Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection after Early versus Delayed Lead Repositioning

(1) Background: Early reintervention increases the risk of infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Some operators therefore delay lead repositioning in the case of dislocation by weeks; however, there is no evidence to support this practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of reoperation on infection risk. (2) Methods: The data from consecutive patients undergoing lead repositioning in two European referral centers were retrospectively analyzed. The odds ratio (OR) of CIED infection in the first year was compared among patients undergoing early (≤1 week) vs. delayed (>1 week to 1 year) reoperation. (3) Results: Out of 249 patients requiring CIED reintervention, 85 patients (34%) underwent an early (median 2 days) and 164 (66%) underwent a delayed lead revision (median 53 days). A total of nine (3.6%) wound/device infections were identified. The risk of infection was numerically lower in the early (1.2%) vs. delayed (4.9%) intervention group yielding no statistically significant difference, even after adjustment for typical risk factors for CIED infection (adjusted OR = 0.264, 95% CI 0.032-2.179, p = 0.216). System explantation/extraction was necessary in seven cases, all being revised in the delayed group. (4) Conclusions: In this bicentric, international study, delayed lead repositioning did not reduce the risk of CIED infection.

Use of mexiletine in therapy-refractory recurrent ventricular tachycardia storm

Electrical storm due to recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) is a life-threatening arrhythmic emergency. The authors present a case report of a 69-year-old male patient with VT storm of non-ischemic etiology. Despite optimal medical treatment escalated by amiodarone antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the patient experienced multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. An electrophysiological study revealed an epicardial substrate; however, considering the patient's extreme obesity and active anticoagulant effect, catheter ablation was deemed to be unfeasible. Subsequently, mexiletine was added to the patient's drug regimen, resulting in successful control of arrhythmias during the following 6 months. Although the most recent European guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias mention mexiletine only for the treatment of LQT3 patients, its use for treatment-refractory VT storm seems to also be an important indication area.

Useful Electrocardiographic Signs to Support the Prediction of Favorable Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone therapeutic opportunity for selected patients with heart failure. For optimal patient selection, no other method has been proven to be more effective than the 12-lead ECG, and hence ECG characteristics are extensively researched. The evaluation of particular ECG signs before the implantation may improve selection and, consequently, clinical outcomes. The definition of a true left bundle branch block (LBBB) seems to be the best starting point with which to select patients for CRT. Although there are no universally accepted definitions of LBBB, using the classical LBBB criteria, some ECG parameters are associated with CRT response. In patients with non-true LBBB or non-LBBB, further ECG predictors of response and non-response could be analyzed, such as QRS fractionation, signs of residual left bundle branch conduction, S-waves in V6, intrinsicoid deflection, or non-invasive estimates of Q-LV which are described in newer publications. The most important and recent study results of the topic are summarized and discussed in this current review.

Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Our meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): -9.11 min (95% CI: -12.93 to -5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: -5.21 min (95% CI: -5.51 to -4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: -3.96 mGy (95% CI: -4.27 to -3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: -104.26 s (95% CI: -183.37 to -25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41-2.15; p = 0.89).

Conclusion

The ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates.

Indications for mexiletine in the new ESC guidelines and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Mexiletine is a class IB sodium-channel blocker. Unlike class IA or IC antiarrhythmic drugs, mexiletine rather shortens than prolongs action potential duration; therefore, it is less associated with proarrhythmic effects.

AREAS COVERED

Recently, new European Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death were published, including a reappraisal of some established older antiarrhythmic drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Mexiletine offers a first-line, genotype-specific treatment strategy for LQT3 patients as emphasized by the most recent guidelines. Besides this recommendation, current study reports suggest that in therapy-refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias and electrical storms adjunctive mexiletine treatment may offer the possibility of stabilizing patients with or without concomitant interventional therapy such as catheter ablation.

Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation: a quasi-randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Routine ultrasound (US)-guidance for femoral venous access to decrease vascular complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures has been advocated. However, the benefit has not been unequivocally demonstrated by randomized-trial data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on uninterrupted anticoagulant treatment were included. A quasi-random allocation to either US-guided or conventional puncture group was based on which of the two procedure rooms the patient was scheduled in, with only one of the rooms equipped with an US machine including a vascular transducer. The same 4 novice operators in rotation, with no relevant previous experience in US-guided vascular access performed venous punctures in both rooms. Major and minor vascular complications and the rate of prolonged hospitalization were compared. Major vascular complication was defined as groin hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, or pseudoaneurysm. Hematoma was considered as a major vascular complication if it met type 2 or higher Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria (requiring nonsurgical, medical intervention by a health care professional; leading to hospitalization or increased level of care, or prompting evacuation). Of the 457 patients 199 were allocated to the US-guided puncture group, while the conventional, palpation-based approach was performed in 258 cases. Compared to the conventional technique, US-guidance reduced the rate of any vascular complication (11.63% vs. 2.01%, p<0.0001), including both major (4.26% vs. 1.01%, p=0.038) and minor (7.36% vs 1.01%, p=0.001) vascular complications. In addition, the rate of prolonged hospitalization was lower in the US-guided puncture group (5.04% vs. 1.01%, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

