1
|
Ferro A, Campora M, Caldara A, De Lisi D, Lorenzi M, Monteverdi S, Mihai R, Bisio A, Dipasquale M, Caffo O, Ciribilli Y. Novel Treatment Strategies for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3611. [PMID: 38930141 PMCID: PMC11204965 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is the most common BC subtype. Endocrine therapy (ET) targeting ER signaling still remains the mainstay treatment option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC either in the early or in advanced setting, including different strategies, such as the suppression of estrogen production or directly blocking the ER pathway through SERMs-selective estrogen receptor modulators-or SERDs-selective estrogen receptor degraders. Nevertheless, the development of de novo or acquired endocrine resistance still remains challenging for oncologists. The use of novel ET combined with targeted drugs, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, has significantly improved long-term outcome rates, thus changing the therapeutic algorithm for metastatic BC (MBC) and recently the therapeutic strategy in the adjuvant setting for early high-risk BC. Eluding the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET is currently an unmet medical need, and there is disagreement concerning the best course of action for patients who continue to progress after this combination approach. Genetic changes in the tumor along its growth uncovered by genomic profiling of recurrent and/or metastatic lesions through tumor and/or liquid biopsies may predict the response or resistance to specific agents, suggesting the best therapeutic strategy for each patient by targeting the altered ER-dependent pathway (novel oral SERDs and a new generation of anti-estrogen agents) or alternative ER-independent signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR or tyrosine kinase receptors (HER2 mutations or HER2 low status) or by inhibiting pathways weakened through germline BRCA1/2 mutations. These agents are being investigated as single molecules and in combination with other target therapies, offering promising weapons to overcome or avoid treatment failure and propose increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. This review presents novel insights into ET and other targeted therapies for managing metastatic HR+/HER2- BC by exploring potential strategies based on clinical evidence and genomic profiling following the failure of the CDK4/6i and ET combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Ferro
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Michela Campora
- Department of Pathology, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy;
| | - Alessia Caldara
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Delia De Lisi
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Martina Lorenzi
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Sara Monteverdi
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Raluca Mihai
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK;
| | - Alessandra Bisio
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy; (A.B.); (Y.C.)
| | - Mariachiara Dipasquale
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy; (A.C.); (D.D.L.); (M.L.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy;
| | - Yari Ciribilli
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy; (A.B.); (Y.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manley H, Mutasa S, Chang P, Desperito E, Crew K, Ha R. Dynamic Changes of Convolutional Neural Network-based Mammographic Breast Cancer Risk Score Among Women Undergoing Chemoprevention Treatment. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 21:e312-e318. [PMID: 33277192 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated whether our convolutional neural network (CNN)-based breast cancer risk model is modifiable by testing it on women who had undergone risk-reducing chemoprevention treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ at our institution from 2007 to 2015. The clinical characteristics, chemoprevention use, and mammography images were extracted from the electronic health records. We classified two groups according to chemoprevention use. Mammograms were performed at baseline and subsequent follow-up evaluations for input to our CNN risk model. The 2 chemoprevention groups were compared for the risk score change from baseline to follow-up. The change categories included stayed high risk, stayed low risk, increased from low to high risk, and decreased from high to low risk. Unordered polytomous regression models were used for statistical analysis, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of 541 patients, 184 (34%) had undergone chemoprevention treatment (group 1) and 357 (66%) had not (group 2). Using our CNN breast cancer risk score, significantly more women in group 1 had shown a decrease in breast cancer risk compared with group 2 (33.7% vs. 22.9%; P < .01). Significantly fewer women in group 1 had an increase in breast cancer risk compared with group 2 (11.4% vs. 20.2%; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, an increase in breast cancer risk predicted by our model correlated negatively with the use of chemoprevention treatment (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Our CNN-based breast cancer risk score is modifiable with potential utility in assessing the efficacy of known chemoprevention agents and testing new chemoprevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Manley
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Simukayi Mutasa
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter Chang
- Department of Radiological Sciences and Center for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Elise Desperito
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine Crew
