1
|
Alkhateeb J, Langley C, Wong I. Arthroscopic Augmentation of Subscapularis Revision Repair Using a Bioinductive Collagen Implant. Arthrosc Tech 2024; 13:102993. [PMID: 39100260 PMCID: PMC11293337 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The overall failure rate of rotator cuff healing after primary repair is high and is even greater in revision cases. This worrisome outcome has spurred the development and use of biological materials to help promote healing potentials. This Technical Note describes an all-arthroscopic technique for the application of a bioinductive collagen patch to augment subscapularis full-thickness tear repair. We describe in detail a stepwise approach to guide surgeons in patient positioning, portal placement, diagnostic arthroscopy, graft preparation, deployment, and fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawaher Alkhateeb
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Charlotte Langley
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ivan Wong
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelly MJ, Dean DM, Hussaini SH, Neufeld SK, Cuttica DJ. Safety Profile of Synthetic Elastic Degradable Matrix for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Foot & Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Spec 2024; 17:201-207. [PMID: 34967245 DOI: 10.1177/19386400211067627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Augmentation of soft tissue repairs has been helpful in protecting surgically repaired tissues as they heal. FlexBand (Artelon, Marietta, Georgia) is a synthetic, degradable, polycaprolactone-based polyurethane urea (PUUR) matrix that has been investigated and used for soft tissue repair in a variety of settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of a PUUR matrix in a large cohort of patients undergoing soft tissue repairs about the foot and ankle. METHODS A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent surgery using FlexBand to augment a soft tissue repair was performed to evaluate for major and minor complications related to the PUUR matrix. Results. A total of 105 patients with an average >6 months follow-up were included. The most common procedures were spring ligament repair, Achilles tendon repair, and Brostrom. There were 12 complications. Four major complications occurred with only 1 requiring PUUR matrix removal. Patients with wound complications had a higher body mass index (BMI) and rate of smoking. CONCLUSION Complication rates involving PUUR matrix in soft tissue foot and ankle reconstruction procedures are low and comparable with historical complication rates. The PUUR matrix is safe for use in a variety of soft tissue procedures about the foot and ankle.Level of Evidence: Level 4, Retrospective case-series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (MJK)
- Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (DMD)
- Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Center, The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Bethesda, Maryland (SHH, SKN, DJC)
| | - Daniel M Dean
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (MJK)
- Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (DMD)
- Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Center, The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Bethesda, Maryland (SHH, SKN, DJC)
| | - Syed H Hussaini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (MJK)
- Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (DMD)
- Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Center, The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Bethesda, Maryland (SHH, SKN, DJC)
| | - Steven K Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (MJK)
- Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (DMD)
- Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Center, The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Bethesda, Maryland (SHH, SKN, DJC)
| | - Daniel J Cuttica
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (MJK)
- Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (DMD)
- Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Center, The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, Bethesda, Maryland (SHH, SKN, DJC)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamijo H, Sugaya H, Takahashi N, Matsuki K, Tokai M, Ueda Y, Hoshika S. Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears Show Clinical and Structural Outcome Better for Small Tears Than Larger Tears. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4:e1133-e1139. [PMID: 35747630 PMCID: PMC9210481 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To retrospectively investigate the mid-term outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears with a relatively large number of patients and to compare them by tear size. Methods Medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2010 and 2017 at our institute. The inclusion criterion was isolated subscapularis tears that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The exclusion criteria were (1) previous rotator cuff surgery, (2) lack of imaging studies or clinical evaluation data, (3) neuromuscular diseases, and (4) <2-year follow-up. Range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Society score, and bear-hug or belly-press test were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Repair integrity was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging at postoperative1 year. The clinical and imaging study outcomes were compared between smaller (Lafosse types 1-3) and larger (types 4 and 5) tears. Results The subjects included 38 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59 years (range, 25-77 years). The mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-96 months). There were 13 type 1, 10 type 2, 12 type 3, 6 type 4, and 5 type 5 shoulders. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Society scores were significantly better in smaller tears than larger tears: 93 ± 8 and 75 ± 14, respectively (P = .003). Smaller tears showed better postoperative internal rotation than larger tears (P = .004). Significant decrease of positive bear-hug or belly-press test was observed in smaller tears (preoperative, 25; postoperative, 11; P < .001), but there was no significant improvement in larger tears (preoperative, 11; postoperative, 9). The retear rate was significantly greater in larger tears (64%) than smaller tears (6%, P < .001). Conclusions The clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears were better in smaller tears than larger tears with a mid-term follow-up. Larger tears showed high retear rates with poorer improvement in active range of internal rotation and subscapularis strength. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective, comparative study.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pedersen DD, Kim S, Wagner WR. Biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds in regenerative medicine: Clinical translation review. J Biomed Mater Res A 2022; 110:1460-1487. [PMID: 35481723 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Early explorations of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine concepts commonly utilized simple polyesters such as polyglycolide, polylactide, and their copolymers as scaffolds. These biomaterials were deemed clinically acceptable, readily accessible, and provided processability and a generally known biological response. With experience and refinement of approaches, greater control of material properties and integrated bioactivity has received emphasis and a broadened palette of synthetic biomaterials has been employed. Biodegradable polyurethanes (PUs) have emerged as an attractive option for synthetic scaffolds in a variety of tissue applications because of their flexibility in molecular design and ability to fulfill mechanical property objectives, particularly in soft tissue applications. Biodegradable PUs are highly customizable based on their composition and processability to impart tailored mechanical and degradation behavior. Additionally, bioactive agents can be readily incorporated into these scaffolds to drive a desired biological response. Enthusiasm for biodegradable PU scaffolds has soared in recent years, leading to rapid growth in the literature documenting novel PU chemistries, scaffold designs, mechanical properties, and aspects of biocompatibility. Despite the enthusiasm in the field, there are still few examples of biodegradable PU scaffolds that have achieved regulatory approval and routine clinical use. However, there is a growing literature where biodegradable PU scaffolds are being specifically developed for a wide range of pathologies and where relevant pre-clinical models are being employed. The purpose of this review is first to highlight examples of clinically used biodegradable PU scaffolds, and then to summarize the growing body of reports on pre-clinical applications of biodegradable PU scaffolds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drake D Pedersen
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Seungil Kim
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William R Wagner
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cook JA, Baldwin M, Cooper C, Nagra NS, Crocker JC, Glaze M, Greenall G, Rangan A, Kottam L, Rees JL, Farrar-Hockley D, Merritt N, Hopewell S, Beard D, Thomas M, Dritsaki M, Carr AJ. Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-138. [PMID: 33646096 PMCID: PMC7958078 DOI: 10.3310/hta25130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rotator cuff tear is a common, disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms may include pain, weakness, lack of shoulder mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery, and the use of patch augmentation (on-lay or bridging) to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds promise. Patches have been made using different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or tissue and synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or mesh). OBJECTIVES The aim of the Patch Augmented Rotator Cuff Surgery (PARCS) feasibility study was to determine the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. DESIGN A mixed-methods feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched between April 2006 and August 2018. METHODS The project involved six stages: a systematic review of clinical evidence, a survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society's surgical membership, a survey of surgeon triallists, focus groups and interviews with stakeholders, a two-round Delphi study administered via online questionnaires and a 2-day consensus meeting. The various stakeholders (including patients, surgeons and industry representatives) were involved in stages 2-6. RESULTS The systematic review comprised 52 studies; only 15 were comparative and, of these, 11 were observational (search conducted in August 2018). These studies were typically small (median number of participants 26, range 5-152 participants). There was some evidence to support the use of patches, although most comparative studies were at a serious risk of bias. Little to no published clinical evidence was available for a number of patches in clinical use. The membership survey of British Elbow and Shoulder surgeons [105 (21%) responses received] identified a variety of patches in use. Twenty-four surgeons (77%) completed the triallist survey relating to trial design. Four focus groups were conducted, involving 24 stakeholders. Differing views were held on a number of aspects of trial design, including the appropriate patient population (e.g. patient age) to participate. Agreement on the key research questions and the outline of two potential randomised controlled trials were achieved through the Delphi study [29 (67%)] and the consensus meeting that 22 participants attended. LIMITATIONS The main limitation was that the findings were influenced by the participants, who are not necessarily representative of the views of the relevant stakeholder groups. CONCLUSION The need for further clinical studies was clear, particularly given the range and number of different patches available. FUTURE WORK Randomised comparisons of on-lay patch use for completed rotator cuff repairs and bridging patch use for partial rotator cuff repairs were identified as areas for further research. The value of an observational study to assess safety concerns of patch use was also highlighted. These elements are included in the trial designs proposed in this study. STUDY REGISTRATION The systematic review is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017057908. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 13. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mathew Baldwin
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cushla Cooper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Navraj S Nagra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna C Crocker
- Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Molly Glaze
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gemma Greenall
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Lucksy Kottam
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jonathan L Rees
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dair Farrar-Hockley
- Patient representative, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Naomi Merritt
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Melina Dritsaki
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baldwin M, Nagra NS, Greenall G, Carr AJ, Beard D, Rees JL, Rangan A, Merritt N, Dritsaki M, Hopewell S, Cook JA. Use of implantable meshes for augmented rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039552. [PMID: 33293307 PMCID: PMC7722806 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To appraise studies reporting on clinical effectiveness and safety of surgical meshes used to augment rotator cuff repairs (RCRs). DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched between April 2006 and April 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All studies evaluating adults (≥18 years) undergoing RCR were considered. There were no language restrictions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects models if ≥2 comparative studies reported the same outcome measure. Risk of bias assessment was undertaken for randomised (RoB2, Cochrane) and comparative studies (ROBINS-I, Cochrane). RESULTS We included 60 studies, consisting of 7 randomised controlled trials, 13 observational comparative studies and 40 observational case series. All comparative studies reported on shoulder-specific functional outcome scores, 18 on the radiographic occurrence of re-tear and 14 on pain score metrics. All studies contained some risk of bias.Compared with non-augmented repair, a small improvement in shoulder-specific function or pain scores was observed for synthetic patches with a mean improvement of 6.7 points on the University of California Los Angles (UCLA) shoulder score (95% CI 0.1 to 13.4) and 0.46 point reduction on the Visual Analogue Scale (95% CI -0.74 to -0.17), respectively. A reduced likelihood of radiologically observed re-tear was observed for synthetic (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.61) and allograft (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.65) patches. A total of 49 studies reported on the occurrence of complications. Slightly higher crude complication rates were observed following patch-augmented repair (2.1%) than standard repair (1.6%). CONCLUSIONS While several studies suggest a decreased failure rate and small improvements in shoulder function and pain following augmented RCR, a paucity of rigorous clinical evaluation, for both effectiveness and safety, prevents firm recommendations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017057908.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Baldwin
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - N S Nagra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Gemma Greenall
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Andrew J Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - J L Rees
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Naomi Merritt
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Jonathan Alistair Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yokoya S, Harada Y, Negi H, Matsushita R, Matsubara N, Adachi N. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Muscle Advancement and Artificial Biodegradable Sheet Reinforcement for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967120960166. [PMID: 33195719 PMCID: PMC7607773 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120960166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Because high failure rates have frequently been reported after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs), we introduced the technique of ARCR with supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle advancement (MA). However, for cases where the original footprint cannot be completely covered, additional surgery using an approved artificial biomaterial is performed. Purpose To investigate the postoperative clinical outcomes and failure rate after MA-ARCR, with and without our reinforcement technique. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A total of 74 patients (mean ± SD age, 68.7 ± 7.7 years) diagnosed with mRCT with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years were included in the current study. Of these patients, 47 underwent MA-ARCR with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet reinforcement (study group), and 27 patients underwent MA-ARCR alone (control group). PGA reinforcement was performed when full coverage of the footprint could not be achieved by MA alone, but where the latter was possible, reinforcement was not required. Thus, the study group had significantly worse muscle quality than the control group (P < .05). The pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM), isometric muscle strength, acromiohumeral interval, and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between these 2 groups. Cuff integrity during the last follow-up period was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, and the failure rate was calculated. In addition, the postoperative foreign body reaction was investigated in the study group. Results In both groups, significant postoperative improvements were seen in acromiohumeral interval, clinical scores, ROM in anterior flexion, and isometric muscle strength in abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation (P < .001 for all). The failure rate of the study group was 12.8% (6 patients) and that of the control group was 25.9% (7 patients). No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups on any of the data findings, even regarding the failure rate. Foreign body reactions in the early period were found in 3 patients, although these spontaneously disappeared within 3 months. Conclusion Patients who underwent PGA patch reinforcement for MA-ARCR when the footprint could not be completely covered had clinical results similar to isolated MA-ARCR when the footprint could be covered. Both procedures resulted in significant improvement in symptoms and function compared with preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Yokoya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yohei Harada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Negi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Matsushita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Norimasa Matsubara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nobuo Adachi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Looney AM, Leider JD, Horn AR, Bodendorfer BM. Bioaugmentation in the surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A review of current concepts and emerging techniques. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8:2050312120921057. [PMID: 32435488 PMCID: PMC7222656 DOI: 10.1177/2050312120921057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament are among the most common athletic injuries, and are the most common involving the knee. The anterior cruciate ligament is a key translational and rotational stabilizer of the knee joint during pivoting and cutting activities. Traditionally, surgical intervention in the form of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been recommended for those who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament rupture and wish to remain active and return to sport. The intra-articular environment of the anterior cruciate ligament makes achieving successful healing following repair challenging. Historically, results following repair were poor, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction emerged as the gold-standard for treatment. While earlier literature reported high rates of return to play, the results of more recent studies with longer follow-up have suggested that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be as successful as once thought: fewer athletes are able to return to sport at their preinjury level, and many still go on to develop osteoarthritis of the knee at a relatively younger age. The four principles of tissue engineering (cells, growth factors, scaffolds, and mechanical stimuli) combined in various methods of bioaugmentation have been increasingly explored in an effort to improve outcomes following surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Newer technologies have also led to the re-emergence of anterior cruciate ligament repair as an option for select patients. The different biological challenges associated with anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction each present unique opportunities for targeted bioaugmentation strategies that may eventually lead to better outcomes with better return-to-play rates and fewer revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Daniel Leider
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew Ryan Horn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cengiz IF, Pereira H, de Girolamo L, Cucchiarini M, Espregueira-Mendes J, Reis RL, Oliveira JM. Orthopaedic regenerative tissue engineering en route to the holy grail: disequilibrium between the demand and the supply in the operating room. J Exp Orthop 2018; 5:14. [PMID: 29790042 PMCID: PMC5964057 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-018-0133-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Orthopaedic disorders are very frequent, globally found and often partially unresolved despite the substantial advances in science and medicine. Their surgical intervention is multifarious and the most favourable treatment is chosen by the orthopaedic surgeon on a case-by-case basis depending on a number of factors related with the patient and the lesion. Numerous regenerative tissue engineering strategies have been developed and studied extensively in laboratory through in vitro experiments and preclinical in vivo trials with various established animal models, while a small proportion of them reached the operating room. However, based on the available literature, the current strategies have not yet achieved to fully solve the clinical problems. Thus, the gold standards, if existing, remain unchanged in the clinics, notwithstanding the known limitations and drawbacks. Herein, the involvement of regenerative tissue engineering in the clinical orthopaedics is reviewed. The current challenges are indicated and discussed in order to describe the current disequilibrium between the needs and solutions made available in the operating room. Regenerative tissue engineering is a very dynamic field that has a high growth rate and a great openness and ability to incorporate new technologies with passion to edge towards the Holy Grail that is functional tissue regeneration. Thus, the future of clinical solutions making use of regenerative tissue engineering principles for the management of orthopaedic disorders is firmly supported by the clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz
- 3B's Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal. .,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
| | - Hélder Pereira
- 3B's Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,Ripoll y De Prado Sports Clinic: Murcia-Madrid FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Madrid, Spain.,Orthopedic Department Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de Varzim, Vila do Conde, Portugal
| | - Laura de Girolamo
- Orthopaedic Biotechnology Laboratory, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Magali Cucchiarini
- Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrbergerstr Bldg 37, D-66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - João Espregueira-Mendes
- 3B's Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal.,Dom Henrique Research Centre, Porto, Portugal.,Orthopedic Department, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Rui L Reis
- 3B's Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,The Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision Medicine, Headquarters at University of Minho, Avepark, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
- 3B's Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal.,The Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision Medicine, Headquarters at University of Minho, Avepark, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
An Update on Scaffold Devices for Rotator Cuff Repair. TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY 2017. [DOI: 10.1097/bte.0000000000000122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
11
|
Biologic and Tissue Engineering Strategies for Tendon Repair. REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40883-016-0019-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|