Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Japanese Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma: Outcomes from the VENERA Study

Analysis aqueous humor lipid profile of neovascular glaucoma secondary to diabetic retinopathy and lipidomic alteration response to anti-VEGF treatment

The objective of this study was to examine the lipid spectrum of aqueous humor (AH) in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy and to investigate the lipid alteration response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. Lipidomic analysis using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was conducted to compare the lipid profiles of the AH in NVG patients with those of a control group. Lipid changes in the AH of NVG patients before and after intravitreal conbercept injections were also evaluated. The identification of lipids showing differential expression was accomplished through both multivariate and univariate analyses. This study included 13 NVG patients and 20 control subjects. Based on LipidSearch software, 639 lipid species across 33 lipid classes were detected in the participants' AH. The combination of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses yielded 53 differentially expressed lipids (VIP >1 and P < 0.05). In addition, 9 lipids were found to be differentially expressed before and after the intravitreal conbercept injections in the NVG patients. Significant alterations in the metabolic pathways of glycerophospholipid and glycerolipid exhibited notable changes. Our results highlighted the lipid changes in patients' AH in relation to the progression of NVG, and indicated that the modified lipids could potentially be utilized as therapeutic targets for NVG.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN and Chinese databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Periodical Database (Wanfang Database), VIP Journal Integration Platform and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to 5 September 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment of NVG using different anti-VEGF agents combined with various methods of drug administration, without any language limitations. All patients included underwent panretinal laser photocoagulation and there were no restrictions on prior glaucoma surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety and rank priority of anti-VEGF regimens. The source of heterogeneity and the related factors affecting the stability of the results were also explored. CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 17 RCTs involving a total of 1311 eyes from 1228 patients. We examined five different treatment regimens, which used three different anti-VEGF drugs. The following treatments showed a significant decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the control group at 1 month after glaucoma surgery: simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of conbercept (ICCIVC) (mean difference (MD)=-11.56, 95% credible interval (CrI) -20.8 to -2.24), intravitreal injection of conbercept (MD=-8.88, 95% CrI -13.93 to -3.78), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (MD=-7.62, 95% CrI -10.91 to -4.33) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab IVB) (MD=-5.51, 95% CrI -10.79 to -0.35). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ICCIVC (82.0%) may be the most effective regimen in reducing IOP. In terms of safety, there were no statistically significant differences among the interventions. According to the SUCRA analysis, ICCIVC (68.0%) was considered the safest choice with the fewest complications. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that mean age was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the study results.

CONCLUSION

ICCIVC was more effective and safer than other anti-VEGF regimens for NVG. Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection was found to be the best route of administration, and conbercept was found to be the superior drug selection when compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022309676.

The progress of assessment methods and treatments of neovascular glaucoma secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

Neovascular glaucoma is a condition that results from central retinal vein occlusion and often leads to blindness. Accurate evaluation and appropriate treatment are crucial for patients. However, there is currently no uniform and clear standard to differentiate between ischemic and non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion. Also, the assessment of neovascular glaucoma progression is uncertain. Meanwhile, although pan-retinal photocoagulation is a standard treatment to prevent the onset of neovascular glaucoma, its actual efficacy and the timing of intervention remain highly controversial. It is still challenging to balance the risks of side effects in the visual field against the uncertain effectiveness of the treatment. This paper delves into the pathogenesis of neovascular glaucoma to understand the development of therapeutic approaches. By taking into account various assessment criteria of central retinal vein occlusion and neovascular glaucoma over the years, combining functional tests and morphological tests provides the most accurate and rigorous solution. The age of patients, the extent, location, and duration of retinal ischemia are the primary factors that affect the severity and extent of ischemic central retinal vein occlusion and induce serious complications. From the perspective of prevention and treatment, the ischemic index is closely related to the development of neovascularization. The paper provides essential insights into the mechanism, efficacy, complications, and optimal timing of pan-retinal photocoagulation. Comparing the treatment effects of pan-retinal photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, we suggest a combination of both treatments to explore effective treatment with fewer side effects in the long term. This article details the debate on the above issues and explores ideas for the clinical diagnosis and preventive treatment of neovascular glaucoma that results from ischemic central retinal vein occlusion.

Short-Term Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With or Without Anti-VEGF in Patients With Neovascular Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. We searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) up to January 2023 and extracted data on three surgical outcomes: postoperative intraocular pressure, success rate and complications. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed publication bias using Begg and Egger tests.

Results

We included seven studies with 353 eyes. Compared to trabeculectomy alone, trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF had a lower risk of postoperative complications (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.89) and higher success rate (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40). The intraocular pressure reduction was significantly greater in the trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF augmentation group than the trabeculectomy group from 1 week (SMD, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.76 to 0.04) to 6 months (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.50 to -0.07) after surgery.