The use of US for femoral vein puncture in patients undergoing PVI decreased the rate of both major and minor vascular complications. This quasi-randomized comparison strongly supports adapting routine use of US for AF ablation procedures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Editorial: Developments in cardiac implantable electronic device therapy: how can we improve clinical implementation?

CIED, cardiac implantable electronic devices; CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; CRT-D, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; EA, electroanatomical; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LBB, left bundle branch; LBBAP, left bundle branch area pacing; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; MRI, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; S-ICD, subcutaneous defibrillator.

Inability to perform 'en bloc' pulmonary vein isolation requiring ablation of the intervenous carina increases recurrence of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Failure to isolate ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PV) "en bloc" by wide-area circumferential ablation (WACA) may necessitate ablation at the intervenous carina. It is unknown how this scenario impacts rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

METHODS

A standard random-effect meta-analysis of randomized or observational studies were performed, where the outcome of first-time AF ablation was reported in patients with "en bloc" isolation of PVs by WACA as compared with those in whom ablation at the intervenous carina was needed after WACA to achieve complete isolation.

RESULTS

A total of five single-center, observational studies (N = 1185) and one, multi-center randomized trial (N = 234) were enrolled. PV isolation could be achieved by WACA "en bloc" in 902/1419 (63.6%) cases. The rest required additional ablation at one or both of the left and right intervenous carinas to achieve isolation. The follow-up time after ablation ranged from 1 to 2 years in the included trials. The incidence of AF recurrence proved to be significantly lower in patients with successful "en bloc" isolation compared to those requiring carina ablation(s) to achieve complete bilateral PV isolation (MH-OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.42-2.53, p < .01) CONCLUSION: This present meta-analysis demonstrates a lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in patients with bilateral "en bloc" isolation, as compared to those who needed additional carina ablation for complete PVI. Therefore, it is imperative that every effort be made to isolate ipsilateral PVs "en bloc" during PVI.

A head-to-head comparison of laser vs. powered mechanical sheaths as first choice and second line extraction tools

AIMS

During transvenous lead extraction (TLE) longer dwelling time often requires the use of powered sheaths. This study aimed to compare outcomes with the laser and powered mechanical tools.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single-centre data from consecutive patients undergoing TLE between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Efficacy and safety of the primary extraction tool were compared. Procedures requiring crossover between powered sheaths were also analysed. Moreover, we examined the efficacy of each level of the stepwise approach. Out of 166 patients, 142 (age 65.4 ± 13.7 years) underwent TLE requiring advanced techniques with 245 leads (dwelling time 9.4 ± 6.3 years). Laser sheaths were used in 64.9%, powered mechanical sheaths in 35.1% of the procedures as primary extraction tools. Procedural success rate was 85.5% with laser and 82.5% with mechanical sheaths (P = 0.552). Minor and major complications were observed in similar rate. Procedural mortality occurred only in the laser group in the case of three patients. Crossover was needed in 19.5% after laser and in 12.8% after mechanical extractions (P = 0.187). Among crossover procedures, only clinical success favoured the secondary mechanical arm (87.1 vs. 54.5%, aOR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.79, P = 0.030). After step-by-step efficacy analysis, procedural success was 64.9% with the first-line extraction tool, 75.1% after crossover, 84.5% with bailout femoral snare, and 91.8% by non-emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of laser and mechanical sheaths were similar, however in the subgroup of crossover procedures mechanical tools had better performance regarding clinical success. Device diversity seems to help improving outcomes, especially in the most complicated cases.

Clinical outcomes of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy in a polymorbid patient cohort

Background

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been designed to overcome lead-related complications and device endocarditis. Lacking the ability for pacing or resynchronization therapy its usage is limited to selected patients at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD).

Objective

The aim of this single-center study was to assess clinical outcomes of S-ICD and single-chamber transvenous (TV)-ICD in an all-comers population.

Methods

The study cohort comprised a total of 119 ICD patients who underwent either S-ICD (n = 35) or TV-ICD (n = 84) implantation at the University Hospital Frankfurt from 2009 to 2017. By applying an inverse probability-weighting (IPW) analysis based on the propensity score including the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to adjust for potential extracardiac comorbidities, we aimed for head-to-head comparison on the study composite endpoint: overall survival, hospitalization, and device-associated events (including appropriate and inappropriate shocks or system-related complications).

