Identifying delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation in patients with non-specific intraventricular conduction delay using coronary venous electroanatomical mapping

The Relationship Between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Electrocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an essential treatment for patients with symptomatic heart failure and ventricular conduction abnormalities. Low-ejection-fraction (EF) cardiomyopathy often involves a wide QRS complex displaying a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and markedly delayed activation of the LV lateral wall. Following CRT, patients with heart failure and LBBB have better outcomes and quality-of-life improvements. Various electrocardiographic and clinical parameters are thought to be able to predict this improvement. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a reliable tool for measuring these patients' quality of life.

METHODS

This is an observational prospective study featuring over 69 individuals diagnosed with cardiac failure and dilatative cardiomyopathy with low-EF and major LBBB. This study analyzed the correlations between patient outcomes and demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

Following the analysis, we observed correlations between the QRS area, intraprocedural systolic blood pressure, Q-LV interval, the R-wave amplitude in the right precordial leads and the CRT outcomes indicated by the KCCQ score.

CONCLUSIONS

The parameters found and their correlation with the KCCQ score show how CRT therapy impacts patients' quality of life, symptom burden, and functional status.

Quest for the ideal assessment of electrical ventricular dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy

This paper reviews the literature on assessing electrical dyssynchrony for patient selection in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The guideline-recommended electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for CRT are QRS duration and morphology, established through inclusion criteria in large CRT trials. However, both QRS duration and LBBB morphology have their shortcomings. Over the past decade, various alternative measures of ventricular dyssynchrony have been proposed, ranging from simple options such as vectorcardiography (VCG), ultra-high frequency ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony mapping to more advanced techniques such as ECG imaging electro-anatomic mapping. Despite promising results, none of these methods have yet been widely adopted in daily clinical practice. The VCG is a relatively cost-effective option for potential clinical implementation, as it can be reconstructed from the standard 12‑lead ECG. With the emergence of conduction system pacing, in addition to predicting the outcome of conventional biventricular CRT, the assessment of electrical dyssynchrony holds promise for defining and optimizing the type of resynchronization strategy. Additionally, artificial intelligence has the potential to reveal unknown features for CRT outcomes, and computer models can provide deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms of these features.

Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Current data and potential explanations for the lack of benefit

The present article reviews the literature on image-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) studies. Improved outcome to CRT has been associated with the placement of a left ventricular (LV) lead in the latest activated segment free from scar. The majority of randomized controlled trials investigating guided LV lead implantation did not show superiority over conventional implantation approaches. Several factors may contribute to this paradoxical observation, including inclusion criteria favoring patients with left bundle branch block who already respond well to conventional anatomical LV lead implantation, differences in activation wavefronts during simultaneous right ventricular and LV pacing, incorrect definition of target regions, and limitations in coronary venous anatomy that prevent access to target regions that are detected by imaging. It is imperative that exclusion of patients lacking access to target regions from these studies would lead to larger benefit of image-guided CRT.

Current Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a recognized therapy for heart failure with altered ejection fraction and abnormal left ventricular activation time. Since the introduction of the therapy, a 30% rate of non-responders is observed and unchanged. The 12-lead ECG remains the only recommended tool for patient selection to CRT. The 12-lead ECG is, however, limited in its inability to provide a precise pattern of regional electrical activity. Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) provides a non-invasive detailed mapping of cardiac activation and therefore appears as a promising tool for CRT candidates. The non-invasive ventricular activation maps acquired by ECGi have been primarily explored for the diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. However, the accuracy of the system in this field is lacking and needs further improvement before considering a clinical application. On the other hand, its use for patient selection for CRT is encouraging. In this review, we introduce the technical considerations and we describe how ECGi can precisely characterize ventricular activation, especially in patients with left bundle branch block, thus identifying the electrical substrate responsive to CRT.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Repositioning and optimization of left ventricular lead position in nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved ejection fraction, lower NT-proBNP values, and fewer heart failure symptoms

Background

Observational data suggest that an anterior or apical left ventricular (LV) position in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with worse outcome and higher likelihood of "nonresponse." It is not known whether the benefits of optimizing LV lead position in a second procedure outweighs the procedural risks.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effects of LV lead repositioning.

Methods

During the period 2015-2020, we identified all patients in whom the indication for the procedure was LV lead repositioning owing to "nonresponse" in combination with suboptimal LV lead position. All patients were followed with a structured visit 6 months post LV lead revision. Heart failure hospitalization and mortality data were gathered from the medical records and cross-checked with the population registry.