Conclusions

According to current evidence, adding intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents to trabeculectomy may improve the short time outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding, secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels, which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of intraocular anti-VEGF medications, alone or with one or more types of conventional therapy, compared with no anti-VEGF medications for the treatment of NVG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register); MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; and LILACS to 19 October 2021; metaRegister of Controlled Trials to 19 October 2021; and two additional trial registers to 19 October 2021. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people treated with anti-VEGF medications for NVG.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results for trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence. We resolved discrepancies through discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (356 eyes of 353 participants). Each trial was conducted in a different country: two in China, and one each in Brazil, Egypt, and Japan. All five RCTs included both men and women; the mean age of participants was 55 years or older. Two RCTs compared intravitreal bevacizumab combined with Ahmed valve implantation and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with Ahmed valve implantation and PRP alone. One RCT randomized participants to receive an injection of either intravitreal aflibercept or placebo at the first visit, followed by non-randomized treatment according to clinical findings after one week. The remaining two RCTs randomized participants to PRP with and without ranibizumab, one of which had insufficient details for further analysis. We assessed the RCTs to have an unclear risk of bias for most domains due to insufficient information to permit judgment.   Four RCTs examined achieving control of IOP, three of which reported our time points of interest. Only one RCT reported our critical time point at one month; it found that the anti-VEGF group had a 1.3-fold higher chance of achieving control of IOP at one month (RR 1.32, 95% 1.10 to 1.59; 93 participants) than the non-anti-VEGF group (low certainty of evidence). For other time points, one RCT found a three-fold greater achievement in control of IOP in the anti-VEGF group when compared with the non-anti-VEGF group at one year (RR 3.00; 95% CI:1.35 to 6.68; 40 participants). However, another RCT found an inconclusive result at the time period ranging from 1.5 years to three years (RR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.75; 40 participants).  All five RCTs examined mean IOP, but at different time points. Very-low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs were effective in reducing mean IOP by 6.37 mmHg (95% CI: -10.09 to -2.65; 3 RCTs; 173 participants) at four to six weeks when compared with no anti-VEGFs.  Anti-VEGFs may reduce mean IOP at three months (MD -4.25; 95% CI -12.05 to 3.54; 2 studies; 75 participants), six months (MD -5.93; 95% CI -18.13 to 6.26; 2 studies; 75 participants), one year (MD -5.36; 95% CI -18.50 to 7.77; 2 studies; 75 participants), and more than one year (MD -7.05; 95% CI -16.61 to 2.51; 2 studies; 75 participants) when compared with no anti-VEGFs, but such effects remain uncertain. Two RCTs reported the proportion of participants who achieved an improvement in visual acuity with specified time points. Participants receiving anti-VEGFs had a 2.6 times (95% CI 1.60 to 4.08; 1 study; 93 participants) higher chance of improving visual acuity when compared with those not receiving anti-VEGFs at one month (very low certainty of evidence). Likewise, another RCT found a similar result at 18 months (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.33 to 12.05; 1 study; 40 participants).  Two RCTs reported the outcome, complete regression of new iris vessels, at our time points of interest. Low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs had a nearly three times higher chance of complete regression of new iris vessels when compared with no anti-VEGFs (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.18; 1 study; 93 participants). A similar finding was observed at more than one year in another RCT (RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.45 to 7.05; 1 study; 40 participants).  Regarding adverse events, there was no evidence that the risks of hypotony and tractional retinal detachment were different between the two groups (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.12 to 3.57 and RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01 to 7.72, respectively; 1 study; 40 participants). No RCTs reported incidents of endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, no light perception, and serious adverse events. Evidence for the adverse events of anti-VEGFs was low due to limitations in the study design due to insufficient information to permit judgments and imprecision of results due to the small sample size. No trial reported the proportion of participants with relief of pain and resolution of redness at any time point.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGFs as an adjunct to conventional treatment could help reduce IOP in NVG in the short term (four to six weeks), but there is no evidence that this is likely in the longer term. Currently available evidence regarding the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGFs in achieving control of IOP, visual acuity, and complete regression of new iris vessels in NVG is insufficient. More research is needed to investigate the effect of these medications compared with, or in addition to, conventional surgical or medical treatment in achieving these outcomes in NVG.

Effects of Postoperative Intravitreal Injections on Outcomes of Traditional Glaucoma Surgery in Patients with Preoperative Intravitreal Injections

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation and trabeculectomies with and without postoperative intravitreal injections (IVIs) in glaucoma patients with a history of preoperative IVIs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 133 eyes of 133 glaucoma patients who underwent GDD implantation or trabeculectomy with at least 1 IVI preoperatively between January 2005 and October 2020 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear.

