Inhibition of ghrelin-induced feeding in rats by pretreatment with a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist

Internal and external modulation factors of the orexin system (REVIEW)

Orexin-A and -B (identical to hypocretin-1 and -2) are neuropeptides synthesized in the lateral hypothalamus and perifornical area, and orexin neurons project their axon terminals broadly throughout the entire central nervous system (CNS). The activity of orexins is mediated by two specific G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), termed orexin type1 receptor (OX1R) and orexin type2 receptor (OX2R). The orexin system plays a relevant role in various physiological functions, including arousal, feeding, reward, and thermogenesis, and is key to human health. Orexin neurons receive various signals related to environmental, physiological, and emotional stimuli. Previous studies have reported that several neurotransmitters and neuromodulators influence the activation or inhibition of orexin neuron activity. In this review, we summarize the modulating factors of orexin neurons in the sleep/wake rhythm and feeding behavior, particularly in the context of the modulation of appetite, body fluids, and circadian signaling. We also describe the effects of life activity, behavior, and diet on the orexin system. Some studies have observed phenomena that have been verified in animal experiments, revealing the detailed mechanism and neural pathway, while their applications to humans is expected in future research.

Sleep Disruption and Cancer: Chicken or the Egg?

Sleep is a nearly ubiquitous phenomenon across the phylogenetic tree, highlighting its essential role in ensuring fitness across evolutionary time. Consequently, chronic disruption of the duration, timing, or structure of sleep can cause widespread problems in multiple physiological systems, including those that regulate energy balance, immune function, and cognitive capacity, among others. Many, if not all these systems, become altered throughout the course of cancer initiation, growth, metastatic spread, treatment, and recurrence. Recent work has demonstrated how changes in sleep influence the development of chronic diseases, including cancer, in both humans and animal models. A common finding is that for some cancers (e.g., breast), chronic disruption of sleep/wake states prior to disease onset is associated with an increased risk for cancer development. Additionally, sleep disruption after cancer initiation is often associated with worse outcomes. Recently, evidence suggesting that cancer itself can affect neuronal circuits controlling sleep and wakefulness has accumulated. Patients with cancer often report difficulty falling asleep, difficulty staying asleep, and severe fatigue, during and even years after treatment. In addition to the psychological stress associated with cancer, cancer itself may alter sleep homeostasis through changes to host physiology and via currently undefined mechanisms. Moreover, cancer treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal, and surgical) may further worsen sleep problems through complex biological processes yet to be fully understood. This results in a "chicken or the egg" phenomenon, where it is unclear whether sleep disruption promotes cancer or cancer reciprocally disrupts sleep. This review will discuss existing evidence for both hypotheses and present a framework through which the interactions between sleep and cancer can be dissociated and causally investigated.

"Sibling" battle or harmony: crosstalk between nesfatin-1 and ghrelin

Ghrelin was first identified as an endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) in 1999, with the function of stimulating the release of growth hormone (GH), while nesfatin-1 was identified in 2006. Both peptides are secreted by the same kind of endocrine cells, X/A-like cells in the stomach. Compared with ghrelin, nesfatin-1 exerts opposite effects on energy metabolism, glucose metabolism, gastrointestinal functions and regulation of blood pressure, but exerts similar effects on anti-inflammation and neuroprotection. Up to now, nesfatin-1 remains as an orphan ligand because its receptor has not been identified. Several studies have shown the effects of nesfatin-1 are dependent on the receptor of ghrelin. We herein compare the effects of nesfatin-1 and ghrelin in several aspects and explore the possibility of their interactions.

