Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: A meta-analysis

Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice

The implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and defibrillators, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years and has been accompanied by a significant rise in cardiac device infections (CDIs), which pose a substantial clinical and economic burden. CDIs are associated with hospitalizations and prolonged antibiotic therapy and often necessitate device removal, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Approximately 1-2% of CIED implants are associated with infections, making this a critical issue to address. In this contemporary review, we discuss the burden of CDIs with their risk factors, healthcare costs, prevention strategies, and clinical management.

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans pacemaker lead infection-A case report and literature review

Aggregatibacter spp. is a rare cause for cardiac device infections. Due to limited data, the management of Aggregatibacter spp. device infections is not clearly defined but should always involve device removal and prolonged intravenous antibiotics.

Infective Endocarditis Involving Implanted Cardiac Electronic Devices: JACC Focus Seminar 1/4

Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) encompasses a range of clinical syndromes, including valvular, device lead, and bloodstream infections. However, accurately diagnosing CIED-IE remains challenging owing in part to diverse clinical presentations, lack of standardized definition, and variations in guideline recommendations. Furthermore, current diagnostic modalities, such as transesophageal echocardiography and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography have limited sensitivity and specificity, further contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This can potentially result in complications and unnecessary costs associated with inappropriate device extraction. Six hypothetical clinical cases that exemplify the diverse manifestations of CIED-IE are addressed herein. Through these cases, we highlight the importance of optimizing diagnostic accuracy and stewardship, understanding different pathogen-specific risks for bloodstream infections, guiding appropriate device extraction, and preventing CIED-IE, all while addressing key knowledge gaps. This review both informs clinicians and underscores crucial areas for future investigation, thereby shedding light on this complex and challenging syndrome.

Update on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections and Their Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases

The American Heart Association sponsored the first iteration of a scientific statement that addressed all aspects of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection in 2010. Major advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of these infections have occurred since then, necessitating a scientific statement update. An 11-member writing group was identified and included recognized experts in cardiology and infectious diseases, with a career focus on cardiovascular infections. The group initially met in October 2022 to develop a scientific statement that was drafted with front-line clinicians in mind and focused on providing updated clinical information to enhance outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection. The current scientific statement highlights recent advances in prevention, diagnosis, and management, and how they may be incorporated in the complex care of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection.

Multimodality Imaging Diagnosis in Infective Endocarditis

Imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). Echocardiography is an essential examination, especially in native valve endocarditis (NVE), but its diagnostic accuracy is reduced in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The diagnostic ability is superior for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), but a negative test cannot exclude PVE. Both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE can provide normal or inconclusive findings in up to 30% of cases, especially in patients with prosthetic devices. New advanced non-invasive imaging tests are increasingly used in the diagnosis of IE. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques have demonstrated their superiority over TEE for the diagnosis of PVE and cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). Cardiac computed tomography angiography imaging is useful in PVE cases with inconclusive TTE and TEE investigations and for the evaluation of paravalvular complications. In the present review, imaging tools are described with their values and limitations for improving diagnosis in NVE, PVE and CIED-IE. Current knowledge about multimodality imaging approaches in IE and imaging methods to assess the local and distant complications of IE is also reviewed. Furthermore, a potential diagnostic work-up for different clinical scenarios is described. However, further studies are essential for refining diagnostic and management approaches in infective endocarditis, addressing limitations and optimizing advanced imaging techniques across different clinical scenarios.

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 2-imaging after device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) improve quality of life and prolong survival, but there are additional considerations for cardiovascular imaging after implantation-both for standard indications and for diagnosing and guiding management of device-related complications. This clinical consensus statement (part 2) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients after implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the role and optimal use of various cardiac imaging modalities in patients with suspected CIED-related complications and also discusses CRT optimization, the safety of magnetic resonance imaging in CIED carriers, and describes the role of chest radiography in assessing CIED type, position, and complications. The role of imaging before and during CIED implantation is discussed in a companion document (part 1).

Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections. However, accuracy increased when [18F]FDG-PET/CT was combined with TEE in endovascular lead bacteremic infection. Spleen and bone marrow hypermetabolism could differentiate bacteremic systemic infection from local infection. Although further prospective studies are needed, follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT could play a potential role in the management of chronic antibiotic suppression therapy when complete device removal is unachievable.

