A decade of atrial fibrillation ablation : Shifts in patient characteristics and procedural outcomes

Hybrid Totally Thoracoscopic Maze and Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience

Atrial fibrillation is now a pandemic in our ageing community. Although James L. Cox devised a surgical procedure with near-universal curative success in 1987, catheter-based interventions have flourished. For persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), however, an isolated endocardial approach has limitations: procedural times are long, carry risk, and the outcomes are not durable. By combining left atrial endocardial and epicardial interventions with staged mapping, we optimise the benefits of both approaches. Our initial series of hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation reports excellent early outcomes, freedom from complications and excellent success at follow-up.

NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION FOR PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION AND NONPULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION IN JAPAN

To propose typical values for the arrhythmia region between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and nonpulmonary vein isolation (non-PVI) in Japan. A nationwide questionnaire was posted to 343 facilities, to which 125 facilities (36.4%) responded. Results is the median for PVI and non-PVI were in terms of Ka,r (317 and 196 mGy), PKA (40.8 and 26.3 Gy.cm2), FT (43.0 and 27.3 min), and CI (326 and 102 images). When comparing PVI and non-PVI procedures, there were significant differences in Ka, r, PKA, FT, and CI (p < 0.05). In other words, by classifying into two types, PVI and non-PVI, we contributed to the establishment of typical values in Japan's RFCA.

Octogenarian Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with New NavX EnSite "Live View" Tool

Background

Atrial Fibrillation ablation in older patients represents a challenge to be addressed to ensure the improvement of the quality of life and survival of these patients. New mapping system tools can help to treat older patients because of its ability to simplify and reduce procedural risks. The new NavX EnSite “Live view” tool allows dynamic “beat to beat” activation and voltage mapping visualization in order to instantly recognize vein disconnection and minimize RF deliveries.

Methods

An 81-year old patient with paroxysmal AF and well-documented firing focus trigger underwent pulmonary veins isolation using NavX EnSite Precision, HD Grid multipolar catheter, and the new “Live view” tool.

Results

All pulmonary veins were successfully isolated with no procedural complications. “Live view” tool allows to perform shorter and safer procedure (total procedural time: 90 minutes, left atrium dwell time: 60 minutes, total RF delivery number: 78).

Conclusion

“Live view tool” allows dynamic activation and voltage mapping in order to perform a safe and tailored approach to ablation, especially in older patients.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of atrial fibrillation percutaneous catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trials

AIMS

We sought out to make comparisons between all atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trial data. Our comparisons were freedom from AF, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy duration.

METHODS

Searches were made of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, and studies were selected which had cryoballoon, conventional radiofrequency (RF), multipolar RF catheters, and laser technology as an arm in the study and were identified as randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These studies were analyzed for direct comparisons using conventional meta-analysis and a combination of indirect and direct comparisons via a network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

With respect to freedom from AF both direct comparisons and NMA did not demonstrate any significant difference. However in analysis of procedural and fluoroscopy duration (minutes) for the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC), both conventional analysis and NMA revealed significantly shorter procedure times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 61.99 [38.03-85.94], P <.00001; NMA: 54.76 [36.64-72.88], P < .0001) and fluoroscopy times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 12.96 [6.40-19.53], P = .0001; NMA: 8.89 [3.27-14.51], P < .01). The procedural duration was also shorter for the cryoballoon with NMA, RF vs CRYO (20.56 [3.47-37.65], P = .02).

DISCUSSION

Our analysis demonstrated that while there was no difference in the efficacy of the individual catheter technologies, there are significant differences in the procedural duration for the PVAC and the cryoballoon. While they may seem an attractive solution for high-volume centers, further RCTs of next-generation technologies should be examined.

MRI-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: what is good enough? An early health technology assessment

Next to anticoagulation, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most important interventional procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite widespread clinical application of this therapy, patients often require multiple procedures to reach clinical success. In contrast to conventional imaging modalities, MRI allows direct visualisation of the ablation lesion. Therefore, the use of real-time MRI to guide cardiac electrophysiology procedures may increase clinical effectiveness. An essential aspect, from a decision-making point of view, is the effect on costs and the potential cost-effectiveness of new technologies. Generally, health technology assessment (HTA) studies are performed when innovations are close to clinical application. However, early stage HTA can inform users, researchers and funders about the ultimate clinical and economic potential of a future innovation. Ultimately, this can guide funding allocation. In this study, we performed an early HTA evaluate MRI-guided PVIs.

Methods

We performed an economic evaluation using a decision tree with a time-horizon of 1 year. We calculated the clinical effectiveness (defined as the proportion of patients that is long-term free of AF after a single procedure) required for MRI-guided PVI to be cost-effective compared with conventional treatment.

Results

Depending on the cost-effectiveness threshold (willingness to pay for one additional quality-of-life adjusted life year (QALY), interventional MRI (iMRI) guidance for PVI can be cost-effective if clinical effectiveness is 69.8% (at €80 000/QALY) and 77.1% (at €20 000/QALY), compared with 64% for fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

Conclusion

Using an early HTA, we established a clinical effectiveness threshold for interventional MRI-guided PVIs that can inform a clinical implementation strategy. If crucial technologies are developed, it seems plausible that iMRI-guided PVIs will be able to reach this threshold.

Acquired Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Single-Center Experience in Catheter Interventional Treatment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to analyze and report a single-center experience with catheter interventional treatment of radiofrequency-induced pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

BACKGROUND

Catheter interventional treatment of radiofrequency-induced PVS following AF ablation remains a challenging field because of a lack of randomized data and treatment guidelines.

METHODS

All patients at a single center who underwent catheter interventional treatment for radiofrequency-induced PVS were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to September 2017, the total rate of PVS following interventional AF ablation was 0.78% (87 of 11,103). Thirty-nine patients with PVS were treated with 84 catheter interventions: 68 (81%) with percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) and 16 (19%) with stent implantation. The distribution of stent type was 3 drug-eluting stents (19%) and 13 bare-metal stents (81%). The overall restenosis rate was 53% after PTA versus 19% after stent implantation (p = 0.007) after a median follow-up period of 6 months (interquartile range: 3 to 55 months). The total complication rate for PTA was 10% versus 13% for stenting (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates significantly better outcomes in terms of restenosis after stent implantation versus PTA only, with comparable complication rates for these 2 options of interventional treatment of radiofrequency-induced PVS. In summary, despite the lack of randomized studies, the present data and currently available published studies seem to favor stent implantation as a first-line therapy in patients with radiofrequency-induced severe PVS.