Silodosin: An Update on Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Indications in Urology

Implementation of a Consensus-Driven Quality Improvement Protocol to Decrease Length of Stay after Elective Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

National guidelines stipulate that postoperative length-of-stay (LOS) after elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should not exceed 1 day on average, yet perioperative care coordination gaps may limit the ability for institutions to achieve this goal. Internal review determined that increased LOS after CEA at our institution was frequently attributable to urinary retention or postoperative hypertension. We designed and implemented a quality improvement (QI) protocol aiming to better our institutional performance in postoperative LOS after CEA, consisting of 2 Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.

METHODS

In the first PDSA cycle, a division-wide standardized protocol was developed by which antihypertensive medications were managed preoperatively and through postoperative day (POD) 1. This protocol included dedicated patient outreach with instructions for at-home antihypertensive management through the morning of POD 0. Second, alpha-1-blockade was administered to all male patients preoperatively. All patients receiving an elective CEA performed at our institution by vascular surgeons were included in the protocol. The primary outcome measure was defined percent failure of the LOS >1 day metric, with raw LOS as a secondary outcome measure. Process measures included adherence to the antihypertensive medication protocol and adherence to preoperative alpha-1 blockade. Balance measures included documented intraoperative hypotension and 30-day readmission. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate relationships between preintervention and postintervention cohorts and the outcome measure. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate relationships between cohorts and total LOS.

RESULTS

Baseline performance on the LOS >1 day metric after elective CEA was 58.3% in the 8 months prior to intervention, across 48 patients. Both PDSA interventions were implemented simultaneously. In the 12 months after intervention, 64 patients met protocol inclusion criteria, including 19 symptomatic patients (29.7%). Process measure success for preoperative antihypertensive regimen adherence was 89.8%. For males not chronically prescribed alpha-1 blockade preoperatively, process measure success for adherence to preoperative alpha-1 blockade was 78.8%. The intraoperative hypotension balance measure occurred in 1 patient (1.6%). Performance on the LOS >1 day outcome measure was improved to 32.8% (P = 0.01). Performance on the raw LOS outcome measure was similar between the preintervention cohort (median 2 days, interquartile range [IQR] 1-2) and postintervention cohort (median 1 day, IQR 1-2, P = 0.07). Performance on the 30-day readmission balance measure was similar between preintervention (6.3%) and postintervention cohorts (9.4%, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus-driven development and implementation of a QI protocol to reduce postoperative LOS after CEA showed promising results in our institution, with approximately 40% improvement in the primary outcome measure. Wider efforts to improve LOS after CEA should include a focus on minimization of postoperative hypertension and urinary retention.

Silodosin Improves Pain and Urinary Frequency in Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis Patients

Purpose: Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis (BPS/IC) is a bladder-related chronic inflammatory disease. Data indicate that stress enhances the excitability of bladder nociceptors through the stimulation of alpha1A-adrenoceptors. Stress is known to play a crucial role in BPS/IC patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of daily silodosin in refractory BPS/IC female patients and its correlation with stress coping. Materials and Methods: An open-label trial was conducted with 20 refractory BPS/IC patients. Evaluations occurred at baseline and the 8th and 12th weeks. Primary endpoint was bladder pain evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included daily frequency, nocturia and maximum voided volume obtained from a 3-day bladder diary, the O’Leary−Sant Symptom Score, and two questions accessing stress coping. Patients initiated daily doses of 8 mg silodosin, which could be titrated to 16 mg. Median values with percentiles 25 and 75 (25; 75) were used. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparisons. A minimally important difference of 3 points for pain was established to define clinically relevant improvement. Results: Median age was 56 years. Median pain score decreased from 8.00 (6.00; 8.00) at baseline to 4.00 (2.00; 5.50) (p < 0.001), meaning that the primary endpoint was reached. Total urinary frequency decreased from 14.00 (13.00; 21.00) to 9.00 (7.50; 11.00) (p < 0.05), and all the other secondary endpoints also showed a statistically significant improvement. Eleven patients improved by ≥3 pain points in VAS, meaning that 65% of patients that ended the study protocol achieved clinical significant improvement or, in the full analysis set, that 55% of the 20 initial patients improved significantly. Fourteen (82%) decreased by ≥2 micturitions/day. Overall, the cohort’s stress coping was low. Conclusions: Silodosin can be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for refractory BPS/IC female patients.

The clinical significance of abnormal ejaculation by silodosin. Is it important?