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard Ha
- Department of Radiology and Breast Imaging Section, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dawood DH, Nossier ES, Ali MM, Mahmoud AE. Synthesis and molecular docking study of new pyrazole derivatives as potent anti-breast cancer agents targeting VEGFR-2 kinase. Bioorg Chem 2020; 101:103916. [PMID: 32559576 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Based on the previous studies that revealed the valuable role of pyrazole scaffold in cancer management and VEGFR-2 inhibition, a new set of pyrazole conjugated with pyrazoline, triazolopyrimidine and pyrazolone moieties were synthesized and investigated for their anticancer efficiency against human breast cancer MCF-7. The anticancer screening revealed the significant sensitivity of breast carcinoma towards compounds 4b, 5c, 6c, 7b, 7c and 12c with IC50 values ranging from 16.50 - 26.73 µM in comparison with tamoxifen (IC50 = 23.31 µM). Moreover, the new analogues were further examined for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity, among the tested derivatives 5c, 6c, 7b, 7c and 12c displayed prominent inhibitory efficiency versus VEGFR-2 kinase with % inhibition ranging from 70 to 79%. Compounds 6c, 7c and 12c revealed inhibitory efficiency in nanomolar level with IC50 (913.51, 225.17 and 828.23 nM, respectively) comparing to sorafenib (IC50 = 186.54 nM). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the promising compound 12c prompted pre-G1 apoptosis and cell growth cessation at G2/M phase and stimulated apoptosis via activation of caspase-3. Moreover, molecular docking study of the promising derivatives was performed to highlight their binding modes and interactions with the amino acid residues of VEGFR-2 enzyme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina H Dawood
- Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Division, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza, P.O. Box 12622, Egypt.
| | - Eman S Nossier
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy(Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, P.O. Box 11754, Egypt
| | - Mamdouh M Ali
- Biochemistry Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza, P.O. Box 12622, Egypt
| | - Abeer E Mahmoud
- Biochemistry Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza, P.O. Box 12622, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rainey L, van der Waal D, Jervaeus A, Wengström Y, Evans DG, Donnelly LS, Broeders MJM. Are we ready for the challenge of implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention? Breast 2018. [PMID: 29529454 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors provides opportunities to shift from a one-size-fits-all screening programme to a personalised approach, where screening and prevention is based on a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. However, potential implementation of this new paradigm could present considerable challenges which the present review aims to explore. METHODS Bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies evaluating potential implications of the implementation of personalised risk-based screening and primary prevention for breast cancer. Identified themes were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS The search strategy identified 5699 unique publications, of which 59 were selected for inclusion. Significant changes in policy and practice are warranted. The organisation of breast cancer screening spans several healthcare delivery systems and clinical settings. Feasibility of implementation depends on how healthcare is funded and arranged, and potentially varies between countries. Piloting risk assessment and prevention counselling in primary care settings has highlighted implications relating to the need for extensive additional training on risk (communication) and prevention, impact on workflow, and professionals' personal discomfort breaching the topic with women. Additionally, gaps in risk estimation, psychological, ethical and legal consequences will need to be addressed. CONCLUSION The present review identified considerable unresolved issues and challenges. Potential implementation will require a more complex framework, in which a country's healthcare regulations, resources, and preferences related to screening and prevention services are taken into account. However, with the insights gained from the present overview, countries expecting to implement risk-based screening and prevention can start to inventory and address the issues that were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Daniëlle van der Waal
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Jervaeus
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet & Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 23300, 14183, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet & Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 23300, 14183, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom; Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Louise S Donnelly
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Dutch Expert Center for Screening, PO Box 6873, 6503 GJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
¿CÓMO PUEDO MODIFICAR MI RIESGO A DESARROLLAR CÁNCER, CUANDO SOY PORTADOR DE UNA MUTACIÓN? REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
6
|
