1
|
Milton K, Poole K, Cross A, Gasson S, Gokal K, Lyons K, Pulsford R, Jones A. 'People don't get cancer, families do': Co-development of a social physical activity intervention for people recently affected by a cancer diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13573. [PMID: 35285105 PMCID: PMC9285961 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This research took a co-design approach to develop a social intervention to support people affected by a cancer diagnosis to be physically active. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with five key stakeholder groups: (1) adults with a recent breast or prostate cancer diagnosis; (2) family and friends of cancer patients; (3) healthcare professionals; (4) physical activity providers; and (5) cancer charity representatives. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes in the data. We then worked with a subset of participants to co-develop the intervention. RESULTS Participants welcomed the idea of a social approach to a physical activity intervention. Input was received on the timing and format of delivery, how to communicate about physical activity to cancer patients and their family and friends and the types of physical activity that would be appropriate. Our findings suggest that interventions need to be flexible in terms of timing and delivery and offer a wide range of physical activity options. These findings directly informed the co-development of 'All Together Active'. CONCLUSION All Together Active is designed to support cancer patients and their family and friends to be active throughout treatment and beyond, benefiting their physical and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Milton
- Norwich Medical SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - Karen Poole
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of SurreySurreyUK
| | | | - Sophie Gasson
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of SurreySurreyUK
| | - Kajal Gokal
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health SciencesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
| | - Karen Lyons
- Connell School of NursingBoston CollegeNewtonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Richard Pulsford
- Sport and Health SciencesUniversity of Exeter, St Luke's CampusExeterUK
| | - Andy Jones
- Norwich Medical SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva Neto LS, Dias FCF, Osório NB, Rolim CLA. eHealth-Based Interventions for Older Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Quick Review of the Literature. TELEMEDICINE REPORTS 2022; 3:79-92. [PMID: 35720442 PMCID: PMC9049822 DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Background The prevalence of prostate cancer (PC) is higher in older adults. Due to early diagnosis and treatment, there is an increase in the survival rate of these patients. The survival of patients with PC imposes the need for specific and effective care strategies. Objective To identify and analyze eHealth intervention programs for older adults with PC. Methods A quick review of evidence from the current literature was employed to address the objective of the study. The recommendations of the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group were used. The PubMed, Embase, Capes Journals, and Lilacs-BVS databases were searched, covering studies published from January 2010 to July 2021. The articles selected were classified considering the modalities and type of eHealth strategies. Results A total of 10 articles were included in this review. Two types of modalities were identified and classified: the intervention that used the web-based platform (WBP) was the most used in the studies (n = 7), followed by the interactive smartphone application (ISA) (n = 3) and mixed (WBP + ISA) (n = 1). As for the classification, mixed interventions were the most used (n = 4), followed by self-monitoring (n = 3), educational (n = 2), and behavioral counseling (n = 1). The clustering of articles generated three groups for the presentation of results and discussion, being eHealth interventions: integrated care, detection of symptoms, and quality of life in older patients with PC, psychological eHealth interventions in older adults with PC, and physical activity eHealth interventions in older adults with PC. Conclusion eHealth interventions for patients with PC are relatively new but promising in the support of current care options.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ezenwankwo EF, Nnate DA, Usoro GD, Onyeso CP, Anieto IB, Ibeneme SC, Albertus Y, Lambert VE, Ezeukwu AO, Abaraogu UO, Shamley D. A scoping review examining the integration of exercise services in clinical oncology settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:236. [PMID: 35189864 PMCID: PMC8859567 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07598-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Addressing questions surrounding the feasibility of embedding exercise service units in clinical oncology settings is imperative for developing a sustainable exercise-oncology clinical pathway. We examined available literature and offered practical recommendations to support evidence-based practice, policymaking, and further investigations. Methods Four thousand eight hundred sixty-three unique records identified in Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and ProQuest (Health and Medicine) were screened for studies that recruited cancer patients, assessed the co-location of exercise service and cancer treatment units, and reported findings on service implementation. Evidence from six studies providing data from over 30 programs was integrated using narrative synthesis. Results Service implementation was relatively modest across the included studies. Exercise services were delivered by physiotherapists, exercise physiologists, and kinesiologists and funded mainly through grants and private donations, with staff salaries accruing as the major expense. Service penetration, adoption, and acceptability were generally low. However, studies recorded high clinician/patient satisfaction. Major barriers to service integration were limited funding, lack of detailed implementation plan, and low organizational buy-in. Common reasons for non-utilization, missed sessions, and dropouts were lack of interest, unwellness, hospital readmission, disease progression, and adverse skeletal events. Conclusion Implementing exercise services in clinical oncology settings seems an effective approach for increasing access to exercise-based rehabilitation for individuals on cancer treatment. While this model appears feasible for patients/clinicians, efforts are required to optimize service integration both in the short and long term. Key priorities include seeking [local] actions to address issues relating to funding and organizational buy-in. Important considerations may include developing an implementation plan to guide the implementation process, expanding the patient core management team to include staff from the exercise rehabilitation unit, and exploring the role of patient feedback in increasing clinician participation (e.g., treating oncologists and nurses) in the referral process. Future research should consider effective strategies to promote patients’ sense of self-efficacy and behavioral control and, further, the place of audit and feedback in improving exercise service delivery and overall service implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07598-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elochukwu F Ezenwankwo
- Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sports (HPALS), Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. .,Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, ObservatoryCape Town, 7925, South Africa.