Improved [18F]FDG PET/CT Diagnostic Accuracy for Infective Endocarditis Using Conventional Cardiac Gating or Combined Cardiac and Respiratory Motion Correction (CardioFreezeTM)

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and diagnostically challenging condition. [18F]FDG PET/CT is valuable for evaluating suspected IE, but it is susceptible to motion-related artefacts. This study investigated the potential benefits of cardiac motion correction for [18F]FDG PET/CT. In this prospective study, patients underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT for suspected IE, combined with a conventional cardiac gating sequence, a data-driven cardiac and respiratory gating sequence (CardioFreezeTM), or both. Scans were performed in adherence to EANM guidelines and assessors were blinded to patients' clinical contexts. Final diagnosis of IE was established based on multidisciplinary consensus after a minimum of 4 months follow-up and surgical findings, whenever performed. Seven patients participated in the study, undergoing both an ungated [18F] FDG-PET/CT and a scan with either conventional cardiac gating, CardioFreezeTM, or both. Cardiac motion correction improved the interpretability of [18F]FDG PET/CT in four out of five patients with valvular IE lesions, regardless of the method of motion correction used, which was statistically significant by Wilcoxon's signed rank test: p = 0.046. In one patient the motion-corrected sequence confirmed the diagnosis of endocarditis, which had been missed on non-gated PET. The performance of the two gating sequences was comparable. In conclusion, in this exploratory study, cardiac motion correction of [18F]FDG PET/CT improved the interpretability of [18F]FDG PET/CT. This may improve the sensitivity of PET/CT for suspected IE. Further larger comparative studies are necessary to confirm the additive value of these cardiac motion correction methods.

Comprehensive assessment of molecular function, tissue characterization, and hemodynamic performance by non-invasive hybrid imaging: Potential role of cardiac PETMR

Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging plays a key role in diagnosis and patient management including monitoring treatment efficacy. The usefulness of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging has been extensively studied and shown to have high diagnostic reliability and prognostic significance, while the nondiagnostic results frequently encountered with single imaging modality require complementary or alternative imaging techniques. Hybrid cardiac imaging was initially introduced to integrate anatomical and functional information to enhance the diagnostic performance, and lately employed as a strategy for comprehensive assessment of the underlying pathophysiology of diseases. More recently, the utility of computed tomography has grown in diversity, and emerged from being an exploratory technique allowing functional measurement such as stress dynamic perfusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is widely accepted as a robust tool for evaluation of cardiac function, fibrosis, and edema, yielding high spatial resolution and soft-tissue contrast. However, the use of intravenous contrast materials is typically required for accurate diagnosis with these imaging modalities, despite the associated risk of renal toxicity. Nuclear cardiology, established as a molecular imaging technique, has advantages in visualization of the disease-specific biological process at cellular level using numerous probes without requiring contrast materials. Various imaging modalities should be appropriately used sequentially to assess concomitant disease and the progression over time. Therefore, simultaneous evaluation combining high spatial resolution and disease-specific imaging probe is a useful approach to identify the regional activity and the stage of the disease. Given the recent advance and potential of multiparametric CMR and novel nuclide tracers, hybrid positron emission tomography MR is becoming an ideal tool for disease-specific imaging.

Lead Extraction-Indications, Procedure, and Future Directions

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation has steadily increased in the United States owing to increased life expectancy, better access to health care, and the adoption of updated guidelines. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is an invasive technique for the removal of CIED devices, and the most common indications include device infections, lead failures, and venous occlusion. Although in-hospital and procedure-related deaths for patients undergoing TLE are low, the long-term mortality remains high with 10-year survival reported close to 50% after TLE. This is likely demonstrative of the increased burden of comorbidities with aging. There are guidelines provided by various professional societies, including the Heart Rhythm Society, regarding indications for lead extraction and management of these patients. In this paper, we will review the indications for CIED extraction, procedural considerations, and management of these patients based upon the latest guidelines.

Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients with Bloodstream Infection: Microbiologic Effect in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is common and can prompt challenges in defining optimal management. We provide a contemporary narrative review of this topic and propose a pathogen-dependent clinical approach to patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

BSI due to staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and enterococci is associated with an increased risk of underlying CIED infection, while the risk of CIED infection due to other organisms is poorly defined. There is growing evidence that positron emission tomography-computed tomography may be helpful in some patients with BSI and underlying CIED. Twenty studies were included to examine the impact of microbiologic findings on the risk of CIED infection among patients with BSI. Diagnosis of CIED infection in patients with BSI without pocket findings is often difficult, necessitating the use of novel diagnostic tools to help guide the clinician in subsequent patient management.

