Safety and feasibility of regadenoson use for suboptimal heart rate response during symptom-limited standard Bruce exercise stress test

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson compared with dipyridamole in myocardial perfusion imaging in patients scheduled to undergo medium to high-risk noncardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Regadenoson is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist used in myocardial perfusion imaging. Its main benefits are its simplified and brief protocol, along with the ability to be administered safely in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of moderate severity. This study aims to identify any potential benefits of regadenoson, regarding the frequency of adverse reactions and its tolerability, over dipyridamole.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled study of 200 patients scheduled for medium to high-risk noncardiac surgery, of whom 100 were stressed with regadenoson (study group) and the rest with dipyridamole (control group).

RESULTS

A greater proportion of adverse reactions was recorded in the regadenoson group as compared to the dipyridamole group (53 vs. 36%; P = 0.023), though the duration of most adverse reactions was shorter in the regadenoson group. Dyspnea (P < 0.001) and gastrointestinal disturbances (P = 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the regadenoson group. The use of aminophylline in patients who developed any adverse events was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). When multiple regression analyses were performed, differences in adverse reactions between the two groups were no longer significant (odds ratio = 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-3.25; P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

In our group of patients scheduled for myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative assessment, the two agents, regadenoson and dipyridamole, have no significant differences in the frequency of mild adverse reactions and in aminophylline use, with regadenoson also having the advantage of faster symptom resolution. Nevertheless, dipyridamole can be considered as a well-tolerated and low-cost alternative.

Assessment of late-term progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in patients with orthotopic heart transplantation using quantitative cardiac 82Rb PET

The risk stratification and long-term survival of patients with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is impacted by the complication of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). This study evaluates changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial coronary flow reserve (CFR) in a group of long-term OHT patients using quantitative cardiac ⁸²Rb-positron emission tomography (PET). Twenty patients (7 females and 13 males, mean age = 72.7 ± 12.2 years with CAV and 62.9 ± 7.2 years without CAV and post-OHT mean time = 13.9 years), were evaluated retrospectively using dynamic cardiac ⁸²Rb-PET at rest and regadenoson-induced stress. The patients also underwent selective coronary angiography (SCA) for diagnosis and risk stratification. CAV was diagnosed based on SCA findings and maximal intimal thickness greater than 0.5 mm, as defined by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Global and regional MBFs were estimated in three vascular territories using the standard 1-tissue compartment model for dynamic ⁸²Rb-PET. The myocardial CFR was also calculated as the ratio of peak stress MBF to rest MBF. Among twenty patients, seven had CAV in, at least, one major coronary artery (ISHLT CAV grade 1 or higher) while 13 patients did not have CAV (NonCAV). Mean rate-pressure products (RPP) at rest were significantly elevated in CAV patients compared to those without CAV (P = 0.002) but it was insignificant at stress (P = NS). There was no significant difference in the stress MBFs between CAV and NonCAV patients (P = NS). However, the difference in RPP-normalized stress MBFs was significant (P = 0.045), while RPP-normalized MBFs at rest was not significant (P = NS). Both CFR and RPP-normalized CFR were significantly lower in CAV compared to NonCAV patients (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between MBFs and RPPs at rest for both CAV (ρ = 0.764, P = 0.047) and NonCAV patients (ρ = 0.641, P = 0.017), while there were no correlations at stress for CAV (ρ = 0.232, P = NS) and NonCAV patients (ρ = 0.068, P = NS). This study indicates that the resting MBF is higher in late-term post-OHT patients. The high resting MBF and reduced CFR suggest an unprecedented demand of blood flow and blunted response to stress due to impaired vasodilatory capacity that is exacerbated by the presence of CAV.

Trials and Tribulations of Assessing New Imaging Protocols: Combining Vasodilator Stress With Exercise

Among all patients referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), a substantial proportion in contemporary practice cannot exercise. Another group of patients are those who are thought to be able to achieve an adequate workload with treadmill (or bicycle) exercise but do not achieve at least 85% of maximum predicted heart rate without developing symptoms. There has been substantial interest and literature on the adjunctive use of vasodilator stress during the same visit to generate best-quality results for patients who do not exercise adequately. Current American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Guidelines recommend the possible use of vasodilator stress agents to supplement exercise in those patients who do not achieve target heart rate. However, optimal timing of administration is not clear. Herein, we summarize literature to date on the combination of vasodilator and exercise stress testing in light of the recently published Exercise to Regadenoson in Recovery Trial (EXERRT).