Assessing the role of ghrelin and the enzyme ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT) system in food reward, food motivation, and binge eating behavior

The peripheral peptide hormone ghrelin is a powerful stimulator of food intake, which leads to body weight gain and adiposity in both rodents and humans. The hormone, thus, increases the vulnerability to obesity and binge eating behavior. Several studies have revealed that ghrelin's functions are due to its interaction with the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHSR1a) in the hypothalamic area; besides, ghrelin also promotes the reinforcing properties of hedonic food, acting at extra-hypothalamic sites and interacting with dopaminergic, cannabinoid, opioid, and orexin signaling. The hormone is primarily present in two forms in the plasma and the enzyme ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT) allows the acylation reaction which causes the transformation of des-acyl-ghrelin (DAG) to the active form acyl-ghrelin (AG). DAG has been demonstrated to show antagonist properties; it is metabolically active, and counteracts the effects of AG on glucose metabolism and lipolysis, and reduces food consumption, body weight, and hedonic feeding response. Both peptides seem to influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the corticosterone/cortisol level that drive the urge to eat under stressful conditions. These findings suggest that DAG and inhibition of GOAT may be targets for obesity and bingeing-related eating disorders and that AG/DAG ratio may be an important potential biomarker to assess the risk of developing maladaptive eating behaviors.

Tumour brain: Pretreatment cognitive and affective disorders caused by peripheral cancers

People that develop extracranial cancers often display co-morbid neurological disorders, such as anxiety, depression and cognitive impairment, even before commencement of chemotherapy. This suggests bidirectional crosstalk between non-CNS tumours and the brain, which can regulate peripheral tumour growth. However, the reciprocal neurological effects of tumour progression on brain homeostasis are not well understood. Here, we review brain regions involved in regulating peripheral tumour development and how they, in turn, are adversely affected by advancing tumour burden. Tumour-induced activation of the immune system, blood-brain barrier breakdown and chronic neuroinflammation can lead to circadian rhythm dysfunction, sleep disturbances, aberrant glucocorticoid production, decreased hippocampal neurogenesis and dysregulation of neural network activity, resulting in depression and memory impairments. Given that cancer-related cognitive impairment diminishes patient quality of life, reduces adherence to chemotherapy and worsens cancer prognosis, it is essential that more research is focused at understanding how peripheral tumours affect brain homeostasis.

Non-selective orexin-receptor antagonist attenuates stress-re-stress-induced core PTSD-like symptoms in rats: Behavioural and neurochemical analyses

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychological disorder affecting many around the world. Growing evidence suggests that orexin-A is involved in the pathophysiology of depression and panic anxiety disorder. However, the role of orexin-A in PTSD remains unclear. Therefore, pharmacological manipulation of orexin-A can be a potential approach for the treatment of PTSD. Male Wistar rats were subjected to stress re-stress (SRS) by restraining them for 2 h followed by foot shock (FS) and halothane exposure on day-2 (D-2). Then the rats were weekly exposed to FS as re-stress cue . Suvorexant, an orexin antagonist (10, 20 and 30 mg/kg p.o.) and paroxetine (10 mg/kg p.o.) were administered from D-8 to D-32. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected for corticosterone and orexin-A measurement. The analysis of serotonin and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 (CRF-R1) were performed in the amygdalar tissue. SRS-induced PTSD-like symptoms like fear response, anxiety-like behaviour and hypocorticosteronism were attenuated by suvorexant and paroxetine. Interestingly, SRS exposed rats showed activation of orexin-A and serotonergic systems, which were also attenuated by suvorexant. Additionally, suvorexant ameliorated the extrahypothalamic induced upregulation of CRH-R1 in SRS-exposed rats. Therefore, orexin-A may be considered as a neurochemical-marker for PTSD and suvorexant alleviated PTSD-like symptoms through modulating orexinergic, serotonergic and neuroendocrine systems.

THE INTRIGUING LIGAND-DEPENDENT AND LIGAND-INDEPENDENT ACTIONS OF THE GROWTH HORMONE SECRETAGOGUE RECEPTOR ON REWARD-RELATED BEHAVIORS