Clinical Approach to Evaluation of Underlying Cardiac Device Infection in Patients Hospitalized with Bacteremia

More than 400,000 cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, are implanted every year in the United States (US). Infection is a serious complication of CIED therapy and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. While CIED pocket infection can be diagnosed based on clinical exam findings, positive blood culture may be the only manifestation of CIED lead infection. Thus, management of bacteremia in patients living with CIEDs requires special consideration. This review summarizes contemporary data in the context of the recently updated 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis. We have synthesized these data into an algorithmic approach to streamline the diagnostic evaluation of CIED infection in patients presenting with bacteremia.

Candidemia in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: Uncertainty in Management Based on Current International Guidelines

Background

In contrast to bloodstream infection due to a variety of bacteria in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), there are limited data regarding candidemia and risk of CIED infection.

Methods

All patients with candidemia and a CIED at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection was defined by (1) clinical signs of pocket site infection or (2) echocardiographic evidence of lead vegetations.

Results

A total of 23 patients with candidemia had underlying CIED; 9 (39.1%) cases were community onset. None of the patients had pocket site infection. The duration between CIED placement and candidemia was prolonged (median 3.5 years; interquartile range, 2.0-6.5). Only 7 (30.4%) patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography and 2 of 7 (28.6%) had lead masses. Only the 2 patients with lead masses underwent CIED extraction, but device cultures were negative for Candida species. Two (33.3%) of 6 other patients who were managed as candidemia without device infection subsequently developed relapsing candidemia. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device removal was done in both patients and device cultures grew Candida species. Although 17.4% of patients were ultimately confirmed to have CIED infection, CIED infection status was undefined in 52.2%. Overall, 17 (73.9%) patients died within 90 days of diagnosis of candidemia.

Conclusions

Although current international guidelines recommend CIED removal in patients with candidemia, the optimal management strategy remains undefined. This is problematic because candidemia alone is associated with increased morbidity and mortality as seen in this cohort. Moreover, inappropriate device removal or retention can both result in increased patient morbidity and mortality.

Cardiovascular positron emission tomography: established and emerging role in cardiovascular diseases

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has established themselves firmly as excellent and reliable functional imaging modalities in assessment of the spectrum of coronary artery disease. With the explosion of technology advances and the dream of flow quantification now a reality, the value of PET is now well realized. Cardiac PET has proved itself as precise imaging modality that provides functional imaging of the heart in addition to anatomical imaging. It has established itself as one of the best available techniques for evaluation of myocardial viability. Hybrid PET/computed tomography provides simultaneous integration of coronary anatomy and function with myocardial perfusion and metabolism, thereby improving characterization of the dysfunctional area and chronic coronary artery disease. The availability of quantitative myocardial blood flow evaluation with PET provides additional prognostic information and increases diagnostic accuracy in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Hybrid imaging seems to hold immense potential in optimizing management of cardiovascular diseases and furthering clinical research.

The Emerging Role of FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing Endocarditis and Cardiac Device Infection

Infective endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI) have witnessed an increasing incidence in clinical practice and associated with increasing health care expenditure. Expanding indications of CIED in various cardiovascular conditions have also contributed to the surge of these infections. Early diagnosis of these infections is associated with a favorable prognosis. Given the lack of a single definitive diagnostic method and the limitations of echocardiography, which is considered a central diagnostic imaging modality, additional imaging modalities are required. Recent studies have highlighted the diagnostic utility of FDG PET and CT. In this review article, we discuss the existing limitations of echocardiography, acquisition protocols of PET/CT, and indications of these advanced imaging modalities in infective endocarditis and CIEDI diagnosis.

CASSIA (cardiology software suite for image analysis): a potential new tool for the evaluation of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the setting of infective endocarditis

PURPOSE

Due to the high morbidity and mortality of infective endocarditis (IE), medical imaging techniques are combined to ensure a correct diagnosis. [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT has demonstrated the ability to improve diagnostic accuracy compared with the conventional modified Duke criteria in patients with suspected IE, especially those with prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVIE). The aim of this study is to provide an adjunctive diagnostic tool to improve the diagnostic accuracy in cardiovascular infections, specifically PVIE.