Results

The median age of the study population was 66.0 years, 22.7% of the patients were female. The underlying heart disease was ischemic cardiomyopathy (61.4%) with a median LVEF of 30%. Only 52.9% had received an ICD for primary prevention, most of the patients (67.3%) had advanced heart failure (NYHA class II–III) and 16.8% were in atrial fibrillation. CCI was 5 points in TV-ICD patients vs. 4 points for patients with S-ICD (p = 0.209) indicating increased morbidity. The composite endpoint occurred in 38 patients (31.9 %), revealing no significant difference between patients implanted with an S-ICD or TV-ICD (unweighted HR 1.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.78–2.90; p = 0.229, weighted HR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.61–1.50, p = 0.777). Furthermore, we observed no difference in any single clinical endpoint or device-associated outcome, neither in the unweighted cohort nor following inverse probability-weighting.

Conclusion

Clinical outcomes of the S-ICD and TV-ICD revealed no differences in the composite endpoint including survival, freedom of hospitalization and device-associated events, even after careful adjustment for potential confounders. Moreover, the CCI was evaluated in a S-ICD cohort demonstrating higher survival rates than predicted by the CCI in young, polymorbid (S-)ICD patients.

Dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial

Aims

Use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging owing to issues with renal clearance, drug accumulation, and increased proarrhythmic risks. Because CKD is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), it is important to establish the efficacy and safety of AAD treatment in patients with CKD.

Methods and results

Dronedarone efficacy and safety in individuals with AF/AFL and varying renal functionality [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, ≥45 and <60, and <45 mL/min] was investigated in a post hoc analysis of ATHENA (NCT00174785), a randomized, double-blind trial of dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF/AFL plus additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Log-rank testing and Cox regression were used to compare the incidence of endpoints between treatments. Overall, 4588 participants were enrolled from the trial. There was no interaction between treatment group and baseline eGFR assessed as a continuous variable (P = 0.743) for the first CV hospitalization or death from any cause (primary outcome). This outcome was lower with dronedarone vs. placebo across a wide range of renal function. First CV hospitalization and first AF/AFL recurrence were both lower in the two least renally impaired subgroups with dronedarone vs. placebo. Treatment emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more frequent with dronedarone vs. placebo and occurred more often in patients with severe renal impairment.

Conclusion

Dronedarone is an effective AAD in patients with AF/AFL and CV risk factors across a wide range of renal function.

A head-to-head comparison of the first choice and crossover lead extraction tool: laser vs. mechanical

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

During transvenous lead extraction (TLE) longer dwelling time often requires the use of powered sheaths.

Purpose

This study aimed to compare outcomes with the laser and mechanical tools.

Methods

Single-center data from consecutive patients undergoing TLE between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy and safety of the primary extraction tool were compared. Procedures requiring crossover between powered sheaths were also analyzed. Moreover, we examined the efficacy of each level of the stepwise approach.

Results

Out of 166 patients 142 (age 65.4±13.7 years) underwent TLE requiring advanced techniques with 245 leads (dwelling time 9.4±6.3 years). Laser sheaths were used in 64.9%, mechanical sheaths in 35.1% of the procedures as primary extraction tools. Procedural success rate was 85.5% with laser and 82.5% with mechanical sheaths (p=0.552). Minor and major complications were observed in similar rate. Procedural mortality occurred only in the laser group in case of 3 patients. Crossover was needed in 19.5% after laser and in 12.8% after mechanical extractions (p=0.187). Among crossover procedures only clinical success favored the secondary mechanical arm (87.1% vs. 54.5%, aOR: 0.09, 95%CI: 0.01-0.79, p=0.030). After step-by-step efficacy analysis, procedural success was 64.9% with the first-line extraction tool, 75.1% after crossover, 84.5% with bailout femoral snare, and 91.8% by non-emergency surgery (Figure).

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of laser and mechanical sheaths were similar in our study, however in the subgroup of crossover procedures mechanical tools had better performance regarding clinical success. Device diversity seems to be indispensable in order to achieve the most optimal outcomes.