Padamsee TJ, Wills CE, Yee LD, Paskett ED. Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:34. [PMID: 28340626 PMCID: PMC5366153 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0826-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Several medical management approaches have been shown to be effective in preventing breast cancer and detecting it early among women at elevated risk: 1) prophylactic mastectomy; 2) prophylactic oophorectomy; 3) chemoprevention; and 4) enhanced screening routines. To varying extents, however, these approaches are substantially underused relative to clinical practice recommendations. This article reviews the existing research on the uptake of these prevention approaches, the characteristics of women who are likely to use various methods, and the decision-making processes that underlie the differing choices of women. It also highlights important areas for future research, detailing the types of studies that are particularly needed in four key areas: documenting women's perspectives on their own perceptions of risk and prevention decisions; explicit comparisons of available prevention pathways and their likely health effects; the psychological, interpersonal, and social processes of prevention decision making; and the dynamics of subgroup variation. Ultimately, this research could support the development of interventions that more fully empower women to make informed and values-consistent decisions, and to move towards favorable health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J. Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management & Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43220 USA
| | - Celia E. Wills
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Lisa D. Yee
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Despite their efficacy, uptake of selective estrogen receptor modulators for breast cancer chemoprevention remains low. Exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, has recently been identified as a potential chemopreventive option with fewer serious side effects compared with selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to assess the uptake of exemestane in a breast cancer prevention clinic. A retrospective chart review was conducted to capture chemoprevention uptake by postmenopausal women presenting to the Yale Breast Cancer Prevention Clinic between November 2011 and November 2012. Descriptive statistics of the study population have been presented. Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) between December 2012 and February 2013. Of 90 postmenopausal women, 56 were eligible for chemoprevention. Their mean age was 56.8 years. Among the women, 39% had osteopenia or osteoporosis. Thirteen women chose to start chemoprevention medication (23%). Although 31% of the chemopreventive medication administered included exemestane, only four of 56 postmenopausal women opted for exemestane (7%). Chemoprevention uptake rates of postmenopausal women in the setting of a breast cancer prevention clinic are higher than that reported in the general population; however, they remain low overall despite the inclusion of exemestane as an option. A significant proportion of postmenopausal women have decreased bone density, which is a potential barrier to exemestane uptake. The results provide practical implications suggesting that exemestane may have limited impact on breast cancer chemoprevention uptake. Further investigations should focus on understanding the factors that influence, predict, and increase chemoprevention uptake.
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith SG, Sestak I, Forster A, Partridge A, Side L, Wolf MS, Horne R, Wardle J, Cuzick J. Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:575-90. [PMID: 26646754 PMCID: PMC4803450 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preventive therapy is a risk reduction option for women who have an increased risk of breast cancer. The effectiveness of preventive therapy to reduce breast cancer incidence depends on adequate levels of uptake and adherence to therapy. We aimed to systematically review articles reporting uptake and adherence to therapeutic agents to prevent breast cancer among women at increased risk, and identify the psychological, clinical and demographic factors affecting these outcomes. DESIGN Searches were carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychInfo, yielding 3851 unique articles. Title, abstract and full text screening left 53 articles, and a further 4 studies were identified from reference lists, giving a total of 57. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42014014957). RESULTS Twenty-four articles reporting 26 studies of uptake in 21 423 women were included in a meta-analysis. The pooled uptake estimate was 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.6-19.0], with high heterogeneity (I(2) = 98.9%, P < 0.001). Uptake was unaffected by study location or agent, but was significantly higher in trials [25.2% (95% CI 18.3-32.2)] than in non-trial settings [8.7% (95% CI 6.8-10.9)] (P < 0.001). Factors associated with higher uptake included having an abnormal biopsy, a physician recommendation, higher objective risk, fewer side-effect or trial concerns, and older age. Adherence (day-to-day use or persistence) over the first year was adequate. However, only one study reported a persistence of ≥ 80% by 5 years. Factors associated with lower adherence included allocation to tamoxifen (versus placebo or raloxifene), depression, smoking and older age. Risk of breast cancer was discussed in all qualitative studies. CONCLUSION Uptake of therapeutic agents for the prevention of breast cancer is low, and long-term persistence is often insufficient for women to experience the full preventive effect. Uptake is higher in trials, suggesting further work should focus on implementing preventive therapy within routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Smith
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - I Sestak
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | - A Forster
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - L Side
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - M S Wolf
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - R Horne