METHODS

A segmentation tool to extract quantitative measures of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT image studies of prosthetic heart valve regions was developed and validated in 20 cases of suspected PVIE, of which 9 were confirmed. For that, Valvular Heterogeneity Index (VHI) and Ring-to-Center Ratio (RCR) were defined.

RESULTS

Results show an overall increase in the metabolic uptake of the prosthetic valve ring in the studies with confirmed PVIE diagnosis (SUV_max from 1.70 to 3.20; SUV_mean from 0.86 to 1.50). The VHI and RCR showed areas under the curve of 0.727 and 0.808 in the receiver operating characteristics curve analyses, respectively, for PVIE diagnosis. Mann-Whitney U tests showed statistically significant differences between groups for RCR (p = 0.02). Visual analyses and clinical reports were concordant with the extracted quantitative metrics.

CONCLUSION

The proposed new method and presented software solution (CASSIA) provide the capability to assess quantitatively myocardial metabolism along the prosthetic valve region in routine [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans for evaluating heart valve infectious processes. VHI and RCR are proposed as new potential adjunctive measures for PVIE diagnosis.

FDG PET/CT in Cardiac Infection: Does It Matter? A Narrative Review

The limited performance of echocardiography in specific infectious processes involving the heart led to the search for additional diagnostic tools. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) has been proposed for its diagnostic abilities in several infectious diseases including cardiac infections. A literature review of studies evaluating FDG PET/CT in native valve infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve IE, cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) infection, and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection is presented, focusing on studies published in recent years. Overall, in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), FDG PET/CT demonstrate high sensitivity (73-93%) and specificity (80-95%), while in native valve endocarditis (NVE) the sensitivity is very low (22-68%), with high specificity (97-100%) similar to PVE. For CIED, LVAD infection, and transcatheter aortic valve implantation associated endocarditis, data come from small studies and show good diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT. International guidelines are increasingly recommending FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of specific conditions of cardiac infections. Beyond the diagnostic performance ability, few studies have evaluated the added benefit of FDG PET/CT in terms of clinical outcomes of patients with suspected cardiac infection. This should be the focus in future studies.

Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices

Nuclear imaging techniques like single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and radionuclide angiography have wide applications in patients receiving a cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED), who cannot usually undergo cardiac magnetic resonance. Our aim was to provide an update of single-photon imaging clinical applications, with a specific focus on CIED recipients. SPECT imaging is commonly used in CIED patients to assess myocardial perfusion, but it can also be used to evaluate myocardial viability, which is an important predictor of LV function improvement by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Radionuclide angiography has shown higher temporal resolution and reproducibility than SPECT in the evaluation of cardiac function and dyssynchrony. Left ventricular dyssynchrony as assessed by radionuclide angiography with phase analysis may be reliably used for CRT patient selection and evaluation of CRT response. SPECT imaging with meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine allows for cardiac sympathetic innervation examination, which may be used for prognostic stratification of heart failure patients and prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Finally, promising results in CIED infection diagnosis have been shown by SPECT with radiolabeled autologous white blood cells.

Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening disease with stable prevalence despite prophylactic, diagnostic, and therapeutic advances. In parallel to the growing number of cardiac devices implanted, the number of patients developing IE on prosthetic valves and cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) is increasing at a rapid pace. The diagnosis of IE is particularly challenging, and currently relies on the Duke-Li modified classification, which include clinical, microbiological, and imaging criteria. While echocardiography remains the first line imaging technique, especially in native valve endocarditis, the incremental value of two nuclear imaging techniques, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) and white blood cells single photon emission tomography with computed tomography (WBC-SPECT), has emerged for the management of prosthetic valve and CIED IE. In this review, we will summarize the procedures for image acquisition, discuss the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and WBC-SPECT imaging in different clinical situations of IE, and review the respective diagnostic performance of these nuclear imaging techniques and their integration into the diagnostic algorithm for patients with a suspicion of IE.