| | - Daniel A Nnate
- Department of Nursing and Community Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.,Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Health Park, Liverpool Road, Chester, CH2 1UL, UK
| | - Godspower D Usoro
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Chimdimma P Onyeso
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Ijeoma B Anieto
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Sam C Ibeneme
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.,Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Therapeuitc Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.,Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, King David University of Medical Sciences, Ebonyi State, Uburu, Nigeria
| | - Yumna Albertus
- Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sports (HPALS), Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Victoria E Lambert
- Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sports (HPALS), Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Antoninus O Ezeukwu
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Ukachukwu O Abaraogu
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.,Department of Physiotherapy and Paramedicine, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Delva Shamley
- Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sports (HPALS), Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Clinical Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of a Web- and Telephone-Based Personalised Exercise Intervention for Individuals with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The ExerciseGuide Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235925. [PMID: 34885036 PMCID: PMC8656540 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Previous research supports the participation in supervised exercise among individuals with metastatic prostate cancer to help lessen the physical and psychological disease burden. However, many individuals experience considerable barriers to attending face-to-face exercise services. To overcome some of these limitations, digital interventions that can be delivered remotely have been proposed. Our pilot study investigated the acceptability, safety and preliminary efficacy of an 8-week computer-tailored web-based exercise intervention. We demonstrated that a web-based exercise program with telehealth support was acceptable and could be implemented safely. Participants in the intervention group increased their participation in moderate to vigorous physical activity compared to the control group. This study provides insight into the prospect of web-based exercise prescription for individuals with metastatic prostate cancer as an alternative for individuals who cannot access supervised exercise interventions. Abstract Preliminary research has shown the effectiveness of supervised exercise-based interventions in alleviating sequela resulting from metastatic prostate cancer. However, many individuals encounter barriers that limit the uptake of face-to-face exercise. Technology-enabled interventions offer a distance-based alternative. This pilot study aimed to explore the acceptability, safety and preliminary efficacy of a web-based exercise intervention (ExerciseGuide) in individuals with metastatic prostate cancer. Forty participants (70.2 ± 8.5 years) with metastatic prostate cancer were randomised into the 8-week intervention (N = 20) or a wait-list control (N = 20). The intervention arm had access to a computer-tailored website, personalised exercise prescription and remote supervision. ExerciseGuide was deemed acceptable with a score ≥20 on the client satisfaction questionnaire; however, the usability score was just below the pre-specified score of ≥68 on the software usability scale. There were no serious adverse events reported. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels between baseline and follow-ups were significantly higher (10.0 min per day; 95% CI = (1.3–18.6); p = 0.01) in the intervention group compared to wait-list control. There were also greater improvements in step count (1332; 95% CI = (159–2505); p = 0.02) and identified motivation (0.4, 95% CI = (0.0, 0.7); p = 0.04). Our findings provide preliminary evidence that ExerciseGuide is acceptable, safe and efficacious among individuals with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Evans HE, Forbes CC, Galvão DA, Vandelanotte C, Newton RU, Wittert G, Chambers S, Vincent AD, Kichenadasse G, Girard D, Brook N, Short CE. Usability, Acceptability, and Safety Analysis of a Computer-Tailored Web-Based Exercise Intervention (ExerciseGuide) for Individuals With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Multi-Methods Laboratory-Based Study. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e28370. [PMID: 34318759 PMCID: PMC8367181 DOI: 10.2196/28370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions such as tailored websites are emerging as valuable tools to provide individualized exercise and behavioral change information for individuals diagnosed with cancer. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate and iteratively refine the acceptability and usability of a web-based exercise intervention (ExerciseGuide) for men with metastatic prostate cancer and determine how well individuals can replicate the video-based exercise prescription. METHODS A laboratory-based multi-methods design was used, incorporating questionnaires, think-aloud tests, interviews, and movement screening among 11 men aged 63 to 82 years with metastatic prostate cancer. Overall, 9 participants were undergoing androgen deprivation therapy, and 2 were completing chemotherapy. Data were collected in two waves, with changes made for quality improvement after participant 5. RESULTS The intervention's usability score was deemed moderate overall but improved after modifications (from 60, SD 2.9 to 69.6, SD 2.2 out of 100). Overall, the participants found the intervention acceptable, with scores improving from wave 1 (24.2, SD 1.1 out of 30) to wave 2 (26.3, SD 2.1 out of 30). The personalized multimodal exercise prescription and computer-tailored education were seen as valuable. After wave 1, website navigation videos were added, medical terminology was simplified, and a telehealth component was included after expert real-time telehealth support was requested. Wave 2 changes included the added variety for aerobic exercise modes, reduced computer-tailoring question loads, and improved consistency of style and grammar. Finally, the participants could replicate the resistance exercise videos to a satisfactory level as judged by the movement screen; however, additional technique cueing within the videos is recommended to address safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS The acceptability and usability of ExerciseGuide were deemed satisfactory. Various problems were identified and resolved. Notably, the participants requested the inclusion of personalized expert support through telehealth. The resistance training algorithms were shown to provide appropriate content safely, and the users could replicate the exercise technique unaided to a satisfactory level. This study has optimized the ExerciseGuide intervention for further investigation in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618001978257; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12618001978257.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly El Evans
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Cynthia C Forbes
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | - Corneel Vandelanotte
- Physical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.,School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gary Wittert
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew D Vincent
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Danielle Girard
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nicholas Brook
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Camille E Short
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|