Aminophylline and caffeine for reversal of adverse symptoms associated with regadenoson SPECT MPI

BACKGROUND

Aminophylline shortages led us to compare intravenous (IV) aminophylline with IV and oral (PO) caffeine during routine pharmacologic stress testing with SPECT MPI.

METHODS

We measured presence, duration, and reversal of adverse symptoms and cardiac events following regadenoson administration in consecutive patients randomized to IV aminophylline (100 mg administered over 30-60 seconds), IV caffeine citrate (60 mg infused over 3-5 minutes), or PO caffeine as coffee or diet cola.

RESULTS

Of 241 patients, 152 (63%) received regadenoson reversal intervention. Complete (CR), predominant (PRE), or partial (PR) reversal was observed in 99%. CR by IV aminophylline (87%), IV caffeine (87%), and PO caffeine (78%) were similar (P = NS). Time to CR (162 ± 12.6 seconds, mean ± SD) was similar in treatment arms. PO caffeine was inferior to IV aminophylline for CR + PRE.

CONCLUSIONS

IV aminophylline and IV caffeine provide rapid, safe reversal of regadenoson-induced adverse effects during SPECT MPI. Oral caffeine appeared similarly effective for CR but not for the combined CR + PRE. Our results suggest PO caffeine may be an effective initial strategy for reversal of regadenoson, but IV aminophylline or IV caffeine should be available to optimize symptom reversal as needed.

The EXERRT trial: "EXErcise to Regadenoson in Recovery Trial": A phase 3b, open-label, parallel group, randomized, multicenter study to assess regadenoson administration following an inadequate exercise stress test as compared to regadenoson without exercise for myocardial perfusion imaging using a SPECT protocol

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the non-inferiority and safety of regadenoson administration during recovery from inadequate exercise compared with administration without exercise.

METHODS

Patients unable to achieve adequate exercise stress were randomized to regadenoson 0.4 mg either during recovery (Ex-Reg) or 1 hour after inadequate exercise (Regadenoson) (MPI1). All patients also underwent non-exercise regadenoson MPI 1-14 days later (MPI2). The number of segments with reversible perfusion defects (RPDs) detected using single photon emission computerized tomography imaging was categorized. The primary analysis evaluated the majority agreement rate between Ex-Reg and Regadenoson groups.

RESULTS

1,147 patients were randomized. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference in agreement rates (-6%) was above the -7.5% non-inferiority margin, demonstrating non-inferiority of Ex-Reg to Regadenoson. Adverse events were numerically less with Ex-Reg (MPI1). In the Ex-Reg group, one patient developed an acute coronary syndrome and another had a myocardial infarction following regadenoson after exercise. Upon review, both had electrocardiographic changes consistent with ischemia prior to regadenoson.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering regadenoson during recovery from inadequate exercise results in comparable categorization of segments with RPDs and with careful monitoring appears to be well tolerated in patients without signs/symptoms of ischemia during exercise and recovery.

A useful and easy to develop combined stress test for myocardial perfusion imaging: Regadenoson and isometric exercise, preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson, a selective A2a receptor agonist, is a vasodilator increasingly used in myocardial perfusion imaging. Adjunction of isometric exercise is a simple method that could improve side effect profile while providing better image quality.

METHODS

Patients undergoing SPECT MPI were prospectively enrolled in handgrip-Regadenoson (HG-Reg test, N = 20) and Regadenoson (Reg) stress test (N = 40). Investigator blinded to stress test analyzed clinical data and images.

RESULTS

Heart rate (HR) increase was statistically higher in the HG-Reg group (27 vs 22 bpm, P = .019). Decrease in SBP was less frequent in the HG-Reg group than in the Reg group (55% vs 85.5%, P = .005), there were less drops >10 mmHg (45% vs 77.7%, P = .012). During stress testing, fewer subjects reported at least one side effect in the HG-Reg compared to Reg group (70% vs 92.5%, P = .021). Images were more often classified as good in the HG-Reg group (75% vs 52.5% in the Reg group, P = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunction of handgrip exercise to Regadenoson administration is a well-tolerated and easy method, without loss of time. Furthermore, image quality seems to be better.