The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) highly expressed in the brain, and also in some peripheral tissues. GHSR activity is evoked by the stomach-derived peptide hormone ghrelin and abrogated by the intestine-derived liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP2). In vitro, GHSR displays ligand-independent actions, including a high constitutive activity and an allosteric modulation of other GPCRs. Beyond its neuroendocrine and metabolic effects, cumulative evidence shows that GHSR regulates the activity of the mesocorticolimbic pathway and modulates complex reward-related behaviors towards different stimuli. Here, we review current evidence indicating that ligand-dependent and ligand-independent actions of GHSR enhance reward-related behaviors towards appetitive stimuli and drugs of abuse. We discuss putative neuronal networks and molecular mechanisms that GHSR would engage to modulate such reward-related behaviors. Finally, we briefly discuss imaging studies showing that ghrelin would also regulate reward processing in humans. Overall, we conclude that GHSR is a key regulator of the mesocorticolimbic pathway that influences its activity and, consequently, modulates reward-related behaviors via ligand-dependent and ligand-independent actions.

Effects of ghrelin on pGSK-3β and β-catenin expression when protects against neuropathic pain behavior in rats challenged with chronic constriction injury

Ghrelin has been shown to alleviate neuropathic pain by inhibiting the release of proinflammatory cytokines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling in mediating the effect of ghrelin on neuropathic pain and to understand the associated mechanisms. Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was used to establish a rat model of neuropathic pain. Hyperalgesia and allodynia were evaluated by observing the mechanical withdrawal threshold and the thermal withdrawal latency. Wnt3a and β-catenin protein expression and GSK-3β phosphorylation were detected by western blotting analysis. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1β were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, we used immunohistochemical analysis to determine the levels of GSK-3β phosphorylation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Intrathecal delivery of ghrelin effectively ameliorated CCI-induced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia at 7 and 14 days and reduced the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α. Ghrelin inhibited CCI-induced GSK-3β activation and β-catenin overexpression in the spinal dorsal horn. Moreover, intrathecal injection of ghrelin suppressed the activation of GSK-3β in the spinal dorsal horn of CCI rats, as assessed by immunohistochemical analysis. Our data indicated that ghrelin could markedly alleviate neuropathic pain by inhibiting the expression of β-catenin, via the suppression of GSK-3β activation, in the spinal cord of CCI rats.

Effects of acute kidney dysfunction on hypothalamic arginine vasopressin synthesis in transgenic rats

Acute loss of kidney function is a critical internal stressor. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) present in the parvocellular division of the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) plays a key role in the regulation of stress responses. However, hypothalamic AVP dynamics during acute kidney dysfunction remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of bilateral nephrectomy on AVP, using a transgenic rat line that expressed the AVP-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). The eGFP fluorescent intensities in the PVN were dramatically increased after bilateral nephrectomy. The mRNA levels of eGFP, AVP, and corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the PVN were dramatically increased after bilateral nephrectomy. Bilateral nephrectomy also increased the levels of Fos-like immunoreactive cells in brainstem neurons. These results indicate that bilateral nephrectomy upregulates the AVP-eGFP synthesis. Further studies are needed to identify the neural and/or humoral factors that activate AVP synthesis and regulate neuronal circuits during acute kidney dysfunction.

The actions of ghrelin in the paraventricular nucleus: energy balance and neuroendocrine implications

Ghrelin is a peptide mainly produced and secreted by the stomach. Since its discovery, the impact of ghrelin on the regulation of food intake has been the most studied function of this hormone; however, ghrelin affects a wide range of physiological systems, many of which are controlled by the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Several pathways may mediate the effects of ghrelin on PVN neurons, such as direct or indirect effects mediated by circumventricular organs and/or the arcuate nucleus. The ghrelin receptor is expressed in PVN neurons, and the peripheral or intracerebroventricular administration of ghrelin affects PVN neuronal activity. Intra-PVN application of ghrelin increases food intake and decreases fat oxidation, which chronically contribute to the increased adiposity. Additionally, ghrelin modulates the neuroendocrine axes controlled by the PVN, increasing the release of vasopressin and oxytocin by magnocellular neurons and corticotropin-releasing hormone by neuroendocrine parvocellular neurons, while possibly inhibiting the release of thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Thus, the PVN is an important target for the actions of ghrelin. Our review discusses the mechanisms of ghrelin actions in the PVN, and its potential implications for energy balance, neuroendocrine, and integrative physiological control.