Influence of Direct Thrombin Inhibitor and Low Molecular Weight Heparin on Platelet Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Interventional Trial

Ex Vivo Antiplatelet Effects of Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on platelet function is still unclear. We conducted a comprehensive ex vivo study aimed at assessing the effect of the four currently marketed NOACs on platelet function.

METHODS

We incubated blood samples from healthy donors with concentrations of NOACs (50, 150 and 250 ng/mL), in the range of those achieved in the plasma of patients during therapy. We evaluated generation of thrombin; light transmittance platelet aggregation (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), human γ-thrombin (THR) and tissue factor (TF); generation of thromboxane (TX)B2; and expression of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and P-selectin on the platelet surface.

RESULTS

All NOACs concentration-dependently reduced thrombin generation compared with control. THR-induced LTA was suppressed by the addition of dabigatran at any concentration, while TF-induced LTA was reduced by factor-Xa inhibitors. ADP- and TRAP-induced LTA was not modified by NOACs. TXB2 generation was reduced by all NOACs, particularly at the highest concentrations. We found a concentration-dependent increase in PAR-1 expression after incubation with dabigatran, mainly at the highest concentrations, but not with FXa inhibitors; P-selectin expression was not changed by any drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the NOACs is associated with measurable ex vivo changes in platelet function, arguing for antiplatelet effects beyond the well-known anticoagulant activities of these drugs. There are differences, however, among the NOACs, especially between dabigatran and the FXa inhibitors.

Immediate postoperative parenteral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mesenteric ischemia after intestinal resection: a retrospective cohort study at a single institute

BACKGROUND

Bowel gangrene represents a major fatal event in acute mesenteric ischemia. Intestinal resection is inevitable in patients with peritonitis and bowel gangrene. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the benefit of postoperative parenteral anticoagulation in patients with intestinal resection.

METHODS

Patients with acute mesenteric ischemia and bowel gangrene were recruited retrospectively between January 2007 and December 2019. All patients underwent bowel resection. They were categorized into two groups: patients without immediate parenteral anticoagulant therapy (Group A) and those with immediate parenteral anticoagulant therapy (Group B). Thirty-day mortality and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were included, with 29 patients in Group A and 56 patients in Group B. Patients in Group B had lower 30-day mortality (16.1%) and a higher 2-year survival rate (45.4%) than patients in Group A (30-day mortality: 51.7%, p = 0.001; 2-year survival rate: 19.0%, p = 0.001). In the 30-day mortality multivariate analysis, patients in Group B had a better outcome (odds ratio = 0.080, 95% confidence interval between 0.011 and 0.605, p = 0.014). Patients in Group B also had a better outcome in the survival multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.435, 95% confidence interval between 0.213 and 0.887, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative parenteral anticoagulant therapy improves prognosis in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia treated by intestinal resection. Trial registration This research was retrospectively approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) I&II of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH-IRB No.CE21256B) on July 28th, 2021. The informed consent waiver was also approved by IRB I&II of Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP guidelines were followed during this study.

Impact of surface coating and systemic anticoagulants on hemostasis and inflammation in a human whole blood model

BACKGROUND

Surface compatibility with blood is critical both for scientific investigations on hemostasis and clinical applications. Regarding in vitro and ex vivo investigations, minimal alteration in physiological hemostasis is of particular importance to draw reliable conclusions on the human coagulation system. At the same time, artificial coagulation activation must be avoided, which is relevant for the patient, for example to prevent stent graft occlusion. The aim was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of antithrombotic and antifouling surface coatings in the context of their suitability for ex vivo incubation and the study of coagulation properties.

METHODS

We investigated the impact of different protocols for surface coating of synthetic material and different anticoagulants on hemostasis and platelet activation in ex vivo human whole blood. Blood samples from healthy donors were incubated in coated microtubes on a rotating wheel at 37°C. Two protocols for surface coating were analyzed for hemostatic parameters and metabolic status, a heparin-based coating (CHC, Corline Heparin Conjugate) without further anticoagulation and a passivating coating (MPC, 2-methacryloyloxethyl phosphorylcholine) with added anticoagulants (enoxaparin, ENOX; or fondaparinux, FPX). Employing the MPC-based coating, the anticoagulants enoxaparin and fondaparinux were compared regarding their differential effects on plasmatic coagulation by thrombelastometry and on platelet activation by flowcytometry and platelet function assays.

RESULTS

Using the CHC coating, significant coagulation cascade activation was observed, whereas parameters remained mostly unchanged with MPC-based protocols. Extended incubation caused significantly elevated levels of the soluble membrane attack complex. Neither ENOX nor FPX caused a relevant impairment of platelet function or activation capacity and thrombelastometric parameters remained unchanged with both protocols. For translational purposes, we additionally modeled endotoxemia with the MPC-based protocols by incubating with lipopolysaccharide plus/minus thrombin. While coagulation parameters remained unchanged, elevated Interleukin 8 and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 demonstrated preserved immune cell responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPC-based protocols demonstrated better hemocompatibility compared to CHC, and ENOX and FPX proved useful for additional anticoagulation. Furthermore, this simple-to-use whole blood model may be useful for experimental analyses of the early coagulatory and immunological response without decalcification.

Factors Associated with Platelet Activation-Recent Pharmaceutical Approaches

Platelets are at the forefront of human health and disease following the advances in their research presented in past decades. Platelet activation, their most crucial function, although beneficial in the case of vascular injury, may represent the initial step for thrombotic complications characterizing various pathologic states, primarily atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we initially summarize the structural and functional characteristics of platelets. Next, we focus on the process of platelet activation and its associated factors, indicating the potential molecular mechanisms involving inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and miRs. Finally, an overview of the available antiplatelet agents is being portrayed, together with agents possessing off-set platelet-inhibitory actions, while an extensive presentation of drugs under investigation is being given.

Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Markers in Patients with COVID-19

INTRODUTION

COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. However, the contribution of platelet reactivity (PR) to the aetiology of the increased thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19 remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate PR in stable patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized with respiratory symptoms (mainly dyspnoea and dry cough), in comparison with a control group comprised of non-hospitalized healthy controls.

METHODS

Observational, case control study that included patients with confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-19 group, n = 60) and healthy individuals matched by age and sex (control group, n = 60). Multiplate electrode aggregometry (MEA) tests were used to assess PR with adenosine diphosphate (MEA-ADP, low PR defined as < 53 AUC), arachidonic acid (MEA-ASPI, low PR < 86 AUC) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide 6 (MEA-TRAP, low PR < 97 AUC) in both groups.

RESULTS

The rates of low PR with MEA-ADP were 27.5% in the COVID-19 group and 21.7% in the control group (OR = 1.60, p = 0.20); with MEA-ASPI, the rates were, respectively, 37.5% and 22.5% (OR = 3.67, p < 0.001); and with MEA-TRAP, the incidences were 48.5% and 18.8%, respectively (OR = 9.58, p < 0.001). Levels of D-dimer, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) were higher in the COVID-19 group in comparison with the control group (all p < 0.05). Thromboelastometry was utilized in a subgroup of patients and showed a hypercoagulable state in the COVID-19 group.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalized with non-severe COVID-19 had lower PR compared to healthy controls, despite having higher levels of D-dimer, fibrinogen, and PAI-1, and hypercoagulability by thromboelastometry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04447131.