Value of Exercise ECG for Risk Stratification in Suspected or Known CAD in the Era of Advanced Imaging Technologies

Exercise stress electrocardiography (ExECG) is underutilized as the initial test modality in patients with interpretable electrocardiograms who are able to exercise. Although stress myocardial imaging techniques provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information, variables derived from ExECG can yield substantial data for risk stratification, either supplementary to imaging variables or without concurrent imaging. In addition to exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression, such markers as ST-segment elevation in lead aVR, abnormal heart rate recovery post-exercise, failure to achieve target heart rate, and poor exercise capacity improve risk stratification of ExECG. For example, patients achieving ≥10 metabolic equivalents on ExECG have a very low prevalence of inducible ischemia and an excellent prognosis. In contrast, cardiac imaging techniques add diagnostic and prognostic value in higher-risk populations (e.g., poor functional capacity, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease). Optimal test selection for symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease requires a patient-centered approach factoring in the risk/benefit ratio and cost-effectiveness.

Non-invasive assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant global public health burden despite advancements in prevention and therapeutic strategies. Common non-invasive imaging modalities, anatomic and functional, are available for the assessment of patients with stable chest pain. Exercise electrocardiography is a long-standing method for evaluation for CAD and remains the initial test for the majority of patients who can exercise adequately with a baseline interpretable electrocardiogram. The addition of cardiac imaging to exercise testing provides incremental benefit for accurate diagnosis for CAD and is particularly useful in patients who are unable to exercise adequately and/or have uninterpretable electrocardiograms. Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and echocardiography with exercise or pharmacological stress provide high sensitivity and specificity in the detection and further risk stratification of patients with CAD. Recently, coronary computed tomography angiography has demonstrated its growing role to rule out significant CAD given its high negative predictive value. Although less available, stress cardiac magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac structure and function and provides a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CAD. The utilization of non-invasive testing is complex due to various advantages and limitations, particularly in the assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain, where no single study is suitable for all patients. This review will describe currently available non-invasive modalities, along with current evidence-based guidelines and appropriate use criteria in the assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with suspected, stable CAD.

Clinical applications of radionuclide imaging in the evaluation and management of patients with congenital heart disease

Non-invasive testing of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) began in the 1950s with the introduction of radionuclide studies to assess shunt fractions, pulmonary blood flow, and ventricular contractile function. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have since replaced radionuclide imaging in many of these roles. Concurrently, percutaneous and surgical repairs of complex CHD evolved, creating new roles for radionuclide imaging. In this paper on applications of radionuclide imaging in CHD, we review the multiple mechanisms for myocardial ischemia in CHD. We critically compare optimal radionuclide imaging techniques to other imaging modalities for assessing ischemia in CHD. We present the current role of nuclear imaging for assessing viability and pulmonary blood flow. We highlight the value added by advances in dedicated cardiac SPECT scanners, novel reconstruction software, and cardiac PET in performing low-dose radionuclide imaging in CHD. Finally, we discuss the emerging clinical indications for radionuclide imaging in CHD including coronary flow reserve assessment and evaluation of cardiovascular prosthesis and device infections.

Regadenoson stress for myocardial perfusion imaging

Noninvasive functional imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by means of the detection of abnormal myocardial perfusion. For this, cardiac stressors are essential as they induce hypoperfusion in the presence of flow-limiting coronary stenosis. Several pharmacological stressors are currently available and it is important that clinicians who are involved in the care and management of patients with CAD become familiar with their indications, contraindications and protocols. Among the primary coronary vasodilator agents, regadenoson is increasingly used as the default stressor or as an alternative to other modalities of stress. This article provides an updated review of regadenoson stress for the assessment of patients with suspected or known CAD and describes its pharmacological properties, stress protocol, efficacy and safety profile.

Does risk for major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing vasodilator stress with adjunctive exercise differ from patients undergoing either standard exercise or vasodilator stress with myocardial perfusion imaging?