Zero and Minimal Fluoroscopic Approaches During Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablations for cardiac arrhythmias are conventionally performed under fluoroscopic guidance. To guide these procedures, zero/minimal fluoroscopy (Z/MF) approaches have become available, using three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing these two different methods for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

Methods

Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of conventional, fluoroscopy-guided vs. Z/MF approaches in patients undergoing electrophysiology (EP) procedures for SVTs. The random-effects model was used to derive mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Twenty-four studies involving 9,074 patients met our inclusion criteria. There was no difference between the groups in terms of acute success rate (RR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.99–1.01; p = 0.97) and long-term success rate (RR: 1.01, 95% CI, 1.00–1.03; p = 0.13). Compared to the conventional method, zero-and-minimal fluoroscopy (Z/MF) ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time [MD: −1.58 min (95% CI, −2.21 to −0.96 min; p < 0.01)] and ablation time [MD: −25.23 s (95% CI: −42.04 to −8.43 s; p < 0.01)]. No difference could be detected between the two groups in terms of the procedure time [MD: 3.06 min (95% CI: −0.97 to 7.08; p = 0.14)] and the number of ablation applications [MD: 0.13 (95% CI: −0.86 to 1.11; p = 0.80)]. The complication rate was 1.59% in the entire study population and did not differ among the groups (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.45–1.05; p = 0.08).

Conclusions

The Z/MF approach for the catheter ablation of SVTs is a feasible method that reduces radiation exposure and ablation time without compromising the acute and long-term success or complication rates.

Implantation of a VDD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead via a persistent left superior vena cava

A persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) represents a challenging congenital abnormality for transvenous cardiac device implantation. In the current case a secondary prophylactic VDD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation was planned in a 75-year-old woman presenting with ischemic cardiomyopathy and elevated stroke risk. Since no venous communication to the right side was identified intraoperatively, the lead was placed via the persistent LSVC. The far-field signal on the floating atrial dipole could be successfully blanked out, and appropriate device function with high and stable atrial sensing was demonstrated at follow-up.

Rationale and feasibility of the atrioventricular single-lead ICD systems with a floating atrial dipole (DX) in clinical practice

Cardiac implantable electronic devices establish proper therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death, significantly reducing the morbidity and mortality of patients with arrhythmias and heart failure. It is well-known that the number of electrodes increases the risk of complications. To preserve the benefit of atrial sensing without the need to implant an additional lead, a single-lead ICD system with a floating atrial dipole (DX ICD lead) has been developed. Besides all of the potential benefits, the necessity of a reliable and stable atrial sensing via the floating dipole could be the main concern against the use of this lead type. In the current generation of DX devices, the specially filtered atrial signal seems to be high enough and stable over time, which is crucial in the early detection of atrial arrhythmias, discrimination between different forms of tachycardias in order to prevent inappropriate ICD therapy, and achieving an optimal atrioventricular and interventricular synchrony in patients with a two-lead CRT-DX system. The present review summarizes the benefits and potential drawbacks of the DX ICD systems based on the available literature, furthermore, proposes an evidence-based algorithm of ICD type selection.

Dronedarone vs placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial

Background

The use of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging due to issues with renal clearance, drug accumulation and increased proarrhythmic risks. Since CKD is a common comorbidity with atrial fibrillation (AF), it is important to establish the efficacy and safety for antiarrhythmic drug treatment in patients with CKD.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with AF or atrial flutter (AFL) across different stages of renal impairment.

Methods

In this post-hoc analysis of ATHENA (NCT00174785), a randomised, double-blind trial of dronedarone 400 mg BID vs placebo in patients with AF or AFL plus additional risk factors for death and a calculated glomerular filtration rate ≥10 mL/min, the primary outcome was time to first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisation or death. Renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) was assessed using CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation and patients were grouped by eGFR (10–44, 45–59, ≥60 mL/min). Log-rank testing and Cox regression were used to compare time to events between treatment groups.

Results

In ATHENA, 43.6% of placebo and 42.2% of dronedarone patients had mild-to-moderate CKD (Table). Median time to CV hospitalisation/death was longer in all strata for dronedarone vs placebo, reaching significance in the 45–59 and ≥60 mL/min groups (Figure 1). There was a trend towards more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), deaths and discontinuations due to TEAEs in patients with eGFR 10–44 mL/min. No clear difference in safety was seen between treatment arms except for discontinuations, which were higher with dronedarone.

Conclusions

This analysis confirms the efficacy of dronedarone, demonstrated in ATHENA, across different stages of renal impairment. Further assessment of safety will require larger populations of patients with CKD.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Sanofi

The prevalence of RAASi uptitration limiting hyperkalemia and the suitability of potassium binders among patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

The use of the renin-angiotensin-aldosteron-system inhibitor (RAASi) regime is crucial to reduce the mortality and morbidity of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, it is well known that among real life circumstances it is challenging to reach the guideline-recommended target doses (TDs) of RAASi-s, due to the occurrence of side effects (e.g. hyperkalemia). Based on the ESC expert consensus document, it is recommended to reduce the RAASi dosages or discontinue the therapy when significant hyperkalemia (HK) occurs (serum potassium &gt;5.0 mmol/l or &gt;6.0 mmol/l, respectively). Within the last years, trials of patiromer and zirconium cyclosilicate demonstrated dose-dependent effect of these drugs enhancing potassium level lowering. The ongoing DIAMOND study examining the effect of patiromer among patients with previous HK (se potassium &gt;5mmol/l) in the effect of RAASi-s in HFrEF hopefully will answer the question whether the use of a potassium binder and in its effect the use of TD-s of RAASi translates to significant mortality benefit in HFrEF.