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the abnormal ejaculation (AEj) on patients using silodosin in terms of drug cessation. We also analysed the possible factors that may affect the decisions of patients with AEj to proceed or change their medication. The patients (n = 118) treated with silodosin 8 mg daily were prospectively analysed. In order to evaluate the erectile function, ejaculatory function, depression and sexual satisfaction; IIEF, MSHQ-EjD, Beck's depression and Golombok-Rust questionnaires were given to patients respectively. Patients were re-evaluated at the 3rd month of their treatment. The rate of AEj was 52.5%. Nearly 42% of the patients with AEj desired to stop their medication whereas it was 7.1% at patients without AEj (p < .001). The pre-treatment International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the decrease in IPSS score were significantly lower in patients who demand to stop their treatment (p < .05). AEj was significantly higher in patients who wanted to stop their medication (p < .001). Even if they had an AEj, patients who were happy with the clinical efficacy of silodosin did not want to change their drug. In addition to this, pre-treatment ejaculatory status was an important indicator for patients to decide drug cessation due to AEj side effect of silodosin.

The Use of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors and Alpha-1 Blockers Does Not Improve Clinical Outcome in Male Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Quebec, Canada

BACKGROUND

Existing literature suggests that bladder cancer (BC) outcome may be improved when patients use 5α-reductase inhibitors and/or α₁-blockers, but such a conclusion may be subject to publication bias. We evaluated whether preoperative use of 5α-reductase inhibitors or α₁-blockers was associated with improved clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with BC undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using provincial health administrative databases, we retrospectively identified male BC patients undergoing RC in Quebec province between 2000 and 2015, and we collected data from 2 years before RC until December 2016 or death. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, propensity score matching, and uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Covariates included age, Charlson's comorbidity index, region of residence, year of RC, distance to hospital, hospital type, annual RC volume of each hospital and surgeon, neoadjuvant chemotherapy use, and type of bladder diversion.

RESULTS

Of the 2822 patients included, 284 patients used 5α-reductase inhibitors and 1001 patients used α₁-blockers prior to surgery. Median follow-up time was 7.7 years. Patients who used 5α-reductase inhibitors or α₁-blockers were generally older, had more comorbidities, and were treated more recently in academic centers. Overall, bladder cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between those using 5α-reductase inhibitors prior to surgery and controls who never used 5α-reductase inhibitors. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21) for overall survival, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.92-1.36) for bladder cancer-specific survival, and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.99-1.42) for recurrence-free survival. The aforementioned outcomes were significantly worse in patients who used α1-blockers prior to surgery compared to controls, with respective adjusted hazard ratios of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.27), 1.19 (95% CI, 1.05-1.35), and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.05-1.33).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative use of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α₁-blockers did not improve clinical outcome in our cohort of male patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

1,4-Benzodioxane, an evergreen, versatile scaffold in medicinal chemistry: A review of its recent applications in drug design

1,4-Benzodioxane has long been a versatile template widely employed to design molecules endowed with diverse bioactivities. Its use spans the last decades of medicinal chemistry until today concerning many strategies of drug discovery, not excluding the most advanced ones. Here, more than fifty benzodioxane-related lead compounds, selected from recent literature, are presented showing the different approaches with which they have been developed. Agonists and antagonists at neuronal nicotinic, α₁ adrenergic and serotoninergic receptor subtypes and antitumor and antibacterial agents form the most representative classes, but a variety of other biological targets are addressed by benzodioxane-containing compounds.

Effect of Water Avoidance Stress on serum and urinary NGF levels in rats: diagnostic and therapeutic implications for BPS/IC patients

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is thought to play a key role in chronic pain felt by bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) patients by activating its high affinity receptor tropomyosin-related kinase subtype A (Trk A). Whether this pathway is also involved in the aggravation of pain sensation during stress events was here investigated. The levels of plasmatic NGF were increased in rats submitted to Water Avoidance Stress test (WAS), compared to controls. The administration of the alpha1A adrenoceptors blocker silodosin prevented the increase of plasmatic NGF. Urinary NGF levels were also moderately increased in animals submitted to WAS. WAS increased pain behaviour score, lowered abdominal mechanical pain threshold and increase voiding bladder reflex activity. These changes were prevented by the administration of TrkA antagonist GW441756. These findings prompt the use of plasmatic NGF as diagnosis tool for chronic visceral painful conditions and opens therapeutic opportunities for TrkA receptors antagonist/NGF sequestration.