METHODS

Chart review of glaucoma patients with traditional glaucoma surgery and at least 1 IVI before surgery. All statistical analyses were conducted with R statistical programming software.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Kaplan-Meier success rates, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and complications.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar between the groups with and without postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had a higher proportion of diabetic retinopathy and retinal vascular occlusions than the group without postoperative IVIs, which had more eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Intraocular pressure, medication burden, and visual acuity were similar between groups at all time points except for IOP at 6 weeks, which was lower in the group with postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had significantly more preoperative IVIs than the group without postoperative IVIs (6.6 vs. 3.3, P = 0.017). For success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 < IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated similar success rates between groups with and without IVIs. When stratified by the number of IVIs, success rates for the group with 7 or more IVIs were significantly higher than the success rates for the group with 0-6 IVIs (P = 0.005). Each additional postoperative IVI resulted in a 7.2% decrease in the hazard of failure to achieve our stated success criteria. With regard to late complications, the group with postoperative IVIs had a higher incidence of vitreous hemorrhage (18.5% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.039) than the group without postoperative IVIs.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher number of postoperative IVIs, specifically 7 or more IVIs, may be associated with improved success rates of traditional glaucoma surgery in glaucoma patients who received IVIs before surgery.

Intravitreal Aflibercept in Japanese Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma: The VEGA Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction

Neovascular glaucoma is characterized by neovascularization of the iris and the anterior angle chamber. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents may improve intraocular pressure (IOP) and neovascularization.

Methods

The VEGA trial assessed the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with neovascular glaucoma in a 13-week, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 study performed at multiple sites in Japan that enrolled patients with anterior segment neovascularization and IOP > 25 mmHg. Patients received background therapy plus IVT-AFL (2 mg) or sham injection at baseline. Patients were re-treated if presenting with IOP > 21 mmHg and incomplete regression of iris neovascularization, receiving additional sham or IVT-AFL injections at week 1 and IVT-AFL injections at weeks 5 and/or 9. Double-masking was maintained throughout. The primary endpoint was change in IOP from baseline to week 1.

Results

Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned (full analysis set); the per-protocol set comprised 52 patients. At week 1, the least squares mean change in IOP was −9.9 mmHg for IVT-AFL versus −5.0 mmHg for sham [full analysis set: difference −4.9 mmHg (95% confidence interval −10.2 to 0.3; P = 0.06); per-protocol set: −5.5 mmHg (95% CI −10.8 to −0.2; P = 0.04)]. At week 1, a greater proportion of patients administered IVT-AFL versus sham achieved IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and had improved neovascularization grades. Patients in the sham group who met re-treatment criteria and received IVT-AFL at week 1 [n = 22 (81.5%)] had an additional mean IOP decrease of 9.2 mmHg by week 2, and the proportion with improvement in neovascularization grades increased from 11.5% to 69.2%. Increases in the proportion of patients with improved neovascularization grades and the proportion who achieved IOP control (≤ 21 mmHg) were also observed by week 2 in this group. Overall, 77.8% and 74.1% of patients treated with IVT-AFL and sham/IVT-AFL, respectively, received a single IVT-AFL injection. The most common ocular treatment-emergent adverse event was punctate keratitis (9.3%: 7.4% and 11.1% in the IVT-AFL and sham/IVT-AFL groups, respectively).

Conclusions

IVT-AFL was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in IOP control, indicating that IVT-AFL may be a potential treatment option for patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT02396316.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01579-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Japanese Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma: Outcomes from the VENERA Study

Introduction

Neovascular glaucoma is characterized by neovascularization of the iris and anterior angle chamber. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents may decrease intraocular pressure (IOP) and improve neovascularization. The VENERA study assessed the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Methods

This was a 5-week, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase 3 study performed at 7 study sites in Japan that enrolled Japanese patients with anterior segment neovascularization and IOP > 25 mmHg who had not undergone (within 30 days prior), nor were imminently scheduled to undergo (within 8 days following) intraocular surgeries, including panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Patients received background therapy plus 2 mg IVT-AFL at baseline. Background therapy with systemic IOP-lowering drugs was prohibited for 3 days before day 1 and until IOP evaluation at week 1. The primary endpoint was the change in IOP from baseline to week 1 and the secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an improvement of ≥ 1 grade of neovascularization of the angle (NVA) from baseline to week 1.

Results

Sixteen patients received treatment (full analysis set); the per-protocol set comprised 15 patients. The mean IOP decreased from 34.1 mmHg at baseline to 25.8 mmHg at week 1 (mean change, −8.3 mmHg [95% confidence interval; CI −12.2 to −4.4; P = 0.0004]). At week 1, 81.3% of patients had an improvement in the grade of neovascularization of the iris (NVI) and 50.0% of patients had an improvement in NVA grade. The proportion of patients with controlled IOP (≤ 21 mmHg) was 43.8% (95% CI 19.8–70.1) at week 1, and increased to 56.3% at week 2 and 86.7% at week 5. The most common ocular treatment-emergent adverse event was eye pain, which occurred in 4 patients (25.0%).

Conclusions

IVT-AFL was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful IOP reductions, without concomitant use of systemic IOP-lowering drugs or PRP. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of IVT-AFL. These findings supplement those from the previous VEGA study, and suggest that IVT-AFL may be a potential treatment option for patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03639675.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01580-y.