18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is challenging because of its variable presentations. We studied the value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of CIED infection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty patients with suspected CIED infection underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The control group was ten patients with asymptomatic CIED who underwent cancer-related 18F-FDG-PET/CT. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was evaluated visually, semiquantitatively as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR). Final diagnosis of CIED infection was based on clinical and bacteriological data. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was visually positive in all 9 patients with recent (≤ 8 weeks) implantation of CIED, but only 4 had confirmed CIED infection. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was true positive in 9 out of 21 cases with remote implantation of CIED and false positive in 3 (14.3%) cases. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was also false positive in 3 (30%) cases of control group. The SUVmax of the pocket area was significantly higher in patients with CIED infection than in the control group (4.8 ± 2.4 vs 2.0 ± .8, P < .001). By using the cut-off value of TBR ≥ 1.8, sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of CIED infection in patients with remote implantation was 90% and specificity 73%, PPV 75%, and NPV 89%.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG-PET/CT is a sensitive but nonspecific method in the diagnosis of CIED infection.

Incidence of lead erosion in a real-world cohort and a case of successful treatment with an antimicrobial mesh

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections are a major complication of CIED therapy and associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of lead erosion as one cause of the CIED-related infections and to provide detailed information about the therapy of two cases of lead erosion. We retrospectively screened the database of a large clinic specialized on patients with CIED (HIZ BERLIN Herzschrittmacher- und ICD-Zentrum, Berlin, Germany) for cases of lead erosion between 2015 and 2020. A total of 5971 outpatients were treated at the HIZ BERLIN - including 4782 patients with a one- or two-chamber pacemaker, 837 patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 352 patients with a biventricular device for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The incidence of lead erosion was 0.033%. As one of the two patients, who suffered from lead erosions, had no signs of systemic infection, the patient received local therapy with an antimicrobial mesh and intravenous antibiotics. After twelve months, he showed a good clinical outcome without ongoing or recurring infection. In conclusion, the incidence of lead erosion is low. In case of lead erosions without signs of systemic infection, an antimicrobial mesh might be implanted as an off-label use in patients that decline complete device removal.

PET Cardiac Imaging (Perfusion, Viability, Sarcoidosis, and Infection)

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Given the increased availability of radiopharmaceuticals, improved positron emission tomography (PET) camera systems and proven higher diagnostic accuracy, PET is increasingly utilized in the management of various cardiovascular diseases. PET has high temporal and spatial resolution, when compared to Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography. In clinical practice, hybrid imaging with sequential PET and Computed Tomography acquisitions (PET/CT) or concurrent PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging are standard. This article will review applications of cardiovascular PET/CT including myocardial perfusion, viability, cardiac sarcoidosis/inflammation, and infection.

Infection of cardiac prosthetic valves and implantable electronic devices: early diagnosis and treatment

There has been a recent rise in the use of implantable cardiac devices, mostly valves but also electronic ones, such as pacemakers, and implantable defibrillators. The increasing use of these devices had as a consequence the raised incidence of endocarditis, an infrequent but morbid complication of these procedures. Thus, early diagnosis of the implantable cardiac devices related infection and endocarditis became pivotal for appropriate management. For diagnostic purposes, the modified Duke criteria are widely used, which are based on clinical and imaging findings, in addition to serological analyses and blood cultures. 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a recently employed method in order to improve the early diagnosis of endocarditis as well as infection of the implantable device. It is likely, that combining the modified Duke criteria with the FDG PET/CT, will increase the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis and will guide the treating physician to an early and appropriate management.

Impact of delayed device re-implantation on outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device related infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Optimal timing of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) re-implantation following device removal due to infection is undefined. Multinational guidelines reflect this and include no specific recommendation for this timing, while others have recommended waiting at least 14 days in cases of CIED related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). The current work seeks to clarify this issue.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed institutional data at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota of patients aged ≥ 18 years who developed CIED-IE from January 1, 1991 to February 1, 2016. CIED-IE was defined as echocardiogram reported device lead or valvular vegetation. Regression analyses were used to relate the risk of clinical outcomes to the interval between CIED removal and re-implantation and the location of vegetations.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients met study inclusion criteria. A majority (68.8%) of patients were men and the median age was 68.0 years. Transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed in 95.4% of patients, with valve vegetations detected in 33.9% (n = 37). Survival analysis comparing patients in whom device re-implantation was < 14 days vs. ≥14 days, and further categorized by those with and without valve vegetation, showed a significant difference (P = 0.028); patients with valve vegetation and reimplantation interval < 14 days had the lowest (58.7%) 12-month survival. When adjusted for valve vegetation, longer time interval for reimplantation trended toward increased hospital length of stay (P = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the recommended 14-day delay between CIED extraction and re-implantation in CIED-IE patients is associated with a survival benefit, but longer length of hospital stay following re-implantation.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