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Wardle
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li F, Dou J, Wei L, Li S, Liu J. The selective estrogen receptor modulators in breast cancer prevention. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2016; 77:895-903. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-2959-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
10
|
Clavelle K, King D, Bazzi AR, Fein-Zachary V, Potter J. Breast Cancer Risk in Sexual Minority Women during Routine Screening at an Urban LGBT Health Center. Womens Health Issues 2015; 25:341-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Revised: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
11
|
Reimers LL, Sivasubramanian PS, Hershman D, Terry MB, Greenlee H, Campbell J, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Jayasena R, Sandoval R, Alvarez M, Crew KD. Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Breast J 2015; 21:377-86. [PMID: 25879521 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Chemoprevention with the anti-estrogens, tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors, reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, uptake has been poor (<5%) in the prevention setting. We assessed use of anti-estrogens for breast cancer prevention, among high-risk women seen at an academic breast center, to observe how uptake rates compare in this setting. We collected data on demographics, breast cancer risk factors, and health behaviors via self-administered questionnaires and medical chart abstraction. Women eligible for chemoprevention with anti-estrogens had a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk according to the Gail model of ≥1.67%, history of lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ (LCIS/DCIS), and/or BRCA mutation. We dichotomized anti-estrogen use as ever or never. Predictors of use were evaluated using multivariable log-binomial regression. Of 412 high-risk women enrolled, 316 (77%) were eligible for chemoprevention. Among eligible women, 55% were non-Hispanic white, 29% Hispanic, 8% non-Hispanic black, and 7% Asian. Women were grouped based upon their highest category of breast cancer risk (in descending order): BRCA mutation carriers (3%), DCIS (40%), LCIS (22%), and 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% (36%). Among those eligible for chemoprevention, 162 (51%) had ever initiated anti-estrogen therapy (71% tamoxifen, 23% raloxifene, 5% aromatase inhibitor). Anti-estrogen use was highest among women with DCIS (73%). In multivariable analysis, women with a 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% had approximately a 20% lower likelihood of anti-estrogen use compared to women with DCIS (p = 0.01). In the primary prevention setting, excluding women diagnosed with DCIS, anti-estrogen use was 37%. Multivariable analysis showed differences in uptake by education and potentially by race/ethnicity. Among high-risk women seen at a breast center, anti-estrogen use for chemoprevention was relatively high as compared to the published literature. Clinicians can support high-risk women by effectively communicating breast cancer risk and enhancing knowledge about the risks and benefits of chemoprevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Reimers
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Dawn Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Heather Greenlee
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Julie Campbell
- Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Maurer
- Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Ramona Jayasena
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Rossy Sandoval
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Maria Alvarez
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghorab MM, El-Gazzar MG, Alsaid MS. Synthesis and anti-breast cancer evaluation of novel N-(guanidinyl)benzenesulfonamides. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15:5582-95. [PMID: 24694543 PMCID: PMC4013583 DOI: 10.3390/ijms15045582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A series of 4-(substituted)-N-(guanidinyl)benzenesulfonamides bearing biologically active pyrazole, pyrimidine and pyridine moieties were prepared and evaluated for their anticancer activity against human tumor breast cell line (MCF7). These sulfonamides showed promising activity with IC50 values ranging from 49.5 to 70.2 μM. The structure-activity relationship of the synthesized compounds was studied. Interestingly, it was found that the most potent compounds in this study were the corresponding 2-cyanoacrylate 3, 3-oxobutanoate 4, pyrazole 6, pyridine 9 and pyrazole 13. Compounds 7 and 8 are nearly as active as Doxorubicin as reference drug with (IC50 values=70.2, 68.1 μM), while compounds 5, 10 and 11 exhibited a moderate activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa M Ghorab
- Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Marwa G El-Gazzar
- Department of Drug Radiation Research, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Nasr City, Cairo 11371, Egypt.
| | - Mansour S Alsaid
- Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Munger K. Are selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) a therapeutic option for HPV-associated cervical lesions and cancers? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2013; 184:358-61. [PMID: 24345353 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Revised: 11/18/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This Commentary highlights the article by Spurgeon et al which evaluates oral SERM raloxifene as a potential therapeutic agent for HPV-associated cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Munger
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|