Aim

To assess the prevalence of RAASi uptitration limiting HK and to assess the potential suitability of potassium binders among HFrEF patients followed-up regularly at a heart failure outpatient clinic (HFOC).

Methods

Data of 557 consecutive HFrEF patients (NYHA: 3.1±0.8; LVEF: 27.4±6.6%; age: 61.2±13.0 years; male: 76.3%; ischemic: 47.2%; atrial fibrillation: 27.3%; diabetes: 35.7%; hypertension: 72.7%, systolic blood pressure: 124.3±24.3mmHg, eGFR: 65.6±23.6 ml/min/1.73m2) was analyzed. At baseline ACEi/ARBs in 33.6%, BBs in 40.9%, MRAs in 37.9% of the total cohort (TC) were used.

Results

After therapy optimization (TO) ACEis/ARBs were applied in 97.5% and TD (equivalent to at least 10 mg of enalapril b.i.d.) was reached in 59.4% of the TC. BBs in 90.7%, TDs of BBs in 48.3%, MRAs in 64.3%, TDs of MRAs in 24.6% of the TC were applied. In 100 patients (17.9%) the TDs of ACEi/ARBs and MRAs were reached simultaneously. Among those 457 patients not reaching the TD of ACEi/ARBs and/or the TD of MRAs the occurrence of HK (se potassium &gt;5 mmol/l) was quite frequent (45.3%, 207 patients), the prevalence of HK with the need of permanent dose reduction of RAASi regime (se potassium&gt;5.5 mmol/l) was 10.5% (48 patients) and the prevalence of HK resulting permanent discontinuation of RAASi (se potassium &gt;6.0 mmol/l) was 2.8% (13 patient) during the TO.

Conclusions

The current ESC guidelines recommend the use of TDs or maximal tolerated doses of RAASi-s in HFrEF. In a real-world patient cohort when every effort was made to reach the TDs, the TD of ACEi/ARBs and the TD of MRAs was reachable only in 17.9% of patients due the side effects observed during the TO. The occurrence of HK preventing to reach the TD, resulting down-titration or temporary/permanent discontinuation of RAASi-s and representing potential suitability for potassium binders is significant among optimally treated HFrEF patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Management of cardiac implantable electronic device infection using a complete interdisciplinary approach

Technological advances and increasing operator experience have improved the success rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE). However, in some cases-especially with longer lead dwelling time-TLE can be highly complicated. In this case report, the authors present an unusual case of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) pocket infection diagnosed by ¹⁸F‑fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F‑FDG-PET/CT). Complete lead extraction required a combined transvenous and surgical approach. Contralateral reimplantation failed due to occlusion of the right brachiocephalic vein. Therefore, a subcutaneous ICD was implanted. This case highlights the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to the treatment of cardiac implantable electronic device infection.

Anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction in biventricular paced rhythm

There is a lack of evidence on electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with biventricular paced rhythm. In all previous case reports of STEMI in biventricular paced rhythm, concordant ST-elevations and/or discordant ST-elevations >5 mm were present. This report describes the case of a patient with anterior STEMI and discordant ST-elevations of less than 5 mm during biventricular stimulation with epicardial left ventricular lead and highlights the importance of comparing the electrocardiogram to previous recordings when STEMI is suspected.

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with a prior ablation for atrial fibrillation/flutter: Insights from the ATHENA study

Background

The role of antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) after catheter ablation is not well established.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that changing the myocardial substrate by ablation may alter the responsiveness to dronedarone.

Methods

We assessed the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in the treatment of paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) post‐ablation, based on a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA study. A total of 196 patients (dronedarone 90, placebo 106) had an ablation for AF/AFL before study entry. In these patients, the effect of treatment on the first hospitalization because of cardiovascular (CV) events/all‐cause death was assessed, as was AF/AFL recurrence in individuals with sinus rhythm at baseline. The safety of dronedarone vs placebo was also determined.

Results

In patients with prior ablation, dronedarone reduced the risk of AF/AFL recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 1.00]; P < .05) as well as the median time to first AF/AFL recurrence (561 vs 180 days) compared with placebo. The HR for first CV hospitalization/all‐cause death with dronedarone vs placebo was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.53; P = .91). Rates of treatment‐emergent adverse events were 83.1% vs 75.5% and rates of serious TEAEs were 27.0% vs 18.9% in the dronedarone and placebo groups, respectively. One death occurred with dronedarone (not treatment‐emergent) and five occurred with placebo.