BACKGROUND

In patients with functional limitations, the use of adjunctive exercise with vasodilator stress has advantages over vasodilator stress alone in single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for technical reasons and with regards to more effective cardiac risk stratification. Whether patients who undergo vasodilator with adjunctive exercise stress MPI possess clinical characteristics and cardiac risk that differs from those who undergo standard exercise or vasodilator stress MPI is unknown.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on 19,367 consecutive patients referred for stress MPI to a tertiary care center (9,331 [48%] underwent exercise-only, 3,793 [20%] underwent vasodilator plus exercise, and 6,243 [32%] underwent vasodilator-only) were analyzed. Perfusion data were scored using the ASNC 17-segment with a summed stress score (SSS) < 4 = normal, 4-8 = mildly abnormal, and > 8 = moderate to severely abnormal. Patients were followed a mean of 1.96 ± 0.95 years. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) were compared between the three stress modality groups.

RESULTS

Comparison of demographics and clinical characteristics revealed significant differences in gender, age, cardiac risk factors, and stress MPI between the three stress modality groups (P < .001). In follow-up, cardiac event-free survival of patients in the vasodilator plus exercise stress group was significantly higher than those in the vasodilator-only group but lower than those in the exercise-only group (P < .001). Annualized cardiac event rates of patients in the vasodilator plus exercise stress group were significantly lower than those in the vasodilator-only group for all three categories of the SSS (P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, with exercise-only as reference category, vasodilator plus exercise and vasodilator-only stress emerged as independent predictors (more likely occurrence) of cardiac death, while vasodilator-only stress emerged as an independent predictor (more likely occurrence) of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. With vasodilator-only as the reference category, exercise-only and vasodilator plus exercise stress emerged as independent predictors (less likely occurrence) of cardiac death as well as of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing vasodilator plus exercise stress MPI possess clinical characteristics and cardiac risk that differs significantly from those undergoing either standard exercise or vasodilator stress MPI and places them in a lower risk category compared to vasodilator stress alone.

Yield of downstream tests after exercise treadmill testing: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency and results of downstream testing after exercise treadmill tests (ETTs).

BACKGROUND

The utility of additional diagnostic testing after ETT is not well characterized.

METHODS

We followed consecutive individuals without known coronary artery disease referred for clinical ETT at a large medical center. We measured the frequency and results of downstream imaging tests and invasive angiography within 6 months of ETT and the combined endpoint of survival free from cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

Among 3,656 consecutive subjects who were followed for a mean of 2.5 ± 1.1 years, 332 (9.0%) underwent noninvasive imaging and 84 (2.3%) were referred directly to invasive angiography after ETT. The combined endpoint occurred in 76 (2.2%) patients. The annual incidence of the combined endpoint after negative, inconclusive, and positive ETT was 0.2%, 1.3%, and 12.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Rapid recovery of electrocardiography (ECG) changes during ETT was associated with negative downstream test results and excellent prognosis, whereas typical angina despite negative ECG was associated with positive downstream tests and adverse prognosis (p < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, higher metabolic equivalents of task achieved, and rapid recovery of ECG changes were predictors of negative downstream tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients referred for additional testing after ETT, the lowest yield was observed among individuals with rapid recovery of ECG changes or negative ETT, whereas the highest yield was observed among those with typical angina despite negative ECG or a positive ETT. These findings may be used to identify patients who are most and least likely to benefit from additional testing.

Is regadenoson an appropriate stressor for MPI in patients with left bundle branch block or pacemakers?

BACKGROUND

Patients with LBBB or ventricular pacemaker undergoing MPI are at risk for false positive MPI results in the setting of an elevated heart rate (HR) with exercise or dobutamine stress. The areas of increased apparent ischemia are typically the LAD and septal territories.

METHODS

In a subanalysis of the ADVANCE MPI 1 and 2 studies, perfusion on an initial adenosine and a second MPI study with regadenoson or adenosine was compared by visual and quantitative analysis. Among 2,015 patients, 64 had LBBB and 93 had pacemakers. The hemodynamic response during the second scan was compared in those with and without LBBB and PM.

RESULTS

Following regadenoson, peak HR in the LBBB group increased by a mean of 25.4 compared to 15.3 bpm following adenosine (P = .0083). In the pacemaker group HR was blunted, 11.8 and 8.1 following regadenoson and adenosine, respectively (P = .1262). However, the visually assessed summed difference score and the quantitatively assessed extent of ischemia for the LAD and septal territories and the entire LV did not differ between the initial adenosine and subsequent regadenoson scans.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant increase in HR observed with regadenoson compared to adenosine did not translate into greater perfusion defects in the LAD or septal territories in patients undergoing regadenoson stress.

Detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using regadenoson stress and 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging

Our objective was to study the diagnostic performance of regadenoson (82)Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We studied 134 patients (mean age, 63 ± 12 y; mean body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m(2)) without known CAD (96 with coronary angiography and 38 with low pretest likelihood of CAD). Stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) minus rest LVEF defined LVEF reserve. The Duke score was used to estimate the anatomic extent of jeopardized myocardium.

RESULTS

Regadenoson PET had a high sensitivity, 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-97%), in detecting obstructive CAD, with a normalcy rate of 97% (95% CI, 86%-99%), specificity of 77% (54/70 patients; 95% CI, 66%-86%), and area under the receiver-operator-characteristic curve of 0.847 (95% CI, 0.774-0.903; P < 0.001). Regadenoson PET demonstrated high sensitivity to detect CAD in patients with single-vessel CAD (89%; 95% CI, 70%-98%). The mean LVEF reserve was significantly higher in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging results (6.5% ± 5.4%) than in those with mild (4.3 ± 5.1, P = 0.03) and moderate to severe reversible defects (-0.2% ± 8.4%, P = 0.001). Also, mean LVEF reserve was significantly higher in patients with a low likelihood of CAD (7.2% ± 4.5%, P < 0.0001) and mild or moderate jeopardized myocardium than in those with significant jeopardized myocardium (score ≥ 6), -2.8% ± 8.3%.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson (82)Rb myocardial perfusion imaging is accurate for the detection of obstructive CAD. LVEF reserve is high in patients without significant ischemia or significant angiographic jeopardized myocardium.

Regadenoson: a focused update

Since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2008, regadenoson has become the most commonly used vasodilator in the United States. Previous reviews have summarized the pre-clinical and clinical data on the use of regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Since then, data have emerged on the safety of this agent in special groups of patients such as those with chronic kidney disease, airway disease (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and liver disease. There has also been recent interest in the use of regadenoson in hybrid protocols with exercise as a way to improve patient tolerance and image quality. Finally, although regadenoson was approved for clinical use based on the agreement rate of regadenoson MPI and adenosine MPI with regards to perfusion abnormalities, data are now available on the prognostic data derived from regadenoson MPI. We will briefly summarize these recent reports here in a focused update on the use of regadenoson for MPI.

Regadenoson pharmacologic stress for myocardial perfusion imaging: a three-way comparison between regadenoson administered at peak exercise, during walk recovery, or no-exercise

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson (Reg) is being administered with increasing frequency either at peak exercise (ExPeak-Reg) or during a slow-down/walking recovery state (ExRec-Reg) rather than at rest (Rest-Reg). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical response of ExPeak-Reg, ExRec-Reg, and Rest-Reg.

METHODS

We compared 531 patients divided equally between Rest-Reg, ExPeak-Reg, and ExRec-Reg matched for age, sex, and BMI.

RESULTS

The average systolic blood pressure (SBP) rise following Reg was modest, but there was considerable heterogeneity and the ExPeak-Reg group had a higher percentage of patients who had a SBP rise of 40 mm Hg or a fall of 20 mm Hg than either the ExRec-Reg or the Rest-Reg groups (≥40 mm Hg rise 6.8%, 1.7%, and 1.7%, respectively) (P < .02) (≥20 mm Hg fall 15.8%, 13.0%, and 7.3%, respectively) (P < .05). Chest discomfort, nausea, dizziness, and interfering abdominal radiotracer activity were less common in both exercise Reg groups compared to Rest-Reg (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson injected at peak of symptom-limited exercise was generally well tolerated, but some patients had a significant rise or drop in SBP. There is no apparent advantage of administering regadenoson at peak exercise rather than during walk recovery, and the latter approach may have a greater safety margin.

Safety and feasibility of adjunctive regadenoson injection at peak exercise during exercise myocardial perfusion imaging: The Both Exercise and Regadenoson Stress Test (BERST) trial

BACKGROUND

The data existing in the literature regarding the safety of using regadenoson with symptom-limited exercise are limited, which motivated the authors to undertake this randomized study.