Results

A total of 25 patients were identified who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All procedures were successful in establishing LV lead pacing in a lateral mid or basal location. Median follow-up was 2.5 years [1.1-3.7]. There were improvements in NYHA class (mean -0.5 ± 0.5 class, P < .001), LV ejection fraction (+5 [interquartile range 2-11] absolute %, P = .01), QRS duration (-36 [-44 to -8], P < .001) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (-615 [-2837 to +121] ng/L, P = .03). Clinical outcome was similar to a reference population with CRT (P = ns).

Conclusion

In nonresponders to CRT with either an anterior or inferior LV lead position, it was feasible to perform LV lead repositioning in all cases, with a low complication rate. Changing the LV lead position was associated with improved LV ejection fraction, larger QRS reduction, and larger NT-proBNP reduction.

Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria that may improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an evidence-based effective therapy of symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction refractory to optimal medical treatment associated with intraventricular conduction disturbance, that results in electrical dyssynchrony and further deterioration of systolic ventricular function. However, the non-response rate to CRT is still 20%-40%, which can be decreased by better patient selection. The main determinant of CRT outcome is the presence or absence of significant ventricular dyssynchrony and the ability of the applied CRT technique to eliminate it. The current guidelines recommend the determination of QRS morphology and QRS duration and the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction for patient selection for CRT. However, QRS morphology and QRS duration are not perfect indicators of electrical dyssynchrony, which is the cause of the not negligible non-response rate to CRT and the missed CRT implantation in a significant number of patients who have the appropriate substrate for CRT. Using imaging modalities, many ventricular dyssynchrony criteria were devised for the detection of mechanical dyssynchrony, but their utility in patient selection for CRT is not yet proven, therefore their use is not recommended for this purpose. Moreover, CRT can eliminate only mechanical dyssynchrony due to underlying electrical dyssynchrony, for this reason ECG has a greater role in the detection of ventricular dyssynchrony than imaging modalities. To improve assessment of electrical dyssynchrony, we devised two novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which can estimate interventricular and left ventricular intraventricular dyssynchrony in order to improve patient selection for CRT. Here we discuss the results achieved by the application of these new ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which proved to be useful in predicting the CRT response in patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern (the second greatest group of CRT candidates), and the significance of other new ECG dyssynchrony criteria in the potential improvement of CRT outcome.

Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a good treatment for heart failure accompanied by ventricular conduction abnormalities. Current ECG criteria in international guidelines seem to be suboptimal to select heart failure patients for CRT. The criteria QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology insufficiently detect left ventricular activation delay, which is required for benefit from CRT. Additionally, there are various definitions for LBBB, in which each one has a different association with CRT benefit and is prone to subjective interpretation. Recent studies have shown that the objectively measured vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies left ventricular activation delay with higher accuracy than any of the current ECG criteria. Indeed, various studies have consistently shown that a high QRS area prior to CRT predicts both echocardiographic and clinical improvement after CRT. The beneficial relation of QRS area with CRT-outcome was largely independent from QRS morphology, QRS duration, and patient characteristics known to affect CRT-outcome including ischemic etiology and sex. On top of QRS area prior to CRT, the reduction in QRS area after CRT further improves benefit. QRS area is easily obtainable from a standard 12-lead ECG though it currently requires off-line analysis. Clinical applicability will be significantly improved when QRS area is automatically determined by ECG equipment.

A different cardiac resynchronization therapy technique might be needed in some patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern

BACKGROUND

Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), devised to eliminate dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block (LBBB), works by pacing the latest activated left ventricular site (LALVS). We hypothesized that patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) pattern respond less favorably to CRT, because their LALVS is far away from that in LBBB.

METHODS

By measuring the amplitude and polarity of secondary ST-segment alterations in two optional frontal and horizontal surface electrocardiogram (ECG) leads and using a software, we determined the resultant 3D spatial secondary ST vector, which is directed 180^o away from the LALVS, in 110 patients with LBBB pattern and 77 patients with NICD pattern and heart failure. To validate the ECG method, we also estimated the LALVS by echocardiography using 3D parametric imaging and 2D speckle tracking in 22 LBBB patients and 20 NICD patients. Patients with NICD pattern were subdivided according to their non-overlapping frontal plane resultant secondary ST vector ranges to the NICD-1 subgroup (n = 44) and the NICD-2 subgroup (n = 33).

RESULTS

Based on the software determined coordinates of the resultant 3D spatial secondary ST vector directed 180^o away from the LALVS, the LALVSs were located leftward, posterosuperior in the LBBB group, slightly left, superior in the NICD-1 subgroup, and slightly left, posteroinferior in the NICD-2 subgroup. The LALVS determined by ECG and echocardiography matched in all patients, except two.