Conclusion

In patients with prior ablation for AF/AFL, dronedarone reduced the risk of AF/AFL recurrence compared with placebo, but not the risk of first CV hospitalization/all‐cause death. Safety outcomes were consistent with those of the overall ATHENA study.

P1663The impact of highest doses of ACEi/ARB therapy on mortality of patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a long-term follow-up, propensity-matched cohort study

Aim

To assess the effect of TD1 of ACEi/ARB on mortality of HFrEF patients followed at a heart failure outpatient clinic (HFOC).

Methods

Data of 579 consecutive HFrEF patients, who hadn't been treated with an ACEi/ARB or were receiving ≤50% of doses equivalent with 20mg enalapril daily (TD2) at the time of initiation of care (NYHA: 3.1±0.8; LVEF: 27.5±6.6%; age: 61.1±13.0 years; male: 76.1%; ischemic: 46.8%; atrial fibrillation: 27.6%; diabetes: 34.9%; hypertension: 72.5%), followed at our HFOC was analysed. After therapy optimization (TO) ACEis/ARBs were applied in 96.5% and at least TD2 was reached in 55.9% of the total cohort, while TD1 of an ACEi/ARB was applied in 111 patients (19.2% of total cohort). BBs in 88.4%, target doses of BBs in 46.8%, MRAs in 57.0% of total cohort were used. To adjust for possible confounders, patients were matched based on the ACEi/ARB doses reached during TO applying propensity score matching (PSM) using the nearest neighbor matching (caliper: 0.2). All-cause mortality (ACM) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

After 7.1±4.7 years follow-up ACM of patients treated with TD1 of ACEis/ARBs was significantly lower than those treated with lower doses in the total cohort (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.50–0.89; p=0.005). Applying multivariate Cox regression analysis the use of TD1 of an ACEi/ARB didn't remain independent predictor of survival; creatinine, NYHA f.c., age, sex, ischemic etiology were proved to be significant predictor of mortality. After PSM the survival of patients receiving TD1 of an ACEi/ARB didn't differ from those treated with lower doses (HR=0.84; 95% CI=0.61–1.14; p=0.27).

Conclusions

The current ESC guidelines recommend the use of target doses or maximal tolerated doses of ACEis or ARBs in HFrEF. In a real-world patient cohort whom all the effort was made to reach the target doses, ACM of patients treated with TD1 of an ACEi/ARB was significantly lower than those treated with lower doses, however this result wasn't independent from the patient characteristics. Beside that, after PSM the survival of patients treated with TD1 or with lower doses of an ACEi/ARB did not differ significantly.

P1034Impact of ablation status on the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter: a post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial

Background

Despite increasing use of ablation for atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL), few systematic data exist on the use of dronedarone and other antiarrhythmic drugs after ablation.

Purpose

To assess efficacy and safety of dronedarone after ablation in patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF/AFL randomized to dronedarone or placebo in the ATHENA trial (NCT00174785).

Methods

In ATHENA, 196 patients (dronedarone 90, placebo 106) had an ablation for AF/AFL prior to study entry. AF/AFL recurrence was evaluated in patients in sinus rhythm at baseline (dronedarone 63, placebo 65) by ECG during study visits or symptom recurrence.

Results

Ablated vs non-ablated patients were more likely to be male, have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker implanted, or be receiving an oral anticoagulant. Fewer ablated patients had an AF/AFL recurrence with dronedarone (36 [57%]) than with placebo (46 [71%]). Median time to first AF/AFL recurrence was significantly longer with dronedarone versus placebo (561 versus 180 days; hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.42–1.00], p<0.05; Fig 1). Time to first cardiovascular hospitalization or death was similar with dronedarone versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.98 [0.62–1.53]). On-treatment rates of treatment-emergent adverse events with dronedarone versus placebo were 83.1 versus 75.5%, serious treatment-emergent adverse events were 27.0 versus 18.9%, permanent drug discontinuations were 10.1 versus 15.1%, and deaths were 0 versus 1.9%.

Conclusions

Dronedarone delayed AF/AFL recurrence in patients with a prior AF/AFL ablation. Safety outcomes were consistent with the overall ATHENA trial. Adequately sized prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations. Given the sparsity of data for antiarrhythmic drugs after ablation, this retrospective analysis has merit and is useful for hypothesis generation.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Sanofi, New York, New York, Unites States of America

Association of Remote Monitoring With Survival in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Remote monitoring is an established, guideline-recommended technology with unequivocal clinical benefits; however, its ability to improve survival is contradictory.