A Review of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections for the Practicing Electrophysiologist

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are morbid, costly, and difficult to manage. This review explores the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CIED infections. Diagnostic accuracy has been improved through increased awareness and improved imaging strategies. Pocket or bloodstream infection with virulent organisms often requires complete system extraction. Emerging prophylactic interventions and novel devices have expanded preventative strategies and options for re-implantation. A clear and nuanced understanding of CIED infection is important to the practicing electrophysiologist.

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially lifesaving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased health care costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well-recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. When compared with previous guidelines or consensus statements, the present consensus document gives guidance on the use of novel device alternatives, novel oral anticoagulants, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, as well as definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. The recognition that an international consensus document focused on management of CIED infections is lacking, the dissemination of results from new important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a Novel 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

PET/CT with 18F-FDG in suspected intracardiac device-related infections: analysis of performance and diagnostic usefulness

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Cardiac device-related infections (CDRI) may be life-threatening and require early and accurate diagnosis. The aims of this study were to analyze the performance of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in suspected CDRI, to assess changes to the initial diagnosis, and to identify a clinical subgroup deriving the greatest benefit from this imaging modality.

METHODS

Retrospective study including patients evaluated by PET/CT for suspected CDRI from 2011 to 2018. We assessed PET/CT performance and the agreement between the initial, post-PET and definitive diagnoses. We also assessed changes in the diagnosis, depending on initial clinical suspicion, to identify patients deriving the greatest benefit from PET/CT.

RESULTS

We included 44 patients. The prevalence of endocarditis was 57%. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis were 0.84 and 0.95, respectively. Post-PET diagnosis improved the initial diagnosis by 45%. PET/CT correctly reclassified 57% of patients with initial suspicion of generator pocket infection by detecting lead infection.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT showed high diagnostic performance in suspected of CDRI and significantly improved the conventional diagnostic approach, especially in patients with initial suspicion of focal infection.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Infection: Approach to Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most utilized invasive electrical neuromodulation treatment for the management of refractory chronic pain syndromes. Infection is one of the most dreaded complications related to SCS implantation and may prevent patients from receiving adequate pain treatment, adding to the initial cost and disability. Most SCS infections present as generator pocket infection. However, delay in diagnosis may lead to complications such as meningitis, epidural abscess, and/or vertebral osteomyelitis. Early recognition of SCS-related infections and associated complications is based on clinical suspicion, laboratory testing, and appropriate diagnostic imaging. While superficial surgical site infection following SCS implant may be treated with antibiotic therapy alone, deep infection involving implant warrants device removal to achieve cure. Duration of antimicrobial therapy depends on severity of clinical presentation and presence or absence of associated complications. Several preventive strategies can be incorporated in surgical practice to reduce the risk of SCS infection.

Clinical Presentation, Timing, and Microbiology of CIED Infections: An Analysis of the WRAP-IT Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study characterized the microbiology of major cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections that occurred during the WRAP-IT (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial) study.

BACKGROUND

The WRAP-IT study offers a unique opportunity for further understanding of the pathogens involved in major CIED infections in a prospective dataset, with implications for clinical practice and infection management.

METHODS

A total of 6,800 patients randomized 1:1 to receive an antibacterial envelope or not (control subjects) were included in this analysis. Patient characteristics, infection manifestation (pocket vs. systemic), and infection microbiology were evaluated through all follow-up (36 months). Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 3,371 patients received an envelope, and 3,429 patients were control subjects. Major CIED infection occurred in 32 patients who received an envelope and 51 control subjects (36-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 1.3% and 1.9%, respectively; p = 0.046). A 61% reduction in major pocket infection was observed within 12 months of the procedure in the envelope group (hazard ratio: 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.73; p = 0.003). Among 76 patients with major infections who had a sample taken, causative pathogens were identified in 47 patients. Staphylococcus species were the predominate pathogen (n = 31) and envelope use resulted in a 76% reduction in Staphylococcus-related pocket infections (n = 4 vs. 17; p = 0.010). Envelope use was not associated with delayed onset of pocket infections and did not affect the presentation of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibacterial envelope use resulted in a significant reduction of major CIED pocket infections and was particularly effective against Staphylococcus species, the predominant cause of pocket infections. (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial [WRAP-IT]; NCT02277990).