METHODS

We offered patients scheduled to undergo vasodilator stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging the opportunity to exercise instead. Patients who failed to reach target heart rate (THR) were randomized to (1) receive regadenoson at peak exercise or (2) stop exercise and receive regadenoson at rest. Patients who reached THR received a standard Tc-99m sestamibi injection with no regadenoson.

RESULTS

200 patients were included (66% male, mean age 52.5 ± 13.6). 125 patients (62%) reached THR with exercise alone. All stress protocols were well tolerated, and there were no significant adverse events. There were no statistically significant differences in the extent of perfusion abnormalities, image quality, or rate of referral to cardiac catheterization within 60 days between the groups. In fully adjusted logistic regression models, beta-blocker use and diabetes remained significant univariate predictors of failure to reach THR (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, P < .0001, OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.2-0.7, P = .004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol combining regadenoson at peak exercise in patients unable to reach THR with exercise is feasible, well-tolerated, and yields comparable imaging results to a standard regadenoson injection at rest. In addition, pharmacologic stress testing may be over-ordered in current clinical practice, as patients referred for such testing were often able to exercise.

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in 514 SPECT MPI patients with and without coronary artery disease and submaximal exercise heart rate response

PURPOSE

The safety of regadenoson (Reg) during low-level exercise testing has been established. However, its administration at peak exercise for patients who do not reach target heart rate (THR) on standard exercise treadmill stress testing (ETT) needs to be established, particularly among patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) METHODS: From our stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) database, we identified all patients between 2009 and 2012 who underwent standard ETT and received Reg at peak exercise for failure to reach THR. Hemodynamics, side effects, and adverse events were entered prospectively into the database at the time of testing and were subsequently retrieved for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 514 patients, mean age 60 ± 12 years, 34 % female gender, and 51 % with prior CAD. There were 218 (42 %) and 297 (57 %) patients who underwent standard or modified Bruce and Cornell protocols, respectively, and with a mean exercise time of 5.8 ± 2.1 min. The mean percentage of peak heart rate achieved was 71 ± 8 %, and mean maximal metabolic equivalent (MET) was 6.7 ± 1.8. There were 63 (12 %) patients who developed ≥30 mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 2 min of Reg administration, and 10 (2 %) had SBP <100 mmHg at 2 min and were younger and achieved higher METs; 8 and 2 patients were symptomatic, respectively. The most common side effects reported were shortness of breath (12 %), chest pain/discomfort (13 %), and dizziness (7 %). There was one syncopal event, but no high-degree heart block, cardiac or respiratory arrest. Four patients received aminophylline. Women were more likely to have shortness of breath or gastrointestinal symptoms, while diabetics were less likely to have chest discomfort. There was otherwise no significant difference in adverse events between different groups including those with and without CAD.

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing standard treadmill stress testing for MPI who do not reach THR, the administration of Reg at peak exercise is safe and without major adverse events. Future large prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the off-label use of Reg in this setting.

Safety and feasibility of regadenoson use for suboptimal heart rate response during symptom-limited standard Bruce exercise stress test

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson during exercise stress test (ETT) can provide maximal hyperemia for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), along with exercise information. Our aim was to study the feasibility and safety of regadenoson injection at peak ETT for submaximal heart rate (HR) response.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent SPECT MPI with standard Bruce ETT or supine-regadenoson (Supine-Reg) were analyzed. ETT patients were grouped as ETT-Max [maximal HR > 0.85 * (220 - age), N = 1,522], ETT-Submax (submaximal HR no regadenoson, N = 504), ETT-Reg (submaximal HR and regadenoson, N = 211).

RESULTS

The HR during ETT was submaximal in 715 (32%) patients. Of these, 211 patients (30%) underwent ETT-Reg (mean exercise duration: 5.5 ± 2.5 minutes). ETT-Reg patients had a higher frequency of hypertension, diabetes, smoking and beta-blocker use, similar rest systolic blood pressure (SBP), but lower rest and peak HR and peak SBP compared to ETT-Max patients. There were no serious complications with regadenoson. Side effects (49% vs 6%, P < .0001) were fewer and aminophylline use was lower with ETT-Reg compared to Supine-Reg (0.5% vs 8.1%, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Submaximal HR response to ETT is common. ETT-Reg is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated. ETT-Reg facilitates a diagnostic MPI with reporting of functional capacity, exercise ECG/hemodynamic changes and MPI at maximal hyperemia.