Objective

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of remote monitoring on mortality in an optimally treated heart failure patient population undergoing cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) implantation in a large-volume tertiary referral center.

Methods

The population of this single-center, retrospective, observational study included 231 consecutive patients receiving CRT-D devices in the Medical Centre of the Hungarian Defence Forces (Budapest, Hungary) from January 2011 to June 2016. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients on remote monitoring and conventional follow-up.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 28.4 (SD 18.1) months. Patients on remote monitoring were more likely to have atrial fibrillation, received heart failure management at our dedicated heart failure outpatient clinic more often, and have a slightly lower functional capacity. Crude all-cause mortality of remote-monitored patients was significantly lower compared with patients followed conventionally (hazard ratio [HR] 0.368, 95% CI 0.186-0.727, P=.004). The survival benefit remained statistically significant after adjustment for important baseline parameters (adjusted HR 0.361, 95% CI 0.181-0.722, P=.004).

Conclusions

In this single-center, retrospective study of optimally treated heart failure patients undergoing CRT-D implantation, the use of remote monitoring systems was associated with a significantly better survival rate.

Clinical outcomes after implantation of quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Some retrospective and prospective studies in heart failure patients with indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) suggest better clinical outcomes for quadripolar (QP) left ventricular (LV) leads over bipolar (BP) leads. Although, lead failure remains an important safety concern, when using these more complex, novel electrodes. To evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes for QP vs. BP LV leads in patients receiving CRT.

Methods and results

We performed a comprehensive literature search through 2018 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies comparing patients with QP and BP LV CRT leads. A total of 12 studies were selected for analysis comprising 31 403 patients (QP lead: 22 429 patients; BP lead: 8974 patients). Eight studies examined the effects of CRT on survival. In these studies, use of QP electrodes was associated with significantly better survival compared to patients with BP LV leads (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.76; P < 0.01). Clinical improval measured in New York Heart Association functional class (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34–1.01; P = 0.05) and hospitalization rates (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.83; P < 0.01) were also improved in patients receiving QP leads. Lead malfunctions defined as LV lead failure resulting in lead deactivation (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.98; P = 0.04) or LV lead dislodgement requiring LV lead replacement/repositioning (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31–0.75; P < 0.01) were more often encountered among patients with BP leads compared to patients with QP leads.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis suggests distinct benefits of QP over BP electrodes in patients undergoing CRT.

How to maximize QRS narrowing

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) resulting in maximal QRS narrowing may be associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

Various atrioventricular (AV) delay settings, including the new SyncAV™ algorithm (St. Jude Medical/Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA), aimed at maximal QRS narrowing were tested in an 81-year old CRT recipient.

RESULTS

Maximal QRS narrowing from 160 to 100 ms was achieved with a manually programmed value of SyncAV™ -30 ms. At 2 months, the patient proved to be a CRT super-responder.

CONCLUSION

SyncAV™ algorithm is a new way for effective QRS narrowing with potentially improved outcomes.

Meta-Analysis of Effects of Digoxin on Survival in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation or Heart Failure: An Update

In 2015, 3 independent meta-analyses raised concerns about digoxin therapy being associated with an increased mortality risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and with heart failure (HF). Although several other studies have been published since then fostering these safety issues, the most recent 2016 European guidelines for AF still recommend this therapy as a class I indication. We performed an updated systematic review and random-effect meta-analysis on publications up to March 2018 reporting data on digoxin associated mortality in subjects with AF or HF. Based on the adjusted survival data of all identified 37 trials comprising a total of 825,061 patients, digoxin use was associated with an increased relative risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.29, p <0.01). Treatment with digoxin was associated with an increased mortality risk in the subgroup of patients with AF (n = 627,620, HR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.30, p <0.01), and in the subgroup of patients with HF (n = 197,441, HR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.16, p<0.01). A sensitivity analysis of studies reporting data on new digoxin users (n = 41,687) demonstrated an even higher risk for all-cause mortality compared with patients not receiving cardiac glycosides (HR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.88, p <0.01). In conclusion, this updated meta-analysis confirms that digoxin use is associated with increased mortality in patients with AF or HF.