Management of cardiac implantable electronic device infection using a complete interdisciplinary approach

Technological advances and increasing operator experience have improved the success rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE). However, in some cases-especially with longer lead dwelling time-TLE can be highly complicated. In this case report, the authors present an unusual case of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) pocket infection diagnosed by ¹⁸F‑fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F‑FDG-PET/CT). Complete lead extraction required a combined transvenous and surgical approach. Contralateral reimplantation failed due to occlusion of the right brachiocephalic vein. Therefore, a subcutaneous ICD was implanted. This case highlights the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to the treatment of cardiac implantable electronic device infection.

F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the infection of heart

Infections involving the heart are becoming increasingly common, and a timely diagnosis of utmost importance, despite its challenges. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a recently introduced diagnostic tool in cardiology. This review focuses on the current evidence for the use of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis, cardiac implantable device infection, left ventricular assist device infection, and secondary complications. The author discusses considerations when using FDG PET/CT in routine clinical practice, patient preparation for reducing physiologic myocardial uptake, acquisition of images, and interpretation of PET/CT findings. This review also functions to highlight the need for a standardized acquisition protocol.

Cardiovascular Imaging in Infective Endocarditis: A Multimodality Approach

Multimodality imaging plays a pivotal role in the evaluation and management of infective endocarditis (IE)-a condition with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of IE is primarily based on the modified Duke criteria with echocardiography as the first-line imaging modality. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography delineate vegetation location and size, assess for paravalvular extension of infection, and have the added advantage of defining the hemodynamic effects of valvular or device infection. Native and prosthetic valve IE, infections relating to cardiac implantable electronic devices, and indwelling catheters are effectively evaluated with echocardiography. However, complementary imaging is occasionally required when there remains diagnostic uncertainty following transesophageal echocardiography. Multidetector computed tomography and nuclear imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography and white blood cell scintigraphy have been shown to reduce the rate of misdiagnosed IE particularly in the setting of prosthetic valve endocarditis, paravalvular extension of infection, and cardiac implantable electronic devices. In this review, we describe a modern approach to cardiac imaging in native and prosthetic valve endocarditis, as well as cardiac implantable electronic devices including pacing devices and left ventricular assist devices. Current guidelines addressing the role of multimodality imaging in IE are discussed. The utility of imaging in the assessment of local and distant endocarditis complications such as pericardial sequelae, myocarditis, and embolic events is also addressed.

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the treatment of pacemaker pocket infection in patients unable or unwilling to undergo CIED extraction

PURPOSE

The occurrence of cardiac pacemaker pocket infection has markedly increased and has become a new problem facing cardiovascular internists. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treating cardiac pacemaker pocket infection using negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients who are unwilling or unable to have their cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) removed.

METHODS

From March 2013 to April 2019, NPWT was applied to 26 patients with cardiac pacemaker pocket infection who were unwilling or unable to have their CIEDs removed. In the first stage, a negative-pressure drainage system was placed in the pacemaker pocket after debridement. Then, NPWT was used to seal the wound, and the negative pressure (300-400 mmHg) was sustained for 5-7 days. In the second stage, the pacemaker was relocated to the subpectoral layer, and the wound was closed.

RESULTS

In all but three of our 26 patients, the wound healed completely without complications and without evidence of residual infection. The average follow-up period was 26.92 ± 9.46 months. Only 3 diabetic patients whose tissue bacterial cultures revealed that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis developed uncontrolled infections. Eventually, the entire original pacemaker systems were removed, and new pacemakers were implanted in the contralateral chest wall.

CONCLUSIONS

When warranted by strictly selected indications, the method of NPWT without CIED extraction can be considered as a new and effective treatment for patients with pacemaker pocket infection who are unwilling or unable to have the device removed.

Comparison Between ESC and Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the value of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria, including ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) in prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVE). Secondary objectives were: 1) to assess the reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT; 2) to compare its diagnostic value with that of echocardiography; and 3) to assess the diagnostic value of the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake BACKGROUND: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has been added as a major criterion in the ESC 2015 infective endocarditis (IE) guidelines, but the benefit of the ESC criteria has not been prospectively compared with the conventional Duke criteria.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, 175 patients with suspected PVE were prospectively included in 3 French centers. After exclusion of patients with uninterpretable ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, 115 patients were evaluated, including 91 definite and 24 rejected IE, as defined by an expert consensus.

