemorrhagic process in stroke, but is suitable for determining the extent of brain tissue destruction both in the first hours of stroke and in the dynamics. The HSE analysis can be useful for monitoring the course of the disease, control of the dynamics of the pathological process, including when the size of the lesion increases, for evaluating the effectiveness of therapy and as a prognostic biomarker.