Refined heart failure detection algorithm for improved clinical reliability of OptiVol alerts in CRT-D recipients

BACKGROUND

The reliability of intrathoracic impedance monitoring for prediction of heart failure (HF) by implantable cardiac devices is controversial. Despite using additional device-based parameters described in the PARTNERS HF study, such as new onset of arrhythmias, abnormal autonomics, low biventricular pacing rate or patient activity level, the predictive power of device diagnostic algorithm is still in doubt. The objective of this study was to compare the device diagnostic algorithm described in the PARTNERS HF study to a newly developed algorithm applying refined diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

Fourty two patients were prospectively enrolled who had been implanted with an intrathoracic impedance and remote monitoring capable implantable cardiac defibrillator with a cardiac resychroniza-tion therapy (CRT-D) device in this observational study. If a remote OptiVolTM alert occurred, patients were checked for presence of HF symptoms. A new algorithm was derived from the original PARTNERS HF criteria, considering more sensitive cut-offs and changes of patterns of the device-based parameters.

RESULTS

During an average follow-up of 38 months, 722 remote transmissions were received. From the total of 128 transmissions with OptiVol alerts, 32 (25%) corresponded to true HF events. Upon multivariate discriminant analysis, low patient activity, high nocturnal heart rate, and low CRT pacing (< 90%) proved to be independent predictors of true HF events (all p < 0.01). Incorporating these three refined criteria in a new algorithm, the diagnostic yield of OptiVol was improved by increasing specific-ity from 37.5% to 86.5%, positive predictive value from 34.1% to 69.8% and area under the curve from 0.787 to 0.922 (p < 0.01), without a relevant loss in sensitivity (96.9% vs. 93.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

A refined device diagnostic algorithm based on the parameters of low activity level, high nocturnal heart rate, and suboptimal biventricular pacing might improve the clinical reliability of OptiVol alerts.

Ventricular rate stabilization for treatment of recurrent VT

A patient with ischaemic cardiomyopathy received a secondary prevention VVI implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after an episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Because of recurrent VTs transmitted via CareLink, medical therapy was optimized and VT ablation was performed. Subsequently, a fast VT with a typical short-long-short initiation developed. In addition, there was an increasing need for ventricular pacing due to sinus bradycardia. This new type of VT could be successfully dealt with by upgrading to DDD ICD and activating the Ventricular Rate Stabilization algorithm.

Epicardial CRT-P- and S-ICD Implantation in a Young Patient with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

Persistent left superior vena cava is known to be a challenging anatomic abnormality for transvenous cardiac device implantation. In the a case of a young man presenting with dilative cardiomyopathy with severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and second-degree atrioventricular block (AV block), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation was indicated. A transvenous approach was attempted, but placement of the right ventricular lead was not successful due to anatomic abnormalities. Therefore, epicardial CRT leads were implanted via a left mini-thoracotomy. For primary prevention of sudden death, the patient was also fitted with an additional subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD). Any cross-talk between the devices was ruled out both intraoperatively and by ergometry prior to discharge. The combination of epicardial CRT-P with S‑ICD implantation might be a safe and effective alternative in patients with cardiac anatomic abnormalities.

The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a real-world clinical setting: experience in 102 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is used for temporary protection of patients deemed to be at high risk for sudden death (SCD) not yet meeting indications for the implantable defibrillator (ICD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and compliance of/to WCD use and subsequent medium-term outcome of patients in a single-center observational study.

METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive patients were fitted with the WCD from 2012 to 2015 and followed for a mean of 11 months (±8 months).

RESULTS

The most common clinical indication for WCD-prescription (63%) was a new diagnosis of severely impaired LV function (LVEF ≤35%). The median wear time of the WCD was 54 days with a daily use of 23 h. Appropriate WCD therapy occurred in four patients (seven shocks for VF, one shock for VT). An ICD was finally implanted in 56 patients (55%). Improvement in LV function was the most common reason not to implant an ICD (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.19-0.73; p = 0.004). Two patients had inappropriate shocks from their WCD due to atrial fibrillation/flutter. Five patients fitted with an ICD after the end of WCD therapy suffered VT/VF episodes. After wearing the WCD, six patients died (five ICD recipients and one non-ICD recipient).

CONCLUSION

WCD therapy was well accepted by patients and provided temporary protection against ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients at risk for SCD. The WCD may help to avoid unnecessary ICD implantations in a significant proportion of patients.

Optimal Anticoagulation Strategy for Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation

For many patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, cardioversion is performed to restore sinus rhythm and relieve symptoms. Cardioversion carries a distinct risk for thromboembolism which has been described to be in the order of magnitude of 1 to 3 %. For almost five decades, vitamin K antagonist therapy has been the mainstay of therapy to prevent thromboembolism around the time of cardioversion although not a single prospective trial has formally established its efficacy and safety. Currently, three new direct oral anticoagulants are approved for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For all three, there are data regarding its usefulness during the time of electrical or pharmacological cardioversion. Due to the ease of handling, their efficacy regarding stroke prevention, and their safety with respect to bleeding complications, the new direct oral anticoagulants are endorsed as the preferred therapy over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation including the clinical setting of elective cardioversion.