CONCLUSIONS

In the NICD-2 subgroup, a remote LALVS was found from that in LBBB pattern, which might explain the high non-response rate of the NICD pattern to the current CRT technique.

Cardiac Inflammation Impedes Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and conduction disorders. Still, one-third of the patients with DCM do not respond to CRT. This study aims to depict the underlying cardiac pathophysiological processes of nonresponse to CRT in patients with DCM using endomyocardial biopsies.

METHODS

Within the Maastricht and Innsbruck registries of patients with DCM, 99 patients underwent endomyocardial biopsies before CRT implantation, with histological quantification of fibrosis and inflammation, where inflammation was defined as >14 infiltrating cells/mm². Echocardiographic left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction ≥15% after 6 months was defined as response to CRT. RNA was isolated from cardiac biopsies of a representative subset of responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients responded (68%), whereas 32 (32%) did not respond to CRT. Cardiac inflammation before implantation was negatively associated with response to CRT (25% of responders, 47% of nonresponders; odds ratio 0.3 [0.12-0.76]; P=0.01). Endomyocardial biopsies fibrosis did not relate to CRT response. Cardiac inflammation improved the robustness of prediction beyond well-known clinical predictors of CRT response (likelihood ratio test P<0.001). Cardiac transcriptomic profiling of endomyocardial biopsies reveals a strong proinflammatory and profibrotic signature in the hearts of nonresponders compared with responders. In particular, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, CTGF, LOX, TGFβ1, PDGFRA, TNC, BGN, and TSP2 were significantly higher expressed in the hearts of nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac inflammation along with a transcriptomic profile of high expression of combined proinflammatory and profibrotic genes are associated with a poor response to CRT in patients with DCM.

Device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction-cardiac resynchronization therapy and more

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), optimal medical treatment includes beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/angiotensinreceptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and ivabradine when indicated. In device therapy of HFrEF, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have been established for many years. CRT is the therapy of choice (class I indication) in symptomatic patients with HFrEF and a broad QRS complex with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. However, the vast majority of heart failure patients show a narrow QRS complex or a non-LBBB morphology. These patients are not candidates for CRT and alternative electrical therapies such as baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) may be considered. BAT modulates vegetative dysregulation in heart failure. CCM improves contractility, functional capacity, and symptoms. Although a broad data set is available for BAT and CCM, mortality data are still lacking for both methods. This article provides an overview of the device-based therapeutic options for patients with HFrEF.

Novel approach to discriminate left bundle branch block from nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay using pacing-induced functional left bundle branch block

PURPOSE

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) has a predictive value for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy as reported by Zareba et al. (Circulation 123(10):1061-1072, 2011). However, based on ECG criteria, the discrimination between complete LBBB and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay is challenging. We tested the hypothesis that discrimination can be performed using standard electrophysiological catheters and a simple stimulation protocol.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into groups of narrow QRS (n = 20), wide QRS of right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology (n = 14), and wide QRS of LBBB morphology (n = 25). Using a diagnostic catheter placed in the coronary sinus, left ventricular activation was assessed during intrinsic conduction as well as during right ventricular (RV) stimulation.

RESULTS

In patients with narrow QRS and RBBB, the Q-LV/QRS ratio was 0.43 ± 0.013 (n = 20) and 0.41 ± 0.026 (n = 14), respectively. In patients with LBBB morphology, the Q-LV/QRS split up into a group of patients with normal (0.43 ± 0.022, n = 7) and a group with delayed left ventricular activation (0.75 ± 0.016, n = 18). By direct comparison of the Q-LV/QRS ratio during intrinsic conduction with the Q-LV/QRS ratio during RV pacing leading to a functional LBBB, a clear distinction between a group of "true LBBB" and another group of "apparent LBBB"/nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) could be generated.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a novel and practical method that might facilitate discrimination between patients with apparent LBBB and true LBBB by comparing Q-LV/QRS ratios during intrinsic activation and during RV stimulation. Although this method can already be directly applied, validation by 3D electrical mapping and prospective correlation to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response will be required for further translation into clinical practice.

Why QRS Duration Should Be Replaced by Better Measures of Electrical Activation to Improve Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-known treatment modality for patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction accompanied by a ventricular conduction delay. However, a large proportion of patients does not benefit from this therapy. Better patient selection may importantly reduce the number of non-responders. Here, we review the strengths and weaknesses of the electrocardiogram (ECG) markers currently being used in guidelines for patient selection, e.g., QRS duration and morphology. We shed light on the current knowledge on the underlying electrical substrate and the mechanism of action of CRT. Finally, we discuss potentially better ECG-based biomarkers for CRT candidate selection, of which the vectorcardiogram may have high potential.