1
|
Crum R, Chowsilpa S, Kaski D, Giunti P, Bamiou DE, Koohi N. Hearing rehabilitation of adults with auditory processing disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence-based interventions. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1406916. [PMID: 38974481 PMCID: PMC11224551 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1406916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background For adults with auditory processing disorder (APD), listening and communicating can be difficult, potentially leading to social isolation, depression, employment difficulties and certainly reducing the quality of life. Despite existing practice guidelines suggesting treatments, the efficacy of these interventions remains uncertain due to a lack of comprehensive reviews. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to establish current evidence on the effectiveness of interventions for APD in adults, addressing the urgent need for clarity in the field. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Scopus, focusing on intervention studies involving adults with APD. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were grouped according to intervention with a meta-analysis only conducted where intervention, study design and outcome measure were comparable. Results Out of 1,618 screened records, 13 studies were included, covering auditory training (AT), low-gain hearing aids (LGHA), and personal remote microphone systems (PRMS). Our analysis revealed: AT, Mixed results with some improvements in speech intelligibility and listening ability, indicating potential benefits but highlighting the need for standardized protocols; LGHA, The included studies demonstrated significant improvements in monaural low redundancy speech testing (p < 0.05), suggesting LGHA could enhance speech perception in noisy environments. However, limitations include small sample sizes and potential biases in study design. PRMS, Demonstrated the most consistent evidence of benefit, significantly improving speech testing results, with no additional benefit from combining PRMS with other interventions. Discussion PRMS presents the most evidence-supported intervention for adults with APD, although further high-quality research is crucial for all intervention types. The establishment and implementation of standardized intervention protocols alongside rigorously validated outcome measures will enable a more evidence-based approach to managing APD in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Crum
- The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanathorn Chowsilpa
- The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Otology Neurotology and Communication Disorder Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Diego Kaski
- The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Neuro-otology Department, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
- Ataxia Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paola Giunti
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Ataxia Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Doris-Eva Bamiou
- The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Neuro-otology Department, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nehzat Koohi
- The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Ataxia Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iliadou VM, Bamiou DE, Keith W, Purdy SC, Thai-Van H. It is time to change the way we think about hearing evaluation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:3261-3264. [PMID: 38573509 PMCID: PMC11065902 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08620-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Doris-Eva Bamiou
- Ear Institute, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - William Keith
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Suzanne C Purdy
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Hung Thai-Van
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Audiologie & Explorations Oto-Neurologiques, Lyon, France
- Institut de L'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
- Université, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones C, Collin E, Kepinska O, Hancock R, Caballero J, Zekelman L, Vandermosten M, Hoeft F. Auditory Processing of Non-speech Stimuli by Children in Dual-Language Immersion Programs. Front Psychol 2021; 12:687651. [PMID: 34733197 PMCID: PMC8558524 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Perception of low-level auditory cues such as frequency modulation (FM) and rise time (RT) is crucial for development of phonemic representations, segmentation of word boundaries, and attunement to prosodic patterns in language. While learning an additional language, children may develop an increased sensitivity to these cues to extract relevant information from multiple types of linguistic input. Performance on these auditory processing tasks such as FM and RT by children learning another language is, however, unknown. Here we examine 92 English-speaking 7-8-year-olds in the U.S. and their performance in FM and RT perceptual tasks at the end of their second year in Cantonese or Spanish dual-language immersion compared to children in general English education programs. Results demonstrate that children in immersion programs have greater sensitivity to FM, but not RT, controlling for various factors. The immersion program students were also observed to have better phonological awareness performance. However, individual differences in FM sensitivity were not associated with phonological awareness, a pattern typically observed in monolinguals. These preliminary findings suggest a possible impact of formal language immersion on low-level auditory processing. Additional research is warranted to understand causal relationships and ultimate impact on language skills in multilinguals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Jones
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Elizabeth Collin
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Olga Kepinska
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Brain and Language Lab, Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roeland Hancock
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Jocelyn Caballero
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Leo Zekelman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Maaike Vandermosten
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Fumiko Hoeft
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Departments of Mathematics, Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.,Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|