RESULTS

Cardiac uptake by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was observed in 67 of 91 patients with definite PVE and 6 with rejected IE (sensitivity 73.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 63.3% to 82.3%], specificity 75% [95% CI: 53.3% to 90.2%]). The ESC 2015 classification increased the sensitivity of Duke criteria from 57.1% (95% CI: 46.3% to 67.5%) to 83.5% (95% CI: 74.3% to 90.5%) (p < 0.001), but decreased its specificity from 95.8% (95% CI: 78.9% to 99.9%) to 70.8% (95% CI: 48.9% to 87.4%). Intraobserver reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was good (kappa = 0.84) but interobserver reproducibility was less satisfactory (kappa = 0.63). A diffuse splenic uptake was observed in 24 (20.3%) patients, including 23 (25.3%) of definite PVE, and only 1 (4.2%) rejected PVE (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool in suspected PVE, and explains the greater sensitivity of ESC criteria than Duke criteria. However, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also presents with important limitations concerning its feasibility, specificity, and reproducibility. Our study describes for the first time a new endocarditis criterion, that is, the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

Diagnostic imaging in infective endocarditis: a contemporary perspective

INTRODUCTION

Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a diagnostic challenge. Prompt diagnosis is essential for accurate risk stratification and appropriate therapeutic decisions and surgical management. In recent years, the use of multimodal imaging has had a transformative effect on the diagnostic approach of IE in selected patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review assesses published literature on different imaging modalities for the diagnosis of IE published between 1 January 2009 and 1 February 2020. We illustrate the diagnostic approach to IE with three clinical cases.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel approaches to imaging for cardiac and extracardiac complications improve and individualize diagnosis, management, and prognosis in patients with suspected IE. The use of multimodal imaging should be guided by a multidisciplinary group of medical providers that includes infectious disease specialists, radiologists, cardiologists, and cardiothoracic surgeons.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance

In 2019, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published excellent articles pertaining to imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease. In this review we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field and provide the reader with an opportunity to review a wide selection of articles. In this first article of this 2-part series we will focus on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. We will specifically discuss imaging as it relates to coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis and inflammation, coronary artery calcification, cardiomyopathies, cardiac implantable electronic devices, prosthetic valves, and left ventricular assist devices. The second part of this review will place emphasis on myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography.

Infective Endocarditis: A Contemporary Review

Infective endocarditis (IE), initially described more than 350 years ago, involves infection of the endocardial surface of the heart. The clinical manifestations of IE can involve every organ system, and the cardiac manifestations can include valvular vegetation, abscess, periannular extension of infection, and myopericarditis. Echocardiography is crucial in the diagnosis of IE, but alternative imaging modalities are playing an increasing role in the diagnosis and management of IE. Multidisciplinary care is imperative to the management of IE, often requiring the expertise of cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, radiologists, and neurologists. We performed a literature search of the PubMed database from January 1st, 2000, to September 30th, 2019, using the terms infective endocarditis, diagnosis, and management to find the most pertinent and highest-quality evidence. This review summarizes key aspects of IE, with a focus on emerging advances in diagnosis. We also highlight growing patient populations at risk for IE, including patients with intracardiac devices and congenital heart disease.

Diagnosis and management of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections based on process mapping

BACKGROUND

Infection is a well-recognized complication of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, including the more recently available subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD). Although the AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines include recommendations for S-ICD use, currently there are no clinical trial data that address the diagnosis and management of S-ICD infections. Therefore, an expert panel was convened to develop consensus on these topics.

METHODS

A process mapping methodology was used to achieve a primary goal - the development of consensus on the diagnosis and management of S-ICD infections. Two face-to-face meetings of panel experts were conducted to recommend useful information to clinicians in individual patient management of S-ICD infections.

RESULTS

Panel consensus of a stepwise approach in the diagnosis and management was developed to provide guidance in individual patient management.

CONCLUSION

Achieving expert panel consensus by process mapping methodology in S-ICD infection diagnosis and management was attainable, and the results should be helpful in individual patient management.